🐱 'We're sitting ducks': Concerns of copycat attacks following paedophile’s killing - Won’t someone think of the paedos

CatParty
Status
Not open for further replies.


OMAHA, Neb. —
When "Jay" first heard the motive behind Mattieo Condoluci's death, he immediately feared for the safety of his family.

"We're sitting ducks," he said.


Prosecutors believe James Fairbanks sent KETV Newswatch 7 an anonymous email about killing Condoluci. The sender said he had been looking for an apartment in the area when he discovered Condoluci on the Nebraska Sex Offender Registry. The sender described Condoluci as standing in his driveway pretending to wash his truck while staring at a group of children playing in the street, making him "sick to his stomach." Fairbanks' ex-wife calls Fairbanks a "protector."

Jay is a registered sex offender. He's worried the homicide will encourage vigilante crimes.

"You don't go out there and take it into our own hands and murder and take the life of somebody else because you weren't happy with the judgement that was made," he said.

Jay said he did not know Condoluci and he's not defending him.

"Yes, he did some pretty rotten stuff," Jay said. "It was horrible, horrible stuff. But to say he didn't deserve a second shot and he was trying to prove himself as a godly man, maybe he was a godly man. We don't know that. He doesn't have the opportunity to speak for himself now."

Condoluci's son, Joseph, told KETV Newswatch 7 his dad changed after prison and became a minister.

"I believe he was doing what he could to turn his life around," said Joseph Condoluci. "Who is to say what it takes to turn your life around from that?"

Joseph Condoluci said his father's past is simply that, his past.

"The guy didn't know my dad. He didn't know anything about him. All he knew was stuff that he's seen online," said Joseph Condoluci.

Jay has been calling senators to change Nebraska's sex offender registry to prevent something like this from happening again.

"Nebraska does not need a public-shaming website where people are put on there to be gunned down. Where people are there to be publicly shamed for the rest of their lives without a way of redeeming themselves," he said.

He argues the sex offender registry should be for law enforcement only.

"The safety of which the registry was built on is no longer safe. It's no longer safe for the community, it's no longer safe for the families of those who have registered," Jay said.
 
Faggot like perverted justice or Chris Hansen mostly just want to point their fingers at someone else and say look they are bigger pos than me
"let those without sin cast the first stone" is a fine message but kind of paralyzing if you're waiting for all society to obey it. there's a saying coined by 70's radicals, "make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
 
All of you fucking bloodthirsty cowards won't say what's on your mind, so I guess I'll say it for you:
"Every sex offense and suspected sex offense should be punished by violent public execution, and fuck any morality, law, or person who gets in our way, they should be destroyed as well." There, now you can stop virtue-signalling about something the average person agrees isn't much of a tragedy on the object level.
EDIT: oh, boo hoo, someone called out our moralfagging circlejerk for what it was.
there needs to be a 'closet paedo' react
 
I appreciate the hustle out there guys but it is supposed to be a snitching list not a hit list. If it gets abused too badly they will take it away.
I don't think so. Changing the registry would be career suicide for any politician that attempts it, and you would need a fair amount of them to do it. No one wants the campaign ad saying they helped pedos hide their identity from the public.

re: public urination
public urination is usually a misdemeanor crime and not a sex offense. Public exposure or public indecency can be a sex offense, but it is a different charge. People who have told you that they are on the registry for peeing are full of shit. Everyone on the registry comes up with a story about how they aren't really a pervert, they're really victims! be extremely wary of a sob story from a registered sex offender.
 
I don't think so. Changing the registry would be career suicide for any politician that attempts it, and you would need a fair amount of them to do it. No one wants the campaign ad saying they helped pedos hide their identity from the public.

re: public urination
public urination is usually a misdemeanor crime and not a sex offense. Public exposure or public indecency can be a sex offense, but it is a different charge. People who have told you that they are on the registry for peeing are full of shit. Everyone on the registry comes up with a story about how they aren't really a pervert, they're really victims! be extremely wary of a sob story from a registered sex offender.
I was thinking more of the courts. If the creeps have a reasonable belief that being put on the registry significantly endangers them it would be hard to argue that it doesn't violate anti-lynching laws and the 4th. Which is pretty much what they are arguing here. But we aren’t there yet.

That's why it is best to do registry related extracurriculars in moderation.
 
I definitely don't think the option should be "hide the registry", unless it becomes a constant and repeated problem (and by that time, someone innocent will be caught in the crossfire). Responding harshly to single-incident crimes is always bad, like "oh, some ugly kid with a bowl cut shot a bunch of black folk? Let's ban all Confederate flags," and I wouldn't be surprised if Canada is already building a watch-list database of "incels" in response to the """terrorist attack""" in Canada recently.
 
I wouldn't call Islamic paedo proclivities 'closeted', it's codified in their laws

source? are you an Islamic scholar? marriage at 14 is codified in Vatican law and it doesn't mean all Catholics do it.


Some US States have no minimum age for marriage and some have 14


I wouldn't go the "their law allows it therefore they all do it" way because the law allows for many things also in the civilised world and people don't do them.

If someone doesn't like Muslims or Arabs (including Christian Arabs) then fine, anyone can dislike anyone they want but "they're all fags because their law says they can be" is imho not the right argument. You don't want Muslims in your neighbourhood fine, but be sensible about it. The arguments you use can be easily turned against you and you'll get the opposite results.
 
If someone is released from prison, then they should not be harmed by vigilantes. We have the rule of law for a reason. If you don't like the rules of law, then petition it and try and get it changed. Vigilante shit never ends well and just leads to innocents getting killed.

Pedos are fucked up, but even the shittiest person has the right to be free from violence after they've served their time.
 
If someone is released from prison, then they should not be harmed by vigilantes. We have the rule of law for a reason. If you don't like the rules of law, then petition it and try and get it changed. Vigilante shit never ends well and just leads to innocents getting killed.

Pedos are fucked up, but even the shittiest person has the right to be free from violence after they've served their time.
The rule of law let Jimmy Saville off the hook.

The rule of law let Jeffery Epstein not kill himself in prison.

The rule of law puts drunkards on sex offender lists for taking a piss in the wrong place at night, and it lets pedos out of prison after two years.
 
source? are you an Islamic scholar? marriage at 14 is codified in Vatican law and it doesn't mean all Catholics do it.


Some US States have no minimum age for marriage and some have 14


I wouldn't go the "their law allows it therefore they all do it" way because the law allows for many things also in the civilised world and people don't do them.

If someone doesn't like Muslims or Arabs (including Christian Arabs) then fine, anyone can dislike anyone they want but "they're all fags because their law says they can be" is imho not the right argument. You don't want Muslims in your neighbourhood fine, but be sensible about it. The arguments you use can be easily turned against you and you'll get the opposite results.
true, tbh I was being flippant/contrarian. I don't like ragheads in general but credit where credit's due, the Taliban put a stop to bacha bazji. If anything I think Islam doesn't prescribe their behaviour, it's intended to limit their worst excesses, which are racially inherent.
 
source? are you an Islamic scholar? marriage at 14 is codified in Vatican law and it doesn't mean all Catholics do it.


Some US States have no minimum age for marriage and some have 14


I wouldn't go the "their law allows it therefore they all do it" way because the law allows for many things also in the civilised world and people don't do them.

If someone doesn't like Muslims or Arabs (including Christian Arabs) then fine, anyone can dislike anyone they want but "they're all fags because their law says they can be" is imho not the right argument. You don't want Muslims in your neighbourhood fine, but be sensible about it. The arguments you use can be easily turned against you and you'll get the opposite results.

Google "dance of the little boys". Then ask any ex armed forces dudes you know about it. Practiced in more countries than people are willing to acknowledge.
 
The rule of law let Jimmy Saville off the hook.

The rule of law let Jeffery Epstein not kill himself in prison.

The rule of law puts drunkards on sex offender lists for taking a piss in the wrong place at night, and it lets pedos out of prison after two years.


Then petition to have the rule of law changed. There are people who are put in jail innocently, even for diddling kids. Like you said, people who piss in public end up getting put on the sex offender's list; if you are saying sex offenders should be killed by some vigilantes, then you are saying they should be killed, too.
 
Before you support the kind of violent morons who go out and murder people based on shit they saw on the Internet, remember that these databases can be incorrect, and that the kind of people who do shit like this are the same kind of morons who fucked up a pediatrician's house because they didn't know the difference between a pediatrician and a pedophile.

very true. the ghetto is full of mistaken identity murders, gangbangers shooting up the wrong house or car on faulty intel.

otoh, this is one where everyone acknowledges the pedophile.
 
No, what happened was that pedos and fucked up groups of them like NAMBLA kept trying to attach themselves to the LGBT movement even though the rest of the movement was vehemently against, horrified, and disgusted by what they were doing.

Not true. Dude who financed most of the early days of the fag rights movement was an open pedo. And "Desmond is Amazing" is opening embraced and encouraged by the gays.
 
What the everloving fuck? Unless we find out later that Frank was gonna use those creeps to help him kill their pedophile customers or some shit, that ain't what the Punisher would do. At all. People who hurt kids? Dead. Fucking dead.
To be fair, he wanted to kill but the girl he was with begged him not to. He later mentions that not killing him has been eating him up and is one of the things that pushes him to become full-on Punisher in the end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back