Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

Funny, most would call cutting off your cock and balls as cruel and unusual punishment.

 

[Ineedahero]

What he did to a child is cruel and unusual punishment.

I'd say kill him, but that may anger some people on here.

I don't get it man. Go into any political thread and there you are, running your mouth about anything and everything, generally directly in opposition to everyone else in the thread without a care, but up comes a tranny pedophile and now you are concerned people will object to your calls for his head?

 

[The Last Stand]

I don't get it man. Go into any political thread and there you are, running your mouth about anything and everything, generally directly in opposition to everyone else in the thread without a care, but up comes a tranny pedophile and now you are concerned people will object to your calls for his head?

The joke was that some user got mad about a pedophile's life being in danger on another thread, then made a follow up thread addressing it ... poorly.

 

[Red Sun]

The joke was that some user got mad about a pedophile's life being in danger on another thread, then made a follow up thread addressing it ... poorly.

He was pretty obviously more mad that kf users feel the need to spam "KILL PEDOS" every time the topic arises, which is very frequently, partly because pedo shit is intertwined with trans shit, but also partly because kf users actively seek out more opportunities to spam "KILL PEDOS". It's really not a groundbreaking opinion, guys, I think it's safe to assume that any given KF user believes pedos should get the rope unless they explicitly state otherwise.

HK-47 very accurately pointed out that the rant was still autistic because he could just not click on the thread, but come on, don't make it "he was mad because a pedophile got killed", that's obviously false.

(Edit to avoid double post)

We need to bring back firing squads. It’s much cheaper and more effective than lethal injection.

Last I checked it's still done in Utah, oddly enough due to Mormon beliefs. They have a principle called "blood atonement" where certain sins can't be forgiven unless you bleed for them. Because properly administered lethal injections or electric chairs don't induce significant bloodshed, prisoners can request a firing squad to help them show true contrition in death.

It's pretty cool, I think, definitely cheaper, and I can't imagine how it'd be less humane or effective than the other options.

(Edit: although it was legal much later than most states, i've now found that firing squads are no longer used in Utah either. The last one was carried out in 2010.)

 

[queue-anon]

Archive (Link)
Supreme Court rules that denial of gender-affirming surgery for trans inmate is ‘cruel and unusual punishment’
EMMA POWYS MAURICE MAY 22, 2020

View attachment 1312287
The US Supreme Court has upheld a previous ruling that a prison’s attempt to block gender-confirmation surgery for transgender inmate Adree Edmo amounts to “cruel and unusual punishment”.

Idaho governor Brad Little appealed to the Supreme Court to avoid paying for surgery for 31-year-old Edmo, a trans woman who is being housed in a men’s facility.

The order on Thursday means Edmo can continue getting pre-surgical treatments and potentially even gender-confirmation surgery this year while Idaho officials wait to hear if the high court will consider their appeal.

Edmo is serving 10 years for sexually abusing a 15-year-old boy when she was 22, and is not eligible for parole. She is scheduled for release in July 2021.
She was diagnosed with gender dysphoria while in prison and her condition has grown so severe that she has attempted to castrate herself twice.

She sued the state three years ago when prison officials first refused her request for surgery, arguing that to do so was increasing the distress of her gender dysphoria.

A panel of judges agreed that denying Adree Edmo the surgery violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment, and she looked set to become the first trans inmate to receive gender-confirmation surgery through a court order.

The Idaho Department of Correction immediately appealed the ruling, but the court of appeals upheld its previous decision.

“It is no leap to conclude that Edmo’s severe, ongoing psychological distress and the high risk of self-castration and suicide she faces absent surgery constitute irreparable harm,” the panel of the Ninth Circuit wrote last year.

But Brad Little attempted to appeal the ruling for a second time, insisting that he “should not have to pay for a procedure that is not medically necessary”.

When the full Ninth Circuit refused to hear the case for a third time he vowed to “vigorously litigate” in the Supreme Court – only to fail yet again.

The Supreme Court’s brief order gave no reasons, only saying that the request had been denied. However, it noted that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would have granted the state’s request.

SCOTUS didn't rule that way at all. Leave it to PrickNews to blatantly lie to make it look like trannies aren't as reviled as they are.

What SCOTUS did was punt the decision, and there are all sorts of reasons why they'll do that.

One is that they think the law is settled, and they don't want to hear a case that's ultimately irrelevant. As far as I know, SCOTUS has never ruled on tranny "health care", so I think it's unlikely that that's the reason.

Another is that there isn't enough disagreement at the circuit court level. If, say, the Fifth Circuit tells trannies to get fucked, then maybe SCOTUS will intervene to clarify the law so you don't have two different circuits with two different rules.

And another is that SCOTUS just doesn't feel that the time is right, and I actually kind of hope that's the real reason because most of this tranny bullshit is a trend informed by mental illness, kinks gone out of control, grooming of children, social contagion, and medical malice and greed. It would make a lot more sense for SCOTUS to rule on this in a decade or two once most of the perverted hysteria has died down.

I also kind of wonder if the other conservatives on the court (aside from Thomas and Alito who said they want to hear this case) are resigned to the Ninth Circuit being exceptional and don't see a reason to hear a case from them unless/until other circuits start joining in.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Last I checked it's still done in Utah, oddly enough due to Mormon beliefs. They have a principle called "blood atonement" where certain sins can't be forgiven unless you bleed for them. Because properly administered lethal injections or electric chairs don't induce significant bloodshed, prisoners can request a firing squad to help them show true contrition in death.

I've literally never heard of such a concept and it seems like one of those "hey those guys are backwards, look at what they believe!" things.

From what I can find it's just a holdout from the early days of the state where the convicted were given a choice in how they could be given their sentence. Especially since there's only so few ways you can capitally punish someone in 1850.

 

[DumbDude42]

Especially since there's only so few ways you can capitally punish someone in 1850.

lol no there are dozens of execution methods that were available at that time.
hanging, beheading, shooting, drowining, strangulation/garrotte, shooting, burning, live burial, just to name a few. hanging was the most common one because of how easy and clean it was (beheading on the other hand makes a terrible mess) and most of the other methods were already considered cruel and barbaric.

the thing is, hanging was considered dishonorable and undignified because of its association with common criminality, while the firing squad was seen as the honorable man's death (because of its military background), that's probably why (some) people were legally allowed to explicitly request that method of execution.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

lol no there are dozens of execution methods that were available at that time.
hanging, beheading, shooting, drowining, strangulation/garrotte, shooting, burning, live burial, just to name a few. hanging was the most common one because of how easy and clean it was (beheading on the other hand makes a terrible mess) and most of the other methods were already considered cruel and barbaric.

Ok there were few constitutionally non-cruel or unusual punishment methods. Hanging was on the table along side firing squad.

 

[JohnDoe]

Ok there were few constitutionally non-cruel or unusual punishment methods. Hanging was on the table along side firing squad.

I'd gladly take a firing squad or hanging over the more 'modern' methods like lethal injection or electrocution. They keep fucking up all these so called "clean, modern, medical" procedures in terrifying ways all so people won't have to feel icky about killing. (I still don't know why they don't use the more humane nitrogen gassing method.)

No thank you. I'd sooner build a shooting machine myself like they did in Nevada (1913) before an IV cocktail.

 

[pwnest injun]

I'd gladly take a firing squad or hanging over the more 'modern' methods like lethal injection or electrocution. They keep fucking up all these so called "clean, modern, medical" procedures in terrifying ways all so people won't have to feel icky about killing. (I still don't know why they don't use the more humane nitrogen gassing method.)

No thank you. I'd sooner build a shooting machine myself like they did in Nevada (1913) before an IV cocktail.

Lethal injection is meant to be horrifying and painful, and anyone who says otherwise is full of shit. We're talking about a primitive feeling of terror and doom while your paralyzed body feels like it's bursting into flames from the inside out. And it ain't fast either. If you were being burned alive you would die quicker than with lethal injection.

There's a reason doctors don't like it.

 

[DumbDude42]

I'd gladly take a firing squad or hanging over the more 'modern' methods like lethal injection or electrocution. They keep fucking up all these so called "clean, modern, medical" procedures in terrifying ways all so people won't have to feel icky about killing. (I still don't know why they don't use the more humane nitrogen gassing method.)
No thank you. I'd sooner build a shooting machine myself like they did in Nevada (1913) before an IV cocktail.

to me, beheading by guillotine seems like the best and most humane way of execution. it happens almost instantaneously - pull the crank, the blade falls, the head rolls, it's over. no hanging from the rope for dozens of seconds while you suffocate, no slow death after the firing squads bullets collapsed your lung, no getting your brain deep-fried on the chair, no time of helplessness as you wait for the injection to kill you.

only downside of beheading is that it makes a bloody mess, but that really shouldn't be a concern imo

 

[BlueCandle]

Just put me on that execution roller coaster and give my family fridge magnet photos of me with my hands up.

 

[AMHOLIO]

Lethal injection is meant to be horrifying and painful, and anyone who says otherwise is full of shit. We're talking about a primitive feeling of terror and doom while your paralyzed body feels like it's bursting into flames from the inside out. And it ain't fast either. If you were being burned alive you would die quicker than with lethal injection.

There's a reason doctors don't like it.

Wow, this is horrifyingly informative. Horrinformative. Either way take all my stickers.

to me, beheading by guillotine seems like the best and most humane way of execution. it happens almost instantaneously - pull the crank, the blade falls, the head rolls, it's over. no hanging from the rope for dozens of seconds while you suffocate, no slow death after the firing squads bullets collapsed your lung, no getting your brain deep-fried on the chair, no time of helplessness as you wait for the injection to kill you.

only downside of beheading is that it makes a bloody mess, but that really shouldn't be a concern imo

Not quite, there's some signs of activity. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...leyn-henry-viii-conscious-brain-a8886126.html

Usually a good call though. I'd prefer being eaten by raptors.

 

[Red Sun]

to me, beheading by guillotine seems like the best and most humane way of execution. it happens almost instantaneously - pull the crank, the blade falls, the head rolls, it's over. no hanging from the rope for dozens of seconds while you suffocate, no slow death after the firing squads bullets collapsed your lung, no getting your brain deep-fried on the chair, no time of helplessness as you wait for the injection to kill you.

only downside of beheading is that it makes a bloody mess, but that really shouldn't be a concern imo

The very best way would be a close-range shot to the head, which should destroy the consciousness even faster than decapitation can (which would hypothetically leave you alive for the time it takes your brain to deoxygenate the blood already in your head, although obviously we have no good way of testing that). Unfortunately, though, both of these methods are forbidden for basically the same reason. Anything that will disfigure the body from the neck up seems to be considered "cruel", even if they should logically be less agonizing.

 

[DumbDude42]

Not quite, there's some signs of activity.

well yeah as long as the brain itself stays intact it will survive for a few seconds even after decapitation
if you want to kill it even faster than that, you'd have to go with methods that directly destroy the brain, like the classic "gunshot to the back of the head" method

 

[Snekposter]

A properly done hanging will actually result in instant lack of consciousness as the spine snaps under their weight (hence the alignment of the rope under an ear instead of straight with the spine), so they're already half-dead and all the noose is doing is just finishing the job. That's why nobody ever starts jumping around on the noose out of self-preservation.

 

[GenitalFetishist]

This thread took a morbid turn...

 

[Dante Alighieri]

This thread took a morbid turn...

As if trannies aren't already.

 

[AnOminous]

SCOTUS didn't rule that way at all. Leave it to PrickNews to blatantly lie to make it look like trannies aren't as reviled as they are.

What SCOTUS did was punt the decision, and there are all sorts of reasons why they'll do that.

What SCOTUS did says absolutely nothing about the merits of the case. They denied a stay, which is a request they have the power to grant, but almost never do. It does not say anything about what they would do if they had to decide the merits of the case on appeal. SCOTUS very, very seldom grants a stay in cases like this, and the main time they will grant such a request is a stay of execution of a case that is going to reach them on appeal.

The reason to grant a stay in the case of an execution is if they did not grant the stay, there would be nothing meaningful left to rule on. The person would be dead.

The state is not suffering some grave irrevocable harm and therefore SCOTUS is not going to grant a stay.

 

[Positron]

I hope the Supreme Court didn't deny his gender affirmation surgery being performed by fellow inmates.