Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

These women come up with the most superlative bullshit and other women co-sign it.

In the past day I've read that sons are mass raping their moms, only men get addicted to 'hard drugs' and Covid-19 isolation is a ploy to have women beaten and killed because men now have 24/7 to bash and kill. Hear that ladies? the world govts want us dead. Funny that.
 
These women come up with the most superlative bullshit and other women co-sign it.

In the past day I've read that sons are mass raping their moms, only men get addicted to 'hard drugs' and Covid-19 isolation is a ploy to have women beaten and killed because men now have 24/7 to bash and kill. Hear that ladies? the world govts want us dead. Funny that.
The reason why they keep talking about sons raping their moms is because they probably have an incest- pedophilia kink.
 
I think you're right on the money there. The people screeching the loudest about something are usually the ones projecting the hardest about it as well.
Alot of terven tend to be just as perverse as (sometimes even more than) the men they autistically screech about. There was one terven with a a scat fetish, another with a period blood fetish, another who drew lesbian rape porn and one who openly ogled underaged boys.
 
It was exactly because of this kind of autism that they got r/NewVaginas banned...

1590220763875.png


Every TERF sub modded like this, not just r/GenderCritical. They're like actual children, they refuse to see anything that strays one iota from the accepted RadFem dogma, and consider any other opinion other that their own to be bigotry.
It's hillarious to watch them then mock the troons for behaving exactly the same way being 'triggered' in their hug boxes, and then they wonder why they don't seem to be getting anywhere with normal people.

More reeeing:

....

1590221003865.png


TERF is 'stating her boundaries', by which I mean she's posted her lengthy manifesto about her hated of little boys as a grown woman.

1590221528513.png

nb. this is the same woman posted above posting this shit in other threads, if TERFs weren't usually such meek, terriffied, autistic shut ins I'd say she'd be a danger to children and should be put on some kind of list.
 
That TERFesto is frightening. Weird how radical feminists call for gender abolishment yet this woman has stuck to the most basic bitch stereotypes about gender. 19th century nursery rhyme stereotypes about how little girls are made of sugar and spice and boys are made of puppy dog tails fit right in with her manifesto.

It's really hard for these insufferably stupid women to realize that often the bad guy is a woman, like the woman who was 'stating her boundaries.'

Women who have had kids don't belong in that movement anyway, according to their own ideology they had a 50% chance of bringing a 'potential rapist' into the world. No matter how much they 'not my Nigelsplain' themselves. Why women who have children can't see that is some major cognitive dissonance.
 
Women who have had kids don't belong in that movement anyway, according to their own ideology they had a 50% chance of bringing a 'potential rapist' into the world. No matter how much they 'not my Nigelsplain' themselves. Why women who have children can't see that is some major cognitive dissonance.
I'm more well-versed on general SJW BS so forgive my ignorance on more TERF-specific subjects, but... by their own ideology shouldn't women who have children be shunned in general, regardless of the sex of their child? I thought some TERFs argued that any sex involving a male is rape, so any woman who had a child would have consented to rape (as weird as that sentence sounds) and forfeited any respect from True Radical Feminists™. Supposedly that latter group are all very angry Vestal Virgins.

Or does that not apply to TERFs who had children before becoming TERFs? How does that all work when it comes to heterosexual sex and children? Er, discounting those who are clearly in violent denial about wanting to have heterosexual sex with children, anyway...
 
I'm more well-versed on general SJW BS so forgive my ignorance on more TERF-specific subjects, but... by their own ideology shouldn't women who have children be shunned in general, regardless of the sex of their child? I thought some TERFs argued that any sex involving a male is rape, so any woman who had a child would have consented to rape (as weird as that sentence sounds) and forfeited any respect from True Radical Feminists™. Supposedly that latter group are all very angry Vestal Virgins.

Or does that not apply to TERFs who had children before becoming TERFs? How does that all work when it comes to heterosexual sex and children? Er, discounting those who are clearly in violent denial about wanting to have heterosexual sex with children, anyway...
I wouldn't look too closely for ideological consistency. I don't think you will find it.
 
Did anyone archive my Twitter thread about the fake police visit? Yes, I can confirm that this was Rosa Freedman (when confronted she said it was not logged because the visit was "informal", and at any rate, if I ever mentioned anything she was going to post confidential case details on her Twitter. I had to send her a cease and desist letter. I won't comment on any other allegations because I'm not risking doing anything for which there isn't straightforward, unequivocal proof).

Article about it here, but trying to find my own thread!

 
Did anyone archive my Twitter thread about the fake police visit? Yes, I can confirm that this was Rosa Freedman (when confronted she said it was not logged because the visit was "informal", and at any rate, if I ever mentioned anything she was going to post confidential case details on her Twitter. I had to send her a cease and desist letter. I won't comment on any other allegations because I'm not risking doing anything for which there isn't straightforward, unequivocal proof).

Article about it here, but trying to find my own thread!

Archive is your friend
 
I'm more well-versed on general SJW BS so forgive my ignorance on more TERF-specific subjects, but... by their own ideology shouldn't women who have children be shunned in general, regardless of the sex of their child? I thought some TERFs argued that any sex involving a male is rape, so any woman who had a child would have consented to rape (as weird as that sentence sounds) and forfeited any respect from True Radical Feminists™. Supposedly that latter group are all very angry Vestal Virgins.

Or does that not apply to TERFs who had children before becoming TERFs? How does that all work when it comes to heterosexual sex and children? Er, discounting those who are clearly in violent denial about wanting to have heterosexual sex with children, anyway...
Believe it or not, radfems have a subreddit specifically about motherhood. It's not dead but it's not bustling with activity either. Not exactly surprising, since most feminists, especially TERFs, are childless catladies.

https://www.reddit.com/r/RadFemMothering (https://archive.is/lgyIk)
 
Alot of terven tend to be just as perverse as (sometimes even more than) the men they autistically screech about. There was one terven with a a scat fetish, another with a period blood fetish, another who drew lesbian rape porn and one who openly ogled underaged boys.
Dude, post receipts or you may as well just be REEing into the void.
 
I'm more well-versed on general SJW BS so forgive my ignorance on more TERF-specific subjects, but... by their own ideology shouldn't women who have children be shunned in general, regardless of the sex of their child? I thought some TERFs argued that any sex involving a male is rape, so any woman who had a child would have consented to rape (as weird as that sentence sounds) and forfeited any respect from True Radical Feminists™. Supposedly that latter group are all very angry Vestal Virgins.

Or does that not apply to TERFs who had children before becoming TERFs? How does that all work when it comes to heterosexual sex and children? Er, discounting those who are clearly in violent denial about wanting to have heterosexual sex with children, anyway...


Radical Feminists are usually staunch anti-natalists.

There are arguments that hetero women can't be true rad fems, because they'll argue that all men suck but not their Nigel. He's the one good chap. He's a good, feminist, non-porn watching man blah blah. That also applies to women who have managed to be the only woman who have socialized their male spawn successful to rad fem ways. That's why the term "Not my Nigel" came about, to kinda make fun of women who still make excuses for the men in their lives.

Honestly, I don't know how it works. I know that there is a schism between lesbians and straights. That's why some straight women become pretend lesbians aka 'political lesbians'. A lot of it is unspoken but it's the reality. You can't be a separatist with a male partner or male kids, so there is always a lot of defensive straight women and mothers, who for whatever reason feel a kinship with man haters who honestly see them as second class feminists. There's a lot of masochism inherent in straight women or mom's who hang out with the rad fem crews.

The gold standard for radical feminists is to be a childless dyke who is a separatist. Some will argue you can't be a radical feminist with a male intimate in your life be it a sexual partner or child. Others will argue it's possible but much harder.

I dunno, I'm just an observer.
 
Dude, post receipts or you may as well just be REEing into the void.
Softcore works was the TERF that drew lesbian rape porn, terfette was the TERF with the shit fetish, Leah Tverly is the TERF with the period fetish and Germain Greer was the TERF that was ogling underaged boys in her book like the nonce she is.
 
Radical Feminists are usually staunch anti-natalists.

There are arguments that hetero women can't be true rad fems, because they'll argue that all men suck but not their Nigel. He's the one good chap. He's a good, feminist, non-porn watching man blah blah. That also applies to women who have managed to be the only woman who have socialized their male spawn successful to rad fem ways. That's why the term "Not my Nigel" came about, to kinda make fun of women who still make excuses for the men in their lives.

Honestly, I don't know how it works. I know that there is a schism between lesbians and straights. That's why some straight women become pretend lesbians aka 'political lesbians'. A lot of it is unspoken but it's the reality. You can't be a separatist with a male partner or male kids, so there is always a lot of defensive straight women and mothers, who for whatever reason feel a kinship with man haters who honestly see them as second class feminists. There's a lot of masochism inherent in straight women or mom's who hang out with the rad fem crews.

The gold standard for radical feminists is to be a childless dyke who is a separatist. Some will argue you can't be a radical feminist with a male intimate in your life be it a sexual partner or child. Others will argue it's possible but much harder.

I dunno, I'm just an observer.

And then they wonder why so few women identify as feminists.
 
Back