Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

What even was his point here? Areas on the country that voted for trump also tend to have more men interested in sexual activity? This is supposed to reflect BADLY on trump voters?
He's trying to imply that Trump-voters are limp-dick virgin weaklings desperately trying to "masculinize" themselves.

Edit: in other words, he's blatantly projecting, given that he's a Never-Trump Principled Conservative™.
 
Last edited:
Reality:
>Is a billionaire
>Married to a supermodel
>Is President
>Takes no crap from the media
>By all accounts has a great attitude with the random little guy

Atlantic:
View attachment 1319617
Archive
Well I think they're jealous that Donald Trump is living the 'Chad' lifestyle; rich, powerful, and married to a beautiful woman most men will never have.

It's for the same reasons why news media gives Elon Musk a lot of crap because he's rich, an innovator, and has banged many women in his life.

So there you have it.
 
Not sexual interest, sexual interest specifically in women. Democrats confirmed as faggots.

In all seriousness, it's interesting how often leftwing insults are sexual in nature (small hands, bimbo accusations, impotence, "whyte bois can't compete", etc.). Isn't sex shaming suppose to be a no-no for the sex-positive party?
Hetero-exclusive is going to be implied to be a sexual disorder.
 
....please let there not be a surge of femboi drumpf art coming out of this.

I have already endured the nightmare of official canon femboy luke skywalker this past week, I dont need to see estrogenised plod turd twink erotica
View attachment 1319622View attachment 1319623
- yes this is the official disney redesign of luke skywalker, i had to see it, now you have to see it -

Those are lips that should be wrapped around my cock, not on Luke Skywalker.

No I don't want Luke Skywalker sucking my dick, I'm just saying, those are some prime DSLs boys.
 
Hopefully Trump wins. I am pretty optimistic.

But if he loses it will definitely be a bummer. Not the end of the world personally though. He has bought me (and us) a good chunk of time to get our shit together. Time that I was entirely sure we were ever going to get. Four more years plus the afterglow would really be nice though. I think enough minds have been changed and enough people see through a lot of the garbage that the future is pretty bright no matter what happens.
 
Hopefully Trump wins. I am pretty optimistic.

But if he loses it will definitely be a bummer. Not the end of the world personally though. He has bought me (and us) a good chunk of time to get our shit together. Time that I was entirely sure we were ever going to get. Four more years plus the afterglow would really be nice though. I think enough minds have been changed and enough people see through a lot of the garbage that the future is pretty bright no matter what happens.
The way I see it, there are going to be infinite amounts of salt to feast upon no matter who wins. It's a win-win situation in terms of entertainment.
 
Hopefully Trump wins. I am pretty optimistic.

But if he loses it will definitely be a bummer. Not the end of the world personally though. He has bought me (and us) a good chunk of time to get our shit together. Time that I was entirely sure we were ever going to get. Four more years plus the afterglow would really be nice though. I think enough minds have been changed and enough people see through a lot of the garbage that the future is pretty bright no matter what happens.
If he loses the Left will be emboldened to clamp down hard on whites. It's going to be seen as a just divine punishment for daring to not be on the right side of history.
 
For context, this hashtag is supposed to be a fun little gag where you "invent" a new crime.
obamagate.png
obamagate2.png
Totally. Rent. Free.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully Trump wins. I am pretty optimistic.

But if he loses it will definitely be a bummer. Not the end of the world personally though. He has bought me (and us) a good chunk of time to get our shit together. Time that I was entirely sure we were ever going to get. Four more years plus the afterglow would really be nice though. I think enough minds have been changed and enough people see through a lot of the garbage that the future is pretty bright no matter what happens.
If the left wins, the right will have to shoot their way back into power. The Dems will not take any chances on losing again. They'll grant amnesty to millions upon millions, make like 5 new blue states from DC and other territories, stack SCOTUS, pass automatic voter registration and mandate vote by mail with no ID.

They'll have a grip on the federal government like they do on Chicago government.
 
It's always #GamerGate with these people. I can bet you that in 100 years from now most people will forget about the Columbine High School massacre and even be more open about making jokes about Eliot Rodger if anyone will then bother to even remember him by then and these idiot lefties will still then bring up #GamerGate as the 'worst' thing to ever happen to the human race since World War 2 by that point.

It's fascinating to see these losers still so worked up about Internet drama that has been dead for years and most people don't care about it anymore and the only people that do care about it are these dipshits that should have moved on from it by now.

Hopefully that'll be around the time people stop referencing hitler and 9/11
 
If he loses the Left will be emboldened to clamp down hard on whites. It's going to be seen as a just divine punishment for daring to not be on the right side of history.
I don't think that's going to happen.

I'll keep an eye out for it like I keep an eye out for alien invasion or insurgent Islamic uprisings. But the odds on that seem really low.
 
If the left wins, the right will have to shoot their way back into power. The Dems will not take any chances on losing again. They'll grant amnesty to millions upon millions, make like 5 new blue states from DC and other territories, stack SCOTUS, pass automatic voter registration and mandate vote by mail with no ID.

They'll have a grip on the federal government like they do on Chicago government.
That's....not how that works. At all. Any new states being added into the union have to be approved by congress and the state legislature, and you cant simply split a state up to get votes. There is an ages old amendment addressing this very issue

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the constitution states:

The Admission to the Union Clause also forbids the creation of new states from parts of existing states without the consent of both the affected states and Congress. The primary intent of this caveat was to give Eastern states that still had western land claims a veto over whether their western counties could become states. This clause has served the same function since, each time a proposal to partition an existing state or states has arisen.

There have only been 7 states in history that were not created from territories. Vermont, Maine, and Kentucky were all created from land of pre existing states, but all 3 you'll notice were the result of the 13 original states being too spread out and cutting off some extraneous part of their state. Maine was a district of Massachusetts, Kentucky was created form land from Virginia, which was just a goddamn massive state at one point, and Vermont was created from a land dispute before the revolution and created by order of King George. EDIT: also Tennessee was formed form land from north carolina.

The next two are california and texas, both made of land seceded from war with mexico.

The only state that has ever split from its host over political differences is West Virginia during the civil war. If it were not wartime it is highly unlikely this would have been allowed, as it was not agreed upon by the Virginian legislature. Making new states from DC and land from other states would require all those states to agree to give up their land and redraw lines, which the other states will never agree to, and must be agreed upon by congress.

Now, congress will be a continuous roadblock. The Senate is predominately republican controlled, and this is much by accidental design. The Senate is designed to represent states with low populations, and by extension this currently means republican states. They are not about to approve these radical changes and will not let democrats stack the courts. Democrats had their change in 2008 and blew it.

Speaking of which, 2008 shows how two faced political parties are. Politicians will not fix the problems they are elected to fix, because then there is no reason to re-elect them. Democrats can campaign on healthcare and citizenship all they want, but if given actual power wont implement these plans, because once they do not only will they torpedo their own re-election speeches but will hand ammunition to their political opponents. Same reason republicans will never cut social security to any degree. Remember, democratic Obama hit new heights of deportation while in power, and his party has been arguing for more aliens for decades.
 
Not sexual interest, sexual interest specifically in women. Democrats confirmed as faggots.

In all seriousness, it's interesting how often leftwing insults are sexual in nature (small hands, bimbo accusations, impotence, "whyte bois can't compete", etc.). Isn't sex shaming suppose to be a no-no for the sex-positive party?
They're the biggest hypocrites. Why else do they have sexual fantasies about him and have incestuous fantasies between him and ivanka?
 
That's....not how that works. At all. Any new states being added into the union have to be approved by congress and the state legislature, and you cant simply split a state up to get votes. There is an ages old amendment addressing this very issue

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the constitution states:

The Admission to the Union Clause also forbids the creation of new states from parts of existing states without the consent of both the affected states and Congress. The primary intent of this caveat was to give Eastern states that still had western land claims a veto over whether their western counties could become states. This clause has served the same function since, each time a proposal to partition an existing state or states has arisen.

There have only been 7 states in history that were not created from territories. Vermont, Maine, and Kentucky were all created from land of pre existing states, but all 3 you'll notice were the result of the 13 original states being too spread out and cutting off some extraneous part of their state. Maine was a district of Massachusetts, Kentucky was created form land from Virginia, which was just a goddamn massive state at one point, and Vermont was created from a land dispute before the revolution and created by order of King George. EDIT: also Tennessee was formed form land from north carolina.

The next two are california and texas, both made of land seceded from war with mexico.

The only state that has ever split from its host over political differences is West Virginia during the civil war. If it were not wartime it is highly unlikely this would have been allowed, as it was not agreed upon by the Virginian legislature. Making new states from DC and land from other states would require all those states to agree to give up their land and redraw lines, which the other states will never agree to, and must be agreed upon by congress.

Now, congress will be a continuous roadblock. The Senate is predominately republican controlled, and this is much by accidental design. The Senate is designed to represent states with low populations, and by extension this currently means republican states. They are not about to approve these radical changes and will not let democrats stack the courts. Democrats had their change in 2008 and blew it.

Speaking of which, 2008 shows how two faced political parties are. Politicians will not fix the problems they are elected to fix, because then there is no reason to re-elect them. Democrats can campaign on healthcare and citizenship all they want, but if given actual power wont implement these plans, because once they do not only will they torpedo their own re-election speeches but will hand ammunition to their political opponents. Same reason republicans will never cut social security to any degree. Remember, democratic Obama hit new heights of deportation while in power, and his party has been arguing for more aliens for decades.
You make the mistake of thinking the constitution still matters.
 
You make the mistake of thinking the constitution still matters.
It does. If it didnt, then California would have left the union in 2016. But it didnt. Democrats wont follow through because they know they dont have the votes int he various state legislatures and congress to pull this move off, and trying to do it without votes would lead to civil war.
 
Back