Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 68 51.9%
  • 1

    Votes: 34 26.0%
  • >1

    Votes: 29 22.1%

  • Total voters
    131
I was referring to posting results from that website as if they mean anything.

Seriously gonna tell me this:

ezgif-2-22837cd7b8f2-gif.1320526


is two different people? Yeah, the free facial recognition website seems about as accurate as the free iq test websites.

Ok. I'm convinced it's her now.
 
That is a disingenuous statement its not obvious at all. What are the odds that people zeroing in on doxes find an unrelated person who looks to a T the same as the individual they are looking for? That is lottery ticket odds.
Unless dick paid for a chin job, new teeth, and a few Botox shots. Then I dont see it.
 
I think they look different enough that they could just be 2 similarly aged Latina women, I went on the first facial recognition website I found to see if maybe it was me, I posted my results and you all sperged, Cameron added more pictures so I did it again with the same results.

I'm sorry this shitty thing isn't agreeing with you lol but until @George Cuckzunian or anybody else posts her email from the restraining order, I'm not ruling the possibility you're wrong out. Sorry
It's not sperging to point out that results from a toy website aren't an indicator of anything. Especially when you're feeding it data that doesn't meet the bare minimum needed to give you already meaningless results. You posted them as if it meant something. It wouldn't have made sense to talk about goalpost moving or white knighting if that wasn't the case.

80px.png
 
It's not sperging to point out that results from a toy website aren't an indicator of anything. Especially when you're feeding it data that doesn't meet the bare minimum needed to give you already meaningless results. You posted them as if it meant something. It wouldn't have made sense to talk about goalpost moving or white knighting if that wasn't the case.

View attachment 1320638

It seemed to realise Maddox and Jim Carrey were the same person, explain that genius :smug:
 
does the broad need to show up to your door and state it shit is clear as day unless you choose to ignore it I don't understand what constitutes actual proof when I am reviewing the same person in multiple photos?
This thread would be a lot more active on the topic if people believed you. But again, I'll just wait to see if it goes...anywhere. Where it looks like it isnt.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Unog
Why is Dick so concerned about this camwhore theory? I mean, there's no truth to it, right?

Really makes you think.

The best defense against her being a camwhore is she is a plain jane that never bothered with it because she understood she was inadequate especially back in the day before every broad thought it was a reasonable way to make a living.
 
82e - Copy.gif


If you look at where the teeth align during the transition of the photo, it looks like her chin is exactly where it should be with that expression.

Also, the teeth look different in the Kik photo because the low lighting is causing the camera flash to glare off of her teeth, obscuring the fine details from view.

I really don't see how this is two different people. And like @Disheveled Human said, what the actual fuck are the odds of looking for hulagirl86 and finding someone that looks just like her? I'll remind everyone that, unless I'm mistaken, nobody , including Jesse, knew about that account until @George Cuckzunian went digging himself.

I'd bet you'd have better odds of being struck by lightning. Or being attacked by a shark.
 
View attachment 1320715

If you look at where the teeth align during the transition of the photo, it looks like her chin is exactly where it should be with that expression.

Also, the teeth look different in the Kik photo because the low lighting is causing the camera flash to glare off of her teeth, obscuring the fine details from view.

I really don't see how this is two different people. And like @Disheveled Human said, what the actual fuck are the odds of looking for hulagirl86 and finding someone that looks just like her? I'll remind everyone that, unless I'm mistaken, nobody , including Jesse, knew about that account until @George Cuckzunian went digging himself.

I'd bet you'd have better odds of being struck by lightning. Or being attacked by a shark.

nose is spot on and flared correctly considering her top palate placement to boot.
 
The shape of the teeth is different, and the chin isnt as sharp, a different mouth position does not add or subtract chin.
Stand in front of your mirror and make different expressions. Your chin will change its shape. I can point my chin at will.
It seemed to realise Maddox and Jim Carrey were the same person, explain that genius
Explain how 2 confirmed photos of Marie came up as a negative, genius. The algorithm can obviously stumble across the right answer when given the right face, but it's still stumbling. It's not magic. It's performing calculations. That's why it needs higher resolution photos. Because if it doesn't even have that then its true positives and true negatives become even closer to being just as meaningless as its false positives and false negatives.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Unog
I think they look different enough that they could just be 2 similarly aged Latina women, I went on the first facial recognition website I found to see if maybe it was me, I posted my results and you all sperged, Cameron added more pictures so I did it again with the same results.

I'm sorry this shitty thing isn't agreeing with you lol but until @George Cuckzunian or anybody else posts her email from the restraining order, I'm not ruling the possibility you're wrong out. Sorry
🎶But she clearly is the same girl
IT ISN'T HER
but the image isn't searchable
IT ISN'T HER
but it clearly is a selfie
IT ISN'T HER
but she uses the same screen name
IT ISN'T HER
Screen name is same as her email
IT ISN'T HER
but it stated in court docs
I DIDN'T READ THEM
but meds match chat leak claim
IT ISN'T HER
from a scrubbed account on drugs.com
IT ISNT HER
but Asterios said it was her
IT ISN'T HER
JLH said it her screen name
IT ISN'T HER
but you asked this guy to prove it..
STILL ISN'T HER
why are you so mad that he proved it?
IT ISN'T HER 🎶
 
Stand in front of your mirror and make different expressions. Your chin will change its shape. I can point my chin at will.

Explain how 2 confirmed photos of Marie came up as a negative, genius. The algorithm can obviously stumble across the right answer when given the right face, but it's still stumbling. It's not magic. It's performing calculations. That's why it needs higher resolution photos. Because if it doesn't even have that then its true positives and true negatives become even closer to being just as meaningless as its false positives and false negatives.

Honestly no point of discussing semantics it is what it is and anyone that argues otherwise is lying to save face for their internet interests.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toast Sandwich
Back