U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whatever he did, it’s unlikely that he deserved something as terrible as suffocating to death from someone kneeling on his neck.

I'm not saying he deserved it. But one thing cops get is a "Here's why you don't loosen up" lessons, and it's usually because someone wound up shot, stabbed, or dead. Being facedown and cuffed was sufficient, and for whatever reason (not gonna theorize or give an excuse) the guy decided to keep him pinned down; and while uncomfortable, a knee on your back or neck is one of the easiest ways to control someone. I'm not going to make excuses for the police, but at the same time; people who act belligerent when dealing with the cops are going to get man-handled, because there have been plenty of examples of everyone getting hurt when you fail to control the suspect.
 
That doesn't answer how 4 officers can't manage to take in a unarmed, handcuffed, prone individual without a death.

What fucking resistance is he doing? Wiggling? The worm?
Maybe the pigs thought he was sleeping like the woman they shot two few weeks before so there was no choice but to murder him in self-defense.

The not based and red-pilled libtards here will never understand the struggles of having to deal with unarmed, restrained cirminals who are laying face down in the floor who could at any moment kill you with a fart or something.

Imagine questioning the brave organization who's motto is "serve and protect" even if they are not legally obliged to protect you regrardless if they can save your life from a criminal.


This commies just don't appreciate unrestricted government enforcing that allows the consequence free execution of citizens in or out of their properties because they hate freedom smh.
 
I'm not saying he deserved it. But one thing cops get is a "Here's why you don't loosen up" lessons, and it's usually because someone wound up shot, stabbed, or dead. Being facedown and cuffed was sufficient, and for whatever reason (not gonna theorize or give an excuse) the guy decided to keep him pinned down; and while uncomfortable, a knee on your back or neck is one of the easiest ways to control someone. I'm not going to make excuses for the police, but at the same time; people who act belligerent when dealing with the cops are going to get man-handled, because there have been plenty of examples of everyone getting hurt when you fail to control the suspect.
lol how was he resisting?
 
Then go after the block captain running it. Not processing some small fry.
And how, exactly, do you to that without going after their henchmen? They are part of his operation. They are involved in whatever charges you bring against him. The more of them you remove off the street the weaker his operation becomes. The more willing witnesses are to come forward.

This is the way the game is played. This is how you defeat small-time rackets. Pick off the goons until the thing collapses.
 
And how, exactly, do you to that without going after their henchmen? They are part of his operation. They are involved in whatever charges you bring against him. The more of them you remove off the street the weaker his operation becomes. The more willing witnesses are to come forward.

This is the way the game is played. This is how you defeat small-time rackets. Pick off the goons until the thing collapses.
Welp they have clearly don't a great job with that. Mission accomplished boy, the streets of NYC now that Eric "The Cig Man" Garner is off the streets.

Just required 6 officers and a prohibited choke hold.

For everyone one nig picked off, there's 10 more nogs to take its place. It's a never ending fight.
 
lol how was he resisting?

The article said he resisted at first; and that could mean anything. That could mean he flailed his hands while saying "Oh hell no!" to out-right punching and kicking the cops. Sure, knee on the back of his neck until you get the cuffs on to restrain him. If he still wants to flail and kick (which he wasn't), you can easily control him by applying force to his back (since he can't use his hands to steady himself/pick himself up). Problem is, in heated moments, your brain doesn't go through things as rationally as one would like; and without video evidence showing the entire event, it's hard to make a judgement since we don't see what came before.

Imagine questioning the brave organization who's motto is "serve and protect" even if they are not legally obliged to protect you regrardless if they can save your life from a criminal.

Their motto isn't their ruling edict, just like the Statue of Liberty's poem isn't immigration law. Cops aren't obligated to render air, and this has been upheld in the Supreme Court. You should always question them.
 
The article said he resisted at first; and that could mean anything. That could mean he flailed his hands while saying "Oh hell no!" to out-right punching and kicking the cops. Sure, knee on the back of his neck until you get the cuffs on to restrain him. If he still wants to flail and kick (which he wasn't), you can easily control him by applying force to his back (since he can't use his hands to steady himself/pick himself up). Problem is, in heated moments, your brain doesn't go through things as rationally as one would like; and without video evidence showing the entire event, it's hard to make a judgement since we don't see what came before.

Yeah he probably resisted like that dangerous teenage girl stormtrooper that was rightifuly smashed face first into the ground for being a rebel scum, I mean the report does say she resisted.
Their motto isn't their ruling edict, just like the Statue of Liberty's poem isn't immigration law. Cops aren't obligated to render air, and this has been upheld in the Supreme Court. You should always question them.

And that's why blue lives don't matter.
 
did you watch the video?

Do we even need to anymore when every one of these goes the same way; Black guy resists or was resisting before video starts, cops are overwhelmed and wrestle the guy, guy dies of positional asphyxia, people sperg.

But shit, just for you I'll start the video and...yep, it's missing the precipitating event and everything else that led up to cop on guy's neck. Exactly like I thought.

I'm not saying people should boot-lick, I'm just saying you guys are being histrionic faggots for buying in to this shit.
 
Yeah he probably resisted like that dangerous teenage girl stormtrooper that was rightifuly smashed face first into the ground for being a rebel scum, I mean the report does say she resisted.


And that's why blue lives don't matter.

One, that wasn't even in America; and she wasn't black, which is what's going to be pushed hard in this case.

Two, no ones life matters outside of your friends and family, and civil rights were a fucking mistake.
 
Welp they have clearly don't a great job with that. Mission accomplished boy, the streets of NYC now that Eric "The Cig Man" Garner is off the streets.

Just required 6 officers and a prohibited choke hold.

For everyone one nig picked off, there's 10 more nogs to take its place. It's a never ending fight.
You clearly weren't around to see how bad NYC was in the 70s/80s.

This shit works. Not their fault he was stupid enough to resist arrest as a deathfat then died by misadventure.
 
You'd be surprised. Most suspects are extremely violent even when cuffed. You never hear all the cases of cops shot or stabbed by what they thought was a compliant or subdued suspect.

It's like the whole "why didn't they shoot his limbs" complaint in an officer shooting. Nothing less than a killshot stops a violent attacker; anything less than that gives them a good ten to twenty adreniline fueled seconds to do whatever they want to whomever is in reach. It sucks but it is reality. Humans are extremely good at taking at least one person down with them.
Will wait for more details before judging, but given that the officier holding the black guy feels that he can turn his eyes away from him and look at the camera, while pinning him with his entire body weight on the guy's throat..

Yeah, this sounds like an irresponsible use of force. I would not hold my breath for firings, but clearly steps need to be taken, after a thorough investigation.

I wonder what Nick Rekieta take on this will be?

Edit: A typo.
I'm going to hold off judgement until the coroner's report gets released. Could easily be this guy was high on crack or PCP which accelerated his heart rate, leading to him having a fatal heart attack while on the ground.

A big guy like that who is flying on some kind of upper can be difficult to restrain, even for four officers. There have been guys on PCP who kept on fighting even after having been shot several times. It's easy to say "Why didn't the cops do X or Y" when you've had no experience in law enforcement. Pinning the neck like that is pretty standard because it's usually pretty safe and it makes it more difficult for the perp to get leverage to either run or keep on fighting. A perp can still be a threat even with his hands cuffed behind his back. Officers have lost their lives to cuffed perps, which is why tactics like pinning the neck started being used in the first place. Pinning the back can actually be more dangerous than pinning the neck because the perp's lungs and diaphragm are being compressed, making it difficult to breathe. As others have said: if he can talk, he can breathe.

"Why didn't they use three cuffs and hogtie him?" Firstly, cuffs for the wrist are not designed to go around ankles. It's extremely painful and often the loops won't fit. That's why they make shackles. But hogtying is usually only used in limited circumstances because many people see it as dehumanizing. It can also lead to injury of the perp either from them fighting their restraints, or when lifting the perp to place them in a vehicle. Broken bones, dislocated joints, lacerated skin, potentially dropping the perp...then you've just given them ammunition to get out of their charges and sue you and your department.
I really don't think one unarmed, cuffed attacker could take down four police armed, trained officers.

@The Dude, i seriously hope you're trolling. It's impossible to be that exceptional. At least, it should be.
 
I really don't think one unarmed, cuffed attacker could take down four police armed, trained officers.

@The Dude, i seriously hope you're trolling. It's impossible to be that exceptional. At least, it should be.
It's not a matter of "taking down", it's a matter of injuring a police officer, destroying evidence, or leading police on a long chase.
 
Do we even need to anymore when every one of these goes the same way; Black guy resists or was resisting before video starts, cops are overwhelmed and wrestle the guy, guy dies of positional asphyxia, people sperg.

But shit, just for you I'll start the video and...yep, it's missing the precipitating event and everything else that led up to cop on guy's neck. Exactly like I thought.

I'm not saying people should boot-lick, I'm just saying you guys are being histrionic faggots for buying in to this shit.
So you're saying 4 cops couldn't handle one unarmed black man without using lethal force? Thunk provoking
 
It's not a matter of "taking down", it's a matter of injuring a police officer, destroying evidence, or leading police on a long chase.

Again. How the hell is it so hard for 4 armed (lethal and nonlethal options at hand) standing officers to keep one unarmed (I'm pretty sure he's shirtless as well), handcuffed, proned individual.

How are they this incompetent?

Sure are alot of bootlickers in this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back