- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper destroyed the world because he had erectile dysfunction.
Luckily he was able to interpret those feelings correctly.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Thread starter Randall Fragg
- Start date
Luckily he was able to interpret those feelings correctly.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2018
>History will remember
>May history not be kind
Who is this god named "History" and why is he an absolute bitch at punishing anyone "bad" until after they're dead?
Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
"You're probably one of them knee-jerk liberals who thinks us gun boys shoot our guns 'cause it's an extension of our penises."-Gun instructor from Death Wish.
Isn't it an age-old leftie trope to blame the destructive and hateful tendencies of the White man on his supposed sexual impotence, because of Freud's theories that sex and aggression are the two sides of human nature?
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
Being a fact-checker for CNN and Washington Post against Trump sounds like the most gayest job in the world.
Well, that or being a film critic reviewing children shows with lesbians and capeshit.
Well, that or being a film critic reviewing children shows with lesbians and capeshit.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
Apologies for double posting, but we got double re-tard alert
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Yeah yeah I hear you. But 56 minutes 28 seconds into the movie Mandrake asks Ripper where he came up with his theory about fluoridation of our precious bodily fluids. And Ripper describes what is essentially erectile dysfunction. And Mandrake is sitting there like "oh my god I knew he was stupid but not this stupid. I'm crouched next to a knuckle-dragging retard that may actually destroy the entire planet."
It is fucking hilarious.
And luckily he was able to interpret those feelings correctly.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2019
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
If History is a god then I guess "history is written by the victors" is his "god helps those that help themselves". Trump won once and might win again so I think History will still be on his side.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Keep talking like that, and you'll get the attention you're craving... from the Secret Service.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
Iirc there's also subtext of Ripper being closeted and he couldn't get it up cause he wanted boipussi
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Is that a common theory? I legitimately do not know, I never actually looked up any of the deeper meaning or Mr. Kubrick intent.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
It's definitely something I've seen brought up before idk
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
That's what I thought when I saw what Twatter did. It does look like they're exercising editorial control over his communications.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Sign of a good movie. If your movie came out 56 years ago and people still discuss it, you done good.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
Twitter is seriously crossing the Rubicon doing that. Up until now, they could largely argue plausible deniability on the more stealthy shit they tried to pull, but this is flagrantly stepping over the line between carrier and publisher. Worse, he's a HEAD OF STATE, distorting his tweets is certainly a federal crime since it causes harm to Trump's ability to communicate clearly what he intends to say to the public.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2019
Holy crap. Urban Dictionary is compromised.
Abort!
Abort!
Abort!
Here's the definitions from the first page of "Trump Derangement Syndrome", first wayback snapshots of 2017-2019.
Here is the entire catalog of UD's TDS entry.
The TDS affliction has been redefined by the TDS afflicted. >.>
And how on earth did I miss this from earlier!?
J. F. C.
Abort!
Abort!
Abort!
Here's the definitions from the first page of "Trump Derangement Syndrome", first wayback snapshots of 2017-2019.
Here is the entire catalog of UD's TDS entry.
The TDS affliction has been redefined by the TDS afflicted. >.>
And how on earth did I miss this from earlier!?
J. F. C.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
You can see how "no-mad" the people that wrote those definitions were.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2016
This attention whore seriously wants another visit from the Secret Service, doesn't she?
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
That's interesting. This exchange hasn't been disclosed until now, and contextually this took place on the same day that Trump joked about Russia finding Hillary's emails. Four days after this exchange, Crossfire Hurricane was opened up, but the thing is that Comey--under oath-- denied that Crossfire ever had anything to do with investigating Trump at the onset, and instead just sort of "lead there" as it was initially just supposed to be an investigation into Russia, but this exchange directly contradicts his testimony.
More interestingly, this snippet doesn't appear anywhere in the OIG report (Pg. 428 of PDF), not even in a redacted form. An investigation should be opened pertaining to specific crimes, not specific people, especially when the person in question is someone that the investigator personally does not like.
Last edited: