Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Godzilla@1989 said:
I saw these and I immediately thought this was a middle finger to Trump.
View attachment 1329329

View attachment 1329330

View attachment 1329331

View attachment 1329332



You can thank Obama era corporate neoliberals for that.
Click to expand...
This is my face looking at that shit:
cddd8d5b4a1179d97da0358374a00c88.jpg

What are they trying to convey making them look like shitty mid 2000 cg mannequins?
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man, witthel, spiritofamermaid and 14 others
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: witthel, Bob's Fries, spiritofamermaid and 17 others
FunPosting101 said:
"mass murder" If a given group of assholes are busy looting, attacking people, and setting things on fire, then using any and all necessary force to stop them for doing so is not illegal. Don't like it? Then don't try to burn an entire city to the ground because of a few murderous cops.
Click to expand...
One possibly negligent homicidal cop*. The (Democrat) DA says he's seen evidence that shows it wasn't murder.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, witthel, spiritofamermaid and 10 others
Coh said:
Amy's political career (at least in the short term. Long-term is hard to tell) is F U C K E D. Literally, this type of shit will earn her the nickname "Shamed Amy" or "Shady Amy" from Trump himself if Joe is dumb enough to choose her for VP. Literally his only two options are a dumb black woman who lost and whined like a child and a woman who slept to her position as the main prosecutor of California AND put black people in prison at astronomic rates. Damn, I knew there was some reason this shit would be the end of Joe's campaign in one way or another.
Click to expand...

I'd appreciate if she got called "Punished Amy" just for the MGS joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man, witthel, Ebonic Tutor and 3 others
So regarding the Executive Order that is meant to counter the censorship on social media, well honestly they pretty much did this to themselves since most of these social media companies are run by cucks that follow 'woke' ideals and these same cucks keep bending the knee to 1% of Twitter's userbase and speaking of Twitter, I bet Jack Dorsey is probably kicking himself that he will probably single handedly kill these Web 2.0 social media websites now that some of their legal protections have been eroded (it must feel terrible to be the straw that broke the camel's back).

If these social media platforms and tech giants didn't act as publishers in the first place then they would not be in this shitshow right now. Remember, the tech companies (such as Twitter, Youtube, Discord, Instagram, Reddit, Amazon, Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Patreon, Kickstarter, and so on) in the old days they stayed neutral and once politics and the perpetually offended morons entered the scene and infiltrated these companies well by that point they were just asking for it and here we are now.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: witthel, spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias and 11 others
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, the fall of man, witthel and 15 others
Twitter went from trying to conquer the Chinese firewall to censoring the president of the fucking United States of America during an important event where lives are at stake.

A lot of these websites I guess got burned out on challenging the powers that be and sold out.

Also this hurts Trump's enemies more as their responses and likes got deleted as well.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, the fall of man, ForTheHoard and 22 others
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, witthel, spiritofamermaid and 13 others
Qriist said:
Twitter has censored the President of the United States.
View attachment 1329602
Replies have been disabled and a surgical ghostban has been applied.
View attachment 1329603View attachment 1329604
Click to expand...
I honestly don't know how to feel about this. Twatter knows they're under attack and it feels like they're pushing the limits to assert their civil liberties. But at the same time they're gambling with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects them from illegal activities performed by their third party users.

I don't like Dorsey any more than I like Susan or Zuckergerg. They fell into the same trappings that every other motherfucker with power and money has gotten themselves into. To make matters worse, they're all politically aligned to where they think they're the hand that will guide public discourse. But at the same time, I don't like the idea that some bureaucrat appointed by a politician I didn't vote for because they have opinions I don't like is going to have increased control over the Internet.

It just feels like the First Amendment is caught between two parties who feel like the First Amendment should only protect their opinions. It may seem great now because the politician we support is sticking it to the people we don't like. But how quick are we to forget that every time the state gives itself power, it always leaves room for interpretation? Sure for now the EO says the FTC should pay more attention to Section 230 abuses. But how long will it be before the government appoints some blue haired troon who has six different head mates that each want to scissor fuck an orangutan interprets Null word filtering nigger, jew, retard, and hashbrown as editorial control?

Twatter's already playing with fire by putting Trump's threat to use force against looters behind a disclaimer. A disclaimer, by the way, that any platform who valued Section 230 would have never put up in the first place. Dorsey and his merry band of faggots could have made a separate statement saying "We don't condone the President threatening to use lethal force against looters peaceful protesters" and that would have been their prophylactic for penetrating this strange controversy. I just hope that fire doesn't spread to some nameless bureaucrat deciding to uphold Section 50 of some country's faggot law because they felt like it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: witthel, Grapefruit Soda, spiritofamermaid and 20 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back