Twitter Hides POTUS Tweet

Null said:
If they repeal Section 230 of the CDA I will close this site the same day and none of you will hear from me again.
Click to expand...
There are literally no plans to repeal Section 230. Trump and his advisor explicitly said so at the bill signing. They're just going to start enforcing it and suing companies that defy it. Also, I'd wager your site would be just fine so long as you act as an open discussion platform, which it does.
EDIT: Now that you posted that Trump Twitter post, I'm not so sure about what I said anymore.
 
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
  • Optimistic
Reactions: The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, Calooby, Dim Glownigger and 19 others
Blacklight said:
I don't see how asking for a law that's already on the books to be enforced is asking for it to get repealed.
Click to expand...
Because he used the words "repeal 230" which could mean repeal the law or repeal the protections. One of them he can't do and won't ever happen, the other he can do after a bunch of court cases. Based on all the flubs in wording it's likely the "repeal 230 protections".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, Whatthefuck, Deven and 10 others
Null said:
View attachment 1330068

"I give up. I give up on this president, I give up on the people of the United States, I give up on "muh freeze peach". I'm completely done. There is no saving this country or idiot, complacent white people, or American liberties in general. I want out."
Click to expand...
There's only one way out, Joshi-boy.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Lone Outsider, The Crow, albertbrown26 and 2 others
Cat Phuckers said:
There are literally no plans to repeal Section 230. Trump and his advisor explicitly said so at the bill signing. They're just going to start enforcing it and suing companies that defy it. Also, I'd wager your site would be just fine so long as you act as an open discussion platform, which it does.
Click to expand...
1590757787744.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: thegooddoctor, Calooby, Whatthefuck and 39 others
Blacklight said:
Well I'm not happy to say I was wrong about this, but I have to still lean with @DarthBrooks , this is nothing more than a dick waving competition.
Click to expand...
yeah lets wave dicks over the foundation of the modern free internet that's a great idea

this nigger sat by for 4 fucking years while kikes crushed modern platforms and THE BANKS TERMINATED ANY PAYMENT PROCESSORS THAT DESTROYED COMPETITION TRYING TO BOOTSTRAP ITSELF and he did NOTHING until Jack Dorsey put a fucking naughty sticker on his fucking Tweets and now this faggot Shabbos Goy cares, but he still only cares about his tweets, not anything else - not the shit that's actually important
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: thegooddoctor, PYSMA, CashMoney! and 154 others
Null said:
View attachment 1330100
Click to expand...

It's going to become "apply Section 230 to Twitter in light of their recent activities", I can all but guarantee. This is far from the first time Trump's scaled or qualified sweeping statements of intent in favor of practicality. The "Muslim ban" became the "irrespective-of-religion-except-for-persecuted-religious-minorities immigration moratorium of countries on a high-risk list from the Obama administration that don't even include the most populous Muslim countries", he didn't continue to chase down Mexico to pay for the wall, he didn't lift CDC guidelines on Easter like he would have wanted-- even in private, he was talked down from quarantining New York.

This happens too many times.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Feels
Reactions: CashMoney!, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, Calooby and 22 others
Null said:
View attachment 1330109
Click to expand...
Trump will say things for leverage, but the EO is about defining what "online platform" means.

I'm pretty sure it's going to be defined in a way that screws Twitter / Facebook without affecting the rest of the Internet. And that's a good thing.

E-Commerce accounts for more than $2 T of the US GDP. I'm pretty sure no one is going to take away the central provision that allows businesses to operate.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: CashMoney!, Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny), Calooby and 8 others
Ivan Shatov said:
I'm pretty sure it's going to be defined in a way that screws Twitter / Facebook without affecting the rest of the Internet. And that's a good thing.
Click to expand...
Or!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FIX
THE
BANKS


The law you're asking for would have to be written in such a delicate, precise way to not have huge, far-reaching implications for all American websites. You're asking CONGRESS. Our CONGRESS. To do surgery.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Giant Throbbing Clit, thegooddoctor, PYSMA and 57 others
Null said:
If they repeal Section 230 of the CDA I will close this site the same day and none of you will hear from me again.
Click to expand...

I know we've had our differences from time to time, but please do whatever it takes to save yourself if it comes to that. It has been an honor to shitpost with you.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: CashMoney!, Wodanaz, BlessedVeggie and 36 others
Jesus Christ! I go to sleep and come back in the morning and find KF on fire because Trump decided to go fucking psychotic.

Trump, buddy... when everyone said to go after the tech companies for bullshit censoring, ADDING MORE BULLSHIT CENSORING was not what we had in mind. This is literally the pendulum swinging the opposite side for the same completely stupid reason, and it's goin to make you look really fucking bad like those religious republican boomers in the 90's that were saying Mortal Kombat was going to create murderers.

Please stop, calm down and re-think this plan of yours before you do anything drastic.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: CashMoney!, Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny), Trout and Tears and 17 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back