Twitter Hides POTUS Tweet

[KingCoelacanth]

How is that even working when they're simultaneously asking people to mask up?

"It makes no sense" is really just the subtitle to 2020.

Well obviously they're not going to throw away all these high-tech invasive surveillance devices once the pandemic ends, they'll stick around.
The cameras as they are now, can detect people and determine how close they are to one another, its pretty much the same stuff that the Chinese government is toying around with, which also have facial recognition features.

10 social credits have been deposited to your account. xie xie

If the mask only partially covers your face (like most medical masks being used), facial recognition is still very possible

 

[Skeletor]

Orange Man bad.

 

[Lensherr]

I hope things turn out all right, but if worst comes to worst, I just wanna say it’s been an honor shitposting with you all.

 

[Mimic]

All he asked is that the FCC in look into how the law is interpreted

Even if that was the case, you REALLY wanna leave decisions involving 230 to Ajit Pai?

 

[Null]

Let's cool our jets and see what happens.

No. People need to be actively protesting this, on his side, or people will get what they fucking deserve.

 

[Trig.Point]

Unless he gets a second term, it’s never happening.
Even if you assume the senate to decided to suck Trump’s cock over his old man temper tantrum, the House is just going to go lol no. It’s still going to be true in a second term.

I don't think that's true. What about all the SJW's that want 'hate speech' off social media, are they going to support section 230, when they have the opportunity after it's gone to let loose the ADL and SPLC on Twitter and Facebook...

 

[Harbinger of Kali Yuga]

null is deathly afraid that this will be the first time Trump finally followed through on a twitter rant

 

[Love Machine]

Hey guy, I'm good to visit the Mexican boarder wall, to do stuff... Tell me how this all goes when I get back.

 

[Jack Awful]

The most depressing part is that the replies to Trump's 230 Tweets are either his senile supporters sucking him off or insane anti Trump grifters calling him Poopy Covfefe Drumpf and asking people to follow them or buy their book.

 

[Ivan Shatov]

Even if that was the case, you REALLY wanna leave decisions involving 230 to Ajit Pai?

Yes.

His positions on Net Neutrality were distorted in the extreme by political opponents.

He's one of the few people I would trust to make a decision on how to enforce 230.

 

[エボラちゃん]

Pretty sure that Trump is a total boomer about internet laws and such, he's being threatening but if measure have to be taken I expect that he'll turn to his staff for more info before making any decision. But who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

 

[WeWuzFinns]

By subjecting this instance of Trump rambling to reason and evidence, we can safely conclude that Trump will figure out a way to cuck out from delivering what he promised just like in every instance preceding this. Only an ardent Trump fan is going to believe that he will actually do anything. This is just some red meat for his supporters, but ultimately they will only get more immigration, no wall and nothing done to Internet censorship.

 

[Tomboy Respecter]

It is the entire foundation of the Internet and has been for decades. You don't see him threatening to change the laws about fucking National Parks do ya? No, specifically 230. Why? The entire Internet, world wide, depends on it.

Because people actually use national parks and they generate revenue for the nation, in addition to being a key part of our national identity. In addition, you can't really supress other people's rights with national parks if they became the new public forum. Who the fuck would change laws relatign to national parks? That's such a shitty analogy, I legitimately think you are retarded for making it.

 

[nohull]

or people will get what they fucking deserve.

Joker moment.

 

[Microlab]

For a bit of grounding, let's contextualize the consequences of repealing Section 230 through the typical Twitter user's lens:

Trump, the racist, homophobic bigot, wants to take away protections so that siterunners will be responsible for everything posted on their platforms. This means, theoretically, a neonazi could post child porn on Tumblr and have the safe spaces of millions of POC and LGBTQA* people taken away instantly. Even if the platform requires legal verification to sign up, unscrupulous dark web hackers would just highjack a poor, unsuspecting black lesbian doctor's account to post the illicit content. Clearly, anyone who would support this repealment is a psychopath who wants persecuted people to suffer and die in silence. I would never vote for someone who supports this.

 

[Null]

Who the fuck would change laws relatign to national parks? That's such a shitty analogy, I legitimately think you are retarded for making it.

My point is he's not threatening something that doesn't matter. Are you a fucking robot?

 

[The Last Stand]

"Glorifying violence"? Is that a joke?

It's more of that "big fat asterisk" crap that they did with Kavanaugh and with Trump after his impeachment fell through. They can't actually do what they want, so they'll pretend that what they can manage to do actually matters at all. And both of said schemes fell through because they were being blind, incompetent political machines, so the "big fat asterisk" rhetoric was just a giant cope.

By that logic, is the raw footage of Vietnam from reporters "glorified violence?"

 

[Tomboy Respecter]

My point is he's not threatening something that doesn't matter. Are you a fucking robot?

It doesn't matter to me so....
Plus, wouldn't threatening national parks threaten the local economies of the nearby areas? I'm pretty sure most of those places only really exist BECAUSE of the fact that national parks are there.

 

[Distant Stare]

Joker moment.
View attachment 1330341

"How about another youtube stream Mur-ray?"

 

[Null]

. This means, theoretically, a neonazi could post child porn on Tumblr and have the safe spaces of millions of POC and LGBTQA* people taken away instantly

Section 230 technically allows this already. See (e)(1)