- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
It seems like my predictions about Trump being remembered as Reagan 2.0 comes true, lol.
Ronald "make California permanent blue" Reagan
Donald "permanently damage the internet" Trump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based Trump has killed the Jannies.View attachment 1327912
It seems like my predictions about Trump being remembered as Reagan 2.0 comes true, lol.
Ronald "make California permanent blue" Reagan
Donald "permanently damage the internet" Trump
Isn't Julius Evola a neopagan, which in of itself is enough for Nick to dismiss as 'wignat trash' no matter what Evola said? I heard some bits and pieces about Evola's ideas, but I don't know how much of a neopagan he actually is.I have watched a couple of nicks streams but i have never seen him engage in higher discussion about any subject. All he is doing in his streams is being an outrage merchant. Not to be a complete Sargon tier fag but has he ever discussed any subject of relevance to his movement such as tradition or Christianity?
The only time i have seen him talk about scripture is either getting dunked on by leopirate or Jay dayer.
I have never seen him talk about evola or heidegger either.
I'm not a fan of Nick but I am a Catholic. You're don't have to think the Pope's opinions, especially on news issues, as divine word. Even St Peter denied Christ. Popes come and go.Some of them are split between not liking the Pope because he isn't based enough and others liking him only begrudgingly. Good amount of them are Sedevacantists and claim that they're better than mainstream Catholics. Some have the lulzy idea of wanting to have a Papacy based in America.
Wow, it's almost as if Catholics have a long history of suspected duel loyalties in American politics.In other words, Nickers are not America Firsters, in reality they're Vatican Firsters. Their loyalties are not to America, but to the Pope. Funniest part is that their pope's cucked.
It's really the most ironic thing about them.They consistently criticize Zionist influence on American politics, and maybe rightfully so, but they're all falangists who think America was founded on catholic principals and monarchy is based. They don't really admit this openly, but the more I've watched the occasional Nick Fuentes clip on YouTube, the more they've become a total farce to me.So they are the catholic version of Trump's Chosen People?
Fuentes thinks all paganism is cringe. Evola was a pagan, at least in some regard, but as the single greatest influence on post-WWII fascist thought, you'd think Fuentes would at least be familiar with him to some degree. I've only read small passages of Evola's writings, but he was clearly an intelligent man who understood a lot about the human condition. I'm not a traditionalist, so if I've found some of his writings profound you'd think Fuentes would as well. That's where Fuentes' immaturity takes over. He often dismisses and mocks ideas with little regard to them. This makes him entertaining, but not very useful as a serious political commentator. I think that's the key to Fuentes though. A lot of people, myself included, only really watch him for his entertainment factor, whether that's sincere or purely ironic.Isn't Julius Evola a neopagan, which in of itself is enough for Nick to dismiss as 'wignat trash' no matter what Evola said? I heard some bits and pieces about Evola's ideas, but I don't know how much of a neopagan he actually is.
Isn't Julius Evola a neopagan, which in of itself is enough for Nick to dismiss as 'wignat trash' no matter what Evola said? I heard some bits and pieces about Evola's ideas, but I don't know how much of a neopagan he actually is.
Then again when another TradRight talks about how they get inspiration from Plato and other Greek and Roman philosophers its not like they were Christians either.
Anyone who is not just a pro government obsessed idiot has duel loyalties. If you have any other moral system or independent thoughts, there are duel loyalties. The country was founded by people who had loyalty to the colonies and loyalty to the Crown - duel loyalties. Catholics are mostly the only ones in public life who actually have to answer for that. Just look at when they try to confirm Catholic judges. It's very difficult, but a judge from most other religions are fine. Just because the head of their religion has a visible, powerful world figure? Everyone should get that same scrutiny or none of them should. It's not like because you don't have a visible head of the religion, there aren't duel loyalties.Wow, it's almost as if Catholics have a long history of suspected duel loyalties in American politics.
Isn't Julius Evola a neopagan, which in of itself is enough for Nick to dismiss as 'wignat trash' no matter what Evola said? I heard some bits and pieces about Evola's ideas, but I don't know how much of a neopagan he actually is.
Then again when another TradRight talks about how they get inspiration from Plato and other Greek and Roman philosophers its not like they were Christians either.
A lot of the people in this sphere have effete hand gestures. I honestly think it's part of the problem. It would be easier to get friends or a partner, probably related to why a lot of these guys are so frustrated, if they had more masculine body language. Why be scared of someone who has the mannerisms of someone who is weak? They would also be taken more seriously as political voices too I'd wager.Edit2: What’s up with the effete hand gestures? He needs to learn a traditional male body language. His wrist is weak af.
If this is a livestream, where are the people spamming "Femoids get out REEEE!!! Women ARE NOT ALLOWED GET OUT!" unless they happen to get banned for counter signaling the Based Honorary Femoids.
Do you have a link to this video or stream? I really wonder what the chat or comments are like.
There's Pope Michael (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bawden), so already there. That said, of these indie Popes (excluding the Coptic Patriarch), only the disturbing Palmarians have any resources.Some of them are split between not liking the Pope because he isn't based enough and others liking him only begrudgingly. Good amount of them are Sedevacantists and claim that they're better than mainstream Catholics. Some have the lulzy idea of wanting to have a Papacy based in America.
You just don´t know what a true chad looks like this is a man whos so confident in his masculinty that he acts like a flamboyant homosexual to own the libs!Edit2: What’s up with the effete hand gestures? He needs to learn a traditional male body language. His wrist is weak af.
While it's true that an adherence to an independent ideology such as libertarianism or conservatism, or a religion could be considered a duel loyalty, where the comparison to Zionism comes in is that Vatican City is a foreign country. A libertarian may criticize the US, but he'll have no allegiance to any other country. A social conservative may have values that don't meld with a large amount of the US population, but he's still all American. A protestant, or a pagan, or an atheist, or whatever, may even have more of an allegiance to their religion than their country, but they probably won't have any allegiance at all to any country but their own. This is why Jewish Zionists, Christian Zionists, and Catholics can be seen as similar. They have allegiance not just to their own country and their own ideology, but also a foreign entity.Anyone who is not just a pro government obsessed idiot has duel loyalties. If you have any other moral system or independent thoughts, there are duel loyalties. The country was founded by people who had loyalty to the colonies and loyalty to the Crown - duel loyalties. Catholics are mostly the only ones in public life who actually have to answer for that. Just look at when they try to confirm Catholic judges. It's very difficult, but a judge from most other religions are fine. Just because the head of their religion has a visible, powerful world figure? Everyone should get that same scrutiny or none of them should. It's not like because you don't have a visible head of the religion, there aren't duel loyalties.
You just don´t know what a true chad looks like this is a man whos so confident in his masculinty that he acts like a flamboyant homosexual to own the libs! or... you know hes a closet homo.
No e-girls is code for no girls.If this is a livestream, where are the people spamming "Femoids get out REEEE!!! Women ARE NOT ALLOWED GET OUT!" unless they happen to get banned for counter signaling the Based Honorary Femoids.
I mean when Nick appeared on a live show back in Florida a while ago, that had Kathy Zhu before it was his turn, people spammed in the comments about how the femoids should get out.
Do you have a link to this video or stream? I really wonder what the chat or comments are like. Its one thing to have Malkin on but I don't even think Faith Goldy and Ashley Rae are even that liked by the average Nick fan.
Islamic people don't have a loyalty to Mecca? Pagans wouldn't have a loyalty to Stonehenge? Did Jewish people not have loyalty before the modern incarnation of Israel? Now while in the past there were Templars and things like that, I doubt if you asked most Catholics today if they are citizens of the country they reside or their country is Vatican City, they would say Vatican City. In fact, you can't get Vatican City citizenship without a lot of work. Just because you are Catholic, doesn't mean you have Vatican City citizenship. Frankly, most modern Catholics know so little about their faith, they probably think it's just a city in Italy where the Pope lives.They have allegiance not just to their own country and their own ideology, but also a foreign entity.
They would in some regard, but there are fifty some Muslim counties, and the politics therein are sufficiently complex so as to make duel loyalties a lesser issue then say, the politics of sharia law or jihad.Islamic people don't have a loyalty to Mecca?
Stonehenge does not have a massive foreign lobby, and even if it did it would probably only be in regard to its preservation, which is the extent of Stonehenge's current political relevance.Pagans wouldn't have a loyalty to Stonehenge?
Prior to WWII Zionism was not as common among American Jews as it was in Europe, but the same issue would still apply if it were, as it does now. Zionism, in the Jewish sense at least, only came about in the late 1800s, but its influence on American politics probably only began in the early or mid 1900s.Did Jewish people not have loyalty before the modern incarnation of Israel?
It should be clear, the issue is not Catholicism itself, but potential undue Catholic influence. In a similar sense, the issue Fuentes has is less with Judaism as a religion, but rather undue Zionist influence. This is why I find it humorous that the groypers will complain about Zionist influence, but then put Vatican city flags in their bios, and talk about how based monarchy is. An American Jew with an Israeli flag in his bio talking about how based Kahane was or whatever would be lit up by the groypers, yet many of them want a stateside Catholic monarchy. I'm sure the vast majority of Catholics don't think this way, but for the TradCaths who do, it honestly borders on farce.Now while in the past there were Templars and things like that, I doubt if you asked most Catholics today if they are citizens of the country they reside or their country is Vatican City, they would say Vatican City. In fact, you can't get Vatican City citizenship without a lot of work. Just because you are Catholic, doesn't mean you have Vatican City citizenship. Frankly, most modern Catholics know so little about their faith, they probably think it's just a city in Italy where the Pope lives.