Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[RA-5C Vigilante]

Obama has spoken:
View attachment 1331255View attachment 1331256

He's handling this about as well as Ferguson, as in not at all and making things worse

 

[JambledUpWords]

What middle aged African American business would start an email by saying “Dude”, especially to a former president.

His entire essay sounds like r/ThatHappened. That “business man” could have just been a former WH staff member.

 

[mandatorylurk]

Just wondering, to what extent would Trump's spat with Twitter, COVID, and the recent riot in Minneapolis affect the election?

Twitter is going to be for Trump when people see the massive hypocrisy in play when compared to other leaders or special blue checkmarks and how they won't touch Ayatolah's or Chyna. It's what makes me think Trump wanted this fight and has been deliberately pushing the Psycho Joe stuff because he wants to be removed so he can play victim and kill Twitter, which a lot of people want just to end the online mob mentality.

Corona Chan, coupled with how Chyna is making themselves look even worse by fucking up Hong Kong, will be another bullet point of "Trump was right" that Biden has no leverage against. And I think he's chomping at the bit to say everyone lied and made it overblown and we could have opened a month earlier. I think that's why they're hitting the hydroxychloroquine and the inject bleach so much, to muddy Trump's previous words of trying to get America working again.

The Minnesota thing is so blatantly wrong by the cop like that asshole cop in Arizona a year ago who made the guy crawl to him, freak him out with orders he couldn't do, and then shot him anyway. But like always, and as seen with Obama's recent fart huffing, the left will overreach and pretend riots aren't riots, call everyone racist and turn them away from any attempt at real change. Trump's thug tweet is hard to ignore or spin as racist to normal people when people are blowing up police stations and rioting while MSNBC says nothing's going wrong. Plus, he said what happened was flat out wrong a day or two ago before the rioting started

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Plus, he said what happened was flat out wrong a day or two ago before the rioting started

Agree with your analysis but I'm going to predict they'll ignore that he said this just like how they pretend his take on Charlottesvile was "Nazis are great people, I prefer my Jews low and slow at 1488 degrees"

 

[Private Pyle]

Twitter is going to be for Trump when people see the massive hypocrisy in play when compared to other leaders or special blue checkmarks and how they won't touch Ayatolah's or Chyna. It's what makes me think Trump wanted this fight and has been deliberately pushing the Psycho Joe stuff because he wants to be removed so he can play victim and kill Twitter, which a lot of people want just to end the online mob mentality.

Corona Chan, coupled with how Chyna is making themselves look even worse by fucking up Hong Kong, will be another bullet point of "Trump was right" that Biden has no leverage against. And I think he's chomping at the bit to say everyone lied and made it overblown and we could have opened a month earlier. I think that's why they're hitting the hydroxychloroquine and the inject bleach so much, to muddy Trump's previous words of trying to get America working again.

The Minnesota thing is so blatantly wrong by the cop like that asshole cop in Arizona a year ago who made the guy crawl to him, freak him out with orders he couldn't do, and then shot him anyway. But like always, and as seen with Obama's recent fart huffing, the left will overreach and pretend riots aren't riots, call everyone racist and turn them away from any attempt at real change. Trump's thug tweet is hard to ignore or spin as racist to normal people when people are blowing up police stations and rioting while MSNBC says nothing's going wrong. Plus, he said what happened was flat out wrong a day or two ago before the rioting started

Aren’t a lot of people against his beef with Twitter for damn good reason? If this law passes, we’ll be even deeper in censorship messes all because of Trump acting like a ruhtard over his ego.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

A wonderful paraphased exchange that happened after I had to explain to my dad about Trump’s remarks regarding mail in ballots. And how millions go missing every year.

Families are fun.

Dad/Mum Can’t you pay attention to British politics?
Me: Sure. When it’s as funny as the US? And are you sure you want me doing that you might end up finding out your wrong.
Dad: Why do you defend Trump so much? He lies all the time.
Me: Loads of places report on that. Not many people report when he tells truth.
Dad: You seem to get very passionate about Trump.
Me: Passionate about a lot of things.
Dad: You are never usually this animated.
Me: I get animated like this when I talk about other things.
Dad: We don’t usually see it.
Me; You don’t care about comics, games, books or anime.

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Aren’t a lot of people against his beef with Twitter for damn good reason? If this law passes, we’ll be even deeper in censorship messes all because of Trump acting like a ruhtard over his ego.

So far there is no law. The EO directs the FTC and FCC to look into ToS fuckery and that if they're being uneven or banning for non-violations (spoiler: they are) they could lose platform status. Then he tweeted about section 230 this morning and everyone's losing their minds and acting like it's a done deal.

 

[Garm]

Aren’t a lot of people against his beef with Twitter for damn good reason? If this law passes, we’ll be even deeper in censorship messes all because of Trump acting like a ruhtard over his ego.

He just needs to get Twitter to blink. Either they lose a bunch of users because of their bullshit or they get smacked with being a publisher.

And I doubt Jack Dorsey wants to go down in history as the man that killed the internet.

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

I rate this "lunacy".

Source / Archive

 

[Shaka Brah]

I rate this "lunacy".
View attachment 1331318
Source / Archive

She even rated it herself.

 

[JambledUpWords]

I rate this "lunacy".
View attachment 1331318
Source / Archive

I’d like to see them try. It’s because of these people that Trump spends a lot more on security.

 

[Private Pyle]

He just needs to get Twitter to blink. Either they lose a bunch of users because of their bullshit or they get smacked with being a publisher.

And I doubt Jack Dorsey wants to go down in history as the man that killed the internet.

Judging by the reactions on this very site, you’d think Trump was already killing the net.

 

[mandatorylurk]

Aren’t a lot of people against his beef with Twitter for damn good reason? If this law passes, we’ll be even deeper in censorship messes all because of Trump acting like a ruhtard over his ego.

Trump looks like he's trying to draw a line that you want to just be a platform and have all those immunities to the content, you can't step in and editorialize. He's putting himself in a win/win situation that either has Twitter backing down, Trump being banned and letting him play the victim, Twitter embracing censorship that will turn people away once all the twitter losers finish with their multicolored clap emojis for the day, or this going to court and it's established what the rules are for real which no one in Silicone Valley really wants, no matter what they say to virtue signal.

It's why Zuckerberg looks like he's trying as hard as he can to distance himself/Facebook from what Twitter is doing and say they can't police people.

 

[Adamska]

Judging by the reactions on this very site, you’d think Trump was already killing the net.

Yeah, I've seen the banner thread. Kind of reminds me of the Wu Flu thread with the literal shaking in it.

I will also state that the delusional idea of Trump even trying to repeal PATRIOT, while it would've been amazing, was never going to happen. Too much bipartisan supports from the creatures from the capitol for that to ever be something that would make it through, even if Trump would've wanted to do that.

I will agree though that he is actually quite angry though and that's fueling this desire. He however is channeling his wrath and spite creatively, akin to the woman he ruined in Atlantic City who refused to sell her building. I don't like it, and honestly wished he just tried the bastards for stepping into things as a publisher, showing why you don't pull that shit as a "platform", rather than use executive fiat to win.

 

[AprilRains]

I don't like it, and honestly wished he just tried the bastards for stepping into things as a publisher, showing why you don't pull that shit as a "platform", rather than use executive fiat to win.

How is he using executive fiat to do it? That's not what the executive order says. In fact, the executive order specifically relies upon provisions of the CDA. He is proposing to enforce provisions that deny a safe harbor protection to companies who censor content according to a political bias.

The only place he talked about repealing the CDA was in a tweet, where he called upon others to repeal it rather than claiming he could do so himself. Have you read the executive order?

 

[Kacho]

Judging by the reactions on this very site, you’d think Trump was already killing the net.

The funny thing to me is that Twitter, Google, etc are already killing the net. They are already all doing exactly what these people claim to be worried about Trump doing. They're more upset about the intimation that silicon valley tech firms would face repercussions for their censorship and attempted cultural and political engineering than they have ever been about the same silicon valley tech firms carrying out that censorship. I don't understand how the 'liberal' position on the internet became the one where corporations get to do whatever they want to individuals.

 

[Garm]

Judging by the reactions on this very site, you’d think Trump was already killing the net.

He is playing chicken with Twitter. That if he loses that would just embolden them. If he follows through then shit hits the fan.

 

[Return of the Freaker]

I don't understand how the 'liberal' position on the internet became the one where corporations get to do whatever they want to individuals.

Corporations made rainbow logo variants and said you are valid and probably trans if you can shove a whole school bus up your rectum

 

[Dededon't]

Judging by the reactions on this very site, you’d think Trump was already killing the net.

That's due mainly to the reactionary culture we are currently experiencing. People lose all composure and sense when they hear something bad could happen and jump straight to doomposting before anything has actually occurred. Shit's depressing to read.

 

[Adamska]

How is he using executive fiat to do it? That's not what the executive order says. In fact, the executive order specifically relies upon provisions of the CDA. He is proposing to enforce provisions that deny a safe harbor protection to companies who censor content according to a political bias.

The only place he talked about repealing the CDA was in a tweet, where he called upon others to repeal it rather than claiming he could do so himself. Have you read the executive order?

I reckon I need to reread it then.

Though why does he need to use an EO to do something that's already described and detailed? And while I can buy hyperbole for this response, why also the desire to kill 230?

Just wondering.