Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[DocHoliday1977]

Pam you still don't even know what's going on. Take your thorazine and go back to your personal cage thread. Just because this guy is more entertaining than you doesn't mean you have to attention whore

I'm just warning you. Be my guest.

 

[SIGSEGV]

This guy has gone too many posts without addressing his twitter account dedicated to filipino men's dick creepshots.

@BoxerShorts47 do you disavow?

 

[Strange Wilderness]

@Strange Wilderness Again, cuckservatives have tried to ignore the race variable for decades. It doesn't work because the liberals see in color and make decisions based on color just like you and me. So when you say you're not a racist, this is an economic issue. they project onto you. They attack you. You become a matry for their sins. They are trying to exorcise the racism out of themselves. So you cannot cuck on racism, you gotta go through it and force them to admit that they're anti white. the same way I am doing with @Book Thievery You gotta force this people to admit they are anti white and as you can see they will desperate try to avoid this. well at least any of the people with optics better than vaush.

I once read somewhere, possibly on this website, that the point of a debate isn't to change the mind of your counter-party but the minds of the audience. Whatever lib you're arguing with has already decided their point and will say whatever they want to discredit you and your positions. What you need to do is make a compelling argument to the audience who CAN have their minds changed. Your opponent will call you a racist on principle, they will always call you a racist. Your audience on the other hand will call you a racist if you are ranting about white genocide, demographic replacement, and how spics and niggers need to hang from trees. Your audience will also listen to you if you frame immigration in terms they can understand, the loss of money and security. Let your opponent call you whatever name they want but unless you make a compelling argument to the Average Joe you're always going to lose and get angrier and angrier.

 

[Blood Bath & Beyond]

Lowkey the hottest new thread of 2020.

 

[Pissmaster]

Anti racism is have always been anti white. 1960s Anti-racism meant white neighborhoods were illegal. white workplace was illegal. You must live with blacks. You must hire blacks. It was denying white people the right to exist as a group. This was tolerable because whites did white flight to minimize the impact and negros were too dumb to get into business. But once you expand racism internally and you attack white women as racists for not dating non-white then it becomes obvious what racism truly is. Open borders and result is the genocide of your own people. That's why there is such a strong biological instinct to be "racist." to preserve your people. It's hardwired into you and you cannot exorcise it out no matter how much you try,

You are hallucinating talking points that nobody's making.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Patience love. I'll give it a month from today if he can keep this sperging up. I doubt he will be able to resist powerleveling and considering how easily he is baited I imagine he has plenty of tard cum out there ready to be found

I just gave you a large amount of my talking points. These ideas work. In the end you just gotta say that either your anti white or your pro white. If you admit your anti white then you accept SJW far-left agenda. GG. You're denying white people self determination, a local community, and that isn't good optics, not the high moral ground that liberals want to use as a platform to virtue signal. The only way they can enact their policies is by framing us as the bad guys, as racists, for wanting a neighborhood that looks like us. Defeat this paradigm and you defeat them. That;s why you gotta go full wignat to fight the liberals and SJWs. no cucking.

@BoxerShorts47 do you disavow?

not me. I thought it was obvious.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Lowkey the hottest new thread of 2020.

I love this thread.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

You are hallucinating talking points that nobody's making.

Yes or no. Is anti racism open borders? What is the end result of anti-racism. White people being denied a white neighborhood, becoming a minority in their nations and going extinct through race mixing? What are you actually promoting?

 

[SIGSEGV]

not me. I thought it was obvious.

Wow, what a faggot. He won't even disavow his binder full of dickpicks.

Yes or no. Is anti racism open borders? What is the end result of anti-racism. White people being denied a white neighborhood, becoming a minority in their nations and going extinct through race mixing? What are you actually promoting?

Laughing at speds (such as yourself), mostly.

 

[Book Thief]

I just gave you a large amount of my talking points. These ideas work. In the end you just gotta say that either your anti white or your pro white. If you admit your anti white then you accept SJW far-left agenda.

You see the whole world in black-and-white (in this case, literally as well) exactly like SJWs do. "Either you're with us or against us." You're so blinded by your retarded ideology that you can't see the gray in between.

Thanks for proving me right.

 

[Witthel]

In the end you just gotta say that either your anti white or your pro white

And I say you're either a glownigger, or a retarded faggot.

 

[SIGSEGV]

And I say you're either a glownigger, or a retarded faggot.

Those aren't mutually exclusive.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Thanks for proving me right.

shades of grey is a lie. liberals said they wanted freedom for everyone. no wrong or right. but that didn't last. now they say if you disagree with them that's hate speech. human brain doesn't operate in shades of grey. it wants to make a moral decision. Even you want to say racism is bad, not shades of grey? Do you tolerate racism? Do you believe racists deserve equality? civil rights for racists? gotta have affirmative action for racists? this is exactly how lunacy is what the avg white thought about civil rights and tolerance for blacks was in the 1960s.

 

[Witthel]

shades of grey is a lie. liberals said they wanted freedom for everyone. no wrong or right. but that didn't last. now they say if you disagree with them that's hate speech. human brain doesn't operate in shades of grey. it wants to make a moral decision. Even you want to say racism is bad, not shades of grey? Do you tolerate racism? Do you believe racists deserve equality? civil rights for racists? gotta have affirmative action for racists? this is exactly how lunacy is what the avg white thought about civil rights and tolerance for blacks was in the 1960s.

You're just asshurt at the fact you can't say nigger in public without any consequences.

 

[Blood Bath & Beyond]

shades of grey is a lie. liberals said they wanted freedom for everyone. no wrong or right. but that didn't last. now they say if you disagree with them that's hate speech. human brain doesn't operate in shades of grey. it wants to make a moral decision. Even you want to say racism is bad, not shades of grey? Do you tolerate racism? Do you believe racists deserve equality? civil rights for racists? gotta have affirmative action for racists? this is exactly how lunacy is what the avg white thought about civil rights and tolerance for blacks was in the 1960s.

But like, I'm only racist against Niggers, Kikes, and Spics but I have quite a few friends that are Black, Jewish and Mexican. I'm a "shade of grey" racist, you understand?

 

[SIGSEGV]

You're just asshurt at the fact you can't say nigger in public without any consequences.

That's because he's a beta with no self confidence. I've called a bunch of black "people" niggers before and they've respected me for it.

 

[Y2K Baby]

ok...and? I've never hid the fact that I'm a farting right-wing. I just think, like I said, that I am a massive cum-guzzling fag.

Woah, bros......?
Does Bingbong REALLY?

 

[Book Thief]

now they say if you disagree with them that's hate speech.

Tell me something I didn't know already.

Another thing has occurred to me over rereading this article: the author frames every single criticism of feminism as if it's coming exclusively men. Because apparently there are absolutely no female Gamergators or Comicsgators, no female critics of Ghostbusters 2016, no women who voted for Trump, nor are there any female anti-feminists who think third-wave feminism is crock of shit. No, women are an absolute monolithic hive-mind, and if you disagree with the loudest, angriest voice in the room, you disagree with all women and want to strip them of the civil rights their feminist foremothers fought for, because there is literally no inbetween.

How are we ResetERA, though? It's not like people get banned at the drop of a hat because they disagree with the political opinions of the moderators. You have to be a serious 'tard for the mods to take action here.

It's a punishment for wrong-speak. Basically, any time you say anything that might suggest that transgenders shouldn't be able to do something, or disagree with them on some issue, no matter how insane it is, it qualifies as "transphobia." Troons equate disagreements to violence, therefore disagreements must be silenced at all costs.

 

[Pissmaster]

Yes or no. Is anti racism open borders?

No. The entire topic of open borders equaling anti-racism, which in your definition equates to anti-white simply falls apart when you consider the concept that whites from nordic countries would have to immigrate here just like anyone else from anywhere else in the world, and blacks born in the United States of America are born with full USA citizenships. That concept doesn't even make sense.

But if you want to get into the nuances of wealthy elites vying for open borders as a way to bring in immigrants that they can bully and practically treat like slaves, with the threat of deportation (H-1B visa holders working in the tech industry are treated horribly, worked to exhausting hours, and can't fight back without risking being fired and having to move back home), then that's something for another thread.

What is the end result of anti-racism. White people being denied a white neighborhood, becoming a minority in their nations and going extinct through race mixing?

See, you're going off on a tangent again. You've defined "anti-racism" in your own way, and you're strawmanning it in your own personal reality. You seem to have taken those "whites will be extinct by 2050" shitposts to heart, even though that's just flat-out impossible.

What are you actually promoting?

I'm promoting deez nuts.

 

[TitanWest]

I literally couldn't give less of a shit about any arbitrary thing like what color your skin is or where you like to wiggle your dinky dick. That all being said I am going to strap in and enjoy your thread here. Please do not disappoint

So you don't care if your country becomes low IQ and low trust? I don't want to be Brazil and I like having running water. Stuff like "Wacism" was common sense to whites pre-1960's. No one cares about skin color. People care about what other races with different biological tendencies moving into your area will do. Diversity + Proximity = Violence. Turn on the news and you'll see that.

The Bell Curve: IQ, Race and Gender | Charles Murray and Stefan Molyneux

MP3 Download: http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/3074/the-bell-curve-iq-race-and-gender-charles-murray-and-stefan-molyneux In continuing our discussion on Human In...

www.youtube.com

Matthew Drake

Diversity DESTROYS Social Trust | Mike Enoch

www.bitchute.com