Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Just A Butt]

Is that person treating you like shit because he is just a bad person or because he doesn't like your race.
You never know.

The irony and autism coming from this statement have my sides aching terribly. Thank you.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Alt-Hype didn't present the "race science". He linked to dozens of articles that did.
If you can't tell the difference between Nationalism, Feminism, MRA, and Communism then you know less about politics than you know about IQ.

You're just another cuckservative who's made uncomfortable about the Left, but is too afraid of them to legitimately oppose them so you make Horshoe Argument cope posts that convince no one but yourselves.

I'm not a conservative, but the notion that your commentary isn't identical to the commies, feminists, MGTOW, and rioters is laughable.

strawman argument. yes or no. are people paranoid about "racism" in diverse societies?
yes.

It's not a strawman, I directly addressed what you said - sociology is bad science, full of reproducibility concerns, and infested with PoMo idiocy.

and that paranoia exists merely from the fact that different races exist. nothing that can be done to overcome this inherent problem.
Rephrase.
I said that if he banned me from that thread, I would view it as an action he took because he is mulatto, not because of his ideology.
I would view race/racism as the factor in his decision making process.
This is the problem in all racial situations. Is that person treating you like shit because he is just a bad person or because he doesn't like your race.
You never know.
This is why you're always paranoid in diversity.

Any threadban you got was because you're a sperg, and not because of some unknown ideology you're attributing to a jannie. I can think of a number of jannies that do the same thing, and I'll bet they're white.

 

[TitanWest]

I mean, you want to whine about "bad science", but you're relying on sociology to make a case for "immigrants lead to low-trust societies."

Sociology isn't as bad as Gender Studies. And if you look at rates of replication for sociology studies and "hard sciences" like neuroscience sociology has a better track record.

You probably should have stuck to genetics, but the simple fact of the matter is there isn't a knockout gene that correlates to intellectual function and melanin, so you're screwed there too.

That's a strawman argument. The real argument is that race strongly correlates with IQ even when accounting for every variable that behavioral researchers have come up with.

Also Race =/= Melanin Content. No one considers Albinos to be white. White means people descended from Europe.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

It's not a strawman, I directly addressed what you said - sociology is bad science, full of reproducibility concerns, and infested with PoMo idiocy.

Again another straw-man. I am not talking about sociology. I am talking about "racial paranoia"
Do people experience racial paranoia in diverse areas? Do they misconstrue honest mistakes as racial hate?
With BLM, are these incidents, when true, caused by incompetent or bad police officers? or by biased racially hating police?
You center-left and center-right liberals want to ignore these real problems.
This is why you lose against the SJWs, because they bring up these issues too.
Except their answer is "fuck white people."
You lost power against the SJWs because you're making bad faith arguments and ignoring these real problems.

 

[Begemot]

You reused the same joke. You're not good at trying to hide behind irony. It's clear that you and everyone except people like SIGSEGV, wolfpac92, and DocHoliday have strong opinions and are just pulling the boring "Ironybro" routine.



Start a Chad Nationalism movement.

You've been in your hugbox too long, sport. Nobody here knows what an 'irony bro' actually is. This isn't a political site. It's a lolcow watching site and our stance is typically apoltical. This is why you and your master @BoxerShorts47 are having trouble cutting through.

Where you see strong opinions everyone else just sees shitposting.

 

[pierce your heart]

i think i walk that line well.

Please look at what you posted ITT and reevaluate this sentence

 

[TitanWest]

I'm not a conservative, but the notion that your commentary isn't identical to the commies, feminists, MGTOW, and rioters is laughable.

That's like saying Hindus, Satanists, Christians, and Agnostics all make the same commentary. Making statements like that shows that a person doesn't know what they're talking about or they're intellectual cowards stuck in the 90's anti-racist propaganda they were raised in before the next version of anti-racism was installed in the 2010's.

A Conservative today is what a Liberal was 20 years ago. A "Classical Liberal" is what a Liberal 10 years ago. Either now or in 10 years you'll be a Conservative. The Left is dragging the Overton Window Left no matter how much you want it to stay put.

It's not a strawman, I directly addressed what you said - sociology is bad science, full of reproducibility concerns, and infested with PoMo idiocy.

Not anymore than the so-called "hard sciences". And works like Putnam's "Bowling Alone" have never been refuted. Why bring up other studies not being replicated?

 

[SIGSEGV]

more sperging

lol calm down

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Do people experience racial paranoia in diverse areas? Do they misconstrue honest mistakes as racial hate?

This is what the SJWs call a micro-aggression.

Psychologist Derald Wing Sue defines microaggressions as "brief, everyday exchanges that send denigrating messages to certain individuals because of their group membership". The persons making the comments may be otherwise well-intentioned and unaware of the potential impact of their word

Acting like Sargon and making bad faith arguments is not going to win the culture war.
You gotta address these real problems.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Again another straw-man. I am not talking about sociology. I am talking about "racial paranoia"

That's like saying Hindus, Satanists, Christians, and Agnostics all make the same commentary. Making statements like that shows that a person doesn't know what they're talking about or they're intellectual cowards stuck in the 90's anti-racist propaganda they were raised in before the next version of anti-racism was installed in the 2010's.

A Conservative today is what a Liberal was 20 years ago. A "Classical Liberal" is what a Liberal 10 years ago. Either now or in 10 years you'll be a Conservative. The Left is dragging the Overton Window Left no matter how much you want it to stay put.

Not anymore than the so-called "hard sciences". And works like Putnam's "Bowling Alone" have never been refuted. Why bring up other studies not being replicated?

If neither of you understand that your studies on "racial trust" are sociological in nature, then neither of you is smart enough to be involved in crafting policy, and if you don't understand the paranoid overlap ion the mentioned groups talking points, then that just cements how ill-equipped you both are to even discuss public policy.

 

[TitanWest]

You've been in your hugbox too long, sport. Nobody here knows what an 'irony bro' actually is. This is why you and your master @BoxerShorts47 are having trouble cutting through.

Where you see strong opinions everyone else just sees shitposting.

If you don't know what an "ironybro" is then you're old and that's not my problem.

This isn't a political site. It's a lolcow watching site and our stance is typically apoltical.

That's bullshit. The majority of people going after political lolcows also just so happen to belong to ideologies that hate them. Only a few people are anywhere near "apolitical". People like An0nymous and SIGSEGV are legitimately just here for entertainment. Everyone else wants to go after people they don't like politically (Unless the lolcow is apolitical like tittystreamers). They added threads like "Articles & News" and "Happenings" for a reason.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

If neither of you understand that your studies on "racial trust" are sociological in nature, then neither of you is smart enough to be involved in crafting policy, and if you don't understand the paranoid overlap ion the mentioned groups talking points, then that just cements how ill-equipped you both are to even discuss public policy.

Again another strawman argument. I am asking you a simple question.
Do people experience racial paranoia?
Do they misconstrue honest mistakes as racial hate?
You cannot answer because you know the truth debunks your entire 1990s multiracial utopia.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

If you don't know what an "ironybro" is then you're old and that's not my problem.

That's bullshit. The majority of people going after political lolcows also just so happen to belong to ideologies that hate them. Only a few people are anywhere near "apolitical". People like An0nymous and SIGSEGV are legitimately just here for entertainment. Everyone else wants to go after people they don't like politically (Unless the lolcow is apolitical like tittystreamers). They added threads like "Articles & News" and "Happenings" for a reason.

I don't hate you, I pity you, because you're the sort of person that shouldn't be allowed outside unsupervised, on the off chance you get surprised by a rainstorm, and drown.

Again another strawman argument. I am asking you a simple question.
Do people experience racial paranoia?
Do they misconstrue honest mistakes as racial hate?
You cannot answer because you know the truth debunks your entire 1990s multiracial utopia.

It's not a strawman, the studies your trying to quote are sociological studies, and I trust them no more than I trust Greta's "climate science." They require bias to produce, regardless of what "side" is producing them.

 

[Just A Butt]

We have politicows now? Neat!

 

[Token Weeaboo]

Holy fuck this twat is still talking?

He wasn't kidding when he said he would never stop barking.

because everyone else eventually gives up and stops arguing with me.

 

[TitanWest]

If neither of you understand that your studies on "racial trust" are sociological in nature, then neither of you is smart enough to be involved in crafting policy, and if you don't understand the paranoid overlap ion the mentioned groups talking points, then that just cements how ill-equipped you both are to even discuss public policy.

If you think "sociological = wrong" then you need to get off Reddit and go doing something productive like taking summer classes during your sophomore year.

You even made a sociological statement while implying "sociological = bad".

lol calm down

no

 

[Superman93]

@BoxerShorts47 so when are you gonna dox yourself?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

If you don't know what an "ironybro" is then you're old and that's not my problem.



That's bullshit. The majority of people going after political lolcows also just so happen to belong to ideologies that hate them. Only a few people are anywhere near "apolitical". People like An0nymous and SIGSEGV are legitimately just here for entertainment. Everyone else wants to go after people they don't like politically (Unless the lolcow is apolitical like tittystreamers). They added threads like "Articles & News" and "Happenings" for a reason.

Even titystreamers are political. Same as sexual revolution culture war.

It's not a strawman, the studies your trying to quote are sociological studies, and I trust them no more than I trust Greta's "climate science." They require bias to produce, regardless of what "side" is producing them.

wow another stramwan. look I asked you a simple question.
Do people experience racial paranoia?
I spoke with a hispanic women that said she didn't think the dean liked her because she was Hispanic and I told her, 'no he's just an asshole."
And she needed to hear that from me, a white male, to understand this situation was not racial.
Normal people are paranoid about "racism" and there is no way to tell if that person is just an 'asshole' or a 'racist.'
so diversity is always low trust, always unstable.
No bias training will ever fix this issue.

Holy fuck this twat is still talking?

He wasn't kidding when he said he would never stop barking.

That's right, you're gonna learn the hard way that I'm the alpha male and I'm in charge. okay?

 

[Begemot]

If you don't know what an "ironybro" is then you're old and that's not my problem.



That's bullshit. The majority of people going after political lolcows also just so happen to belong to ideologies that hate them. Only a few people are anywhere near "apolitical". People like An0nymous and SIGSEGV are legitimately just here for entertainment. Everyone else wants to go after people they don't like politically (Unless the lolcow is apolitical like tittystreamers). They added threads like "Articles & News" and "Happenings" for a reason.

"It's not my job to explain my terminology, bigot!" You sound like an SJW. Due to horseshoe theory you resemble them most avidly.

And I know what an ironybro is because I've examined your depraved subculture. The vast majority of people here aren't stormfront posters so what you're posting looks like schizoid gibbering. Sorry, kid, time to bend the knee.

 

[Just A Butt]

That's right, you're gonna learn the hard way that I'm the alpha male and I'm in charge. okay?

In charge of what exactly? Considering you can’t even figure out how to change your avatar...