Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[TitanWest]

It's not a strawman, the studies your trying to quote are sociological studies, and I trust them no more than I trust Greta's "climate science." They require bias to produce, regardless of what "side" is producing them.

Earlier you asked "find the alleles", but suddenly you're "SCIENCE BAD!".

Putnam was biased - against his own research. He constantly checked over his own work trying to disprove it, but after doing years of work the data wouldn't budge. Then he sighed and published the research. To this day he openly states how he hated his own conclusion emotionally and gives flimsy arguments like "Ethnic diversity is good 'cuz food" to make himself feel better.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Holy fuck this twat is still talking?

He wasn't kidding when he said he would never stop barking.

Apparently, the tard-handler never explained that "people give up and stop arguing with me" has more to do with the outrageous lunacy, and less with the validity of anything he presents.

@BoxerShorts47 - It's still not a strawman to dismiss your sources based on their lack of scientific validity. At best, it's a genetic fallacy, and it's not even that, because it's a valid dismissal - sociology isn't science of particular value, especially not when it comes from a pre-biased position, which 95% of it does, regardless of the side presenting it.

This is exactly why I mentioned up-thread that Destiny and Vaush would murder you in a debate - you have exactly 1 rebuttal, and you'd just try to out-screech whichever dolt you were in a stream with.

Earlier you asked "find the alleles", but suddenly you're "SCIENCE BAD!".

Putnam was biased - against his own research. He constantly checked over his own work trying to disprove it, but after doing years of work the data wouldn't budge. Then he sighed and published the research. To this day he openly states how he hated his own conclusion emotionally and gives flimsy arguments like "Ethnic diversity is good 'cuz food" to make himself feel better.

If you don't understand that genetics is not subjective, and sociology is, then I can't help you, my friend. It's pretty basic shit.

 

[TitanWest]

"It's not my job to explain my terminology, bigot!" You sound like an SJW. Due to horseshoe theory you resemble them most avidly.

Calling people old for not knowing what the word "ironybro" is is now SJW? You midwits and your horseshoe theory crack me up. Here let me try:

"I'm offended at your ageism!" you sound just like an SJW. You also drink water just like Hitler so I guess you're Hitler too.

And I know what an ironybro is because I've examined your depraved subculture. The vast majority of people here aren't stormfront posters so what you're posting looks like schizoid gibbering. Sorry, kid, time to bend the knee.

Ironybro doesn't come from Stormfront. It came from Zoomers across the political spectrum. You're showing your age again.

And it's not "schizoid" it's "schizo". Rich coming from the guy saying every eth-nat in this thread is a glownigger conspiring to bring KF down. Take your meds.

If you don't understand that genetics is not subjective, and sociology is, then I can't help you, my friend. It's pretty basic shit.

Basic Reddit shit. The hard vs. soft science meme is mostly for undergrad midwit Redditors. It doesn't matter how many test tubes and beakers an experiment has. It matters that you can do research that has predictive validity and Putnam's research like "Bowling Alone" is just as predictive or even more predictive than genetics is. Hell, even Twin Studies are more reliable for things like predicting height than genetic studies are.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Ethnic diversity is good 'cuz food" to make himself feel better.

omg i love those bad faith arguments
my favorite faith argument is "what is white?"
what is your favorite bad faith liberal argument.

Apparently, the tard-handler never explained that "people give up and stop arguing with me" has more to do with the outrageous lunacy, and less with the validity of anything he presents.

you think the civil rights and social justice warriors won by a different strategy?
they fought until people gave up defending
>marriage between a man and a women became gay marriage is marriage
>biological differences between men and women became men and women are equal
>transwomen is a women
>blacks are the same as whites
etc.
they won when people gave up and their lunacy became normalized.
people would virtue signal their lunacy like you're doing right now.

This is exactly why I mentioned up-thread that Destiny and Vaush would murder you in a debate - you have exactly 1 rebuttal, and you'd just try to out-screech whichever dolt you were in a stream with.

if you can setup a debate I would love that. I can beat them both. Destiny preferred cuz he is higher IQ.

If you don't understand that genetics is not subjective, and sociology is, then I can't help you, my friend. It's pretty basic shit.

yes or no. do people experience racial paranoia?

 

[Stranger Neighbors]

He thinks that @Stranger Neighbors is a mod lol

He has accused several people of being Mods. He is either a super mega tard or He didn't lurk at all before sperging.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

you think the civil rights and social justice warriors won by a different strategy?
they fought until people gave up defending
>marriage between a man and a women became gay marriage is marriage
>biological differences between men and women became men and women are equal
>transwomen is a women
>blacks are the same as whites
etc.
they won when people gave up and their lunacy became normalized.
people would virtue signal their lunacy like you're doing right now.

Irrelevant. Move the goalposts back.

if you can setup a debate I would love that. I can beat them both. Destiny preferred cuz he is higher IQ.

Both have accounts on twitter, feel free to tweet them and demand a debate.

yes or no. do people experience racial paranoia?

yes or no. do women experience paranoia about men?
yes or no. do men experience paranoia about women?


Dude, you better have better science than some sociology to have a discussion about the concept of stereotypes and paranoia. I'd also suggest being vastly more literature and eloquent than you are here, if your going to debate a pair of mongs with Destiny and Vaush, but I absolutely want to watch you embarrass yourself.[/QUOTE]

He has accused several people of being Mods. He is either a super mega tard or He didn't lurk at all before sperging.

Pigeons, chessboards, etc.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

yes or no. do women experience paranoia about men?
yes or no. do men experience paranoia about women?

Dude, you better have better science than some sociology to have a discussion about the concept of stereotypes and paranoia. I'd also suggest being vastly more literature and eloquent than you are here, if your going to debate a pair of mongs with Destiny and Vaush, but I absolutely want to watch you embarrass yourself.

This is a good example and it shows the same problem: BLM racial paranoia i.e. races are not equal (same) = #MeToo sexual paranoia i.e. the sexes are not equal (same).

 

[SIGSEGV]

what is your favorite bad faith liberal argument.

All of your posts on this site.

 

[Begemot]

omg i love those bad faith arguments
my favorite faith argument is "what is white?"
what is your favorite bad faith liberal argument.


you think the civil rights and social justice warriors won by a different strategy?
they fought until people gave up defending
>marriage between a man and a women became gay marriage is marriage
>biological differences between men and women became men and women are equal
>transwomen is a women
>blacks are the same as whites
etc.
they won when people gave up and their lunacy became normalized.
people would virtue signal their lunacy like you're doing right now.



if you can setup a debate I would love that. I can beat them both. Destiny preferred cuz he is higher IQ.



yes or no. do people experience racial paranoia?

I think you're about to experience 'racial paranoia' when my 20-inch black trans dick gets shoved down your writhing throat, whiteboi

Calling people old for not knowing what the word "ironybro" is is now SJW? You midwits and your horseshoe theory crack me up. Here let me try:

"I'm offended at your ageism!" you sound just like an SJW. You also drink water just like Hitler so I guess you're Hitler too.



Ironybro doesn't come from Stormfront. It came from Zoomers across the political spectrum. You're showing your age again.

And it's not "schizoid" it's "schizo". Rich coming from the guy saying every eth-nat in this thread is a glownigger conspiring to bring KF down. Take your meds.



Basic Reddit shit. The hard vs. soft science meme is mostly for undergrad midwit Redditors. It doesn't matter how many test tubes and beakers an experiment has. It matters that you can do research that has predictive validity and Putnam's research like "Bowling Alone" is just as predictive or even more predictive than genetics is. Hell, even Twin Studies are more reliable for things like predicting height than genetic studies are.

Not saying it comes from Stormfront, just using that site as a synecdoche for white supremacy in general. Ironybro is used by wig-nats to as signal something a bit more specific.

As for horseshoe theory, considering how your fellow Langley alum @BoxerShorts47 has implied violence against kiwis here, how is he different from AntiFa?

 

[Stranger Neighbors]

@BoxerShorts47 and @TitanWest both of you are like babies of white nationalism

Take a load of my main Nigga @EasyPeasy
He is boss Whitey round here and is actually entertaining. Take a good look at his post history and start learning

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

because the white race needs a leader and you're too cucked to lead.

You can't figure out how to change your avatar, or notice the difference between "nuisance" and "nuance" and you think you can lead? No one who's responsible enough to choose their own lunch would let you run a fucking bath unsupervised, never mind a movement. If tenacity was veracity, you'd be killing this like you imagine you are. Perhaps the nuisance/nuance confusion is relevant; you appeared to have confused "ambition" and "ability".

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I think you're about to experience 'racial paranoia' when my 20-inch black trans dick gets shoved down your writhing throat, whiteboi

CRINGE,
You're a loser becaue you don't have a good sense of humor.
100% crude.
right?

Not saying it comes from Stormfront, just using that site as a synecdoche for white supremacy in general. Ironybro is used by wig-nats to as signal something a bit more specific.

white supremacy is a derogatory term used to marginalize the white community.
Just like I said, you cannot win through honet conversation and debate, you gotta use insults / ad hominem like "white supremacist" to win.

As for horseshoe theory, considering how your fellow Langley alum @BoxerShorts47 has implied violence against kiwis here, how is he different from AntiFa?

violence is normal.
If you don't like violence than kill yourself because you need violence against animals or plants to eat.
and this society is maintained by police violence, govt sanctioned violence.
the difference between me and antifa is against whom I want to use violence.

 

[Heckler1]

really? did the SJWs win using your magic fairy tale model?
Did the civil rights activists

and no doc holiday lost. every argument was a straw-man. he avoided all the main points like the fact that he is turning america into Brazil and doesn't even in DNA. ya science denying. strong optics 2020 /sneed

Yes. MLK is regarded as the head of civil rights because he was a compelling and charismatic figure who kept his cool, but was passionate when needed to persuade people to his side. And frankly, based on current events its pretty clear that a lot of the ground they made up may have been surface level/ temporary at best.

Despite claiming to hate SJWs, you are trying to do the same oppression Olympics tactic they use, you've just replaced muh p-o-cees with "muh hwite peepul". You also stuff a ton of arguments together to make a big emotional argument, the same way the people you hate do. You are not a revolutionary, big shot, or 4-D chess master. You're just a free range t@rd who wants to larp like a big brained induhvidual.

@DocHoliday1977 is a literal schizophrenic woman who believes there is a celebrity conspiracy against her. And she STILL is more capable of composing an argument in a coherent/compelling way than you are

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

the difference between me and antifa is against whom I want to use violence.

I'm 100% serious. Lock up all liberals in FEMA death camps. I'm sick and tired of your bullshit and I don't want to co-exist.

Everyone that disagrees with you, which isn't different from AntiFa's position.

 

[SIGSEGV]

You're a loser becaue you don't have a good sense of humor.

This thread is a joke and you're the punchline.

 

[Begemot]

CRINGE,
You're a loser becaue you don't have a good sense of humor.
100% crude.
right?


white supremacy is a derogatory term used to marginalize the white community.
Just like I said, you cannot win through honet conversation and debate, you gotta use insults / ad hominem like "white supremacist" to win.



violence is normal.
If you don't like violence than kill yourself because you need violence against animals or plants to eat.
and this society is maintained by police violence, govt sanctioned violence.
the difference between me and antifa is against whom I want to use violence.

Yes, in a Hobbesian sense, violence is always bubbling under the surface in most societies. Most won't resort to that unless they're gibbering mal-adjusted schizoids or....blatantly obviously provacateurs. Really activates those almonds, huh, sport?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Yes. MLK is regarded as the head of civil rights because he was a compelling and charismatic figure who kept his cool, but was passionate when needed to persuade people to his side. And frankly, based on current events its pretty clear that a lot of the ground they made up may have been surface level/ temporary at best.

civil rights movement was just as fraudulent as social justice movement.
The only difference between Obama and MLK is the internet.
we didn't have the internet to fact check their narrative.
read https://kiwifarms.net/threads/u-s-riots-of-may-2020-over-george-floyd.70231/page-638#post-6588351

Despite claiming to hate SJWs, you are trying to do the same oppression Olympics tactic they use, you've just replaced muh p-o-cees with "muh hwite peepul". You also stuff a ton of arguments together to make a big emotional argument, the same way the people you hate do. You are not a revolutionary, big shot, or 4-D chess master. You're just a free range t@rd who wants to larp like a big brained induhvidual.

horseshoe theory. yes I hate the SJWs, because i hate their outcome. But their tactics work. So I've internalized them all. Just because I want to use their tactics against them doesn't mean I am the same as them. it means i've learned from them, adapted, evolved.

@DocHoliday1977 is a literal schizophrenic woman who believes there is a celebrity conspiracy against her. And she STILL is more capable of composing an argument in a coherent/compelling way than you are

oh she is a women. well that explains the bleeding heart.

Yes, in a Hobbesian sense, violence is always bubbling under the surface in most societies. Most won't resort to that unless they're gibbering mal-adjusted schizoids or....blatantly obviously provacateurs. Really activates those almonds, huh, sport?

Look the only way to take care of antifa is through beatings.
there are rude bitches that need a slapping.

https://youtu.be/mzXkbJwrN38

you're a liberal so you hate violence, hate masculinity
I'm illiberal. I recognize sometimes violence is the only solution.

 

[SIGSEGV]

I'm illiberal. I recognize sometimes violence is the only solution.

Then why are you hiding behind a monitor instead of being a violent animal in the streets, faggot?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Then why are you hiding behind a monitor instead of being a violent animal in the streets, faggot?

because that doesn't work.
hitler learned that lesson in the 1920s.

 

[Begemot]

Look the only way to take care of antifa is through beatings.
there are rude bitches that need a slapping.

https://youtu.be/mzXkbJwrN38

you're a liberal so you hate violence, hate masculinity
I'm illiberal. I recognize sometimes violence is the only solution.

Do you even lift, bro?