Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

It makes me wonder when, if ever, some of these more prominent leftists driving this whole thing are going to realize that they are not Soros's co-conspirators or partners, but just more pawns and that he'd sacrifice them all to put society in range of his declaring check.
I'm wondering when the blacks are going to wake up and realize that neither the Dems or Reps have their best interest in mind, and just break from the two party scene all together.

or whites for that matter...

Normies are getting scarred. They don’t care how! They just want it to stop... I can’t believe these idiots didn’t think of the fear aspect of this among the common people! I mean I get it, but like I find it hard not to believe someone didn’t bring it up?! Like fear from unrest leads to wanting of draconian polices!
>implying that's not the goal

Leftists have been chomping at the bit to portray Pro-2A, anti-tax, anti-lockdown types "no u are the REAL authoritarians"; now people supporting the federal government deploying troops to protect lives and property is somehow PROOF that the right is a bunch of bootlickers who hate freedom.
At least thats what the totally organic trend on FB & twatter that cropped up this morning is implying
 
They think suggesting we all come together as one is a sign that you're disrespecting how the individual groups are completely different. You can see this pretty often with the modern leftists. Supporting an idea like "All Lives Matter" would suggest looking past the precious identity politics to see how to fix issues with the police, which they think only exist for blacks in spite of white people being more likely to be shot by police than blacks.

View attachment 1343292
This but with races :^) Separation is diversity.
 
They clearly want segregation. Just give them Detroit and let them have their own country.
They have a country already... and they are destroying it. One way boat ride to Africa, give them a one time payment of 5k and revoke citizenship. They are not Americans first, they identify only with their race. Why not give them what they want? I have no idea what to do about them. I know this is not a possibility. I just dont know what the fuck their goal is at this point.

There are people all over the fucking world who would kill to be granted American citizenship. And you have these assholes acting so fucking entitled.

I just don't buy the whole "generational trauma" bullshit. Serfs in Russia were freed from the land around the very same time blacks gain freedoms. And then were bound for much longer, and in much worse conditions, as they did not have someone to feed and shelter them. Yet we dont see all these slavs doing what the blacks do?

Get the fuck over it. You arent special. Every race has been fucked over, even the white people. Get the fuck over it.
I'm wondering when the blacks are going to wake up and realize that neither the Dems or Reps have their best interest in mind, and just break from the two party scene all together.

or whites for that matter...


>implying that's not the goal

Leftists have been chomping at the bit to portray Pro-2A, anti-tax, anti-lockdown types "no u are the REAL authoritarians"; now people supporting the federal government deploying troops to protect lives and property is somehow PROOF that the right is a bunch of bootlickers who hate freedom.
At least thats what the totally organic trend on FB & twatter that cropped up this morning is implying
I agree with the sentiment that this is what the left wants, in terms of authoritarian action they can point to. But I do not think it is going to earn them the goodwill of more voters.

As much as I do occasionally (and autisticly) wonder if we could get away with "disappearing" a chunk of the worst and most stubborn, I know with today's technology and communication, it is not possible.

In historical situations similar to what we are experiencing right now, I cannot think of a situation where a fractured populace was able to agree on an amicable solution.

These countries either splinter into smaller factions, either based on racial, idealogical, or geographical differences. Or one side removes their adversaries altogether.

The greatest issue with all this hate and anger, is that it is a cycle that will only be fed to the next generation.

Here in America you have a generation of blacks who grew up in poverty, they use these circumstances as an excuse. But how did these places become riddled with poverty? Disgruntled blacks burning down the local businesses, forcing everyone to go back to square one in development. Then they ask why they aren't on square two like the neighboring town, and claim it is racism instead of owning up to these things. Instead of using their circumstances to become more resiliant, they play the victim.

They use their situation as a crutch and demand special treatment. And when you give them what they want, this just reinforces that what they are doing isn't going put a stop to these handouts. In fact, it is the opposite. I see corporations and politicians bowing down and giving concessions for these actions. Yes, things should absolutely change in terms of police brutality, but when you have no one correcting the bad behaviors, they think you are cheering on the rioting and looting as well.

Perhaps that is why they feel like they are in the right to set fires and go absolutely insane. So many in these younger generations assume they are owed these things, because these radicals have been glorified instead of fucking shamed.

You want to stop a cycle? Let's start with the one where we enable poor behavior. There are no consequences anymore. There is no incentive to behave, yet there is a lot of incentive to go loot a Rolex store. Why the fuck are we tolerating this?

Why is it that anyone speaking out against this is barraged with "it was white people too" or "the police started it"? I dont fucking care what color these people are or what they did to supposedly deserve retaliation. They avoid the real issue that this shit is happening.

It is very, very simple: if you do not wish to be treated like animals, do not behave like animals.

The lack of actual prosecutions of those arrested is in itself a product of liberal governors and mayors of these large cities contributing to the "fuck Trump" effort. It is reckless and completely insane. They are enabling an uprising and they absolutely know it.

We have a fucking good thing here in this country. It is rich and powerful. Secure as hell. And for some fucking reason these people feel it is their God given right to destroy it for everyo else. What about the immigrants who came here for the stability? What about the fucking people who just want to live their goddamn lives.

You have to stop the bleeding, yet there are some people who just won't ever accept an extended olive branch. The issue I see is that no matter what anyone does, it will always be the wrong move in their eyes. Something will have to give.

First step is reopening. Get a chunk of them off the streets and back to working. Stop giving them a monthly handout that exceed their wages from working. Stop enabling them.

Then we should get to the arrests. Because by then you will be able to weed out those who are just there to make trouble, and not those who are bored after remaining in quarantine for so long.
 
Last edited:
They think suggesting we all come together as one is a sign that you're disrespecting how the individual groups are completely different. You can see this pretty often with the modern leftists. Supporting an idea like "All Lives Matter" would suggest looking past the precious identity politics to see how to fix issues with the police, which they think only exist for blacks in spite of white people being more likely to be shot by police than blacks.

View attachment 1343292

Inherently there's nothing wrong with "just accept we're all different and that's okay", but the division they're calling for here is not an acknowledgement of actual differences, it's so they can then rank who's "valid" and who's not... notice that it is, of course, a white male spouting the obviously incorrect take and receiving gazes of scorn and derision in this ugly #wokecomic. If you call for actual unity, you can't then angle to have your particular identity declared the top of the progressive stack, thus there can only ever be unity of cause, never unity of identity and humanity. Basically, as you said, it's valid to be angry when the cops kill black people, it's not worth noticing when the cops kill white people, and that's the difference they're okay with.

In other words it's just a rephrased and catchier version of "Some animals are more equal than others."
 
(archive)
(archive)
1591128391476.png
 
So many people are going to be unironic racists. Many are tired of the race baiting and of the riots every time a black criminal gets killed.
They are literally giving racists fuel. Giving them facts to back up their arguments. Yet then they bitch about being unfairly profiled.

If you dont want to be treated like an animal, dont act like one.

Want equality? Act like you're equal.

Due to personal property damage I've gone from a fence sitter to an unironically racist piece of shit in less than a week. I'm pissed that these faggots are so entitled to destroying shit that is not theirs.

This is how you breed extremists.

I apologize for the tone I am posting with today. I had a rough night keeping my house from being set on fire.
 
I really stress rereading "Screwtape Proposes a Toast" during this time.
But by the latter part of the century the situation was much simpler, and also much more ominous. In the English sector (where I saw most of my front-line service) a horrible thing had happened. The Enemy, with His usual sleight of hand, had largely appropriated this progressive or liberalizing movement and perverted it to His own ends. Very little of its old anti-Christianity remained. The dangerous phenomenon called Christian Socialism was rampant. Factory owners of the good old type who grew rich on sweated labor, instead of being assassinated by their workpeople — we could have used that — were being frowned upon by their own class. The rich were increasingly giving up their powers, not in the face of revolution and compulsion, but in obedience to their own consciences. As for the poor who benefited by this, they were behaving in a most disappointing fashion. Instead of using their new liberties — as we reasonably hoped and expected — for massacre, rape, and looting, or even for perpetual intoxication, they were perversely engaged in becoming cleaner, more orderly, more thrifty, better educated, and even more virtuous. Believe me, gentledevils, the threat of something like a really healthy state of society seemed then perfectly serious.
. . .
Democracy is the word with which you must lead them by the nose. The good work which our philological experts have already done in the corruption of human language makes it unnecessary to warn you that they should never be allowed to give this word a clear and definable meaning. They won't. It will never occur to them that democracy is properly the name of a political system, even a system of voting, and that this has only the most remote and tenuous connection with what you are trying to sell them. Nor of course must they ever be allowed to raise Aristotle's question: whether “democratic behaviour” means the behaviour that democracies like or the behaviour that will preserve a democracy. For if they did, it could hardly fail to occur to them that these need not be the same.

You are to use the word purely as an incantation; if you like, purely for its selling power. It is a name they venerate. And of course it is connected with the political ideal that men should be equally treated. You then make a stealthy transition in their minds from this political ideal to a factual belief that all men are equal. Especially the man you are working on. As a result you can use the word democracy to sanction in his thought the most degrading (and also the least enjoyable) of human feelings. You can get him to practise, not only without shame but with a positive glow of self-approval, conduct which, if undefended by the magic word, would be universally derided. The feeling I mean is of course that which prompts a man to say I'm as good as you.
. . .
Under the influence of this incantation those who are in any or every way inferior can labour more wholeheartedly and successfully than ever before to pull down everyone else to their own level. But that is not all. Under the same influence, those who come, or could come, nearer to a full humanity, actually draw back from fear of being undemocratic. I am credibly informed that young humans now sometimes suppress an incipient taste for classical music or good literature because it might prevent their Being Like Folks; that people who would really wish to be — and are offered the Grace which would enable them to be — honest, chaste, or temperate refuse it. To accept might make them Different, might offend against the Way of Life, take them out of Togetherness, impair their Integration with the Group. They might (horror of horrors!) become individuals.

All is summed up in the prayer which a young female human is said to have uttered recently: “O God, make me a normal twentieth century girl!” Thanks to our labours, this will mean increasingly: “Make me a minx, a moron, and a parasite.”

Meanwhile, as a delightful by-product, the few (fewer every day) who will not be made Normal or Regular and Like Folks and Integrated increasingly become in reality the prigs and cranks which the rabble would in any case have believed them to be. For suspicion often creates what it expects. (“Since, whatever I do, the neighbors are going to think me a witch, or a Communist agent, I might as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb, and become one in reality.”) As a result we now have an intelligentsia which, though very small, is very useful to the cause of Hell.
 
Last edited:
Because that sort of stuff is very simplistically "good guys vs. bad guys" and that's how the left sees the world.

Several posts late, but that's actually pretty funny because even though the PPG villains are still seen as villains, they're shown to be people (even though they're usually not humans), too, even Him has his own "I'm not going to do anything villainous today" routines. Hell, Fuzzy Lumpkins just wants to be left alone, he's only a villain because he goes on a hillbilly rampage when someone enters his property or touches his banjo. Yeah, he used to turn the citizens of Townsville into meat before the Girls came into the picture, but he decided to go live out in his neck of the woods after that and tries to stay out of conflict when he can.

I think maybe outside of Harry Potter, black-and-white morality in fiction (even for kids) is not as strictly black-and-white morality as one might think because real life is more complex than that, which allows creators to explore their characters and make them feel more real. That's the main reason the "villains out shopping" and "go-karting with Bowser" tropes exist because even villains have downtime and have other things to do in their personal lives. For fuck's sake, that beloved episode of Batman: The Animated Series had some of the villains just sitting around playing poker and drinking tea talking about the times they almost got the Batman, but only the Joker said he was scheming something, he was just taking a break.

I'm more than willing to bet that many of the leftists sceeching about this shit have a list of their all-time favorite villains, and some of those villains are most likely truly heinous but they're a lot of fun to watch and they might also be super sexy. But because Drumpf isn't a bishounen he's a bad orange man who they sometimes have dream sex with.
 
I really stress rereading "Screwtape Proposes a Toast" during this time.
But by the latter part of the century the situation was much simpler, and also much more ominous. In the English sector (where I saw most of my front-line service) a horrible thing had happened. The Enemy, with His usual sleight of hand, had largely appropriated this progressive or liberalizing movement and perverted it to His own ends. Very little of its old anti-Christianity remained. The dangerous phenomenon called Christian Socialism was rampant. Factory owners of the good old type who grew rich on sweated labor, instead of being assassinated by their workpeople — we could have used that — were being frowned upon by their own class. The rich were increasingly giving up their powers, not in the face of revolution and compulsion, but in obedience to their own consciences. As for the poor who benefited by this, they were behaving in a most disappointing fashion. Instead of using their new liberties — as we reasonably hoped and expected — for massacre, rape, and looting, or even for perpetual intoxication, they were perversely engaged in becoming cleaner, more orderly, more thrifty, better educated, and even more virtuous. Believe me, gentledevils, the threat of something like a really healthy state of society seemed then perfectly serious.
. . .
Democracy is the word with which you must lead them by the nose. The good work which our philological experts have already done in the corruption of human language makes it unnecessary to warn you that they should never be allowed to give this word a clear and definable meaning. They won't. It will never occur to them that democracy is properly the name of a political system, even a system of voting, and that this has only the most remote and tenuous connection with what you are trying to sell them. Nor of course must they ever be allowed to raise Aristotle's question: whether “democratic behaviour” means the behaviour that democracies like or the behaviour that will preserve a democracy. For if they did, it could hardly fail to occur to them that these need not be the same.

You are to use the word purely as an incantation; if you like, purely for its selling power. It is a name they venerate. And of course it is connected with the political ideal that men should be equally treated. You then make a stealthy transition in their minds from this political ideal to a factual belief that all men are equal. Especially the man you are working on. As a result you can use the word democracy to sanction in his thought the most degrading (and also the least enjoyable) of human feelings. You can get him to practise, not only without shame but with a positive glow of self-approval, conduct which, if undefended by the magic word, would be universally derided. The feeling I mean is of course that which prompts a man to say I'm as good as you.
. . .
Under the influence of this incantation those who are in any or every way inferior can labour more wholeheartedly and successfully than ever before to pull down everyone else to their own level. But that is not all. Under the same influence, those who come, or could come, nearer to a full humanity, actually draw back from fear of being undemocratic. I am credibly informed that young humans now sometimes suppress an incipient taste for classical music or good literature because it might prevent their Being Like Folks; that people who would really wish to be — and are offered the Grace which would enable them to be — honest, chaste, or temperate refuse it. To accept might make them Different, might offend against the Way of Life, take them out of Togetherness, impair their Integration with the Group. They might (horror of horrors!) become individuals.

All is summed up in the prayer which a young female human is said to have uttered recently: “O God, make me a normal twentieth century girl!” Thanks to our labours, this will mean increasingly: “Make me a minx, a moron, and a parasite.”

Meanwhile, as a delightful by-product, the few (fewer every day) who will not be made Normal or Regular and Like Folks and Integrated increasingly become in reality the prigs and cranks which the rabble would in any case have believed them to be. For suspicion often creates what it expects. (“Since, whatever I do, the neighbors are going to think me a witch, or a Communist agent, I might as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb, and become one in reality.”) As a result we now have an intelligentsia which, though very small, is very useful to the cause of Hell.
If you want to understand Leftism, the Screwtape Letters are an amazing deconstruction of it. I'm glad you linked that.
 
Watching them go after Trump's "record" on piety is fucking hilarious. Obama apparently ditched church entirely once he was in office and if anything was lauded for it, now they're combing through Trump's Sundays looking for evidence of his attendance record and how it affects his grades as a Proper Christian. They just cannot be consistent on anything, the sheer blatancy of the hypocrisy and bad faith arguments is astounding.
 
Watching them go after Trump's "record" on piety is fucking hilarious. Obama apparently ditched church entirely once he was in office and if anything was lauded for it, now they're combing through Trump's Sundays looking for evidence of his attendance record and how it affects his grades as a Proper Christian. They just cannot be consistent on anything, the sheer blatancy of the hypocrisy and bad faith arguments is astounding.

That condescending atheist meme trying to use Christian morals as a cudgel pic never, never gets old.
 
Back