Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[TheImportantFart]

white nationalism is the hottest movement and lots of people want to understand why America is collapsing and only we have the answers.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

Gotta admire this sperg's staying power, though, guys, c'mon... Maybe his Fillipino catamite must have died of exhaustion and that's why he has this much free time?
To be fair, we could continue this without him at this point; some sort of shitpost generator with random instances of one of his 5 or 6 stock arguments would fill the void and we might not notice for a few days.

 

[AnOminous]

not lose.
if you threaten me, i think that's rude and i'll punish you by not responding to you anymore.
clearly threatening people means the debate is over.

If you was alone I'd punch ya right in the nose!

 

[SIGSEGV]

Funny how this Pinoy sex pest has shut up VERY quickly when I suggested he go talk to null about taking over the website as he's the 'alpha' that will crush us all..

The only whiteness this freak desires is semen from virile Aryans. This whole sordid 'debate' is likely a masturbation tool for a whimpering writhing Pinoy pervert....

@BoxerShorts47 is a subhuman retard and I would NOT have sex with him.

How much adderall are you on?

He accidentally the entire bottle of adderall

 

[Drain Todger]

This is why you're a cuck.
You live in fear of the liberals.
They say diversity good and you say begrudgingly "okay."
If liberals want immigration than conservatives want EMIGRATION.
you are the very reason society keeps tilting leftward.
End result is a low trust brazil shithole.

Nobody even cares where immigrants come from. Ever notice that? Refugees are just called refugees, with no qualifier, no nation of origin, like they just materialized out of the ether. Not Syrian refugees, not Libyan refugees, not Yemeni refugees. Just "refugees".

If you don't want refugees, then don't bomb the Middle East and North Africa. Don't smuggle weapons there, either. Leave them the fuck alone. See how simple that was? The only way to cut off the flow of refugees is to stop these ridiculous and costly wars.

Can you explain why the Democrats and the Republicans have the same exact foreign policy? Can you explain why Liberals would be in favor of making brown people homeless in one context, but eager to give them new homes in another?

I spent years and years arguing this point with liberals. Years. Literally years. They could never grasp the cognitive dissonance, there. It was like I was arguing with two different people in one. In one breath, they said that the interventions in the Middle East were necessary, to stop "evil dictators". In the next, they opined that taking in refugees was our duty. They could never seem to make the connection in their head between war and homelessness, no matter how many times I brought it up. It went in one ear and out the other.

So, given that the public cannot even decide on a position with any semblance of internal moral or logical consistency, what makes you think you have the persuasive power to convince them of anything? How do you plan on getting unaccountable alphabet agencies and bureaucrats to stop making brown people homeless? Are you going to just waltz right on down to Langley, Virginia, walk into the CIA's headquarters, and deliver them a printed ultimatum?

If you do, livestream it. I'll bring the popcorn.

strawman arguments. you ignored everything i said.
i won.

No, actually, I raised a very important point.

What you're advancing is a program for people; White Nationalism. You think people are too distracted with idle pleasures (as you said, greed and apathy) to follow your program.

What you have not explained is how you plan on getting people to give up the ease and joy of consooming for the hardship of becoming a white nationalist and being ostracized by basically everyone they ever knew. What are you gonna do? Are you gonna feed them Kellogg's Corn Flakes so they stop masturbating to interracial porn? Are you gonna take the SIM cards out of their phones and smash them with a hammer and get them to join your tiki torch rally?

If you think people are too distracted to join your movement, then what do you plan on taking away from them so that they're no longer distracted, and do you think you have the persuasive power to get them to give it up willingly?

 

[Just A Butt]

@BoxerShorts47 is a subhuman retard and I would NOT have sex with him.

He accidentally the entire bottle of adderall

You know, when I go on a bender and eat, say 60mg or so in one sitting, I usually end up doing something productive. Like cleaning my room. Why haven’t you written that manifesto yet? Or you know. Cleaned your fucking room?

 

[Token Weeaboo]

not lose.
if you threaten me, i think that's rude and i'll punish you by not responding to you anymore.
clearly threatening people means the debate is over.

Debate? Where? I guess I missed it.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

You're making bad faith arguements.

Nobody even cares where immigrants come from. Ever notice that? Refugees are just called refugees, with no qualifier, no nation of origin, like they just materialized out of the ether. Not Syrian refugees, not Libyan refugees, not Yemeni refugees. Just "refugees".

white flight. even if people virtue signal diversity their actions show that they hate diversity.

If you don't want refugees, then don't bomb the Middle East and North Africa. Don't smuggle weapons there, either. Leave them the fuck alone. See how simple that was? The only way to cut off the flow of refugees is to stop these ridiculous and costly wars.

I'm not bombing any nation.
I'm a pleb and we don't have any power.
This is a total straw-man because illegals and legal immigration have existed before the 2010s.
anti racism = open borders and capitalism wants more bodies to increase GDP and lower wages.
Liberalism + Capitalism make you a minority in your own nation.
They destroy your people.
100% unsustainable.

Can you explain why the Democrats and the Republicans have the same exact foreign policy? Can you explain why Liberals would be in favor of making brown people homeless in one context, but eager to give them new homes in another?

These are straw-man arguments.
issue here is white genocide.
1. Whites have never voted to make themselves a minority in their own nation.
2. People votes against making CA an illegal magnet prop 187 https://youtu.be/MREnHjatoMQ
3. Europe and all the other Western White nations have this same issue.
We got a crisis here.

I spent years and years arguing this point with liberals. Years. Literally years. They could never grasp the cognitive dissonance, there. It was like I was arguing with two different people in one. In one breath, they said that the interventions in the Middle East were necessary, to stop "evil dictators". In the next, they opined that taking in refugees was our duty. They could never seem to make the connection in their head between war and homelessness, no matter how many times I brought it up. It went in one ear and out the other.

So, given that the public cannot even decide on a position with any semblance of internal moral or logical consistency, what makes you think you have the persuasive power to convince them of anything? How do you plan on getting unaccountable alphabet agencies and bureaucrats to stop making brown people homeless? Are you going to just waltz right on down to Langley, Virginia, walk into the CIA's headquarters, and deliver them a printed ultimatum?

1. You're a liberal?
2. IMC won't matter once USA collapses from internal destabilization. Moot argument.

What you're advancing is a program for people; White Nationalism. You think people are too distracted with idle pleasures (as you said, greed and apathy) to follow your program.

Correct.

What you have not explained is how you plan on getting people to give up the ease and joy of consooming for the hardship of becoming a white nationalist and being ostracized by basically everyone they ever knew. What are you gonna do? Are you gonna feed them Kellogg's Corn Flakes so they stop masturbating to interracial porn? Are you gonna take the SIM cards out of their phones and smash them with a hammer and get them to join your tiki torch rally?

If you think people are too distracted to join your movement, then what do you plan on taking away from them so that they're no longer distracted, and do you think you have the persuasive power to get them to give it up willingly?

1. You gotta frame yourself as moral. then people are willing to join the cause, to endure hardship.
2. Gotta be able to protect people. One of the big issues with the alt-right was they still got clucked by terms like nazi and white supremacist and racist. they were too fragile.
3. Alt-right wasn't able to clearly articulate why we need white nationalism. The 5 points I wrote above make a much better case than anything Richard Spencer said.

 

[SIGSEGV]

You gotta frame yourself as moral

Racism is immoral.

 

[GethN7]

Holy shit, I'm actually watching @Drain Todger school this utter smoothbrain.

Now that is some top tier levity from all the recent doom and gloom.

 

[JamusActimus]

Too much autism it's intimidating, how can I jump on board of the retarded debate train with the great boxershorts47?

 

[SIGSEGV]

Too much autism it's intimidating, how can I jump on board of the retarded debate train with the great boxershorts47?

The secret is not to debate him, just call him a retard and make fun of him. Don't engage him on an intellectual level, because he's consistently demonstrated that he's not capable of having an intellectual discussion.

 

[Draza]

You're making bad faith arguements.


white flight. even if people virtue signal diversity their actions show that they hate diversity.


I'm not bombing any nation.
I'm a pleb and we don't have any power.
This is a total straw-man because illegals and legal immigration have existed before the 2010s.
anti racism = open borders and capitalism wants more bodies to increase GDP and lower wages.
Liberalism + Capitalism make you a minority in your own nation.
They destroy your people.
100% unsustainable.


These are straw-man arguments.
issue here is white genocide.
1. Whites have never voted to make themselves a minority in their own nation.
2. People votes against making CA an illegal magnet prop 187 https://youtu.be/MREnHjatoMQ
3. Europe and all the other Western White nations have this same issue.
We got a crisis here.



1. You're a liberal?
2. IMC won't matter once USA collapses from internal destabilization. Moot argument.



Correct.



1. You gotta frame yourself as moral. then people are willing to join the cause, to endure hardship.
2. Gotta be able to protect people. One of the big issues with the alt-right was they still got clucked by terms like nazi and white supremacist and racist. they were too fragile.
3. Alt-right wasn't able to clearly articulate why we need white nationalism. The 5 points I wrote above make a much better case than anything Richard Spencer said.

"Whites have never voted to make themselves a minority in their own nation."

Citation needed.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

"Whites have never voted to make themselves a minority in their own nation."

Citation needed.

elites forced population replacement on their nations.
they never asked people if they wanted to become a minority
UN is even open about population replacement.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/replacement-cover.pdf

 

[No Exit]

elites forced population replacement on their nations.
they never asked people if they wanted to become a minority
UN is even open about population replacement.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/replacement-cover.pdf

If people didn't want the elites doing that they'd break out the guillotines like any other time in history.

 

[Draza]

elites forced population replacement on their nations.
they never asked people if they wanted to become a minority
UN is even open about population replacement.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/replacement-cover.pdf

"elites forced population replacement on their nations"

Okay how did these "elites" forced it down our throats?

 

[SIGSEGV]

elites forced population replacement on their nations.
they never asked people if they wanted to become a minority
UN is even open about population replacement.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/replacement-cover.pdf

I love it when you avoid responding to questions that you're too retarded to answer. Which, as it turns out, means you don't respond to most of the questions asked of you.

 

[drain]

i'll punish you by not responding to you anymore.

thats actually good tbh

 

[JamusActimus]

"elites forced population replacement on their nations"

Okay how did these "elites" forced it down our throats?

With Blacked .com

 

[Just A Butt]

elites forced population replacement on their nations.
they never asked people if they wanted to become a minority
UN is even open about population replacement.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/replacement-cover.pdf

I feel like a real UN article would have spelled aging correctly.

Edit: holy fuck that’s the real site. I’m a little worried that retardation is the real enemy here.