Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[MarineTrainedTard]

I mean with his last name he's either a Flip or a Spic so either way he should know his place.

 

[Token Weeaboo]

 

[SIGSEGV]

View attachment 1349282

Someone tell him to lol calm down.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

oh it is.
you're here because you want to speak with you
you're spending your life, your most valuable asset, to speak with me
if i block you, then you can no longer invest your life into me.
simple logic.

When your dox are dropped, I'm going to find your mom, and tell her how sorry I am that you're her son - a pathetic, cock-lusting Pinoy bottom that has dreams of finding a strong white daddy. Also, I'll report you to the Filipino gov't as a drug dealer, so Duterte will find you and shoot you.

 

[WeeGee]

View attachment 1349282

He must be... Pinoyed at us.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

View attachment 1349282

like antifa or sjws or illegals. if you don't have laws that put the bad apples in their place, they ruin society for everyone else.
profile is like a microcosm of the world at large.
As i said, these trolls are the internet version of ANTIFA.

@BoxerShorts47 remember when you said;

(man those first three pages are like real life forshadowing)

I'm unsure you were trained and prepared to face a literal conglomerate- a hive mind- of concentrated autism and shit posting.

Round two when?

Wasn't foreshadowing, I analyzed how the civil rights activists and social justice warriors won.
They won through attrition as the republican party slowly gives in and the base gets blackpilled.

I'll debate anyone but these people don't want to debate, they either want to spam (which I'll ignore and give a dumb remark) or strawman.
that's how i know i am winning.
in bad faith debates, the other side won't admit they are wrong.
but normal people can see the bad faith, they can see the evasion, so this tactic doesn't work IRL.
this is why the religious right lost.

i have 100s of hours debating people on the internet during the fanboy wars: xbox 360 vs ps3 or android vs iphone during the 2000s.
i got exp.
i can tell who is debating in good faith and bad faith
when to bait and when to ignore.
But I didn't realize that I'm more hardcore than most people.

 

[Pissmaster]

ah yes the famous "what is white?"
what is black?
what is brown?
what is red?
what is yellow?
what does van jones mean when he says all white people have a virus in their brain?
if we're all 1 race the human race does that means racism doesn't exist?
clearly a bad faith argument, you know what whites means and you're only saying this to delegitimize white people. to marginalize us.
yes we can get into a debate regarding edge cases, "are Armenians white? is Kim white?" that's an interesting question but her mixed race kids with Kenya are definitely not white.



1. Mexico has been shitty far before the Cartels. Even in the late 1800s, early 1900s. whites could tell that Mexico was under-preforming American and Canada.
2. These are all strawman arguments. I'm not talking about coyotes or drug cartels, I'm talking about immigration, both legal and ILLEGAL. Yes you are mischaracterizing my arguments. The fact that people actually think you're good at debating is Dunning–Kruger.
3. Like I said, do you want white people to become a minority ruled by hispanics and race mix away. Yes or no? This is the topic. We're talking about the negative effects of diversity and the long-term vision for American.


failed leader
alt-right pundit.
Nick had the opportunity to go mainstream in 2019 and he failed.
also manlet

Ooh, 10:24pm to 7:36am! That's 9 hours, 12 minutes! I'm glad you finally got some good rest.

Well, enjoy yet another day of frustratedly screaming at Kiwi Farms, I guess.

 

[WeeGee]

i have 100s of hours debating people on the internet during the fanboy wars: xbox 360 vs ps3 or android vs iphone during the 2000s.
i got exp.
i can tell who is debating in good faith and bad faith
when to bait and when to ignore.
But I didn't realize that I'm more hardcore than most people.

That sounds like nothing but autism, people that ironically argue over consoles or any electronics are just autistic as hell.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

"While you were training for war and politics, I was arguing about the best vidya gaem console or bleep-bloop cell phone. Thus I am the mostest hardcore and definitely leadership material"

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Ooh, 10:24pm to 7:36am! That's 9 hours, 12 minutes! I'm glad you finally got some good rest.

Well, enjoy yet another day of frustratedly screaming at Kiwi Farms, I guess.

thanks man.
I think I was really upset over the BLM narrative.
Once I found the truth that he died of a heart attack caused by drugs, I felt a lot better.
The shitlibs really overextended themselves and we can use the truth to start attacking their anti racism bullshit.
They've proven that they have an anti white bias and have caused the deaths of innocent people.
GG civil rights & social justice.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Listen here, GARCIA, you're either a wetback or a Flip. Your stance on White nationalism is not worth considering, shitskin

 

[SIGSEGV]

but normal people can see the bad faith, they can see the evasion

And that's exactly why retards like yourself aren't worth debating. You're not worth taking seriously in any capacity, and any argument that you present should be dismissed as the babbling of a retard with an IQ close to the freezing temperature of water. Each and every sentence that you utter is unworthy of being given serious thought, and you should consider yourself fortunate that the Kiwis in this thread are kind enough to give you any attention at all. Get down on your fucking knees and kiss my shoes whenever I take time out of my day to shitpost in your thread.

i have 100s of hours debating people on the internet during the fanboy wars: xbox 360 vs ps3 or android vs iphone during the 2000s.

Oh yeah? Well I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills.

 

[Buxinator]

From my exp. avg IQ 85-115 general know they aren't the smartest and listen to others but 115-130 ( top 30 national college educated class) suffer from Dunning-Kruger effect. They can tell they are smarter tan the avg person but they're too stupid to appreciate real genius so they're very arrogant. They cannot tell the difference between IQ 145 vs IQ 55. Genius looks the same as insanity to them.

Correct me if I'm wrong, according to your thesis, quoted above, there are either morons or arrogant assholes. The only smart and not arrogant assholes are rare humans which are shattered across the world. I have to mention, that I'm from Europe, so I now nothing about the system in the US but here not everybodys IQ is tested; in the US it is maybe different, but was your IQ tested? If yes, what was the result and can you prove it?

 

[Pissmaster]

i have 100s of hours debating people on the internet during the fanboy wars: xbox 360 vs ps3 or android vs iphone during the 2000s.
i got exp.
i can tell who is debating in good faith and bad faith
when to bait and when to ignore.
But I didn't realize that I'm more hardcore than most people.

Your "fanboy wars" was 360 vs PS3? Lmao you really are young.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

i have 100s of hours debating people on the internet during the fanboy wars: xbox 360 vs ps3 or android vs iphone during the 2000s.

Holy fucking shit, my sides

You're fucking autistic

 

[GethN7]

thanks man.
I think I was really upset over the BLM narrative.
Once I found the truth that he died of a heart attack caused by drugs, I felt a lot better.
The shitlibs really overextended themselves and we can use the truth to start attacking their anti racism bullshit.
They've proven that they have an anti white bias and have caused the deaths of innocent people.
GG civil rights & social justice.

That's a matter to be decisively proven in a court of law. We have the autopsy report, but no layman can alone call that conclusive as to anyone's guilt or innocence. To presume otherwise is foolish, a jury of one's peers before a court of law to settle these questions is the only true way to get this settled. The smug and arrant belief you know better is no substitute for that.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

He rated my post agree


He's actually autistic

lmao

 

[SIGSEGV]

He rated my post agree


He's actually autistic

lmao

"muh weaponized autism"
That's going to be his next post, just watch.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

An autistic beaner/flip is arguing in favor of white nationalism

2020, what a year

How hard do you think this retard is stimming while he reads this thread

 

[BoxerShorts47]

That sounds like nothing but autism, people that ironically argue over consoles or any electronics are just autistic as hell.

sorta..
I wouldn't say autistic, I would say passionate
that passion can be channeled into unproductive outlets (like trolling and fanboy wars) or productive (like politics)
similar to video game addiction.

Correct me if I'm wrong, according to your thesis, quoted above, there are either morons or arrogant assholes. The only smart and not arrogant assholes are rare humans which are shattered across the world. I have to mention, that I'm from Europe, so I now nothing about the system in the US but here not everybodys IQ is tested; in the US it is maybe different, but was your IQ tested? If yes, what was the result and can you prove it?

IQ isn't tested but I have enough exp to sense it.

Only the high IQ 145+ people change the world by creating new ideas.
Einstein
Newton
Gauss

IQ 130-145 is upper management.
reflects the IQ of most Nazis.

http://miyaguchi.4sigma.org/gradytowers/nazi.html

IQ 115-130 is middle management
etc.

Your "fanboy wars" was 360 vs PS3? Lmao you really are young.

There wasn't social media before ~2004.
I hear super sperg gen x fags used to troll on BBS and newsgroups but I wasn't on the internet back then.

That's a matter to be decisively proven in a court of law. We have the autopsy report, but no layman can alone call that conclusive as to anyone's guilt or innocence. To presume otherwise is foolish, a jury of one's peers before a court of law to settle these questions i the only true way to get this settled. The smug and arrant belief you know better is no substitute for that.

doesn't matter
both sides will spin the story to their narrative
if he walks than biased jury or some other systemic problem
if he gets convicted than biased jury or judge tainted by the riots.
Jury sentence only works when it's view as legitimate by the public and we don't have that type of society anymore.