Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Friend Chicken is almost the best concept to come out of his mouth. And it was super early on in the thread.

Who wouldn’t want a chicken for a friend? Sounds like a marvelous adventure waiting to happen.
Chickens actually have a surprisingly high intelligence, and can be recognize people/ remember people who are nice to them. They also use different vocalizations around people than other chickens, basically making them better at socializing than OP.
 
Perhaps the funniest part of this thread is how it managed to bring out all the other autistic users. Trying to give legitimate criticism to a retard is pointless, obviously, but shouldn't everyone here know this? Regardless, the spergs came out in force with their master's thesis on how wrong he is, why ideology is dangerous, and how it's stupid to share your political opinions online. Then they proceeded to tell everyone about all their own political opinion bullet points; completely oblivious to the irony of the situation. This created an autistic warzone of petty bickering about all their shitty political opinions. Inevitably devolving into a dick measuring contest where, under the guise of insulting @BoxerShorts47, everyone started showing off their fucking IQ scores they got from some sketchy online site. And in the end @AnOminous and @SIGSEGV were the only ones smart enough to make fun of them for it.

Edit: Wasn't trying to say everyone who was critiquing or sharing their IQ is autistic, I was specifically making fun of the couple of guys who are taking themselves way too seriously.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps the funniest part of this thread is how it managed to bring out all the other autistic users. Trying to give legitimate criticism to a retard is pointless, obviously, but shouldn't everyone here know this? Regardless, the spergs came out in force with their master's thesis on how wrong he is, why ideology is dangerous, and how it's stupid to share your political opinions online. Then they proceeded to tell everyone about all their own political opinion bullet points; completely oblivious to the irony of the situation. This created an autistic warzone of petty bickering about all their shitty political opinions. Inevitably devolving into a dick measuring contest where, under the guise of insulting @BoxerShorts47, everyone started showing off their fucking IQ scores they got from some sketchy online site. And in the end @AnOminous and @SIGSEGV were the only ones smart enough to make fun of them for it.
I don't think anyone genuinely took those test results remotely seriously, to be fair. Baiting the shit out of the Flipfag was the only goal for most. He's the only one who seems to actually care about IQ scores. But then, he's a fucking retard.
 
Inevitably devolving into a dick measuring contest where, under the guise of insulting @BoxerShorts47, everyone started showing off their fucking IQ scores they got from some sketchy online site. And in the end @AnOminous and @SIGSEGV were the only ones smart enough to make fun of them for it.
actually I was subtly making fun of everyone talking about their IQ including myself at the same time as I was posting my own IQ. the extreme subtlety and intricacy of my satirical humor just went over your head because your IQ isn't nearly as high as mine. this once again proves that I am the most intelligent person in this thread.
 
IQ numbers are still pretty fucking meaningless in the grand scheme of things tbqh since it loops back to the point that people who actually give a fuck about them are almost invariably socially-inept NEETs

Chickens actually have a surprisingly high intelligence, and can be recognize people/ remember people who are nice to them. They also use different vocalizations around people than other chickens, basically making them better at socializing than OP.

But does a chicken have a 145+ IQ? Checkmate, libtard!
 
You actually have the hots for Hillary. As if you couldn't have been more of an absolute garbage person.

Seriously quit claiming you're white. I've had it with you mutts.
@BoxerShorts47 is the only person I have ever heard of that has ever said he found Hillary Clinton attractive

You'd think you'd hear that more in clown world but he's seriously the one and only person I've ever seen say that
 
You do know that both those countries have the largest economies in the world and are almost considered as global superpowers, right?
so much cope and falsehoods
1. both of these nations are worse than USA and America is becoming more like Brazil the more Hispanic we get.
2. those nations will NEVER be superpowers because they don't have the military might and they won't.
3. End result is USA is still white genocide and you're trying to avoid this issue. denial.

He's not COMPLETELY wrong. I am a "classical liberal", meaning I don't care what you do so long as it's not screwing anyone else over. Live and let live is my political stance on anyone who leaves me be.

OP, however, seems to be the retarded "classical republican", believing all members of a society have a civic duty to each other. Not a bad idea, admirable insofar as it respects the beliefs of others, but OP apparently feels his interpretation of one's civic duty is what he and he only believes is right, and he can take that opinion and shove it.

By classical liberal I assume you mean 1960s far-left or 1990s center-left. civil rights good, discrimination bad, racism bad, sexism bad, great society (welfare) good?
Problem is this already infringes on the right of white people to have white neighborhoods or cisgendered people to live with cisgendered norms.
Civil rights are the foundation of social justice.

ALL ACTIONS have a consequence, even your own suicide would hurt your friends and family.
If the majority of society doesn't get married or have kids, that'll create an economic effect and cultural effect, be shown in the movies or tv shows.
if everyone else is doing drugs and casual sex then they'll peer pressure you and you'll feel inferior if you don't do those actions; mental hurt.
the higher a women's body count, the less likely she'll become a good wife which makes it harder for you to find a wife.
"Not judging" translates to not giving people advice or guidance.
You're ignoring the real world consequence of this mentality.
End result is everyone is atomized, an individual and people feel no sense of community ,belonging, loneliness increases,. nihilism increases.
You don't live as an individual, you like as a part of a group and even learning language is communal.
Again, you're repeating 1990s or 2000s liberal talking points without thinking about the consequences.

No you fucking can't you mongoloid. You can't deport a toddler's parents and then figure out what to do with the toddler later. That's the reason we have the current detainment centers for illegals' children the left is having such conniptions over (even though they ignored them under Democrat presidents). It's something that has to be addressed at the same time is everything else.

If both parents are still together, they're not going to want to be separated. If the child is being cared for by a non-white parent, you can't leave them alone without parents. If they're being cared for by a white parent, that white parent is not going to want their kid deported. Ditto if the child is in the care of grandparents. Regardless of what you do, you're going to make mortal enemies out of all these people and their extended family and friend circles.

And no, you can't use "the same programs as the ones that brought them here, but in reverse" for legal citizens who were born here. I already said when we had this conversation in the Fuentes thread that other countries aren't going to accept people who have never lived there as citizens, and you're reply was to just threaten every nonwhite country into taking people in, which would turn virtually every country in the world against the US.

You say that Hitler was a failure because he went to war and got his ass kicked, but your own agenda would lead to the same thing. Both civil war and international invasion, united in an alliance of not putting up with your shit.
again appeal to consequence fallacy? yes or no. do you believe that diversity will turn USA into a weaker nation or stronger nation? You have to answer this question before we proceed.
 
By classical liberal I assume you mean 1960s far-left or 1990s center-left. civil rights good, discrimination bad, racism bad, sexism bad, great society (welfare) good?
That isn't what classical liberalism means, therefore this is a strawman:
Problem is this already infringes on the right of white people to have white neighborhoods or cisgendered people to live with cisgendered norms.
Maybe he should look things up instead of pulling definitions out of his gaping, cum and blood dripping asshole.
 
so much cope and falsehoods
1. both of these nations are worse than USA and America is becoming more like Brazil the more Hispanic we get.
2. those nations will NEVER be superpowers because they don't have the military might and they won't.
3. End result is USA is still white genocide and you're trying to avoid this issue. denial.



By classical liberal I assume you mean 1960s far-left or 1990s center-left. civil rights good, discrimination bad, racism bad, sexism bad, great society (welfare) good?
Problem is this already infringes on the right of white people to have white neighborhoods or cisgendered people to live with cisgendered norms.
Civil rights are the foundation of social justice.

ALL ACTIONS have a consequence, even your own suicide would hurt your friends and family.
If the majority of society doesn't get married or have kids, that'll create an economic effect and cultural effect, be shown in the movies or tv shows.
if everyone else is doing drugs and casual sex then they'll peer pressure you and you'll feel inferior if you don't do those actions; mental hurt.
the higher a women's body count, the less likely she'll become a good wife which makes it harder for you to find a wife.
"Not judging" translates to not giving people advice or guidance.
You're ignoring the real world consequence of this mentality.
End result is everyone is atomized, an individual and people feel no sense of community ,belonging, loneliness increases,. nihilism increases.
You don't live as an individual, you like as a part of a group and even learning language is communal.
Again, you're repeating 1990s or 2000s liberal talking points without thinking about the consequences.


again appeal to consequence fallacy? yes or no. do you believe that diversity will turn USA into a weaker nation or stronger nation? You have to answer this question before we proceed.
1. Brazil is not a Hispanic country since the majority of Brazilians speak Portuguese, not Spanish.

2. Being a superpower does not always equal to military might. There is also economic and political might which makes Western countries like the U.S a superpower. If you were to base it on military might, then all the conflicts the U.S has not won and still engaged in won't make it a superpower.

3. What are you doing to stop this "white genocide"? Also tell us what it is.
 
so much cope and falsehoods
1. both of these nations are worse than USA and America is becoming more like Brazil the more Hispanic we get.
2. those nations will NEVER be superpowers because they don't have the military might and they won't.
3. End result is USA is still white genocide and you're trying to avoid this issue. denial.



By classical liberal I assume you mean 1960s far-left or 1990s center-left. civil rights good, discrimination bad, racism bad, sexism bad, great society (welfare) good?
Problem is this already infringes on the right of white people to have white neighborhoods or cisgendered people to live with cisgendered norms.
Civil rights are the foundation of social justice.

ALL ACTIONS have a consequence, even your own suicide would hurt your friends and family.
If the majority of society doesn't get married or have kids, that'll create an economic effect and cultural effect, be shown in the movies or tv shows.
if everyone else is doing drugs and casual sex then they'll peer pressure you and you'll feel inferior if you don't do those actions; mental hurt.
the higher a women's body count, the less likely she'll become a good wife which makes it harder for you to find a wife.
"Not judging" translates to not giving people advice or guidance.
You're ignoring the real world consequence of this mentality.
End result is everyone is atomized, an individual and people feel no sense of community ,belonging, loneliness increases,. nihilism increases.
You don't live as an individual, you like as a part of a group and even learning language is communal.
Again, you're repeating 1990s or 2000s liberal talking points without thinking about the consequences.


again appeal to consequence fallacy? yes or no. do you believe that diversity will turn USA into a weaker nation or stronger nation? You have to answer this question before we proceed.

Missed by a long shot.

Classical liberalism goes back MUCH farther than that era. I recommend reading up on the Founding Fathers, Gouverneur Morris in particular. He advocated absolute liberty for all free men to live their lives as they pleased, do with their property as they pleased, and pursue whatever vocation they pleased, so long as they did not trammel on the rights and privileges of anyone else in the process.

Thomas Jefferson was an early proponent of the concept in the American political context, as seen in the phrase "Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness", with pursuit meaning the vocation of or practice of finding.
 
so much cope and falsehoods
1. both of these nations are worse than USA and America is becoming more like Brazil the more Hispanic we get.
2. those nations will NEVER be superpowers because they don't have the military might and they won't.
3. End result is USA is still white genocide and you're trying to avoid this issue. denial.



By classical liberal I assume you mean 1960s far-left or 1990s center-left. civil rights good, discrimination bad, racism bad, sexism bad, great society (welfare) good?
Problem is this already infringes on the right of white people to have white neighborhoods or cisgendered people to live with cisgendered norms.
Civil rights are the foundation of social justice.

ALL ACTIONS have a consequence, even your own suicide would hurt your friends and family.
If the majority of society doesn't get married or have kids, that'll create an economic effect and cultural effect, be shown in the movies or tv shows.
if everyone else is doing drugs and casual sex then they'll peer pressure you and you'll feel inferior if you don't do those actions; mental hurt.
the higher a women's body count, the less likely she'll become a good wife which makes it harder for you to find a wife.
"Not judging" translates to not giving people advice or guidance.
You're ignoring the real world consequence of this mentality.
End result is everyone is atomized, an individual and people feel no sense of community ,belonging, loneliness increases,. nihilism increases.
You don't live as an individual, you like as a part of a group and even learning language is communal.
Again, you're repeating 1990s or 2000s liberal talking points without thinking about the consequences.


again appeal to consequence fallacy? yes or no. do you believe that diversity will turn USA into a weaker nation or stronger nation? You have to answer this question before we proceed.
The more he types the less he actually says. It’s truly remarkable.
 
Back