Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Spamy the Bot]

@BoxerShorts47 Nice 133 page thread.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I'd rather be judged by my character, not my skin color.

1. This is a straw-man argument. CRAs forced diversity and told us what we could and couldn't do, who we must love and hate just like the SJWs.
2. CRAs will never let us judge blacks by the content of their character just like SJWs will never let us judge muzzies by their character; that's racism and islamophobiaia.
3. End result is still white people becoming a minority and race mixing away. You are still promoting white genocide and you want to ignore the consequence of not caring about race.

Serious question, do you have any other debate topics? a plan B? because reee'ing at SJWs was overdone years ago

No, you argued in bad faith against the SJWs. Tried to mock them away. "haha SJW so crazy." You lost.

I just find it hilarious he cringes away from black people muslim people, no matter who they are, like he's gonna get cooties.

look i just upgraded your software from civil rights activist to social justice warrior.

As a classical liberal, I concur, if you own property, you may sell to whom you wish, and you may choose to work wherever you can find gainful employment.

Okay so you support discrimination? You support racism? You support sexism? You support islamophobia? You believe in removing Civil Rights because it infringes upon the right of people to do as they wish?

Thing is, like them or not, black people are here to stay. The lawless scumbags (let's call them the "niggers") and the law abiding black people who simply want to enjoy the same rights as others without demanding special treatment beyond what is enshrined in the Constitution are two different things. Just because you are averse to all black people does mean those who wish you no harm should be lumped in with the rest.

If you feel otherwise, I'm sorry you reduce everyone to the color of their skin as opposed to their personal integrity.

WRONG. They are here because you liberals want them to stay. They live in isolated ghettos in the inner cities and ruin every single major city. You cannot build a high trust, safe, 21st century nation with blacks destroying your inner cities and forcing you to flight to the suburbs. This nation, America. is OVER. It's a failed 1960s great society experience and every year America gets closer and closer to collapsing. USA as you know it will NOT last till the end of the century. There is no moving forward until we deal with the downsides of diversity. As for muh consutition, no one cares anymore.

Alright, let me explain the appeal to consequences fallacy using an example. I know this is probably beyond you but it may be helpful to others reading the thread:

I can say that achieving immortality by drinking rat poison is "necessary" because we're all going to die one day. I may be right that we're all going to die one day, but that doesn't make my solution any less wrong.

People who say drinking rat poison is a bad idea because it will kill you aren't using an appeal to consequences fallacy. That would only apply if they said that actually people aren't going to die one day because they don't like my solution of drinking rat poison.

In short, I'm not talking about the consequences of you "being right" dumbass. I'm talking about your retarded plan to handle deportations, IE- forcing countries across the world to take in millions of US citizens by threatening them, along with this half-assed "we'll worry about that later" for every difficult question you're too much of a lazy fuck to try and answer. Whether you're right or wrong is completely irrelevant to how countries across the world and people in the US are going to react to that. They'll react the same way whether you're right or wrong: with extreme hostility. Even if you've correctly identified the problem it doesn't matter because your solution is fucking retarded and would cause things to deteriorate faster than doing nothing would.

But you haven't correctly identified the problem anyway, since the Hispanic population of the US is correlated more closely to whites than blacks when it comes to violent crime, with differences accounted for by differences in the poverty level, and Nigerian immigrants similarly have much more positive statistics than the majority of black Americans, as has been discussed in the "Things that go against the BLM narrative" thread. And then of course there are the examples of Asians and Jews that other people have already brought up, who have higher economic success and lower rates of criminality than whites. So you're presenting a false dichotomy on the impact of non-whites on American society and what options are available to do something about it.

There's another fallacy argument for you to look up the definition of, since you like to use it all the fucking time. Then you can accuse other people of doing it when you're too dumb or lazy to answer a question or criticism.

We aren't talking about rat poison. This is a strawman arguement. We aren't talking about only Hispanic crime. Another strawman. Likewise Nigerians vs Africian-Americans is another strawman. The question is, is white people becoming a minority and race mixing away a good or bad future? This is the question you want to avoid. So you're finding every single strawman you can to avoid this subject because you know you will lose. You know you're on the wrong side of history.

@BoxerShorts47 Nice 133 page thread.

see how these trolls are finally debating. For all their bs about "not caring or "lulz" the truth is they do care and they cannot justify white genocide which is why they pull out every bad faith argument to avoid this topic. I knew this going into this thread from my exp. arguing on gab and twitter. Centert-Right Libretarians, Center-Left Liberals, and SJWs, none of these groups can justify white genocide. Once you force them to justify white genocide, they lose. Instead of admitting I am right, these "trolls" have to drag out this debate to over 130 pages in a desperate attempt to strawman men. Pathetic. They should just admit that they are wrong and leave.

 

[Begemot]

1. This is a straw-man argument. CRAs forced diversity and told us what we could and couldn't do, who we must love and hate just like the SJWs.
2. CRAs will never let us judge blacks by the content of their character just like SJWs will never let us judge muzzies by their character; that's racism and islamophobiaia.
3. End result is still white people becoming a minority and race mixing away. You are still promoting white genocide and you want to ignore the consequence of not caring about race.


No, you argued in bad faith against the SJWs. Tried to mock them away. "haha SJW so crazy." You lost.


look i just upgraded your software from civil rights activist to social justice warrior.


Okay so you support discrimination? You support racism? You support sexism? You support islamophobia? You believe in removing Civil Rights because it infringes upon the right of people to do as they wish?


WRONG. They are here because you liberals want them to stay. They live in isolated ghettos in the inner cities and ruin every single major city. You cannot build a high trust, safe, 21st century nation with blacks destroying your inner cities and forcing you to flight to the suburbs. This nation, America. is OVER. It's a failed 1960s great society experience and every year America gets closer and closer to collapsing. USA as you know it will NOT last till the end of the century. There is no moving forward until we deal with the downsides of diversity. As for muh consutition, no one cares anymore.



We aren't talking about rat poison. This is a strawman arguement. We aren't talking about only Hispanic crime. Another strawman. Likewise Nigerians vs Africian-Americans is another strawman. The question is, is white people becoming a minority and race mixing away a good or bad future? This is the question you want to avoid. So you're finding every single strawman you can to avoid this subject because you know you will lose. You know you're on the wrong side of history.


see how these trolls are finally debating. For all their bs about "not caring or "lulz" the truth is they do care and they cannot justify white genocide which is why they pull out every bad faith argument to avoid this topic. I knew this going into this thread from my exp. arguing on gab and twitter. Centert-Right Libretarians, Center-Left Liberals, and SJWs, none of these groups can justify white genocide. Once you force them to justify white genocide, they lose. Instead of admitting I am right, these "trolls" have to drag out this debate to over 130 pages in a desperate attempt to strawman men. Pathetic. They should just admit that they are wrong and leave.

There is no debate. You're just our gibbering cumdumpster.

 

[Buster O'Keefe]

1. This is a straw-man argument. CRAs forced diversity and told us what we could and couldn't do, who we must love and hate just like the SJWs.
2. CRAs will never let us judge blacks by the content of their character just like SJWs will never let us judge muzzies by their character; that's racism and islamophobiaia.
3. End result is still white people becoming a minority and race mixing away. You are still promoting white genocide and you want to ignore the consequence of not caring about race.


No, you argued in bad faith against the SJWs. Tried to mock them away. "haha SJW so crazy." You lost.


look i just upgraded your software from civil rights activist to social justice warrior.


Okay so you support discrimination? You support racism? You support sexism? You support islamophobia? You believe in removing Civil Rights because it infringes upon the right of people to do as they wish?


WRONG. They are here because you liberals want them to stay. They live in isolated ghettos in the inner cities and ruin every single major city. You cannot build a high trust, safe, 21st century nation with blacks destroying your inner cities and forcing you to flight to the suburbs. This nation, America. is OVER. It's a failed 1960s great society experience and every year America gets closer and closer to collapsing. USA as you know it will NOT last till the end of the century. There is no moving forward until we deal with the downsides of diversity. As for muh consutition, no one cares anymore.



We aren't talking about rat poison. This is a strawman arguement. We aren't talking about only Hispanic crime. Another strawman. Likewise Nigerians vs Africian-Americans is another strawman. The question is, is white people becoming a minority and race mixing away a good or bad future? This is the question you want to avoid. So you're finding every single strawman you can to avoid this subject because you know you will lose. You know you're on the wrong side of history.


see how these trolls are finally debating. For all their bs about "not caring or "lulz" the truth is they do care and they cannot justify white genocide which is why they pull out every bad faith argument to avoid this topic. I knew this going into this thread from my exp. arguing on gab and twitter. Centert-Right Libretarians, Center-Left Liberals, and SJWs, none of these groups can justify white genocide. Once you force them to justify white genocide, they lose. Instead of admitting I am right, these "trolls" have to drag out this debate to over 130 pages in a desperate attempt to strawman men. Pathetic. They should just admit that they are wrong and leave.

Have you applied for a job yet you lazy slob?

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

133 pages and he still doesn't know what a strawman is smdh

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

A whole mess o' shit

Your equating of any other races existing alongside white people and daring to breed, sometimes even (gasp!) breeding with white people, to white genocide, might be the funniest take yet, in a thread filled with your simious nonsense.

Non-white people exist. Deal with the fact that whilst you're perfectly welcome to not work with/for them and not sell them goods or services that you offer to others, they're still going to be there.
The idea that a self-important pissant like you, who lacks the force of will to influence even a self-admitted pack of autists like the farms, could ever have any impact on that is not just delusional it's hubris.

TL;DR: You couldn't influence the outcome of your next wank, much less the racial makeup of a nation. Get fucked, you asslamp.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Non-white people exist. Deal with the fact

replace non white with muslims or trans and congrats you're a SJW. You make the exact same bad faith marginalization arguments.

 

[Swiss46]

replace non white with muslims or trans and congrats you're a SJW. You make the exact same bad faith marginalization arguments.

Wasn't your big brained idea earlier in thr thread to use SJW tactics and talking points against them?

 

[AnOminous]

There is no debate. You're just our gibbering cumdumpster.

This tard is still so profoundly autistic that he doesn't understand that a "debate user" thread is actually for mocking the user, not debating him. It's funny how oblivious autists are to when they're just being made fun of, and think they're in some battle.

 

[Buster O'Keefe]

replace non white with muslims or trans and congrats you're a SJW. You make the exact same bad faith marginalization arguments.

You absolute total fucking moron, you've just perfectly demonstrated a straw man. Race is not religion or mental illness you total fucking embarrassment to flip faggots everywhere. Get a job and stop freeloading off your mother.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Wasn't your big brained idea earlier in thr thread to use SJW tactics and talking points against them?

tactics yes, ideas not.
he is using the exact same ideas as SJW.
"omg blacks are here. deal with it. omg trans are here. deal with it. omg muzzies are here, deal with it."
I don't get why these people say they aren't SJWs. They call you a bigot if you say a man is not the same as a women or a black man is not the same as a white man but then are shocked when SJWs call them bigots for saying a muslim isn't the same or an illegal or a trans isn't the same. compartmentalization check?

 

[SIGSEGV]

2. CRAs will never let us judge blacks by the content of their character just like SJWs will never let us judge muzzies by their character; that's racism and islamophobiaia.

But you're a nigger and we've been judging you by the content of your character for this whole thread.

Okay so you support discrimination? You support racism? You support sexism? You support islamophobia? You believe in removing Civil Rights because it infringes upon the right of people to do as they wish?

I don't know about you guys, but this thread is making me more inclined to support whatever -isms and -phobias allow me to discriminate against faggots like OP.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

You absolute total fucking moron, you've just perfectly demonstrated a straw man. Race is not religion or mental illness you total fucking embarrassment to flip faggots everywhere. Get a job and stop freeloading off your mother.

and anti sexism isn't a mental illness? thinking women are the same (equal) as men?
and anti racism isn't a mental illness? thinking blacks are the same (equal) as whites?
You're a total lunatic and it's obvious there are biological differences between races or sexes.
But that goes against your social justice civil rights religion cuz equality.

 

[SIGSEGV]

and anti sexism isn't a mental illness? thinking women are the same (equal) as men?
and anti racism isn't a mental illness? thinking blacks are the same (equal) as whites?
You're a total lunatic and it's obvious there are biological differences between races or sexes.
But that goes against your social justice civil rights religion cuz equality.

Treating people like subhumans just because they're not exactly like you is immoral.

 

[Begemot]

and anti sexism isn't a mental illness? thinking women are the same (equal) as men?
and anti racism isn't a mental illness? thinking blacks are the same (equal) as whites?
You're a total lunatic and it's obvious there are biological differences between races or sexes.
But that goes against your social justice civil rights religion cuz equality.

And the answer is obvious pol-tier idiocy like shipping blacks back to Africa, somehow?

 

[Buster O'Keefe]

tactics yes, ideas not.
he is using the exact same ideas as SJW.
"omg blacks are here. deal with it. omg trans are here. deal with it. omg muzzies are here, deal with it."
I don't get why these people say they aren't SJWs. They call you a bigot if you say a man is not the same as a women or a black man is not the same as a white man but then are shocked when SJWs call them bigots for saying a muslim isn't the same or an illegal or a trans isn't the same. compartmentalization check?

@BoxerShorts47 is a failure. ITT he has failed to:

1. Explain his degenerate twitter account
2. Prove his whiteness or lack there of
3. Admit he is a freeloading scumbag
4. Persuade anybody to follow his unhinged crusade to deport millions of people
5. Understand what a straw man is
6. Explain what a 'friend chicken' is
7. Not be an enormous faggot
8. Neck himself for the good of the white race

Total failure.

 

[AnOminous]

And the answer is obvious pol-tier idiocy like shipping blacks back to Africa, somehow?

Bitch I didn't post that gibberish.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

And the answer is obvious pol-tier idiocy like shipping blacks back to Africa, somehow?

What is the solution?
2 options:
1. send them back to africa
2. kill them all
I'm trying to be as reasonable as possible.
But the fact is blacks have disproportionately killed whites over the last 60 years so any moral high ground they had from slavery or jim crow is gone.
They are welfare burden, they are population that is waiting to riot and loot (LA Riots, Katrina, Ferguson, Everywhere 2020) and they destroy all our major cities.
They are hostile enemy population and we have a moral right and a duty to protect ourselves from them, from the content of the black character.
yes, not every black individual is a "bad" person but as a group they are a threat and they hurt the white community.
So I am trying to be reasonable about sending them back to Africa.
If you have a better idea, let me know. What is your plan to deal with the black situation?
Because this nation cannot go into the future as a low trust society where whites lack access to their major cities.

 

[Buster O'Keefe]

Society isn't perfect
What is the solution?
2 options:
1. Deport black people to some random country
2. kill them all
Those are the only 2 options.

The ravings of a mad faggot.

 

[AnOminous]

What is the solution?

Just answer the question of how fucking fat are you, you fat bastard? You call yourself BoxerShorts47. Are you really a size 47? Holy fuck you're fat.