U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
We Britbongs were feeling left out, and as such we now have a dead jogger of our very own to chimp out about!


It's not spelled exactly the same, but I would just like to acknowledge that some loving black parent named their child "Simeon", which sounds an awful lot like "Simian" when you look at it.

Condolences to you, unknown black parent. I hope your other children, Nog and Honkie Francis, are both protected from police-related violence.

[EDIT]: Changed "mother" to "parent" since I don't know who was responsible, and I don't want to be executed when this endlessly cycling fiasco of persecution that was originally known as "musical chairs" decides that women are far more oppressed than blacks again.
 
Last edited:
Cities on fire
Businesses destroyed by looters
People dying due to coronavirus and rioting
People out of work due to lockdowns and quarantines
Radical ideas that will lead to disaster being put into practice (abolishing the police)
Anti-white sentiment at an all time high
Social Media censoring factual information from government agencies

With all this lets check in on our betters who are elected to protect and serve this great nation and its citizens in the halls of Congress:
View attachment 1360901

oh

The Mummy Lord herself is bowing to the people destroying her city, assaulting her officers, and burning the citizens who elec...she's in a predominately white district that hasn't been touch who am i fucking kidding here.

California can fall into the ocean for all i care, that state deserves to be turned into Escape from LA ASAP.
 
It's not spelled exactly the same, but I would just like to acknowledge that some loving black mother named their child "Simeon", which sounds an awful lot like "Simian" when you look at it.

Condolences to you, unknown black mother. I hope your other children, Nog and Honkie Francis, are both protected from police-related violence.
Good fucking Lord I didn't even clock that. It makes me think of that scene in Brave New World with the epsilon minus semimoron lift operater, who Huxley describes as simian. The one who goes into raptures when they reach the roof
 
Oh, that's that company that's carried by shows butchered into English by the far left agenda having FUNimation.
That company who regularly inserts their shit takes on politics into their dubs in place of what lines were actually said, but have correct translations for the subtitles.
Who would've thought?
Also keep in mind that the channel that owns Toonami, CN, aired shows like SU and AT, often pandering to the adult audiences on social media and even using Toonami to promote the former’s movie.
That’s double not surprising.
 
Then why are the lowest crime rates in the world often in countries where the woman controls the household and much of the family finances along with raises the children while men are expected to work and earn money such as in East Asia? Why are they higher in more patriarchal countries like in the Middle East and South America? If you only want to discuss North America then why has most crime been falling as the divorce rate is rising?

Your own statistics here are skewed by the fact children are more likely to end up with a single mother than living with a single father for many different factors. The highest of which is that men are much more likely to want to "start over" and have nothing to do with their own children after a marriage breaks down. How do you think the "my dad went out for cigarettes" joke became such a thing?
Sure, explain the black crime rate and the rise in single motherhood in jogger communities. How many of these women led societies already had a low crime rate to begin with? Why has crime gone up within jogger communities since the fathers were basically incentivized to leave their kids? The middle east has almost never known peace so why even bring it up? The Sassanids to my knowledge (and I could be wrong here) was lead by alot of females and look at how that turned out for them. Not well.
 
Oy vey delete that goym

EZ55-z7XQAIp0r0.jpg
 
Then why are the lowest crime rates in the world often in countries where the woman controls the household and much of the family finances along with raises the children while men are expected to work and earn money such as in East Asia? Why are they higher in more patriarchal countries like in the Middle East and South America? If you only want to discuss North America then why has most crime been falling as the divorce rate is rising?

Your own statistics here are skewed by the fact children are more likely to end up with a single mother than living with a single father for many different factors. The highest of which is that men are much more likely to want to "start over" and have nothing to do with their own children after a marriage breaks down. How do you think the "my dad went out for cigarettes" joke became such a thing?
"Running" and "leading" are very different things. COO and CEO.
 
I know things have changed a lot but while catching up on details I found this gem:

Ehhh depends. Tactically one person doesn't take on a mob, the only way to crush a mob is overwhelming force. The element of surprise helps too. They're also currently in downtown if I'm looking at this right which means there aren't many civilians around to pull a gun on them.

1-given enough ammo and a chokepoint a single person can pretty much commit genocide so long as the mob's stupid enough to keep comming. That's one of the advantages of "stand your grownd", you're fighting on your territory and had time to stockpile.

2-have you seen the kind of bubbad soviet surplus abominations texans cooked up? I tried to fond the video, sadly couldn't, but I swear I once saw a vertical grip, belt fed, open bolt, AK-like carabine. I'm fairly sure the fucker that made that one could cook up enough "overwhelming force" to turn a riot into a warcrime on his own.
 
Then why are the lowest crime rates in the world often in countries where the woman controls the household and much of the family finances along with raises the children while men are expected to work and earn money such as in East Asia? Why are they higher in more patriarchal countries like in the Middle East and South America? If you only want to discuss North America then why has most crime been falling as the divorce rate is rising?

Your own statistics here are skewed by the fact children are more likely to end up with a single mother than living with a single father for many different factors. The highest of which is that men are much more likely to want to "start over" and have nothing to do with their own children after a marriage breaks down. How do you think the "my dad went out for cigarettes" joke became such a thing?
because between radically different countries there are a gorillion of radical differences in living conditions that all influence crime well beyond the family situation you buffoon
to get relevant information you have to compare crime rates of single mother offspring to crime rates of proper family raised children within the same country

besides that, it's not 'just' about crime. single mothers kids end up doing much worse than normal kids in virtually all aspects of life that one can think of. higher rate of mental health problems, drug addiction, alcoholism, self harm, suicide attempts, etc. lower educational achievement, lower ability to hold down a job, higher chance of ending up on welfare, etc. crime is just the most drastic and most visible part, but the issues run much deeper.
 
I would imagine it is all perfectly legal if you are out in public. It isn't illegal to have surveillance cameras outside of buildings, for instance. Now, I don't know how illegal it gets if you are at a private residence, but in a public place you can be photographed without permission.

Generally, but there's issues with airspace and local jurisdiction. The feds have national jurisdiction, but it's not unlimited, and I don't know how local surveillance laws interact with it. They're free to walk a public street and take pictures, of course, but airspace is sometimes private and sometimes restricted.

If they're flying a drone 30,000 feet up that probably gets around it, but I'm not an expert on this stuff.
 
2-have you seen the kind of bubbad soviet surplus abominations texans cooked up? I tried to fond the video, sadly couldn't, but I swear I once saw a vertical grip, belt fed, open bolt, AK-like carabine. I'm fairly sure the fucker that made that one could cook up enough "overwhelming force" to turn a riot into a warcrime on his own.
Ya know as a bonglander I have always been curious, given how military grade rifles tend to be manufactured to be as cheap and efficient to mass produce/maintain/repair/use effectively as possible, what would be the most "fuck it, im throwing every gadget and my life savings at this thing to make it the best gun that has ever existed" rooty-tooty-point-and-shooty setup technically possible?
 
Ya know as a bonglander I have always been curious, given how military grade rifles tend to be manufactured to be as cheap and efficient to mass produce/maintain/repair/use effectively as possible, what would be the most "fuck it, im throwing every gadget and my life savings at this thing" rooty-tooty-point-and-shooty setup technically possible?

AK-47. It's cheap as shit, easy to repair, you can throw it in the mud and it will still fire enough to at least protect you at a decent range. There's a reason it's one of the widest spread Assault Rifles on the planet because you can repair and build one with a fucking shovel:
 
Generally, but there's issues with airspace and local jurisdiction. The feds have national jurisdiction, but it's not unlimited, and I don't know how local surveillance laws interact with it. They're free to walk a public street and take pictures, of course, but airspace is sometimes private and sometimes restricted.

If they're flying a drone 30,000 feet up that probably gets around it, but I'm not an expert on this stuff.
In America anyone in a public place that has no expectation of privacy (read "everywhere but bathrooms") is legal to be photographed or video-taped by private citizens and the government. Surveillance is perfectly legal.
 
I won't say this is my position, because it isn't.

But I'm starting to fear it might be sort of true. Women aren't universally dumb or naive. But they are, on average, more agreeable, and that might explain why you see easily exploitable, "naive" voter decisions (like welfare states and porous borders), after women get the vote. And there is nothing in human evolution that would make women, on average, great leaders of nations. (Of family units and their analogues, maybe. But nations aren't families.)

I would like to be wrong about this, but I don't see any other explanation for the correlation.

This but also I want to add onto it. Autism inbound.

I feel like a lot of women are "agreeable" in this way because of how we are socialized, at least in the west. Women are very judgemental and form hierarchies all the time. They also have a shit habit of not being particularly clear about why you're where you are in the hierarchy. They'll whisper and gossip and treat you like dirt for something that's often a non-issue, but you'll probably never know what it is. So we become agreeable and easily manipulated because we want to avoid that conflict, because agreeing with what sounds popular or what sounds "right" helps us gain social ranking without much effort.

Contrast that to most western men who will tell you when you're being a retard and why. They, in my experience, will engage in an actual discussion about the issue instead of vaguely pressuring you to change.

Obviously there's shit-eaters that are men and reasonable independent people that are women but these are just the trends I've noticed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back