Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Stardust said:
This guy is using 'fallacy' more often now. What happened to 'strawman'? Did they leave you for Tyrone?
Click to expand...
Used the straw man to cook the friend chicken

Trigger Me Timbers said:
so you admit to sharing your KiwiFarms account with other people?

Either way, lucky for your Discord is FREE and super simple to set up! (Not as easy as posting a picture of your thumb but you know....)

Also if you truly don’t have discord, does that mean you have never said what your typing here out loud? Debating via text is very different then using your “aryan” lungs and mouth.

I think it’s very important you get discord so you can continue “winning” and debate IRL and destroy me with your Facts and Logic.
Click to expand...
Multiple people sharing his account and not one of them have a white thumb to post
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Non-Threatening Niall, Robert Sanvagene, witthel and 6 others
Troon Draugur said:
Oh, I don't know so much; the lad can take a pounding, as evidenced here... Gotta be a way to monetise that, surely.
Click to expand...
1591658070662.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Robert Sanvagene, witthel, Dead Mime and 3 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
America was basically an ethnostate pre 1965. Everyone already knows it. All diverse empires like USA right now eventually collapse. This is shown by history. If diversity is so good, why is America getting less and less stabilized each year? why are racial tensions worse today than pre obama?


BS. I was part of the alt-right. Richard Spencer was "Become Who We Are" or some BS like that. Most of the convos were either about race realism or JQ. Most people ignored white genocide, they were too busy talking about racial differences rather than articulate a solid vision of the future.
Click to expand...
imagine being this triggered by the existence of non whites
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: The Cunting Death, Stardust, blatanthatred and 7 others
When BoxerShorts47 says he wants men and women to be treated differently, what he means is:

"Women MUST lump me in with all the masculine men, since I cannot actually be masculine. Women, also, MUST be readily available to me, but ONLY the feminine ones; any girl who can actually beat me up is a bull dyke, which is 99% of them."

Which leads into the desire to lower the age of consent. What he really means is:

"I am inferior to the stature and prowess of a teenage girl, and that is unfair. This levels the playing field. Besides, if she were 16+, she could have a car and make my no-car-having ass look bad."
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FuckedUp, Bunny Tracks, Tatu Carreta2 and 10 others
GethN7 said:
Dude, let me drop some real talk on you.

IRL, so long as you are a civil human being, I will, insofar as it does not require me to make an unreasonable sacrifice of ethics or common sense, humor whatever someone wants to be called.

If a man wants to be called a purple people eater, so long as it's harmless to do and he's nice enough about, I'll humor him. If a transgender person asks me to refer to them by certain pronouns politely and doesn't lose their shit if I don't want to, I'll honor their courtesy and do so as a gesture of returned courtesy.

As you already know, I'm a Christian, but I'm capable of putting being a civil human being over beating people over the head with my ideology and dogma because I live in something called reality, where you sometimes have to swallow your bile and live with what you don't like and humor certain things even if you don't approve, if only to keep a fight from happening you might not want to be dragged into.

I suggest you learn to do likewise, if only so you pass more as a human and less as a rabid chimp.
Click to expand...
I unblocked you because cucked this post is.

1. Tell me your bar of unreasonable. What is your threshold?

Everything the CRAs wanted was unreasonable even into the 1970s.
>treat a women the same as a man: cannot slap her ass, cannot compliment a her breast size. or hit on her period.
>treat blacks the same as whites: allow my kids to race mix, live with blacks, work with blacks, no escape from diversity.
This was unreasonable in the past .
Everything the SJWs propose today was unreasonable during #GamerGate.
>using preferred pronoun, treated a transwomen the same as a women.
>gay marriage is marriage, homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality.
>treating an illegal/non-citizen the same as a citizen.
>defending the police.

If you cannot defend minor things like noun than you cannot defend major things like the border or the police. That's what we see. Liberals first attack the most vulnerable targets (gay marriage) before they demand more unreasonable accommodations (drag story time, LGBT month, sex education).

2. Common sense. I'm not sure common sense exists. it appears to be the dominant culture under which you were raised.
The follow ideas were 100% common sense in the 1950s.
>Women are too emotional, not good leaders, they don't like STEM.
>Blacks are more violent and dangerous than whites. different races have different qualities that explain different outcome.
The idea that all people were equal or deserved freedom/liberty was not common sense even a few centuries ago.

3. Humor = cope. The reason you're using their preferred pronouns is because you've lost the power to control your society, your culture. They are telling you how the behave and you are complying because there is punishment if you refuse. Rather than admit that you're oppressed, you've had your agency taken away, you're jumping through many different mental hoops to protect yourself from admitting this truth, similar to Stockholm Syndrome. End result is you find yourself in a society that doesn't represent you. You feel like a foreigner, a refugee, in your own nation. This is the problem with "rights," in practice you simply transfer power from own group to another. You cannot create more rights.

You're wrong, I am the one acting like a human because I show both love and hate, I don't allow my agency to taken away by freaks. You act like an NPC; you repeat the culture that is forced onto you. FYI preferred pronouns are 100% lie. You cannot "transition" that's lunacy and these people are lying about their sex. Pure dishonestly or insanity. Liberals always ask, "how did we get a post-truth society? Why don't fact matter?" No clue.

snailslime said:
imagine being this triggered by the existence of non whites
Click to expand...
These are such bad faith shitlib arguments. Are you getting them from Steven Colbert? They'll work on the ignorant/uniformed voter but anyone that understands demographics or race realism will know you're full of shit and trying to marginalize our white voice.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: The Cunting Death, Balanced Boomer, Be patient I have lurkism and 24 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
These are such bad faith shitlib arguments. Are you getting them from Steven Colbert? They'll work on the ignorant/uniformed voter but anyone that understands demographics or race realism will know you're full of shit and trying to marginalize our white voice.
Click to expand...
how many shills have access to your account?
& where's my dang vocaroo?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: blatanthatred, Non-Threatening Niall, Troon Draugur and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back