Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Table Country]

At this point I'm not entirely unconvinced that Boxman is a chatbot.

 

[Stardust]

What should be done with Filipinos? Where do they fit in this great white utopia?

 

[SIGSEGV]

What should be done with Filipinos? Where do they fit in this great white utopia?

They can stick around as a labor class. Not @BoxerShorts47 though, he can go in a mass grave with the niggers.

 

[Pee Cola]

do you want to be added to the list?

View attachment 1361064

Interesting. @SIGSEGV is on the list, but @Drain Todger isn't. Maybe DT isn't winning the debate after all?

 

[Pissmaster]

I unblocked you because cucked this post is.

1. Tell me your bar of unreasonable. What is your threshold?

Everything the CRAs wanted was unreasonable even into the 1970s.
>treat a women the same as a man: cannot slap her ass, cannot compliment a her breast size. or hit on her period.
>treat blacks the same as whites: allow my kids to race mix, live with blacks, work with blacks, no escape from diversity.
This was unreasonable in the past .
Everything the SJWs propose today was unreasonable during #GamerGate.
>using preferred pronoun, treated a transwomen the same as a women.
>gay marriage is marriage, homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality.
>treating an illegal/non-citizen the same as a citizen.
>defending the police.

If you cannot defend minor things like noun than you cannot defend major things like the border or the police. That's what we see. Liberals first attack the most vulnerable targets (gay marriage) before they demand more unreasonable accommodations (drag story time, LGBT month, sex education).

2. Common sense. I'm not sure common sense exists. it appears to be the dominant culture under which you were raised.
The follow ideas were 100% common sense in the 1950s.
>Women are too emotional, not good leaders, they don't like STEM.
>Blacks are more violent and dangerous than whites. different races have different qualities that explain different outcome.
The idea that all people were equal or deserved freedom/liberty was not common sense even a few centuries ago.

3. Humor = cope. The reason you're using their preferred pronouns is because you've lost the power to control your society, your culture. They are telling you how the behave and you are complying because there is punishment if you refuse. Rather than admit that you're oppressed, you've had your agency taken away, you're jumping through many different mental hoops to protect yourself from admitting this truth, similar to Stockholm Syndrome. End result is you find yourself in a society that doesn't represent you. You feel like a foreigner, a refugee, in your own nation. This is the problem with "rights," in practice you simply transfer power from own group to another. You cannot create more rights.

You're wrong, I am the one acting like a human because I show both love and hate, I don't allow my agency to taken away by freaks. You act like an NPC; you repeat the culture that is forced onto you. FYI preferred pronouns are 100% lie. You cannot "transition" that's lunacy and these people are lying about their sex. Pure dishonestly or insanity. Liberals always ask, "how did we get a post-truth society? Why don't fact matter?" No clue.

Page 147 and you haven't learned shit, and haven't swayed a single person to your side.

Keep going, though. We're moving into week 2 of your new life here on Kiwi Farms where you bang your head against a brick wall all day long, I'm sure this is a productive way to get exactly what you want out of life.

 

[The Last Stand]

Interesting. @SIGSEGV is on the list, but @Drain Todger isn't. Maybe DT isn't winning the debate after all?

He's monitoring the situation.

 

[Witthel]

I unblocked you because cucked this post is.

1. Tell me your bar of unreasonable. What is your threshold?

Everything the CRAs wanted was unreasonable even into the 1970s.
>treat a women the same as a man: cannot slap her ass, cannot compliment a her breast size. or hit on her period.
>treat blacks the same as whites: allow my kids to race mix, live with blacks, work with blacks, no escape from diversity.
This was unreasonable in the past .
Everything the SJWs propose today was unreasonable during #GamerGate.
>using preferred pronoun, treated a transwomen the same as a women.
>gay marriage is marriage, homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality.
>treating an illegal/non-citizen the same as a citizen.
>defending the police.

If you cannot defend minor things like noun than you cannot defend major things like the border or the police. That's what we see. Liberals first attack the most vulnerable targets (gay marriage) before they demand more unreasonable accommodations (drag story time, LGBT month, sex education).

2. Common sense. I'm not sure common sense exists. it appears to be the dominant culture under which you were raised.
The follow ideas were 100% common sense in the 1950s.
>Women are too emotional, not good leaders, they don't like STEM.
>Blacks are more violent and dangerous than whites. different races have different qualities that explain different outcome.
The idea that all people were equal or deserved freedom/liberty was not common sense even a few centuries ago.

3. Humor = cope. The reason you're using their preferred pronouns is because you've lost the power to control your society, your culture. They are telling you how the behave and you are complying because there is punishment if you refuse. Rather than admit that you're oppressed, you've had your agency taken away, you're jumping through many different mental hoops to protect yourself from admitting this truth, similar to Stockholm Syndrome. End result is you find yourself in a society that doesn't represent you. You feel like a foreigner, a refugee, in your own nation. This is the problem with "rights," in practice you simply transfer power from own group to another. You cannot create more rights.

You're wrong, I am the one acting like a human because I show both love and hate, I don't allow my agency to taken away by freaks. You act like an NPC; you repeat the culture that is forced onto you. FYI preferred pronouns are 100% lie. You cannot "transition" that's lunacy and these people are lying about their sex. Pure dishonestly or insanity. Liberals always ask, "how did we get a post-truth society? Why don't fact matter?" No clue.

That's an awful loft of words for "I'm a huge faggot".

 

[Heckler1]

You're wrong, I am the one acting like a human because I show both love and hate

Given your recent stance on age of consent, this seems like an ill advised statement to make. Why are you like this?

 

[mr.moon1488]

do you want to be added to the list?

View attachment 1361064

Stupid nigger not putting me on the list.

 

[The Spice boi]

View attachment 1362008
C'mon dude, why don't you go all out and start revenge rating everyone who makes fun of you? It's not like you have anything to lose.

Oh he's trying . But getting positive reacts in this thread is like getting your dick sucked by a flip white supremacist

 

[Witthel]

do you want to be added to the list?

View attachment 1361064

I'm offended at not being on the list.

 

[SIGSEGV]

Stupid nigger not putting me on the list.

I'm offended at not being on the list.

Cope harder, liberals.

 

[GethN7]

You're wrong, I am the one acting like a human because I show both love and hate, I don't allow my agency to taken away by freaks. You act like an NPC; you repeat the culture that is forced onto you. FYI preferred pronouns are 100% lie. You cannot "transition" that's lunacy and these people are lying about their sex. Pure dishonestly or insanity. Liberals always ask, "how did we get a post-truth society? Why don't fact matter?" No clue.

Thanks for unblocking me, my answer is simple:

In the hypothetical examples I listed, those people would be understanding, civil, and I'd have no reason not to attempt to return the favor, even it meant humoring them a little.

In your case, you're an unreasonable jackass who deserves the same regard you give others, which is none at all.

 

[Swiss46]

unblocked you because cucked this post is.

This implies You're reading our blocked posts anyway because you can't handle the thought of someone online mocking you. Congrats you're the cuck.

 

[Witthel]

Thanks for unblocking me, my answer is simple:

In the hypothetical examples I listed, those people would be understanding, civil, and I'd have no reason not to attempt to return the favor, even it meant humoring them a little.

In your case, you're an unreasonable jackass who deserves the same regard you give others, which is none at all.

There's no use trying to explain or reason with him, his brain's been fried too much by /pol/.

 

[GethN7]

There's no use trying to explain or reason with him, his brain's been fried too much by /pol/.

That's an insult to /pol/.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Thanks for unblocking me, my answer is simple:

In the hypothetical examples I listed, those people would be understanding, civil, and I'd have no reason not to attempt to return the favor, even it meant humoring them a little.

In your case, you're an unreasonable jackass who deserves the same regard you give others, which is none at all.

There is a difference between being polite and weak. With pronouns, these are lying. Transwomen are not women. Transmen are not men. Gay marriage is not marriage. You're enabling them and normalizing their insanity. You're being unethical by trying to rebrand your cowardice being polite. Pure cope. The reason you're calling me a jackass is because I'm being honest. This is one of the reasons I dislike you Christians. You brag about Christianity morality but when I speak with you, I see no morality.

 

[Table Country]

There is a difference between being polite and weak. With pronouns, these are lying. Transwomen are not women. Transmen are not men. Gay marriage is not marriage. You're enabling them and normalizing their insanity. You're being unethical by trying to rebrand your cowardice being polite. Pure cope. The reason you're calling me a jackass is because I'm being honest. This is one of the reasons I dislike you Christians. You brag about Christianity morality but when I speak with you, I see no morality.

Why is gay marriage not marriage? Marriage is also a social construct and society can reconstruct it any given moment. Not that I necessarily disagree with marriage as a concept, but not all social constructs are disagreeable. In an animal society men would take several women as mates and would fuck inferior males to assert their dominance. The latter was actually a common practice in Rome, fucking non-Roman men to assert Roman dominance.
You still haven't answered where the Right of Conquest comes from. Is it God-given, law-given, intrinsic?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Why is gay marriage not marriage? Marriage is also a social construct. Not one that I necessarily disagree with, but not all social constructs are disagreeable. In an animal society men would take several women as mates and would fuck inferior males to assert their dominance. The latter was actually a common practice in Rome, fucking non-Roman men to assert Roman dominance.

Can you not tell the difference between a white person and a black person? Between a man and a women? Between a transwomen and a women? Between 2 men getting married and a man and a women getting married? Do you not trust your eyes?

But fine if you need a solid understanding. Marriage is a social construct between a MAN and a WOMEN. It was created by lower rank (beta? gamma?) males wanted needed to secure a female partner. Marriage prevents hypergamy. Gay marriage makes no sense between they aren't securign a partner. INB4 legal benefits, yes gays were offered "civil unions" and many were okay with that concept but the LGB lobbying-group wanted "marriage" as the legal word because gay marriage is just a torjan horse to normalize homosexuality. Motte and Bailey fallacy. Easier to defend gay marriage is the same as marriage than homosexuality is the same as heterosexuality. But this is ultimately the goal, to make people accept and love and have sex with gays no different from straights. If you refuse to have sex with another man that's homophobia and you're discriminating against them based on their sexual orientation. Total lunacy and I don't want to go outside of my home and see LGBT shame flags everything. I don't want to see homosexuals kissing in movies. Ultimately they are forcing homosexuality on me and taking away my hetro-normative culture. Gay marriage is the trojan horse that they're using to accomplish this. Not only is gay marriage not marriage but it's a total lie because the true goal is normalizing homosexuality.

"You still haven't answered where the Right of Conquest comes from. Is it God-given, law-given, intrinsic?"

intrinsic. In fact without right of conquest, you can justify eating meat. Did you watch the Destiny vs Vegan Gains debate?

 

[SIGSEGV]

Can you not tell the difference between a white person and a black person? Between a man and a women? Between a transwomen and a women? Between 2 men getting married and a man and a women getting married? Do you not trust your eyes?

Stop discriminating against the blind, you asshole.