Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[Chicken Picnic]

Absolutely Based and wedpilled, Wossy

 

[OnMoTi]

Biology is transphobic.

 

[Clem Fandango]

Evidence of the tide finally turning? If mainstream celebrities get away with this stuff, it will show the rest of the public that the trans mafia is actually a bunch of toothless Twitter addicts, and yes what everyone accepted as true ten years ago (men cannot become women) is still true.

 

[Corn Flakes]

He still keeps his dick. It is a given he is going to fuck more kids. And I hope the parents of the victims will sue the court.

Are you telling me girldick can be used for evil? But they told me girldick could only be used for good and wholesome things!

Whoever signed the release on that pedophile needs to be prosecuted for it. A sexual offender is a sexual offender, no matter whether they decided to take hormones or put on a Catholic priest's frock.

 

[neverendingmidi]

Yes, it would be. I am a complete amateur when it comes to any of these subjects, but on many topics that are sensitive you are relegated to Internet discussion forums because nobody else will touch a subject or aspects of it - especially not the very people who the public looks to to address these questions, professionals, as they have a professional reputation to lose. Brainlets like myself have to resort to spectulation and our own research to get any honest, truthful answers. So, I am just throwing this in the mix, not being sure how this piece fits into the puzzle (pun intended) or not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echolalia

Imitation of another one's behaviors, mannerisms, without fully comprehending significance, context, and such. Yes, that does remind me of a lot of transgender people. I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt, that early transitioners just have to get used to acting like the opposite sex, but many times their behaviors seem to be like grotesque carricatures or exaggerations of women, in the case of MtF. Then again, they often do not do a particularly good job with fitting in with their sex, either, so maybe that awkwardness makes them believe that they are not really the gender matching their sex. It provides a convenient excuse for years of awkwardness then. You can wash your hands of all those socially uncomfortable moments. Many people even seem to invent illnesses for themselves (many YouTube channels seem to center around that) so that they can offload their issues and shortcomings in life onto them.

It's likely been already brought up, but probably no debate of autism would be complete without mentiong the "extreme male hypothesis":

The extreme male brain, explained

The ‘extreme male brain’ theory suggests that autism is an exaggeration of systematic sex differences in ways of thinking.

www.spectrumnews.org

I don't know how good the article is. It's just a starting point and should do a good enough job explaining the basic tenets of it. People still unfamiliar with it can go from there.

However, if the psychogenic hypotheses regarding child neglect and abuse are true, it would probably be adding insult to injury to simply say to autistic people "Well, you just have a very male brain." I also remember studies that showed a significant difference how much male vs. female infants are being held or how much attention parents pay to them. That, together with a general attitude that male infants should perhaps be treated "rougher" to "toughen them up" could have contributed a portion of why there are more autistic male children. This is not so different from the general attitude in society to tell men to "man up" and for them to not act feminine, lest they be labeled gay. Ironically, this general callousness, if true, could have increased, rather than decreased, the number of cases of males with gender identity disorder. I am just speculating, though.

I’d wonder if it’s the result of expecting “manliness”, yet not giving responsibilities. Boys in the 1800’s and 1900 up until the very end might’ve been told to toughen up, but they were also expected to get out there and plow the damn field. Expectations and responsibilities.

Now there’s very few responsibilities for the middle/upper class children of either sex. So to be a man has gone from being a provider who cares for the family to a nebulous definition that changes by the microsecond.

 

[PowerWomon]

Anyway as has been previously discussed everywhere troons are analyzed, there really is no such thing as a troon with a personality other than troonery. Only the gay homosexual male troons have anything more than that, but even then it’s just a group shared personality ie set of traits and behaviors that they share with drag queens and flamers. It’s not a real personality, it’s a persona. Troonery is a persona. Fursona is a persona. These are all costumes. And the only people who want to wear them are empty people who don’t have anything interesting or notable about themselves.

On the point of gay men being diagnosed with gender identity disorder, there are various studies. Here is a particular quote on the diagnosis of gay men with GID:

One reason for the risk of increased trauma among gay men is that as children they tend to display behaviors and attitudes frequently associated with gender atypical behavior. Brooks (2001) contended that gender atypical boys are at increased risk for sexual, physical, and emotional abuse. Violence is often used against these gender atypical boys to punish their “misbehavior” and to teach other boys the “rules” for socially acceptable male behavior. Males who behave in a gender atypical “feminine” manner are at high risk for being stigmatized, ostracized, and abused. Robertson (1997) further postulated that mental health professionals compound the difficulties some of these boys struggle with by diagnosing them with gender identity disorder in childhood. He contended this diagnosis often leads to treatment that is designed to “change” homosexuality in boys, which is of questionable value since 75% of such nontraditional boys are likely to be gay-identified later in life (Swidey, 2005). Additionally, there is an elevated risk of attempted suicide for younger gay men (and lesbians) that may also be attributed to a history of abuse (Fergusson, Horwood, & Beautrais, 1999; Gonsiorek, Sell, & Weinrich, 1995; Herrel et al., 1999; Vives, 2002).

Brady, Stephen. “The Impact of Sexual Abuse on Sexual Identity Formation in Gay Men.” Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 17, no. 3–4 (200: 359–376.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10538710802329973

There is other impact on child sexual abuse on identity formation and possibly sexuality:

Emerging data suggests that gay males have an increased risk for physical and sexual abuse as children. This includes sexual abuse and other forms of interpersonal violence, which may predispose some gay men to have negative mental and physical health outcomes (Guarnero, 2001; Kalichman, Gore-Felton, Benotsch, Cage, & Rompa, 2004; Krahe, Scheinberger-Olwig, & Schutze, 2001; Sandfort, de Graaf, Bijl, & Schnabel, 2001). In a nonclinical sample of 942 homosexual and heterosexual adults, 46% of gay men reported a history of childhood same-sex molestation compared to 7% of their heterosexual counterparts (Tomeo, Templer, Anderson, & Kotler, 2001). In a study utilizing a probability sample of 2,881 urban gay men, 20% reported a history of childhood sexual abuse, primarily by nonfamily perpetrators (Paul, Catania, Pollack, & Stall, 2001). Niesen and Sandall (1990) conducted a chart review of 201 gay and lesbian chemically addicted inpatients and found that nearly 50% reported a history ofsexual abuse in childhood. Jinich and colleagues (199 explored the prevalence of childhood sexual abuse among a nonclinical sample of 1,941 gay and bisexual men and found that one-quarter reported a history of childhood sexual abuse.

 

[Executive Koala]

Fun fact: Jonathan Yaniv is called Balldemort by twitter terven

This was one of my favorite names for him back when the "publishing ban" on his name was still in effect and you could get perma-banned from Twitter, Reddit, Medium, YouTube, etc. for even speaking his name. Very much He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.

I can't help but wonder how much Rowling knows about Yaniv. Glinner and Gervais have been joking about him for a year or so, so she must know.

 

[lololololagain]

White cis man Jonathan Ross defines transphobia for trans people while mass-blocking prominent LGBT+ activists

Josh Milton June 8, 2020

Jonathan Ross (L) has backed JK Rowling amid a torrent of criticism for the author tweets on trans lives. (Dave J Hogan/Dave J Hogan/Getty Images/Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Jonathan Ross announced Sunday evening (June 7) that he has become a representative of the entire LGBT+ community as he sought to defend JK Rowling over her comments on trans people and define what is and isn’t transphobia.
Rowling was, in recent weeks, prosaically sharing pictures doodled by children of her new book series, The Ickabog, before she suddenly weighed in on trans folk and how, she said, they’re not “discriminated against”.

And seemingly straight from the Rowling playbook, the British TV presenter innocuously tweeted that he ate “too many brownies” before abruptly proclaiming that Rowling is “right and magnificent”.



“For those accusing her of transphobia,” the 59-year-old continued, “please read what she wrote.

“She clearly is not.”
Jonathan Ross: LGBT+ people slam comedian for defending JK Rowling.
Backlash immediately brewed against Ross, with many LGBT+ Twitter users flaying Ross for using his thumping platform to define what transphobia is.


















Bizarrely, anger also turned to confusion, as some high-profile members of the LGBT+ community, including PinkNews staffers, reported that Ross had, at some point recently, blocked them on Twitter.






So, what did JK Rowling actually say and was it ‘anti-trans’?
According to trans folk who have, you know, directly experienced and are still experiencing transphobia, yes.
Rowling, 54, amid a series of cascading tinderbox issues, from the coronavirus pandemic to the Black Lives Matter demonstrations as well as less than a week into LGBT+ Pride Month, decided now was the perfect time to hit that send button and tweet about trans folk.
The children’s book author took to Twitter Saturday evening (June 6) to comment on people’s genitalia. She focused a thread on her views of sex and gender in relation to trans people that sparked fury online.






Rowling’s thread was first seeded earlier that evening, when she shared an article in Devex, the media platform for the global development community, with the headline: “Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.”



“‘People who menstruate’,” she responded. “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”
In the avalanche of tweets that followed, she sought to reassure her 14.5 million followers that she “knows and loves trans people” and claimed that the idea she hates trans people is “nonsense”.
“I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them,” wrote the writer.
“I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans,” she capped off the thread.

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/06/08/jonathan-ross-jk-rowling-trans-transphobia-white-cis-twitter-juno-dawson/

http://archive.md/39KCL

It's funny how transwomen can define what it means to be a woman, can speak for women, can say they are women, and speak over ACTUAL women, but ACTUAL women can't say shit about trans women's opinion on womanhood because...it's transphobic.

I love how they say, "White cis straight male" as if he was a "black gay cis male" or a "black transwomen" they'd cared about what was being said if it didn't go with the tranny narrative. It's not like people like Blaire White, aren't considered traitors and transphobes, even though he is a transwoman.
or like they didn't get pissed at that black trans woman who said that trannies were impersonators. It's almost as if they only want people to agree.

 

[trannyfucker]

It's funny how transwomen can define what it means to be a woman, can speak for women, can say they are women, and speak over ACTUAL women, but ACTUAL women can't say shit about trans women's opinion on womanhood because...it's transphobic.

I love how they say, "White cis straight male" as if he was a "black gay cis male" or a "black transwomen" they'd cared about what was being said if it didn't go with the tranny narrative. It's not like people like Blaire White, aren't considered traitors and transphobes, even though he is a transwoman.
or like they didn't get pissed at that black trans woman who said that trannies were impersonators. It's almost as if they only want people to agree.

Black is good. White is bad. Cis is bad. Trans is good. Remember this and you can be a MSM reporter.

E.g., 'the homeless man was shot by the police' [that makes him a victim, but white people can't be victims, so leave out 'white']

'the black transwoman was beaten up by a mob' [the mob was also black, but only mention that the 'victim' is black, because black people are good and can't do bad things or if they do and you mention it, that's racist]

'St. Louis Police captain killed after responding to a pawnshop alarm ' [he was black and was killed by a black person, but cops are bad so that cancels out the being killed, and double bad for the killer also being black so he probably deserved it]

'Vallejo police kill unarmed 22-year-old, who was on his knees with his hands up' [he's white, so don't mention his race]

 

[Trump's Chosen]

Daniel Radcliffe declares ‘trans women are women’ in response to JK Rowling’s anti-trans tirade

Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe has made his unwavering support for trans equality clear, in response to anti-trans comments from the series’ author JK Rowling.


Rowling spent much of the weekend infuriating her own fans with an anti-trans tirade, insisting that “erasing the concept of sex” means there’s “no same-sex attraction” and “the lived reality of women globally is erased”.



It was only the latest display of anti-trans rhetoric from the author, but has triggered condemnation from from fans and former cast members.

Daniel Radcliffe: ‘We need to support trans and non-binary people, not invalidate their identities.’

Responding in a blog for LGBT+ charity The Trevor Project, Radcliffe said that while his response will probably be branded “in-fighting between JK Rowling and myself, that is really not what this is about, nor is it what’s important right now”.



He wrote: “While Jo is unquestionably responsible for the course my life has taken, as someone who has been honoured to work with and continues to contribute to The Trevor Project for the last decade, and just as a human being, I feel compelled to say something at this moment.


“Transgender women are women. Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo or I.


“According to The Trevor Project, 78 per cent of transgender and non-binary youth reported being the subject of discrimination due to their gender identity. It’s clear that we need to do more to support transgender and non-binary people, not invalidate their identities, and not cause further harm.”

Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe spoke out (Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for WarnerMedia)


Addressing the thousands of upset Harry Potter fans who have publicly made their disappointment clear, he added: “To all the people who now feel that their experience of the books has been tarnished or diminished, I am deeply sorry for the pain these comments have caused you.


“I really hope that you don’t entirely lose what was valuable in these stories to you.


“If these books taught you that love is the strongest force in the universe, capable of overcoming anything; if they taught you that strength is found in diversity, and that dogmatic ideas of pureness lead to the oppression of vulnerable groups; if you believe that a particular character is trans, non-binary, or gender fluid, or that they are gay or bisexual; if you found anything in these stories that resonated with you and helped you at any time in your life – then that is between you and the book that you read, and it is sacred. And in my opinion nobody can touch that.

“It means to you what it means to you and I hope that these comments will not taint that too much.”


Radcliffe is the first major member of the Harry Potter film cast to speak out in response to Rowling, though Katie Leung, who played Cho Chang, posted a rallying cry for Black trans lives.

Emma Watson, who played Hermione Granger in the film series, has previously made her support for transgender people clear – but has not been drawn into responding to Rowling’s comments on this occasion.

Harry Potter fans are overcome in response to actor’s powerful message.

Fans responded emotionally to Radcliffe’s statement.

One Twitter response reads: “No, but seriously, I think it’s so important that Daniel Radcliffe wrote the letter to make sure everyone feels validated in the Harry Potter fandom and that he supports each one of us. I’m literally crying.”

Another added: “Harry Potter’s legacy is in great hands with Daniel Radcliffe.”

Trans actor Harrison Browne wrote: “In all seriousness, Daniel Radcliffe is saving lives with this statement. As a trans person, I used movies and books as an escape from my life and Harry Potter was one of those spaces I found refuge in. From one Harry to another… thank you.”

Loading…

archive.is

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/06/09/daniel-radcliffe-harry-potter-trans-transgender-jk-rowling-transphobia-trevor-project/

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Harriet Potter and the Stumpy Wand

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

Then go out and fuck one.
Put your dick where your mouth is Potter Boy.

 

[TwinkLover6969]

what does feeling validated even feel like? it sounds like some fake ass emotion to me.

 

[Wraith]

Great. When is ol' Daniel gonna transform into a man?

 

[Benisinbagina]

Then do one, faggot.

 

[Gar For Archer]

Then go out and fuck one.
Put your dick where your mouth is Potter Boy.

The response to “trans women are real women” should ALWAYS be “....but would you fuck a tranny?”

Followed up with “You don’t actually have to give me an answer - you can lie to me, but you can’t lie to yourself.”

 

[(((Obar Lazcano Kamz)))]

i wonder what rons position on trannies is? from the movies he seems like a bigot

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

what does feeling validated even feel like? it sounds like some fake ass emotion to me.

Here’s how you feel validated.
First, smoke a load of weed and take some disassociatives. Wait about an hour, then look in the mirror and think, “Man, I don’t look that bad.”

The response to “trans women are real women” should ALWAYS be “....but would you fuck a tranny?”

Followed up with “You don’t actually have to give me an answer - you can lie to me, but you can’t lie to yourself.”

No ones obligated to like you or fuck you.
Just be polite and go on with your separate lives.

 

[KingCoelacanth]

I'm so glad we have these warring wealthy aristocrats to dominate public opinion and discussion

 

[Return of the Freaker]

what does feeling validated even feel like? it sounds like some fake ass emotion to me.

Idk but it sounds to me like it should feel like being happy to be a nonhuman object. Like a fucking coupon.