Kelly Lenza / LividLipids / softbodytendermind / ass_child / photopotamus - "Radical body liberationist”, Intentionally Repulsive, Uber woke middle-aged SJW influencer wannabe, doxed her former therapist for getting WLS, ate her way to heart failure

1C3A4E22-7C9D-44F3-9889-D1333B1A1C8E.jpeg8D2F790E-5724-4AF0-AFD9-F980C980F4C0.jpegCE88AD98-47D9-4601-A2D8-958AD225D856.jpegEA9F4981-BF96-4CD2-9BAA-1F06AB5FAE3F.jpeg
85866BB5-01F9-4EE4-B5D4-91AE2C3477CF.jpeg

A3A0DE10-34BF-4FAC-AC6A-F10AE398E08B.jpegAB9DE482-2EFA-4651-B424-17EA543162E9.jpeg
 
Maybe it’s just me but stopping a random black woman for your portfolio shot seems less than tactful. Also the lighting that she shot her in is very unflattering and makes her skin look grey. I’m not even a photography fag but she’s making a nice shot look dead and sad by not at least editing it a little bit.
Edit: I know this is really spergy but kelly being a photographer despite not realizing that skin color affects white balance is driving me fucking insane
 
Last edited:
She betrays way too much of how woke politics work in this. Here’s a fellow white woman with a hobby “job,” probably also 100% supported by a husband with a well paying job, trying desperately to avoid the woke Gestapo turning their eyes on her portfolio and seeing that even with all the online virtue signaling, she doesn’t actually have any real black friends or clients. Kelly’s reposting old stuff with the caption unwittingly revealing that she awkwardly approached a random woman at the store and begged her to take a photo so she wouldn’t get called racist on twitter. I can only imagine how the subject of these photos must feel to be so transparently trotted out for woke points. Probably gives her the creeps.
But it’s all politics, all optics, all virtue signaling, and it’s constant. No wonder Kelly is so tired and stressed all the time- she has to navigate the insanity that is progressivism while finding time to ignore her kids and eat thousands of calories. The only way to win is not to play, but she wants everyone in the world to play too so she can beat up on them for not following the latest set of rules.
“You treat black people the same as anyone else? Racist! You need to fetishize and tokenize women at the grocery store or else you’re a white supremacist!”

footnote re: the gender BS: isn’t that what radfems believe? How can you square “gender is made up and you can do whatever” with “I don’t fit what most people think of as “feminine” so here’s a new gender that I made up”?
 
What if the kids were white, Kelly? What if they were #whitesupremacist children. who wouldn't bend the knee or have parents who openly and loudly hated their 'whiteness' in public and instilled shame and guilt into their children? What if they were cops's children? Surely your woke guilty white liberal lady self would relish the chance to punch those narrrrrziiiiiiiiiii children in the mush? Isn't that how your politics, or what passes for them, works these days? GUD vs BAD. End.

She and her dumb friend in Oregon are the absolute nadir of how utterly naive, guilty white liberal women who've led sheltered lives see black people. They don';t see them as individuals who like all humans, vary in personality and behaviour and worth. They lump them all in a box and worship away in the the most patronising manner possible. Behind all this free photshoot crap lies the assumption that black folks couldn't possibly pay for a shoot on their own, because they're all Oppressed Poors Held Down By The Man. Nope, no middle class black people with better jobs than either of these women at all. Cannot exist. In the end though, all they're doing is signalling their piousness to other guilty white liberal women. Vomitous stuff.
 
Curious as to how threatening to punch a child for candy qualifies as sexual violence. Seems like QUITE the bad faith leap. Projecting a little, are we, miss lipids?

she says she would punch the child “in the taint” which I guess is borderline sexual violence? It was a tremendously bizarre thing to say but Kelly’s call out wasn’t much better.



**champagne socialists.
 
These women are saying "with their weapons" but that statement is very misleading. A cop is always wearing a holstered weapon. Notice they are not saying "with weapons drawn." Also, yes, any cop making a welfare check will ask if you have a weapon. Its just what they do. Now these white twats are trying to claim police violence for mundane shit.
 
These women are saying "with their weapons" but that statement is very misleading. A cop is always wearing a holstered weapon. Notice they are not saying "with weapons drawn." Also, yes, any cop making a welfare check will ask if you have a weapon. Its just what they do. Now these white twats are trying to claim police violence for mundane shit.

Yep.

They're basically complaining the cops did as they were asked and checked up on them.

If the cops hadn't checked up on them, they would also be complaining. If they cops hadn't checked up on them and their suicidal self had sliced their wrists or smothered their baby, they'd also be blaming the cops.

If they were held at gunpoint or shot, or abused during the visit in some tangiable way, they'd have a reasonable complaint.

Basically nothing the system can do is right for these types. Cops, social workers, nobody. Sounds like all they want is a padded room and a daily visit from someone who'll at them on the head and tell them how stunning and brave they are for existing while fat / black / Kelly lenza.
 
Back