Do the feds not have to authorize the military stuff getting rehomed? If not I learned something today
Against my better judgment, I'll bite.
Yes, if you're talking about the 1033 program then as far as I understand the feds do have to authorize military material being donated to/purchased by police departments and other non-military government organizations. However, I don't think the feds have jurisdiction over it once material is already in the hands of the police. If they did, Obama would have taken it all back in 2015. And as it happens, billions of dollars in "military equipment" (including a lot of non-combat material) were already transferred from the DoD to police departments even before Trump came into office. Rifles and armor can last a very long time in storage.
That all doesn't really matter, though. Your original issue with it was:
Trump was supposed to be that but he’s simping hard for militarized police forces right now
Now, I'll readily admit I don't know whether demilitarizing the police was part of Trump's political platform in 2016. Believe it or not, I didn't vote for the man so I didn't follow his promises. I can't find anything on it after a quick Google search, though, and it doesn't sound like the type of thing he'd make any promises about considering the rest of his platform. I would be surprised if he
hadn't been all about big displays of force by the police.
In the end... this has nothing to do with police militarization.
Most of the police actions (and abuses of force) we're seeing footage of are being performed by cops in standard riot gear, including batons, pepper spray and tear gas. Stuff that you'd see in the armories of any well-funded PD in any large American city, not military equipment. Now, if you want to talk about authoritarian local governments deploying heavily-armed police officers with aggressive mandates like there's a clearance sale on those things, then we can chat about that.