Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Karl der Grosse]

What do you think of Warhammer 40K?

 

[SIGSEGV]

post birth abortions

You first.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Serious question @BoxerShorts47 - have you mentioned anything on what to do with disabled whites in your ethnostate?

I ask because perhaps those with special needs might want to live with neighbors who share their ideals, and am sincerely hoping that your utopia might include a section of New York lovingly referred to as "Downietown"

Of course he's fine with disabled people, otherwise he'd be executed in his own perfect society.

 

[AnOminous]

depends on the condition. I'm pro abortion to abort disabled babies, including post birth abortions. I don't think it's moral to invest community resources into a drag on the community.

You're a drag on the community you fucking subhuman incel who will never reproduce.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

depends on the condition. I'm pro abortion to abort disabled babies, including post birth abortions. I don't think it's moral to invest community resources into a drag on the community. For people that get injured during life. I think there should be assistance.

The autist cries out as it spergs.

So, can we clarify, then: Is *whatever your disability issue is* congenital or did you fall into a vat of commercial autism?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

What do you think of Warhammer 40K?

heard about it
never played it.

 

[Popper Whiting]

I'm pro abortion to abort disabled babies, including post birth abortions.

I agree 100%. So lets meet up, you bring your glorious self and I'll bring the wire coathanger.

 

[Heckler1]

He should give up on his whole speaking tour thing already. He has zero charisma, is uninteresting to listen to (as he tries to brute force arguments with meaningless buzzwords and misrepresenting his superior debaters), and while having one edgy talking point can make someone a lighting rod for controversy in a good way, this dood has ALL of the edgy talking points.
Is anyone else getting Johnathon Ross vibes from this dood?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

He should give up on his whole speaking tour thing already. He has zero charisma, is uninteresting to listen to (as he tries to brute force arguments with meaningless buzzwords and misrepresenting his superior debaters), and while having one edgy talking point can make someone a lighting rod for controversy in a good way, this dood has ALL of the edgy talking points.
Is anyone else getting Johnathon Ross vibes from this dood?

ya, go big or go home.
any 1 of my talking points is completely outside the overton window. might as well just go balls to the wall.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

ya, go big or go home.
any 1 of my talking points is completely outside the overton window. might as well just go balls to the wall.

"Balls to the chin" is more your speed, I would have thought?

 

[Stardust]

Balls to the walls is fitting for him here, provided said walls are under the age of 14.

 

[Heckler1]

ya, go big or go home.
any 1 of my talking points is completely outside the overton window. might as well just go balls to the wall.

I know this may shock you, but that is really really dumb. No one on the right or left is going to let you on a stage because your points are anathema to both groups. So really, your career is DOA unless you can stop being disingenuous and consider other points of view instead of yelling "STRAWMAN" or some other fallacy name as if that is how logic works. It makes you a weaselly little shit with all the trustworthiness of a helicopter with an ejector seat.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

I know this may shock you, but that is really really dumb. No one on the right or left is going to let you on a stage because your points are anathema to both groups. So really, your career is DOA unless you can stop being disingenuous and consider other points of view instead of yelling "STRAWMAN" or some other fallacy name as if that is how logic works. It makes you a weaselly little shit with all the trustworthiness of a helicopter with an ejector seat.

As soon as you start with the pedo nonsense, at that point, only the pedos will accept you. Even then, despite being the lowest form of life on earth, some of them would consider BoyShagger47 too much to countenance.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

This thread is just one giant stealth halal and I love it.

 

[Popper Whiting]

It makes you a weaselly little shit with all the trustworthiness of a helicopter with an ejector seat.

@BoxerShorts47 sincerely argued earlier for lowering the age of consent to 12. Being a weaselly untrustworthy piece of shit is stock standard for chomos. I'll bet London to a brick this fucker drives a white van.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I know this may shock you, but that is really really dumb. No one on the right or left is going to let you on a stage because your points are anathema to both groups. So really, your career is DOA unless you can stop being disingenuous and consider other points of view instead of yelling "STRAWMAN" or some other fallacy name as if that is how logic works. It makes you a weaselly little shit with all the trustworthiness of a helicopter with an ejector seat.

Everything the liberals have ever promoted: feminism (19A, raising age of consent, equal pay), diversity (civil rights, open borders, affirmative action), homosexuality, transgenderism, EVERYTHING was anathema at one point in time. Your job as a grassroots activist aka revolutionary is to change the minds of people. You do that by repeating your talking points until they give up out of frustration. This is how democracy works. Do you think the liberals said, "wow everyone hates gay marriage, maybe we should listen to people/" or "Wow these people are ignorant, we need to double down on our brainwashing." ?

 

[Popper Whiting]

Everything the liberals have ever promoted: feminism (19A, raising age of consent, equal pay), diversity (civil rights, open borders, affirmative action), homosexuality, transgenderism, EVERYTHING was anathema at one point in time. Your job as a grassroots activist aka revolutionary is to change the minds of people. You do that by repeating your talking points until they give up out of frustration. This is how democracy works. Do you think the liberals said, "wow everyone hates gay marriage, maybe we should listen to people/" or "Wow these people are ignorant, we need to double down on our brainwashing." ?

 

[GethN7]

depends on the condition. I'm pro abortion to abort disabled babies, including post birth abortions. I don't think it's moral to invest community resources into a drag on the community. For people that get injured during life. I think there should be assistance.

I find it rather disturbing how callously you decide who should live or die. Due to my faith, I'm not a fan of abortion, but I'm not going to stand in the way of a woman wanting to get one, that's her decision. At the same time, when it comes to arguing who deserves an abortion, I find it sobering to consider the question as if you would be one of the people you say should be aborted. If you are perfectly fine with the idea someone should have prevented you from being born, fair enough, that's your opinion, but I don't find it moral to callously decide who should live or die by some heartless metric of who you would consider not worth keeping around.

 

[cumrobbery]

Everything the liberals have ever promoted: feminism (19A, raising age of consent, equal pay), diversity (civil rights, open borders, affirmative action), homosexuality, transgenderism, EVERYTHING was anathema at one point in time. Your job as a grassroots activist aka revolutionary is to change the minds of people. You do that by repeating your talking points until they give up out of frustration. This is how democracy works. Do you think the liberals said, "wow everyone hates gay marriage, maybe we should listen to people/" or "Wow these people are ignorant, we need to double down on our brainwashing." ?

What's your favorite digimon

 

[Pissmaster]

There is no better possible clip you could have posted in response to that