@BoxerShorts47 the logic of a white ethnostate to serve white interests is flawed before it's even started because it assumes there's such a thing as "white interest" or "black interest" and that those things are mutually exclusive. Here's the deal, I'm a white woman with a white husband, our children will be white, however, there's a chance our grandchildren won't be, that doesn't change the fact that they carry my genetics and my love for them is not conditional on phenotype. If those grandchildren were deported in the name of your white ethnostate, it goes against my personal interest.
If my adopted brother were to be deported in the name of your white ethnostate, it goes against my personal interest.
If my community demographic were to change and the nice Chinese family that owns the best restaurant in town were to get sent back to China, or the elderly black man who crosses my jogging path on his walk to the library every morning and says a friendly 'hi' as we pass were to disappear in the name of your white ethnostate, it goes against my personal interest.
If my mix breed dog were euthanized in the name of your purebred ethnostate, it goes against my personal interest.
Calling me a liberal cuck when you know literally nothing about the way I vote is not a counter argument that makes your ethnostate in the name of "white interests" a less flawed model. I have no interest in your retarded white ethnostate wet dream, if you can't convince me why it benefits me personally, why should I want it?