Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

How do you memory hole three days in a gold casket for a guy who might've died on the way to hospital anyway? The media just jumped five sharks.

These are the same weasels who will proclaim objectivity while telling such obvious propaganda it makes the Ministry of Truth look like a mom and pop operation, I have no doubt they'll find a way.
 
These are the same weasels who will proclaim objectivity while telling such obvious propaganda it makes the Ministry of Truth look like a mom and pop operation, I have no doubt they'll find a way.

I just talked to a person who is fully on board with social justice and their entire faith in mainstream media as been shaken considerably, they've had no comeback to me for the points I've been bringing up, and they always have had a comeback, always. Now take the regular 9-5 person whos just been told talk of BLM is barred from workplace talk.
 
How do you memory hole three days in a gold casket for a guy who might've died on the way to hospital anyway? The media just jumped five sharks.
Same way you memory hole 'Protests and funerals are not an essential activity! If you even dare go outside you are literally killing grandma and who knows how many POCs!' and replace it with 'Racism is even worse than covid! All these peaceful riots and a massive funeral fit for an African despot are an essential part of the healing process!' within the span of a week, I suppose.
 

All of this shit reporting is so vague; I can't even find out how the removal of these protections will allegedly affect people. Does it mean that doctors and insurance companies can more easily deny the transing of kids (i.e. child abuse) and SRS genital mutilation without fear of retribution? Does it mean that taxpayers don't have to foot the bill for this psychosis? Because those are good things.
 
All of this shit reporting is so vague; I can't even find out how the removal of these protections will allegedly affect people. Does it mean that doctors and insurance companies can more easily deny the transing of kids (i.e. child abuse) and SRS genital mutilation without fear of retribution? Does it mean that taxpayers don't have to foot the bill for this psychosis? Because those are good things.
It means that health plans don't have to cover tranny surgeries, so the military doesn't need to pay for $100,000 full body cosmetic surgery. It also means doctors and psychs have the right to refuse "treatment" to autogynephiles, or can treat them as having a mental illness without being sued.
 
He won't. As soon as the momentum starts to fade they'll just find some other piece of trash who happened to get killed by a white or "white" person to take his place. All this praising and wailing and canonizing will be forgotten, he'll just be some drug addict loser with his couple of dozen kids still all trying to sue the state for gibs over his death.

I'd have to agree, look at Michael Brown, especially once the autopsy came in and courts got to take a look at it and it clear that the cop was justified in shooting him, you even had the tape of him abusing the clerk/store owner when he stole from them before him and his buddy ran into the cop. They still use "HAND'S UP DON'T SHOOT" but Brown himself was discarded into the trash. Floyd definitely has gotten some of the most grand treatment since Obama said Trayvon could've been his son but hell Trayvon didn't get to lay in state and have the mayor weeping at his gold tinted casket. The next darkie that gets offed by a white cop is gonna have to step his game up.

In regards to Trump though I think he's handled things fairly well without federalizing the National Guard, he's seemingly picked his course and intends to ride it out, I'm guessing he's banking on the people actually living in these states and cities to see how shitty their local politicians are first hand and maybe bring some over to his side or just destroy their confidence in their elected officials.
 
Last edited:
In regards to Trump though I think he's handled things fairly well without federalizing the National Guard, he's seemingly picked his course and intends to ride it out, I'm guessing he's banking on the people actually living in these states and cities to see how shitty their local politicians are first hand and maybe bring some over to his side or just destroy their confidence in their elected officials.

My thoughts exactly. Trump made noises about lowering the boom if he had to, but refrained from doing so because he figured, correctly, this would burn out, and to do so would give his enemies ammo. Besides, once all the rage dies down, his enemies still have to pick up the pieces from what they let fester in their own backyards and they will torpedoed confidence in them while he loses little letting them destroy themselves.
 
In regards to Trump though I think he's handled things fairly well without federalizing the National Guard, he's seemingly picked his course and intends to ride it out, I'm guessing he's banking on the people actually living in these states and cities to see how shitty their local politicians are first hand and maybe bring some over to his side or just destroy their confidence in their elected officials.

The problem is you wonder how much support Trump has inside the apparatus of Government. If he activated the insurrection act would the Generals revolt? We know the FBI says "there is no evidence of Antifa involvement" and one Genereal "apologized for clearing the area in front of the White House after the Chruch was burnt down", just how many people are brainwashed inside the Government at this point?
 
I'd have to agree, look at Michael Brown, especially once the autopsy and courts got to take a look at it and it clear that the cop was justified in shooting him, you even had the tape of him abusing the clerk/store owner when he stole from them before him and his buddy ran into the cop. They still use "HAND'S UP DON'T SHOOT" but Brown himself was discarded into the trash. Floyd definitely has gotten some of the most grand treatment since Obama said Trayvon could've been his son but hell Trayvon didn't get to lay in state and have the mayor weeping at his gold tinted casket. The next darkie that gets offed by a white cop is gonna have to step his game up.

In regards to Trump though I think he's handled things fairly well without federalizing the National Guard, he's seemingly picked his course and intends to ride it out, I'm guessing he's banking on the people actually living in these states and cities to see how shitty their local politicians are first hand and maybe bring some over to his side or just destroy their confidence in their elected officials.
Since we were talking about history, it's been mentioned more than once that there were several protesting blacks in buses before Rosa Parks - but the civil rights movement kept "turning them down" until the right person came along. And Rosa - being a good, decent person - was that right gal for them to rally a movement around.

Now? Instant gratification generation who can't seem to wait for a truly egregious violation. Heck even in this instance - even though George Floyd wasn't an angel, EVERYBODY agreed this was wrong (and the man should have had his day in court). But it seems like the rally goers really want things to go by the script they imagined in their heads. Remember the infamous panels of riri williams from the Ironman comics?
1592024942803.png
1592024710986.png
That's literally them now. They cannot handle any deviation from the expected script. "What are you doing? You're supposed to be evil. You're supposed to fight back. Please oppress me."
 
Since we were talking about history, it's been mentioned more than once that there were several protesting blacks in buses before Rosa Parks - but the civil rights movement kept "turning them down" until the right person came along. And Rosa - being a good, decent person - was that right gal for them to rally a movement around.

The problem is the movement they are rallying around is the lowest deaths by race in the nation. There's no way to extrapolate from that other than it's a tool for the DNC to get votes and devise the same oppressive policies that got Blacks in that moment in the first place. It's a literal con-job in plain view.
 
Since we were talking about history, it's been mentioned more than once that there were several protesting blacks in buses before Rosa Parks - but the civil rights movement kept "turning them down" until the right person came along. And Rosa - being a good, decent person - was that right gal for them to rally a movement around.

Yeah, it was more like a casting call than an organic event. That's why it's interesting to me that BLM only finds actual criminals, not good little model citizens, to be their Rosa Parkses, and that it still resonates so deeply. What does that say about our current society?
 
Yeah, it was more like a casting call than an organic event. That's why it's interesting to me that BLM only finds actual criminals, not good little model citizens, to be their Rosa Parkses, and that it still resonates so deeply. What does that say about our current society?

I consider it a sad commentary on how values have changed. Rosa Parks was someone who simply wanted to be treated as an equal and made a moral stand against inequality via an act of respectable civil disobedience where she accepted the consequences of her actions if it meant an injustice would be confronted and ended. Back in her day, that's all people in her position asked for, basic dignity.

These days, there are a lot more people who think equality is not good enough and want more. They've gotten greedy, and nothing will please them except more. Hence why they elevated a criminal who committed a financial crime to be the new Rosa Parks. Says a lot about how things have changed, and not for the better.
 
The problem is you wonder how much support Trump has inside the apparatus of Government. If he activated the insurrection act would the Generals revolt? We know the FBI says "there is no evidence of Antifa involvement" and one Genereal "apologized for clearing the area in front of the White House after the Chruch was burnt down", just how many people are brainwashed inside the Government at this point?
Is there some detail I'm missing here? Clearing the protest out by military force for a photo-op seems rather questionable, and enabled the media to kneecap the reassurance gained from it. Would the country really have spiralled into irrevocable chaos if it weren't for that one symbolic picture of Trump standing by the damaged church with Bible in hand, as if to say " I'm here to hold things together in these dark times" ? I guess it works in a "Freikorps voran-die Grenze Brennt! Fur eine zerbrochene Welt" kind of way.

("Free Corps ahead, the borders burn! [We fight] for a broken world." is the literal translation according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3EfLouZiUs).
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Tismguide
All of this shit reporting is so vague; I can't even find out how the removal of these protections will allegedly affect people. Does it mean that doctors and insurance companies can more easily deny the transing of kids (i.e. child abuse) and SRS genital mutilation without fear of retribution? Does it mean that taxpayers don't have to foot the bill for this psychosis? Because those are good things.
Ran into this when I saw #gaysfortrump trending on Twitter. Don't worry, as soon as I scrolled over it, it instantly vanished since twitter was trying to censor it. Had to search the phrase to find the censored tweet again.

2841 (1).jpg

Absolutely nothing fucking happened.
 
So remember when someone mentioned chipping away culture and history via attacking the weakest parts? Guess what: A statue dedicated to Caesar Rodney, a Founding Father, was taken down in Wilmington. (Archive here)

Legit called it whoever said that.
A quote from the article.

"We cannot erase history, as painful as it may be, but we can certainly discuss history with each other and determine together what we value and what we feel is appropriate to memorialize,”

Too bad these fucks think that anyone having to do with American history isn't "appropriate".
 
I consider it a sad commentary on how values have changed. Rosa Parks was someone who simply wanted to be treated as an equal and made a moral stand against inequality via an act of respectable civil disobedience where she accepted the consequences of her actions if it meant an injustice would be confronted and ended. Back in her day, that's all people in her position asked for, basic dignity.

These days, there are a lot more people who think equality is not good enough and want more. They've gotten greedy, and nothing will please them except more. Hence why they elevated a criminal who committed a financial crime to be the new Rosa Parks. Says a lot about how things have changed, and not for the better.

If Rosa Parks was still alive, she could had reacted like MLK in this "alternate reality".

 
Back