Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I too have been marathoning King of the Hill in yearning for better times.
I have been rewatching the goode family. people say it wasn't as funny and was too on the nose, but with how people are now they seem pretty tame and actually funny.
 
Forgive the use of a reaction image, but this was literally the first thing that jumped into my brain when reading this tweet.
5ee.jpg

I'm not gonna says why I know this, but you guys know all those stories of the US being "full of animals" and "overflowing with plants" when Europeans showed up? Part of that is because the people who were managing that stuff had already fucked off when the settlers arrived.
It would be like if suddenly every chicken-farmer in the US knocked down their buildings and moved to Nevada but left the chickens behind. If you didn't know better you'd think chickens were just native to the Ozarks or whatever.
 
If true, since his mother was an American "Natural born citizen" could still be applied making President Obama a citizen by birth right . There is no legal definition of the term, closest thing there is for this, is 8 USC § 1409 paragraph (c) which states that if a child is born overseas to an unmarried mother who is a citizen (and the father isn't) the mother needed to at any time prior to birth reside in the US for 1 year.
 
17763571-436F-4403-94EF-F79183D367AC.jpeg
Okay, there’s a few differences between then and now:
  1. The populations were much smaller and much less dense than today
  2. Groups of people were more homogenized (which is correlated with less crime)
  3. People being captured and taken as prisoners was pretty universal
    1. The Aztec liked to kill their prisoners
    2. Native Americans throughout the Americas had elaborate slave networks (the Europeans were unaware of this when they first arrived. It’s also how you’d end up coming across a Hopi in Massachusetts)
      1. There was even a whole new tribe that was made up entirely of slaves called the Genizaros (though, this was after Spanish conquest)
    3. There were other trade networks as well that didn’t just sell slaves, it’s why you saw Macaw feathers in Pueblo territory (current day New Mexico)
  4. For any society to function, laws (written or unwritten) need to be in place. Even if there weren’t police, those laws could have just been enforced by the communities
 
View attachment 1379481
Okay, there’s a few differences between then and now:
  1. The populations were much smaller and much less dense than today
  2. Groups of people were more homogenized (which is correlated with less crime)
  3. People being captured and taken as prisoners was pretty universal
    1. The Aztec liked to kill their prisoners
    2. Native Americans throughout the Americas had elaborate slave networks (the Europeans were unaware of this when they first arrived. It’s also how you’d end up coming across a Hopi in Massachusetts)
      1. There was even a whole new tribe that was made up entirely of slaves called the Genizaros (though, this was after Spanish conquest)
    3. There were other trade networks as well that didn’t just sell slaves, it’s why you saw Macaw feathers in Pueblo territory (current day New Mexico)
  4. For any society to function, laws (written or unwritten) need to be in place. Even if there weren’t police, those laws could have just been enforced by the communities
And this is why proper education is necessary. This entire planet is pretty much guilty of it's past and we need to learn to move on.
 
View attachment 1379481
Okay, there’s a few differences between then and now:
  1. The populations were much smaller and much less dense than today
  2. Groups of people were more homogenized (which is correlated with less crime)
  3. People being captured and taken as prisoners was pretty universal
    1. The Aztec liked to kill their prisoners
    2. Native Americans throughout the Americas had elaborate slave networks (the Europeans were unaware of this when they first arrived. It’s also how you’d end up coming across a Hopi in Massachusetts)
      1. There was even a whole new tribe that was made up entirely of slaves called the Genizaros (though, this was after Spanish conquest)
    3. There were other trade networks as well that didn’t just sell slaves, it’s why you saw Macaw feathers in Pueblo territory (current day New Mexico)
  4. For any society to function, laws (written or unwritten) need to be in place. Even if there weren’t police, those laws could have just been enforced by the communities

Even assuming that the Natives didn't have any law enforcement (it seems weirdly racist that they assume they all lived in a state of anarchy and couldn't figure out how to make or enforce laws until whity came along), the second post suggests that modern societies all really do need police and you couldn't just get rid of them.

The more advanced civilizations near the equator had a complex network of courts, and the Aztecs had not only a prison but had European style debtors prisons, a death row for inmates awaiting capital punishment, a separate prison for minor offenses, and varying methods of execution including hanging and stoning. The complex societies that formed in the Americas had comparable structures to basically all European ones, and it isn't like Europe was the only continent in the old world to have prisons.
 
I think discussions about progressiveness often suffer from an "Emperor's New Clothes" situation. People aren't willing to call out extreme view points because they're afraid of being labeled as ignorant. For example, the idea of "genderfluid" seems weird to me, but I'm worried that in a few decades stuff like that will be considered perfectly normal and those of the then will wonder how we of the now could've been so closed minded.
The slippery slope is real.
Person's twitter is here,he protected his tweets and I regret not doing it sooner.
faggot went on a tirade that books are bad because dyslexia or some shit.
Audiobooks are a thing. Surely he's heard of them.
 
Even assuming that the Natives didn't have any law enforcement (it seems weirdly racist that they assume they all lived in a state of anarchy and couldn't figure out how to make or enforce laws until whity came along), the second post suggests that modern societies all really do need police and you couldn't just get rid of them.
Even the tribes who did live in smaller groups or who operated as nomads had what we would consider to be rigid social structures that weeded out people with antisocial traits. If you couldn't fit somewhere in the structure of the band or tribe you were exiled. They might not have killed them outright, but criminals were, largely irreparably, cut from the social fabric.
 
Even the tribes who did live in smaller groups or who operated as nomads had what we would consider to be rigid social structures that weeded out people with antisocial traits. If you couldn't fit somewhere in the structure of the band or tribe you were exiled. They might not have killed them outright, but criminals were, largely irreparably, cut from the social fabric.
They were also a great example of "restorative justice" these loons like to go on about (and idealize natives for practicing). Which meant in some societies you literally had to pay for your crimes (which might include giving away a daughter for free) at a price the other guy and the chief agreed on, and if you couldn't pay you either got kicked out (which means you'd probably be dead sooner or later) or you got to be the other guy's slave until you paid off that debt. What a great system we should copy.

Another great form of native justice is the tribes that practiced honor killings for fornication or adultery where they'd just drown both the man and woman who committed it assuming the father/husband asked for it.
 
Back