Sluthate.com

[umad]

Are you gonna provide better arguments or are you gonna scream FALLACY in this argument?

Why should i ever provide an argument when we have retards asking for peer reviewed studies even if you claim the sky is blue?

By "better arguments" do you mean contenent,thus a justification to a flow of ad-hominems? No thanks.

 

[EI 903]

Why should i ever provide an argument when we have retards asking for peer reviewed studies even if you claim the sky is blue?

By "better arguments" do you mean contenent,thus a justification to a flow of ad-hominems? No thanks.

You should go outside. It's nice out there.

 

[Sanic]

Why should i ever provide an argument when we have retards asking for peer reviewed studies even if you claim the sky is blue?

By "better arguments" do you mean contenent,thus a justification to a flow of ad-hominems? No thanks.

You're back, lol

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

Why should i ever provide an argument when we have retards asking for peer reviewed studies even if you claim the sky is blue?

By "better arguments" do you mean contenent,thus a justification to a flow of ad-hominems? No thanks.

You really aren't intellectually equipped for an argument, so you allege that having an argument is impossible. Bravo.
Like I said, step your game up or piss off.

 

[JU 199]

You should go outside. It's nice out there.

I don't think he ever left his mothers uterus....

 

[Stratomsk]

Are you gonna provide better arguments or are you gonna scream FALLACY in this argument?

Our adorable little troll doesn't even know what fallacies mean. This is how he uses them:

Dr Boe Jangles Esq: "You're right, you just focus on a website bashing people with "maxilla issues" and "sub-5s". Face it, your brand of retardation is no different."
umad thinking: (What to do what to do. Oh! I know! I'll just bombard these kiwifags with wikipedia links and act like I won.) "Take that! *Posts random fallacies without explanation* I feel so accomplished with myself."

 

[José Mourinho]

Why should i ever provide an argument when we have retards asking for peer reviewed studies even if you claim the sky is blue?

By "better arguments" do you mean contenent,thus a justification to a flow of ad-hominems? No thanks.

Thanks for proving my point lol. Are you gonna provide better arguments to prove your points, or are you gonna scream FALLACIES and AD HOMINEMS or STRAWMEN just to derail discussion lol?


Nice damage control you did there. :3

 

[umad]

Truthfully, @umad, you're actually the least entertaining Sluthater here. You're not intelligent enough to have a discussion, so you rely entirely on that "Just lol at this" bit and shitposting. Don't you want to achieve more as an asshole? Try discussing your views, "redpill" us, anything. Bring the A-game, or fuck off.
Edit: You need to google what "lurker" means.

Translation: Provide me contenent that i archived through provoking you,contenent that will make me feel superior and relieve my misery,otherwise go away cause we don't want logic here.

http://urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lurker

 

[Sanic]

Translation: Provide me contenent that i archived through provoking you,contenent that will make me feel superior and relieve my misery,otherwise go away cause we don't want logic here.

http://urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lurker

dude, quit being so fat

 

[JU 199]

@umad Do you have any IRL friends?

 

[Sanic]

@umad Do you have any IRL friends?

I don't think we need an answer for that one.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

Translation: Provide me contenent that i archived through provoking you,contenent that will make me feel superior and relieve my misery,otherwise go away cause we don't want logic here.

http://urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lurker

I wouldn't ask your for contenent, bro.
Lurking requires shutting the fuck up. You never shut the fuck up, ergo, you are not lurking.
How's that for logic?

 

[SU 390]

They love to claim every heinous criminal as their own don't they? I've never seen a group so intent on vilifying themselves in order to gain oppression points. SJWs are infinitely smarter by comparison.

Not getting the poon-poon will make people insane. Which reminds me, I need to figure out which fleshlight I should get.

 

[OV 370]

Translation: Provide me contenent that i archived through provoking you,contenent that will make me feel superior and relieve my misery,otherwise go away cause we don't want logic here.

http://urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lurker

I'm confused, can you please link to a definition of "contenent"?

 

[umad]

Oh,watch out,the sanic ad-hominem butthurt wannabe trolls duo is here! Im going to cry in the corner because you guiz are mean to me!

 

[José Mourinho]

I like how umad is obsessed spending lots of time analysing about how minor bones can influence how attractive you are and analysing every single fallacy instead of.... using that time to actually try dating women.

Oh never mind, I'm Chad Thundercock so my opinion doesn't matter.

 

[Sanic]

Oh,watch out,the sanic ad-hominem butthurt wannabe trolls duo is here! Im going to cry in the corner because you guiz are mean to me!

Your salt is tasty.

 

[Positron]

Exactly, but the principles of aesthetic design overlap. Headlights of a car bear an obvious resemblance to the eyes of a human.

The human brain is an expert analogizer: its job is to find patterns. A cloud can look like a human face and that doesn't mean anything.

So then the ideal bone structure doesn't exist. Thanks for clarifying.

They're firm believers in Platonic forms, but can't even manage to get a Platonic relationship.

Why would their genetics be incapable of producing them? What are you even saying?

The ideal bone structure in terms of shape and angulation is subjective. So are individual features. But the preference in the positioning of the upper and lower jaw is universal. Function follows form. Correct position of the maxilla and mandible = bigger airway, better breathing, less chance of sleep apnea, fully erupted teeth, wide palate, less wear on teeth, etc. Maxilla/Mandible = over 60% of the face. That is all.

You're fucking contradicting yourself: if some position of skull bones leads to better health, then by definition such position is ideal and therefore not "subjective". It is your aesthetic preference that is subjective.

Without orthognathic bone structure, people can't accurately evaluate features.

I can't even parse this sentence: do you mean people without "orthognathic" bone structures are lousy judges in beauty, or do you mean you can't accurately judge a person's features unless he or she has "orthognathic" bone structures? Because both interpretations are ridiculous.

 

[Stoned Tablet]

Ok, what your final point then?

My final point is that as trivial as it seems, proper positioning of the upper jaw and lower jaw relative to the soft tissue is crucial to an aesthetically pleasing face. This is important because people severely underestimate the role an aesthetic face plays in social situations. How you act and what you say does unquestionably plays a role in attraction, sex, dominance, human interaction, and general likeability, but the face is actually just as important. So, if you struggle in the love department and have a skeletal deformity (underbite, overbite, crossbite, open bite), you might want to look into orthognathic surgery to not only improve the FUNCTION of your jaws and airways but also the correct the AESTHETICS of your face. FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. That is all.

 

[AnOminous]

Aren't you all the smart ones? I thought simple baits like mine would not work with such smart persons but i were wrong.

Does not change the fact that since i joined the thread boosted from page 150 to 650+ pages and i only made 400 posts,the rest were made all by your users. Just lol at all the time you have wasted.

So what? The site is for laughing at retards and you're one. We have a thread 10 times as long for a spastic retard named Margarine Sikfuk.