Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like how umad is obsessed spending lots of time analysing about how minor bones can influence how attractive you are and analysing every single fallacy instead of.... using that time to actually try dating women.

Oh never mind, I'm Chad Thundercock so my opinion doesn't matter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Do any of you actually base what you are saying to reality or just assume it's truth because "we cool dawg".

I do all of that and im also Chad Thundercock. umad?
 
Oh,watch out,the sanic ad-hominem butthurt wannabe trolls duo is here! Im going to cry in the corner because you guiz are mean to me! :(
Hello there. This is my first time talking to you, and I'd like to make it memorable. Ergo, I'd like to let you know that I'll try to be your friend, until you say something stupid.
 
My final point is that as trivial as it seems, proper positioning of the upper jaw and lower jaw relative to the soft tissue is crucial to an aesthetically pleasing face. This is important because people severely underestimate the role an aesthetic face plays in social situations. How you act and what you say does unquestionably plays a role in attraction, sex, dominance, and general likeability, but the face is actually just as important. So, if you struggle in the love department and have a skeletal deformity (underbite, overbite, crossbite, open bite), you might want to look into orthognathic surgery to not only improve the FUNCTION of your jaws and airways but also the correct the AESTHETICS of your face. That is all.
Have you considered that maybe you don't score because you discuss shit like that all the time?
 
My final point is that as trivial as it seems, proper positioning of the upper jaw and lower jaw relative to the soft tissue is crucial to an aesthetically pleasing face. This is important because people severely underestimate the role an aesthetic face plays in social situations. How you act and what you say does unquestionably plays a role in attraction, sex, dominance, and general likeability, but the face is actually just as important. So, if you struggle in the love department and have a skeletal deformity (underbite, overbite, crossbite, open bite), you might want to look into orthognathic surgery to not only improve the FUNCTION of your jaws and airways but also the correct the AESTHETICS of your face. That is all.

autism.png
 
Do any of you actually base what you are saying to reality or just assume it's truth because "we cool dawg".

Is this the kind of way you spend your days when you know you're going to die a lonely virgin drowning in your own tears?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Meowthkip and Sanic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Do any of you actually base what you are saying to reality or just assume it's truth because "we cool dawg".

I do all of that and im also Chad Thundercock. umad?
I like how you're actually proving my point further by still screaming Wikipedia links.

If all your arguments are just pointing out fallacies, I think you should better rethink your arguments and know what fallacies actually are.

Keep on damage controlling as usual.
 
I provided an anecdotal example of my own experience with jaw surgery a few pages back.
I know. I'm not going to read it though. Two reasons why:
1.) Anecdotal evidence and case studies bear no statistical significance, and are useless in identifying trends.
2.) Judging by your previous posts, I'm guessing it's boring and indulgent as all fuck.
 
I like how you're actually proving my point further by still screaming Wikipedia links.

If all your arguments are just pointing out fallacies, I think you should better rethink your arguments and know what fallacies actually are.

Keep on damage controlling as usual.
Umad: Damn, I wish there was a Wikipedia link for pointing out a fallacy that means calling me out on pointing out too much fallacies!
 
I like how you're actually proving my point further by still screaming Wikipedia links.

If all your arguments are just pointing out fallacies, I think you should better rethink your arguments and know what fallacies actually are.

Keep on damage controlling as usual.
You maked a public comment damaging my image,i replied defending myself.

It's called accountabilty.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accountability
 
Do any of you actually base what you are saying to reality or just assume it's truth because "we cool dawg".

I do all of that and im also Chad Thundercock. umad?
See, right now you really feel like you're arguing. But in actuality, your situation is more like that of a hamster trapped in the dryer with a load of tennis balls.
 
That's the exact fallacy our friend @umad has.

Umad, umad?
Actually no.


  • It is reasonable to, at least provisionally, reject an improbable proposition for which no adequate evidence has been presented. So, if you can show that all of the common arguments for a certain proposition are fallacious, and the burden of proof is on the proposition's proponents, then you do not commit this fallacy by rejecting that proposition. Rather, the fallacy is committed when you jump to the conclusion that just because one argument for it is fallacious, no cogent argument for it can exist.

    Where's the evidence to the claims you all are making?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back