Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

Cosmos said:
View attachment 1386614

"I need help but the government won't give me enough to survive on!"

"You do realize you're tweeting at a Republican and Republicans are the ones who keep cutting funding for that?"

"They should, welfare queens are ruining this country!"
Click to expand...
One can only wonder how they could get only $24 in food stamps and the like unless they either screwed up on the application or they don't make enough money but live with people that can provide. All that said, it is a sort of hypocrisy when you have a republican that wants welfare cut and yet they want to rely on it. Especially they have enough means to live without it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Disagree
Reactions: Chester Rigby and Shield Breaker
Cat Menagerie said:
So I posted this in an A&N thread already but it goes well here, too. Anyway, they're already lining up outside the BOK center in Tulsa for the rally on Saturday. COVID numbers are spiking here already (though deaths have remained pretty low for now) and hospitalizations have gone up. I'm not a COVID doomer but I'm expecting a lot of old and fat people at this rally, and this disease is known to hate boomers and fatties.

www.news9.com

Supporters Line Up At Tulsa's BOK Center Days Before President Trump's Rally

People Line Up At Tulsa's BOK Center Days Before President Trump's Rally
www.news9.com

Click to expand...
If 800k people can gather in NYC for BLACK LIVES MATTER I'm sure this won't matter either. Right?
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Exterminate Leftists, JimmyNugget, Whatsup bud? and 1 other person
MarineTrainedTard said:
I personally wouldn't be comfortable betting on this election tbh but the incumbent is pretty much always the favorite and Biden is... Not great
Click to expand...
In theory Trump should lose this election easily.If his opponent was Kennedy or Roosevelt or Clinton the guy or Obama.Disastrious management of a pandemic is an easy attack platform.All that an opponent has to do is bring up the stats about the death toll that's it for the next 5 months.You repeat 100k+ dead long enough people will get the message.Add the recession and its in theory even easier.Even if the economy recovers say by september an opponent all he has to say is this 'Trump is like a store supervisor who didn't pull the fire alarm on time and the store burned down.Now he's trying to take credit for a new store getting built.No you don't take credit for something when your incompetence caused the problem in the first place.'As for the riots you can easily say 'our country went through an unprecedented shock people were waiting for POTUS to do something when that something was nothing the end result was violence.When leadership fails anarchy follows'.But then you remember that its Biden we're talking about here.Someone like Kennedy would defeat Trump in a landslide his reaction would be 'you're kidding right this is too easy'.Trump is an easy target now with the pandemic since you can easily blame him for every fatality.Its on his watch after all.But its Biden we're talking about here.A guy who isn't even Obama lite.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Exterminate Leftists, Stay safe and 8 others
iafiv said:
In theory Trump should lose this election easily.If his opponent was Kennedy or Roosevelt or Clinton the guy or Obama.Disastrious management of a pandemic is an easy attack platform.All that an opponent has to do is bring up the stats about the death toll that's it for the next 5 months.You repeat 100k+ dead long enough people will get the message.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure Biden even knows what year it is much less that there's a pandemic.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Exterminate Leftists, ConfederateIrishman and 11 others
I do find it weird that in 2020 the only candidates who were considered even somewhat viable were all in their 70's on both sides.Sure you had a few younger ones but none viable.'Who the fuck is Pete Buttigieg?' was my reaction when hearing he was running in Iowa.It reminds me of a joke that was popular towards the end of the Soviet Union.'in a monarchy power goes from father to son in the soviet system it goes from grandpa to grandpa'.This was a joke on the alleged decrepit state of the soviet state with leaders who were all very old.Jokes aside it is genuinely weird to have only geriatrics on all sides.It means that there is a clear rupture from the upper leadership to the lower levels.If no one aged 50-60 is even in theory viable that is a warning sign.There is a rupture between the 65+ and the 45 below.Normally there should be a healthy group of 45-60 year olds that can bridge the gap.But this time it seems there isn't.And there wasn't at the last election either.
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Army Burger, Unsweet and 2 others
iafiv said:
Normally there should be a healthy group of 45-60 year olds that can bridge the gap.But this time it seems there isn't.And there wasn't at the last election either.
Click to expand...

The young contingent is either painfully green, ineffectual soy boys, outright cucks, or otherwise obviously incapable of leading.

Mrs Paul said:
Trump doesn't seem to be all that with it either, especially lately. How can people not notice?
Click to expand...

He seems under stress like he realizes he's fucking up but doesn't actually have the ability to do his job.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Army Burger, ConfederateIrishman and 8 others
But you do need a connection between the youngsters and the older ones.A complete rupture is catastrophic.Ruptures when they happen precede all out collapse of the system.Ultimately youngsters are the future.We're not yet at the level at which the olds can live forever.Tech hasn't yet reached that point.We're getting there slowly(Bob Dole is almost 97 despite having been partially paralysed since fighting in WW2 something down to technological progress at the end of the day) but not yet.So you can't realistically afford a complete rupture.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chester Rigby
MarineTrainedTard said:
I agree, Trump is poised to lose this election handily, but then the Dems once again are trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by nominating grandpa fuckin' Joe Biden.

Like I said, I absolutely would not bet on Trump winning this election, but I wouldn't bet against it either.
Click to expand...

The Democrats have done worse than that. They have been letting their cities burn to appease the mobs. The Democrats should have seized upon the Floyd situation and offered reasonable solutions to the problems. Instead they have been treating the rioting dipshits as equally valid as the real protesters. Even in my red as hell state we had retarded democrats calling for the elimination of police. Then it got even worse, because now you have democrats in Georgia trying to get the death penalty for a cop who is on video being extremely reasonable and trying to de-escalate the situation before a drunk grabbed his partners taser and the cop shot him.

I used to think Biden had a chance, but unless the Democrats turn things around in four months, I think they are going to lose a lot of seats.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Exterminate Leftists, The Last Stand and 1 other person
I always expected the riots to come.The pandemic has shaken the US and quite importantly its made people realise that the system is actually quite weak.19 years of preparing for the next 9/11(ie the next major shake-up of society) and when it finally came the response was chaotic.Far more chaotic than on 9/11.The moment the pandemic came i was counting down the days until the riots started.I was wrong about when.I was expecting it in autumn or early next year.Truth is both sides or at least the most commited ones are showing signs of abandoning any idea of election politics and wanting a war.Dems and repubs are starting to veer dangerously close to the idea of finally going to war.In fact I do suspect quite a few high ranking politicians on both sides are eagerly waiting for a war after the election results come.Lets be honest here does Mitch McConnell seem like the kind of guy who would recoil in horror at such a prospect?Maybe i'm wrong but i'm getting a distinct feeling that the most commited dems and repubs no longer want to solve this peacefully and are only looking for a way to blame the war on the other side.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Exterminate Leftists, Stay safe and 7 others
Amya Spedonym said:
The Democrats are going to have to work hard to lose this election, but so far they show every sign of being up to the task, which is amazing.
Click to expand...
With choosing Biden rather than ones that were popular like Bernie, it should of given one that idea. Biden showed more of it with all the things he said like "Corn Pop was a bad dude" and "if you don't vote for me, then you're not black."
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Chester Rigby and Stay safe
iafiv said:
I do find it weird that in 2020 the only candidates who were considered even somewhat viable were all in their 70's on both sides.Sure you had a few younger ones but none viable.'Who the fuck is Pete Buttigieg?' was my reaction when hearing he was running in Iowa.It reminds me of a joke that was popular towards the end of the Soviet Union.'in a monarchy power goes from father to son in the soviet system it goes from grandpa to grandpa'.This was a joke on the alleged decrepit state of the soviet state with leaders who were all very old.Jokes aside it is genuinely weird to have only geriatrics on all sides.It means that there is a clear rupture from the upper leadership to the lower levels.If no one aged 50-60 is even in theory viable that is a warning sign.There is a rupture between the 65+ and the 45 below.Normally there should be a healthy group of 45-60 year olds that can bridge the gap.But this time it seems there isn't.And there wasn't at the last election either.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind, though, that older generations tend to vote more often than younger ones. That explains the age component at least partially.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Last Stand
c-no said:
With choosing Biden rather than ones that were popular like Bernie, it should of given one that idea. Biden showed more of it with all the things he said like "Corn Pop was a bad dude" and "if you don't vote for me, then you're not black."
Click to expand...
Speaking of old men. I mean, Obama was young (compared to Biden) as well as extremely intelligent and charismatic. There's nobody on the Democratic side that's like that today? Nobody?
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Exterminate Leftists, Spastic Colon and 2 others
Mrs Paul said:
Trump doesn't seem to be all that with it either, especially lately. How can people not notice?
Click to expand...

His supporters are a cult. He could literally shit in their mouths and they'd brag about how it's sticking it to the libs

TaimuRadiu said:
Speaking of old men. I mean, Obama was young (compared to Biden) as well as extremely intelligent and charismatic. There's nobody on the Democratic side that's like that today? Nobody?
Click to expand...

Pete is probably the closest thing to that.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Chester Rigby, Exterminate Leftists, wry wrangler and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back