U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
the hellish future i envision is mankind like in an HR Giger painting, the flesh rendered cold and sterile while the now-biomechanical body is anally penetrated through piston pumping out from the luciferian machine horror fused on it for all of eternity. a cold, systematic violation of human dignity in all aspects.
 
  • Feels
  • Autistic
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, Confused Doggo, Accidental Racism and 8 others
Fangsofjeff said:
Whoa. Is this a /pol/ gayop or did the soy golems really turn on the jews?
View attachment 1387694View attachment 1387683
View attachment 1387706
Click to expand...
Sounds familiar alright. Antifa are Nazis in disguise.
IMG_20200619_022921.jpg
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Mammamia in Naziland, Syaoran Li, StalinMan53 and 23 others
spiritofamermaid said:
I wonder if it's because the idea of debating has changed? In the past, it was about convincing/persuading the other party to see your side, either through facts or logic.
Now it's more of a berating, browbeating kind of thing.
You can see this in the presidential debates (specifically the dem primary ones, as I watched those), where there isn't any time for actual facts or evidence, all they do is spout platitudes and good-feeling words to sound "right".

Not that all are like that, just that it's becoming more popular.
Click to expand...
When I did debate team back in the stone ages, you didn't even get to argue things with which you agreed. You were given a topic and assigned a side (pro/against) and you were expected to come up a good argument whether you personally agreed with it or not. You also had to anticipate your opponent's arguments so your speech would automatically wipe out their argument before you even got to the rebuttal.

I hate that I am officially an old fart who says it was better back in my day. But damn it, it was better back in my day. (Well, at least some things were -- I'm willing to concede there have been a few good changes along the way.)
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: murgatroid, Exterminatus, Teignmouth Electron and 16 others
Spastic Colon said:
When I did debate team back in the stone ages, you didn't even get to argue things with which you agreed. You were given a topic and assigned a side (pro/against) and you were expected to come up a good argument whether you personally agreed with it or not. You also had to anticipate your opponent's arguments so your speech would automatically wipe out their argument before you even got to the rebuttal.

I hate that I am officially an old fart who says it was better back in my day. But damn it, it was better back in my day. (Well, at least some things were -- I'm willing to concede there have been a few good changes along the way.)
Click to expand...

Anyone who can't argue the opposite side of an opinion doesn't deserve to even be allowed to have one.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Sir Yarnsalot, Daughter of Cernunnos, Exterminatus and 21 others
Zero Day Defense said:
My contention is not that civic nationalism has not been tried, but that we've stopped trying to uphold civic nationalism, and-- what's more-- we've become incapable of upholding civic nationalism because we've mostly disintegrated a unifying culture through the countercultural movement of the 60s, not establishing a front against illegal immigration, and paying absolutely no mind whatsoever to integrating immigrants into our society (in part because we had all but decimated the culture we could do that with).

I'm not even arguing that civic nationalism is perfect or that it doesn't have issues (there is no perfect human government), but it's good enough and its issues manageable when we're actually insisting on it. We didn't just outlast the USSR-- we were much older than the USSR. We're still in our first republic, which is more than what one could say of any other competitive nation. Civic nationalism has worked for us for the most part, and that's despite the fact that we were almost always taking in immigrants, but it worked because the U.S. always considered its culture superior and necessary for immigrants to assimilate into. And, of course, that was even when we had a second class citizenry.
Click to expand...
Did it ever work tough? Civic nationalism always seemed like a far off pipe dream, Us was segergated until what the 1960´s?
en.wikipedia.org

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Civic nationalism has failed in every tried form. It failed in Rome, it failed in the austrohungarian emipre and it failed in America. The interests of people are just to different to have under the same roof unless one is suppressed hard and forced at gunpoint to assimilate. Even then its just a question of time until intrests divirge too far. To invite civicnationalism is to invite a conflict that will weaken your people and honestly is the effort worth the reward? Is it worth the terror and rape to say your tolerant?


Is this bait i can´t even tell anymore.
1592525633818.png
grump said:
I'm of the opinion that we were on the cusp of the rise of a nationwide or even global neorightwing Great Awakening much larger than what we're seeing right now, that would rise in Hegelian opposition to the growing SJW movement. But was strangled in its crib by Silicon Valley after helping Trump win.

Metokur, Milo, Sargon, the Red Pill, etc, I could probably fill a dictionary of rising rightwing stars and organizations and groups that have been squashed in the post election censorship campaign before they could become nuclei for a growing movement. Practically every popular conservative I can think of outside of very big organizations like Fox or boring old thinktanks has been affected. I mean, most of these people are still around of course but at varying degrees of irrelevancy from their heights after having been kneecapped by Big Tech.
Click to expand...
None of those people are rightwing.
Milo and Sargon are fucking leftwing liberals from the 90´s
Metokur is a constitutionalist who just wants to be left alone and play his vidya.
The real problem is that the rightwing movement lacks acceptable figure heads. Either they are 1488-skinheads or they are limpwristed fags that bought in to the movement to make a quick buck (Fuentes, milo).
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: plattschwanz, Gorilla Tessellator, DumbDude42 and 16 others
grump said:
I'm not defending or endorsing any one in particular I'm just saying the 2016 thing that put Trump into office was the beginning of something much bigger that would have made 4chan and the current alt right look like a kindergarten meetup if the tech companies didn't launch a huge postelection anticonservative campaign and kept their policies in place.
Click to expand...
This is my view on it, the 4chan and meme shit was a smokescreen for democrats to hide their failures. The right wing hate machine has been talking shit about the Clintons for years since 1994 and that played a giant role in many people hating Hillary and seeing her as Satan. That ground was already long ago and the right wing's fruits of labor came to fruition in 2016, however I believe their motivation was that Clinton would win and they would harass her in public while backdoor deals in private. Trump basically took that hate and used it heavily to his advantage.

Another reason is that the white working class was heavily fucked over by NAFTA and other trade deals. And then they get ignored by the Democrats while they pander to spics and illegal immigrants. The democrats assumed the white working class was obedient like niggers but they proved that assumption heavily wrong in 2016. Two time Obama voters switched to Trump, kinda destroys the KKK narrative. Bill Burr even made a great joke about that, that the trumptard was like that nigger is good enough to be president twice but fuck that old white cum dumpster.

Trump has a chance to make the GOP the party of the white working man otherwise they just squandered a giant opportunity just to suck off Wall Street and Corporate America that doesn't give two fucks about them no more.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Syaoran Li, Dorsia.Reservation, derpherp2 and 12 others
Drain Todger said:
Nothing about any of this is organic. It's all fucking fake.
Click to expand...

That's what I wonder. We are probably lucky we live in the internet age. There are people on the ground recording footage independent of news organizations. There are third party websites writing articles. It makes you wonder, how much have MSM and the Government lied in the past? What have they lied about, before there was any alternative to what the "truth" was?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GloJojo, Syaoran Li, plattschwanz and 14 others
Fangsofjeff said:
I really hope this isn't a gayop and Jews will start accusing BLM of being a nazi group. :optimistic:

View attachment 1387720
Click to expand...
Jews and blacks dont have such a good relationship, esp in NYC. Recently, the majority of anti Jewish hate crimes in the NYC area are committed by blacks. Back in the 90s, the black community got angry about a jewish guy that had a car accident that resulted in the death of a black kid, one thing led to another and the last recorded pogrom in history took place in Crown Heights. This pogrom was led by Al Sharpton and had people yelling slogans like "No Justice No Peace", "Death to the Jews!", and "Whose streets? Our streets!"

The Orthodox remember this and are redpilled about the blacks, the vast majority of them consider BLM a hate group esp after they condemned Israel. The leftist/secular jews on the other hand are another story and will be eaten alive by the BLM hordes.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Donny Cheese, GloJojo, Shroom King and 19 others
Terrorist said:
One underrated development in all this is Matt Gaetz producing an adult hispanic son out of thin air to own the libs. Literally nobody had heard of Nestor before now. What were you doing prowling Havana for 12 year old boys to adopt as an adult alcoholic, Matt?
Click to expand...

That's a weird one, but apparently people who know him personally say he talks about his son all the time. Even Katie Hill, yes that Katie Hill, is sticking up for him. He never publicly used him as a political prop, until he snapped at being called racist and brought him up.

It really says something about 2020 that this is the least noteworthy story of the month.

Meanwhile, the shitposting continues.
1592528241783.png

link / archive

 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Sir Yarnsalot, XtrmGamr719 and 72 others
Kenobi said:
Did it ever work tough? Civic nationalism always seemed like a far off pipe dream, Us was segergated until what the 1960´s?
en.wikipedia.org

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Civic nationalism has failed in every tried form. It failed in Rome, it failed in the austrohungarian emipre and it failed in America. The interests of people are just to different to have under the same roof unless one is suppressed hard and forced at gunpoint to assimilate. Even then its just a question of time until intrests divirge too far. To invite civicnationalism is to invite a conflict that will weaken your people and honestly is the effort worth the reward? Is it worth the terror and rape to say your tolerant?


Is this bait i can´t even tell anymore.
View attachment 1387673

None of those people are rightwing.
Milo and Sargon are fucking leftwing liberals from the 90´s
Metokur is a constitutionalist who just wants to be left alone and play his vidya.
The real problem is that the rightwing movement lacks acceptable figure heads. Either they are 1488-skinheads or they are limpwristed fags that bought in to the movement to make a quick buck (Fuentes, milo).
Click to expand...
Because Liberia was such a great example of that...
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GloJojo, GrimProphet, Spergoy of Cuckkad and 3 others
Tucker is on tonight with the ratings and comments enabled, which surprises me given what he talks about. However I feel like he could have made this more longer and more informative by bringing up Booker T. Washington's point on race hustlers as well as talking about income inequality, death of the middle class and corporate America is fucking you harder than ever while they are rootless cosmopolitans. So much potential to go full Punished Tucker like he was last week on BLM.

 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: tampax pearl, Exterminatus, Gustav Schuchardt and 9 others
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: tampax pearl, Draza, Spastic Colon and 3 others
Harvey Danger said:
That's a weird one, but apparently people who know him personally say he talks about his son all the time. Even Katie Hill, yes that Katie Hill, is sticking up for him. He never publicly used him as a political prop, until he snapped at being called racist and brought him up.
Click to expand...

Katie Hill's support isn't exactly what you should want if you want to appear credible, IMO.

I find it kinda hard to believe he managed to conceal all public knowledge of having an adopted son for 7 years, if that is truly the situation. There's keeping your kids out of the spotlight (plenty of politicians do), but does any politician flat out deny having them? Gaetz is a public figure and an increasingly controversial one, so at least one media outlet in FL should've caught on before now.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: polyester, Dorsia.Reservation and spiritofamermaid
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back