Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Shaka Brah]

I think when Biden announces Kamala as his VP, Trump should come out and commend her for her career in law enforcement and justice and say he wishes the GOP had her. Imagine the heads that would melt.

It's going to be that sheboon from GA.

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

It's going to be that sheboon from GA.

If it is that would be them throwing in the towel. He might as well pick Maxine Waters as her.

 

[Shaka Brah]

If it is that would be them throwing in the towel. He might as well pick Maxine Waters as her.

As if a Biden pick wasn't already some degree of towel-throwing lol. Guy can't even complete a sentence. At this point the Dems are limping along trying to appease their base with whatever they can find.

 

[Cast Iron Pan]

I think Trump should declare Juneteenth (still a stupid name) a national holiday. I wonder if people would suddenly hate the holiday if he did?

A national Juneteenth holiday is long overdue.

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

As if a Biden pick wasn't already some degree of towel-throwing lol. Guy can't even complete a sentence. At this point the Dems are limping along trying to appease their base with whatever they can find.

If he was their sincere pick yeah, but I've always figured him for the sacrificial lamb to get whoever was his VP pick in there, whoever it might be. (Still betting Hillary and that's why they're playing coy as long as possible, but anyhoo.) Even the outspoken Dem voterbase have admitted that they're basically being McCain-and-Palin'd (and they're of course okay with that). But for that to work their pick needs to be at least as vaguely palatable as Palin was... picking a pure gimmick candidate that can't even string two words together is a far cry from an actual politician who's just a bit folksy.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

If he was their sincere pick yeah, but I've always figured him for the sacrificial lamb to get whoever was his VP pick in there, whoever it might be. (Still betting Hillary and that's why they're playing coy as long as possible, but anyhoo.) Even the outspoken Dem voterbase have admitted that they're basically being McCain-and-Palin'd (and they're of course okay with that). But for that to work their pick needs to be at least as vaguely palatable as Palin was... picking a pure gimmick candidate that can't even string two words together is a far cry from an actual politician who's just a bit folksy.

I think Sarah Palin might feel insulted to be compared to that GA sheboon if she get the VP nomination.

 

[Mysterious Girlfriend X]

If he was their sincere pick yeah, but I've always figured him for the sacrificial lamb to get whoever was his VP pick in there, whoever it might be. (Still betting Hillary and that's why they're playing coy as long as possible, but anyhoo.) Even the outspoken Dem voterbase have admitted that they're basically being McCain-and-Palin'd (and they're of course okay with that). But for that to work their pick needs to be at least as vaguely palatable as Palin was... picking a pure gimmick candidate that can't even string two words together is a far cry from an actual politician who's just a bit folksy.

Not only that, but for all of Palin's faults, at least she was able to disguise her animosity. Any VP choice the democrats are looking at is a sneering, acrimonious little goblin who is just going to openly broadcast their resentment and contempt to America, especially Hillary Clinton.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

I like how pundits are acting like Trump somehow lost with the LGBT ruling.

Thank you Colbert.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

It's going to be that sheboon from GA.

I highly, highly, highly doubt Stacy "We wuz the real winnahs!" Abrams will be their pick.

Biden is extremely gaffe-prone. They need someone to offset the stupid shit Biden says, and that person is NOT Stacy "Wypipo vote wrong" Abrams. Abrams doubles the risk without any reward. She brings nothing positive to the table that they cant find in any other generic WoC, but incurs so much more risk than anyone else.
Unless their plan is to just cede all air time to Trump (which even then Stacy "We dont need no farms!" Abrams still adds nothing), they won't go with Abrams.

Although it would be absolutely hilarious if they did.
Journo: "So Mr. Biden, what is your plan to deal with China?"
Biden: "You know in 1944, FDR did the thing. You know the thing. The peanut butter thing. Have you Xi sure likes his peanut butter goes great on Fig Newtons but not Corn Pop, now Corn Pop is a bad hombre dont trust him just like FDR basement... [more incoherent rambling]"
CNN manager: "Cut to the VP! Cut to the VP!"
Abrams: *unaware her mic is on* "...anyways if we just banned wypipo from voting then we could tax them all into poverty..."
CNN manager: "SHIT! SHIT! Cut back to Biden!"
Biden: *shits self on camera*

 

[Godzilla@1989]

I should be posting this in Biden’s thread, but this is cringy.

Joe Biden may win more than 400 electoral votes, but there's a long way to go

Former Vice President Joe Biden is well ahead in the national polls right now. More importantly, he holds the advantage in the pivotal swing states.

www.google.com

 

[Jarolleon]

Yet another Know Your Meme entry:

Donald Trump's Red Triangle Posts

Donald Trump's Red Triangle Posts refers to a series of advertisements posted by the 2020 Donald Trump presidential campaign that features an image of a red upside-down triangle. Many online have pointed out that the red triangle was a symbol used by the Nazis to mark political prisoners and...

knowyourmeme.com

Also, a few comments:

"Just to be clear, there is a group that self-identifies as opposing fascists that opposes the administration. Then the administration calls them out labeling them with an actual symbol that the most well-known fascist government in history used to tag its political opponents. This is either ballsy trolling or unbelievable ignorance. The "it's just a coincidence" excuse has lost its currency after being used a couple of times per month for the past four years."

"You know, I think there comes a point in which Hanlon's razor stops applying anymore. I know that it's very easy to interpret a lot of things that Trump does as just him being a fucking buffoon, and him "accidentally" using nazi symbology meant for political prisoners in concentration camps while speaking against Antifa would just be just another "blunder" of him, but considering how frequent stuff like this happens, between him appealing to "both sides" between Antifa and white supremacists back in Charlottesville, to his response to football playing not kneeling, to him saying that Antifa is an terrorist organization weeks ago, to now this?

Call it a paranoid observation from guy that doesn't even live in the US, but I honestly believe he's slowly turning the US into a fascist, authoritarian state and people are neither picking up on it, or actively enabling it."

"It's both my friend, fascist governments start exactly how its happening now. All it takes is one loser to get in a position of power to warp everything into a wrong path. Another example, Putin."

"He teargassed protesters so he could film a propaganda video of him holding a bible. "When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.""

Thoughts? Is this really proof off Trump being a fascist, like these people seem to think?

But who the hell knows the exact symbols used by the Nazis in concentration camps (besides Jude of course)? It's a case of people obsessed with a topic thinking everyone else is just as well-versed in it as they are. Unfortunately that probably applies to some of us thinking that all the gay ops the Deep State and MSM are pulling will radicalise the normies.

Edit: How long before Canadian Tire has to change their symbol because it's a "Nazi dogwhistle"?

 

[Shaka Brah]

But who the hell knows the exact symbols used by the Nazis in concentration camps (besides Jude of course)? It's a case of people obsessed with a topic thinking everyone else is just as well-versed in it as they are. Unfortunately that probably applies to some of us thinking that all the gay ops the Deep State and MSM are pulling will radicalise the normies.

FWIW it isn't even the same symbol. The patch was orange-red with no border, and the Antifa version is red with a black border. It's a symbol some groups use as a kind of historical identifier to connect their violence with concentration camp victims. I guess it was good optics since the media is parroting it.

 

[Witthel]

Kinda off-topic, but what's happening right now makes this a good time to watch this video.

 

[tehpope]

I should be posting this in Biden’s thread, but this is cringy.

Joe Biden may win more than 400 electoral votes, but there's a long way to go

Former Vice President Joe Biden is well ahead in the national polls right now. More importantly, he holds the advantage in the pivotal swing states.

www.google.com

Are these niggas serious? He can't even get a small crowd for his events. Its within the realm of possibility for him to win with 400 electoral votes, but at this stage of the election, I'm highly skeptical. IMHO, Biden will probably not even get over 200 Electoral votes. He'll get around 115-150 at best. But I guess we'll see in Nov.

Edit: Doing the math, 150 is a pipe dream. Its probably more like 250 electoral votes top. 115-150 range would mean Trump would need to turn some Dem Strongholds red, which I don't see happening.

Joe Biden may win more than 400 electoral votes, but there's a long way to go

CNN Digital Expansion 2018 Harry Enten
Analysis by Harry Enten, CNN

Updated 7:14 AM ET, Fri June 19, 2020

(CNN)Former Vice President Joe Biden is well ahead in the national polls right now. More importantly, he holds the advantage in the pivotal swing states.

Chances are Biden will still be ahead come November and that he'll win a comfortable, not blowout win.

Still, it's worth emphasizing that with more than four months to go there's an incredibly wide range of results that are within the margin of error.

Biden could win the largest landslide for a Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in 1964 -- or he could lose to President Donald Trump.

For Biden to score a huge win, very little needs to change. Biden is ahead by 10 points in an average of live interview polls nationally. The largest Democratic win in the last 56 years was Bill Clinton's 9-point win in 1996.

More impressively, Biden isn't that far from taking more than 400 electoral votes. Let's assume Biden wins all the electoral votes Hillary Clinton did four years ago (232), as polls indicate. One or more recent polls put him up as well in Arizona (11 electoral votes), Florida (29 electoral votes), Georgia (16 electoral votes), Michigan (16 electoral votes), North Carolina (15 electoral votes), Ohio (18 electoral votes), Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes) and Wisconsin (10 electoral votes).

If Biden wins all of these states, he gets to just south of 370 electoral votes.

Add on Iowa (6 electoral votes) and Texas (38 electoral votes), where Biden was down just a point in two high quality polls released in June, and he gets more than 400 electoral votes. That would beat Clinton's 379 electoral votes in 1996 as the largest since Johnson's 486 electoral vote win in 1964.

Indeed, forecast models based on a slew of indicators (such as one put together by University of Alabama student Jack Kersting) have Biden earning more than 400 electoral votes within its 95% confidence interval.

Yet, models such as these also have Biden getting only about 200 electoral votes as a plausible scenario too.

Remember, it was only a few months ago when Biden's lead in the live telephone national polls was 6 points. That would put Trump within the range where he could win an electoral college victory with a small polling error, even if he lost the national vote. In fact, in many of the 2016 Trump states where Biden currently leads, there were polls that favored Trump just a few months ago.

In our fast moving news cycles, one could imagine a new unforeseen crisis arising. Likewise, a topic currently dominating the news (e.g. the protests) may fall to the background. Either of these could cause the presidential race to tighten up.

Moreover, history tells us that it's also quite conceivable that Biden loses. Harry Truman in 1948 was facing a similar deficit in the national polls that Trump is facing now. He'd win by nearly 5 points nationally and carry the electoral college in a tight contest. More recently, Clinton was in a distant third place at this point in 1992 to Republican George H.W. Bush and independent Ross Perot. Clinton took the popular vote by 6 points and scored 370 electoral votes.

If we have any movement in the national polls like those two cycles, Trump would almost certainly win.

Now, the best bet is we won't end up at either extreme discussed here. Biden, given his large lead nationally and Trump's struggling approval ratings, is the clear favorite. The most likely scenario is he'll end up somewhere in the low to mid-300s in terms of electoral votes.

Still, there are a lot of states with a lot of electoral votes where the polling has dramatically shifted the last few months. Biden may win all of them or none of them. There are a lot of potential scenarios on the table.

 

[heathercho]

I should be posting this in Biden’s thread, but this is cringy.

Joe Biden may win more than 400 electoral votes, but there's a long way to go

Former Vice President Joe Biden is well ahead in the national polls right now. More importantly, he holds the advantage in the pivotal swing states.

www.google.com

This is what I find really weird ; If Biden was SO far ahead in all the polls, all of the support etc, then why are they running so much interference? They wouldn't need it. Why try and cancel Trump rallies? Why all the palaver?

 

[SBG]

If he was their sincere pick yeah, but I've always figured him for the sacrificial lamb to get whoever was his VP pick in there, whoever it might be. (Still betting Hillary and that's why they're playing coy as long as possible, but anyhoo.) Even the outspoken Dem voterbase have admitted that they're basically being McCain-and-Palin'd (and they're of course okay with that). But for that to work their pick needs to be at least as vaguely palatable as Palin was... picking a pure gimmick candidate that can't even string two words together is a far cry from an actual politician who's just a bit folksy.

Democrats are delusional enough that they believe their popularity polls are indicative of nationwide sentiments even after getting proven hilariously wrong in the past. They see polls about Alexi Cortez doing great and think it means she's fantastically charismatic, even though the main reason for her popularity is Dems seeing Republicans mocking her, which to Dems means she must be doing something right. So maybe it's not right to say their polls are wrong, but that they don't ask the right questions to know how bad things are for them making them hilariously misleading.

Biggest problem for the Dems right now is that they've killed off their voters' enthusiasm and have done next to nothing to fix it since they see polls showing how popular they are with their own voters.

 

[Too Many Catgirls]

Kinda off-topic, but what's happening right now makes this a good time to watch this video.

The video didn't load but I read the text of your post and thought to myself: It's Bezmenov, isn't it?


Yes you should definitely watch this video, people. Well, specifically watch this version:

 

[Strange Wilderness]

FWIW it isn't even the same symbol. The patch was orange-red with no border, and the Antifa version is red with a black border. It's a symbol some groups use as a kind of historical identifier to connect their violence with concentration camp victims. I guess it was good optics since the media is parroting it.

I know some LGBT groups have actually used the concentration camp symbols as identifiers for their movements, I guess the proper term would be "reclaimed'? Some gays use the pink triangle and some lesbians use the black triangle. The media is clutching their pearls at the use of a Nazi symbol to condemn Trump as a Nazi while ignoring all the other groups who have taken these symbols as a badge of pride to say "fuck the Nazis".

 

[tehpope]

This is what I find really weird ; If Biden was SO far ahead in all the polls, all of the support etc, then why are they running so much interference? They wouldn't need it. Why try and cancel Trump rallies? Why all the palaver?

According to the Dems, Trump is the embodiment of evil and must be stopped no matter what. They were less harsh on him in 2016, but they were basically doing the same thing back then. Because they've worked themselves into a 4 year frenzy over him, they can't back down from him being the direct spawn of satan himself.

So even if Biden was filling the largest football stadiums for his rallies, they'd still try and stop Trump at every step.

 

[Gehenna]

This is what I find really weird ; If Biden was SO far ahead in all the polls, all of the support etc, then why are they running so much interference? They wouldn't need it. Why try and cancel Trump rallies? Why all the palaver?

Because while he is ahead in the polls... its not by a lot. Which is -terrifying- given -why- he is ahead in the polls.

Massive economic downturn, a plague, massive riots, the continued never ending russia gate bullshit. A full court, breathless press against him.

For what? +10 points? In the most biased polls? Within the margin of error in the aggregate?

That is sobering, it means that under absolutely optimal conditions for a challenger, Biden still can't break free. And this doesn't even calculate that Biden has been avoiding the limelight and Trump hadn't ramped up his own campaigning. That margin should be massive, it should be Trump v. Clinton levels of skewed towards Biden.