Culture Roosevelt Statue to Be Removed From Museum of Natural History - Sorry Indie your Wrong

Theodore Roosevelt's statue will be removed from the Museum of Natural History

Roosevelt Statue to Be Removed From Museum of Natural History
The equestrian memorial to Theodore Roosevelt has long prompted objections as a symbol of colonialism and racism.
1592781189805.png




The statue of Theodore Roosevelt outside the Museum of Natural History, under police watch, will be coming down. It has drawn many protests in recent years.Credit...Caitlin Ochs for The New York Times

By Robin Pogrebin
  • June 21, 2020Updated 6:33 p.m. ET
The bronze statue of Theodore Roosevelt, on horseback and flanked by a Native American man and an African man, which has presided over the entrance to the American Museum of Natural History in New York since 1940, is coming down.
The decision, proposed by the museum and agreed to by New York City, which owns the building and property, came after years of objections from activists and at a time when the killing of George Floyd has initiated an urgent nationwide conversation about racism.
For many, the “Equestrian” statue at the museum’s Central Park West entrance had come to symbolize a painful legacy of colonial expansion and racial discrimination.
“Over the last few weeks, our museum community has been profoundly moved by the ever-widening movement for racial justice that has emerged after the killing of George Floyd,” the museum’s president, Ellen V. Futter, said in an interview. “We have watched as the attention of the world and the country has increasingly turned to statues as powerful and hurtful symbols of systemic racism.
“Simply put,” she added, “the time has come to move it.”
The museum took action amid a heated national debate over the appropriateness of statues or monuments that first focused on Confederate symbols like Robert E. Lee and has now moved on to a wider arc of figures, from Christopher Columbus to Thomas Jefferson.
Last week alone, a crowd set fire to a statue of George Washington in Portland, Ore., before pulling it to the ground. Gunfire broke out during a protest in Albuquerque to demand the removal of a statue of Juan de Oñate, the despotic conquistador of New Mexico. And New York City Council members demanded that a statue of Thomas Jefferson be removed from City Hall.

1592781217620.png


  • Thanks for reading The Times.
Subscribe to The Times

In many of those cases, the calls for removal were made by protesters who say the images are too offensive to stand as monuments to American history. The decision about the Roosevelt statue is different, made by a museum that, like others, had previously defended — and preserved — such portraits as relics of their time and that however objectionable, could perhaps serve to educate. It was then seconded by the city, which had the final say.
“The American Museum of Natural History has asked to remove the Theodore Roosevelt statue because it explicitly depicts Black and Indigenous people as subjugated and racially inferior,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a statement. “The City supports the Museum’s request. It is the right decision and the right time to remove this problematic statue.”
When the monument will be taken down, where it will go and what, if anything, will replace it, remain undetermined, officials said.
A Roosevelt family member, who is a trustee of the museum, released a statement approving of the removal.
“The world does not need statues, relics of another age, that reflect neither the values of the person they intend to honor nor the values of equality and justice,” said Theodore Roosevelt IV, a great-grandson of the 26th president and a member of the museum’s board of trustees. “The composition of the Equestrian Statue does not reflect Theodore Roosevelt’s legacy. It is time to move the statue and move forward.”





Image
“The world does not need statues, relics of another age, that reflect neither the values of the person they intend to honor nor the values of equality and justice,” said Theodore Roosevelt IV, a great-grandson of the 26th president, said in a statement approving the removal.Credit...Caitlin Ochs for The New York Times
To be sure, the Roosevelt family did get something in return; the museum is naming its Hall of Biodiversity for Roosevelt “in recognition of his conservation legacy,” Ms. Futter said.
Ms. Futter also made a point of saying that the museum was only taking issue with the statue itself, not with Roosevelt overall, with whom the institution has a long history.
His father was a founding member of the institution; its charter was signed in his home. Roosevelt’s childhood excavations were among the museum’s first artifacts. The museum was chosen by New York’s state legislature for Roosevelt’s memorial in 1920.
The museum already has several spaces named after Roosevelt, including Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Hall, the Theodore Roosevelt Rotunda and Theodore Roosevelt Park outside.
“It’s very important to note that our request is based on the statue, that is the hierarchical composition that’s depicted in it,” Ms. Futter said. “It is not about Theodore Roosevelt who served as Governor of New York before becoming the 26th president of the United States and was a pioneering conservationist.”
Critics, though, have pointed to President Roosevelt’s opinions about racial hierarchy and eugenics and his pivotal role in the Spanish-American War.
The statue — created by James Earle Fraser — was one of four memorials in New York that a city commission reconsidered in 2017, ultimately deciding after a split decision to leave the statue in place and to add context.
The museum tried to add that context with an exhibition last year, “Addressing the Statue,” which explored its design and installation, the inclusion of the figures walking beside Roosevelt and Roosevelt’s racism. The museum also examined its own potential complicity, in particular its exhibitions on eugenics in the early 20th century.
The exhibition was partly a response to the defacing of the statue by protesters, who in 2017 splashed red liquid representing blood over the statue’s base. The protesters, who identified themselves as members of the Monument Removal Brigade, later published a statement on the internet calling for its removal as an emblem of “patriarchy, white supremacy and settler-colonialism.”
“Now the statue is bleeding,” the statement said. “We did not make it bleed. It is bloody at its very foundation.”
The group also said the museum should “rethink its cultural halls regarding the colonial mentality behind them.”
At the time, the museum said complaints should be channeled through Mayor de Blasio’s commission to review city monuments and that the museum was planning to update its exhibits. The institution has since undertaken a renovation of its North West Coast Hall in consultation with native nations from the North West Coast of Canada and Alaska.
In January, the museum also moved the Northwest Coast Great Canoe from its 77th Street entrance into that hall, to better contextualize it. The museum’s Old New York diorama, which includes a stereotypical depiction of Lenape leaders, now has captions explaining why the display is offensive.
Mayor de Blasio has made a point of rethinking public monuments to honor more women and people of color — an undertaking led largely by his wife, Chirlane McCray, and the She Built NYC commission. But these efforts have also been controversial, given complaints about the transparency of the process and the public figures who have been excluded, namely Mother Cabrini, a patron saint of immigrants who had drawn the most nominations in a survey of New Yorkers.
On Friday, the Mayor announced that Ms. McCray would lead a Racial Justice and Reconciliation Commission whose brief would include reviewing the city’s potentially racist monuments.
Though the debates over many of these statues have been marked by rancor, the Natural History Museum seems unconflicted about removing the Roosevelt monument that has greeted its visitors for so long.
“We believe that moving the statue can be a symbol of progress in our commitment to build and sustain an inclusive and equitable society,” Ms. Futter said. “Our view has been evolving. This moment crystallized our thinking and galvanized us to action.”


...............................................................................
I Agree with JIm FFS. So just give it to buyers or cold storage like ARK of Covenant
1592781094301.png
 
Fuck this, Fuck BLM, Fuck Floyd and his seemingly need to break the law, do drugs, and allow him self to be in such a state of poor health he couldn't fucking survive being arrested. Fuck him and how he enabled a bunch of morons and terrorists to make demands that are being taken seriously.
 
This is bullshit. Teddy, fucking Theodore Roosevelt the man who invited the first black man into the white house to talk about race relations, the man that worked not only tried to integrate native's but provide for them and treat them as humans, the man who integrated African Americans into the army, the man who did more for race relations than any president in the paste 5 decades. The whole point of the statue was meant to show how much he fucking helped those people that they were able to walk side by side with him, as ducking equals and yet it's offensive. That's who you are offended by, get fucked I'm going to a rooftop the next time riots start up by me, in minecraft of course.

Also Theodore Roosevelt the IV needs to be put down, the fucking thought that one of his decedents would be such a fucking weakling, he doesn't deserve the Roosevelt name let alone the blood in his veins.
 
“The American Museum of Natural History has asked to remove the Theodore Roosevelt statue because it explicitly depicts Black and Indigenous people as subjugated and racially inferior,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a statement.
While I get that it's weird there's an injun and a black man on either side of him I don't see any way they could have been depicted any better unless Teddy was crawling while leashed.
 
So I guess this shows their counter argument that these statutes can go in museums as total bullshit.

If appealing to an uneducated mob that thinks erasing/changing history to suit hysterical feelings is "the right side of history", a mob that proves time and again nothing will truly appease them...isn't a slippery slope, I don't know what is.
 
I said Jefferson's home was going to be burnt down. I'll take that back. I think the next step is museums. Lynching whitey is next too. I wouldn't be surprised to start seeing some white folks strung up on trees pretty soon. As in the next month or so. And the Media and twitter will say its fake and they killed themselves. And then it'll come out black people did it and they weren't smart about hiding the evidence (ie leaving DNA everywhere, video recording it, bragging on twitter about it).

Screenshot from 2020-06-21 17.58.01.png

1776 is rising.
 
I said Jefferson's home was going to be burnt down. I'll take that back. I think the next step is museums. Lynching whitey is next too. I wouldn't be surprised to start seeing some white folks strung up on trees pretty soon. As in the next month or so. And the Media and twitter will say its fake and they killed themselves. And then it'll come out black people did it and they weren't smart about hiding the evidence (ie leaving DNA everywhere, video recording it, bragging on twitter about it).

View attachment 1396044
1776 is rising.
You forgot the part where the black people lynching others won't ever get tried even if there's video evidence because Only Black Lives Matter.
 
I said Jefferson's home was going to be burnt down. I'll take that back. I think the next step is museums. Lynching whitey is next too. I would be surprised to start seeing some white folks strung up on trees pretty soon. As in the next month or so. And the Media and twitter will say its fake and they killed themselves. And then it'll come out black people did it and they weren't smart about hiding the evidence.

View attachment 1396044
1776 is rising.
I wish there was a paranoid rating. Anyway, archivists can always be counted on to save documents. It's not the statues that tell our history, but the original news articles, letters, and personal journals that are most interesting and beneficial to preserving history from an anthropological standpoint. Documents are small, and not likely to be destroyed anytime soon.
 
You forgot the part where the black people lynching others won't ever get tried even if there's video evidence because Only Black Lives Matter.
If they're lynching people in Dem run places, the police and DA will look the other way. Even with DNA and video evidence. They'll only bring it to trial once white people get pissed off. And even then, it'll just be a show trial with the culprits only getting community service and a fine.

If all of the above happens, white people will protest. The media will call them traitors, terrorists, and any other names in the book. And when a white person shoots a black person in defense at one of these events, they'll throw the book at that person. Then civil war 2 will start.
 
Back