Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

So why the focus on American politics? Why bother having Canadian characters stand in front of the white house, complain about Americans declaring antifa a terrorist organization, or talk about Joe Biden? Why repost American political content? She's not even LARPing as an American since she has the very blatant frogspeak on every comic. If she's so politically active that she shows up to protest where hilarious 1920's cops tell her to get back into the kitchen then why does she never post anything about local politics where she could be an actual activist and actually vote?

Because Labelle has no personality, hobbies or even a career that doesn't revolve around being trans, so to stay in the spotlight Labelle has to twist every little thing into a trans issue, or at least shift focus on how it effects trans people so that people keep listening and Labelle feels important for one more day.
Labelle has decided that the current turmoil in the states is a (black) trans matter and thus feels justified to chime in and pretend to be part of it all.
Remember how Labelle went from crying over Notre Dame like someone whose lost a close friend to yelling about what a waste of money restoring it was? Prime example of the issue and the outcome having no bearing on Labelle, just like with American politics. What matters is making sure you remember that this thing happening half a world away is all about Labelle, either personally or through being trans.
 

The two individuals behind Oh Joy Sex Toys have serious mental issues.

Regardless, imagine being bound, for the rest of your life, to that tool. Having to dilate else you run into health problems.

And each time, reminding you you're not a woman.

These surgeries are an aberration, a crime against nature. To bind people to a lifetime of maintenance is incredibly horrifying. Should be outlawed. There the lobotomies of our generation.
 
This is actually a pretty good comic seeing as it might put off some people from having the operation and also parents of kids who are being pushed into it.

Although it might be intentional from Labelle since he seems to be more for trans people to just say things like ‘This is my penis and I’m female so it’s a female penis’ rather than have surgery, it’s hard to say since ohjoysextoy is such a Poe’s law kind of site where if you didn’t know it was sincere it’d sometimes be hard to tell if it was someone making fun of them or just a crazy person who believes in it.
 
The gags write themselves.
whenisthecomic - Copy.png
allaboutme - Copy.jpg
cameraisoff - Copy.jpg
why - Copy.jpg
 
He should just rename this 'swing and a miss comics'.

Wow. He actually thinks the perps could be guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
The two individuals behind Oh Joy Sex Toys have serious mental issues.

Regardless, imagine being bound, for the rest of your life, to that tool. Having to dilate else you run into health problems.

And each time, reminding you you're not a woman.

These surgeries are an aberration, a crime against nature. To bind people to a lifetime of maintenance is incredibly horrifying. Should be outlawed. There the lobotomies of our generation.

I have seen some hefty shit in my life, but something about dilators honestly makes my skin crawl. Something about the sheer horror of purposely and painfully reopening a wound that goes inside your body twice a day for the sole purpose of having someone else thrust their dick in it while you feel little to no sexual pleasure is just unfathomable.
You literally fight your own body's healing process because the idea of someone fucking a deep, oozing wound in your body is more arousing to you than the ability to feel actual, sexual pleasure through your own existing, natural hole or your penis.
And no, no matter what any one else says there is NO other reason to be shoving that dick-stick in there after every meal, because that hole literally serves no other purpose. If you just wanted vag aesthetics you could get one of those super shallow neo-vags that seem to be hella less work (still work though). These are for fetish purposes and that fetish now rules their life.
 
I suspect that in the long run "this is my girl penis" is healthier, cheaper, and easier to reverse than "lop it off," so I'll give that to LaBelle.
yeah, wasnt sophie always arguing that transness is on par with silly childhood exploration, and that taking off the dress and asking people to switch back to your old name and pronouns are always an option
which to be fair it absolutely is. which is why its better to let kids explore really early on and leave the actual life changing medical transition for way WAY later, when theyre 100% positive. but ultimately, most trans people DO transition, and sophie doesnt seem willing to accept that or show it because she needs transness to keep seeming like just some fun nonsense and nothing serious
 
Since Labelle hasn't been posting comics or even posters masquerading as comics since the states is sad so the canadian living in finland can't work surrounded by such chaos, I wanna address a classic that I've seen make a resurgence on some feeds:
39957107_978609835654614_8080733285249974272_o.jpg


Every one who reads here knows that Labelle and their ilk loves to push the idea that not wanting to date a trans person makes you transphobic, that's not even a debate anymore.
It's gotten to the point where, after being called out on it they don't even deny it, they just belittle the people who pointed it out (once again attempting to use shame to pressure you into accepting something sexual that you're not comfortable with.

tumblr_o7fa4z6pcR1rsz952o1_1280.jpg


1536131348857.jpg


372b77b00055a879c65e74408d09c64b.jpg


tumblr_nx0ay73EBE1tm163xo1_1280.jpg


why-didnt-you-tell-me-you-were-trans-before-we-23024723.png


(He's saying he's gay, Labelle, and that he's not into women. You had a dick and look like a dude, he's respecting your gender despite the fact that you clearly don't pass, you slug.)

I've ranted about my hatred for predators using social pressure and shaming to guilt people into sexual situations they're not comfortable with, so don't worry, this won't just be a rehash of that.

What I want to do today is give people the tools to fight against this kind of "logic" when faced with it without risking their status as an open minded individual.

I know most of us here don't have to worry about it, but sometimes when confronted head on it's easy to get flustered and going in to life prepared to protect your body and sense of comfort is paramount.

SO!

The original argument that came forward was pretty simple (but stupid)
"If you say you like women, that includes trans women, if you like men then also trans men, you're a transphobe otherwise."

That's how we got to the "discussion" about preferences, which even Sophie "Too straight to ever date a woman" Labelle couldn't even backtrack out of. The solution was obvious though, having preferences is now transphobic.

trans_sexual_guilt.png


(actually a lot of people who want to have kids in their future do...)

This of course is very illogical and confusing since transwomen in particular are trying to argue that lesbians should just accept their dicks, which is very scary and homophobic.
For more information on this revolting phenomena, look up the term "cotton ceiling" which was coined by transwomen to make themselves feel victimized by lesbians not wanting a hard dicking.

[T]he cotton ceiling [is] us[ed] to challenge cis lesbians’ tendency to support trans causes generally but draw the line at sleeping with trans women or including trans lesbians in their sexual communities.

Oh look, they out and out admit that they're victimized specifically because you won't have sex with them.
Oppressed because women won't sleep with them, my god, why does that sound so familiar?


365b57cf3d461d682c04d29939a82764.jpg


History lesson over, so what do you do when faced with this?

Smart money says get new friends, yours are obviously insane but internet culture sometimes leaks into our real lives and can have real consequences if you're not prepared.
You tell them you don't find transpeople attractive then you're screeched at "that you can't even tell a transwoman from a cis woman" refusing to believe that just because there are exceptions to every rule, doesn't mean the rule is moot.

But I've finally found, and tested, an answer that seems to let us slide through these tricky minefields. See, they're playing a game you're not supposed to be able to win, since they have the trump card of just calling you a bigot and then twisting everything in retellings of the convo until it evolves into you literally stabbing them in the throat while misgendering everyone in the room.
The trick is to forget about all the concrete stuff that makes us attractive to one another, don't talk about looks or dicks or fat content or anything. You need to keep it nebulous. You need to talk about how you wouldn't date someone fat/homeless/trans/whatever you're not attracted to because they'd be incompatible with you lifestyle.

"I would never date a transperson because I just don't think I'm stable enough to give them the support and attention they deserve."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm afraid my own body dismorphia would be too constantly triggering for them and I'd make them miserable."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm constantly questioning my own gender but not ready to explore it and I'm afraid I'd become hateful towards how out and brave and beautiful they are."
"I would never date a trans person because my family is incredibly toxic and unaccepting and the idea of dragging someone I love into that situation would be too much for me to bear, but I could never ditch my fam because love them, as flawed as they are."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm not brave enough to face the world like they are, I'm not strong enough to survive in this transphobic world and they deserve someone who can stand strong by their side."

Imagine what a DICK someone would have to be to try and counter that shit? And if they do they'd have to pull out some wild hypothetical about you meeting the most stable, passing transperson in the entire world who lifts you above all else and is a paragon of love blah blah blah. Try to resit rolling your eyes and saying "well yeah and if I won the lotto I'd buy a fucking castle but let's talk odds here." and instead, again, massage that ego
"Oh I could never go out with someone that perfect, it'd be too intimidating. I'm pretty flawed and can really only be comfortable with compatibly flawed people."
Or some such shit.
And this works for all of Labelle's dumb shit "preferences are for bigots" crap.
Fat? "My place would be way too small for her to be comfortable in, it wouldn't be fair." or "I'd never want to restrict his lifestyle but having the kinds of foods he likes when we're together would just trigger my past eating disorder."
Wrong Genitals? Try to resist pointing out that no, those oozing, bleeding, malformed neo-vaginas and those permanently semi-erect horror hotdogs are not attractive to you, since that is also somehow transphobic (although somehow also stating you wouldn't date a cis-person with unnatural looking breasts due to enhancements isn't discrimination because fixing their body dismorphia was an "option" for them) and instead say that you need a fertile partner since having you and your partner share in creating a life is hella important to you and the adoption or fertility routes are just too expensive, long and painful for you to endure.
Or if you're gay, tell them that you've tried alternatives to your preferred for of pleasure (since they'll no doubt bring up sex toy alternatives) and you just don't get any pleasure from it, no matter how much you care about your partner, and that you're too selfish to live a life abstaining, even in the face of true love.

Trust me, when you make it personal and about "lifestyle" you'll quickly find your detractors giving you a pass, especially if you can work in something about money or mental health, since those aren't issues a good SJW will suggest you just "get over" to suck some lady cock.

Rate me autistic, I'm okay with that but if this helps even one cornered person out of a tumbler induced social panic or painfully uncomfortable forced/pressured sexual situation it will be worth it.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 82
  • EUpJxXrXQAMLwr7.jpg
    EUpJxXrXQAMLwr7.jpg
    130.3 KB · Views: 88
Since Labelle hasn't been posting comics or even posters masquerading as comics since the states is sad so the canadian living in finland can't work surrounded by such chaos, I wanna address a classic that I've seen make a resurgence on some feeds:
View attachment 1392745

Every one who reads here knows that Labelle and their ilk loves to push the idea that not wanting to date a trans person makes you transphobic, that's not even a debate anymore.
It's gotten to the point where, after being called out on it they don't even deny it, they just belittle the people who pointed it out (once again attempting to use shame to pressure you into accepting something sexual that you're not comfortable with.

View attachment 1392802

View attachment 1392803

View attachment 1392804

View attachment 1392805

View attachment 1392807

(He's saying he's gay, Labelle, and that he's not into women. You had a dick and look like a dude, he's respecting your gender despite the fact that you clearly don't pass, you slug.)

I've ranted about my hatred for predators using social pressure and shaming to guilt people into sexual situations they're not comfortable with, so don't worry, this won't just be a rehash of that.

What I want to do today is give people the tools to fight against this kind of "logic" when faced with it without risking their status as an open minded individual.

I know most of us here don't have to worry about it, but sometimes when confronted head on it's easy to get flustered and going in to life prepared to protect your body and sense of comfort is paramount.

SO!

The original argument that came forward was pretty simple (but stupid)
"If you say you like women, that includes trans women, if you like men then also trans men, you're a transphobe otherwise."

That's how we got to the "discussion" about preferences, which even Sophie "Too straight to ever date a woman" Labelle couldn't even backtrack out of. The solution was obvious though, having preferences is now transphobic.

View attachment 1392851

(actually a lot of people who want to have kids in their future do...)

This of course is very illogical and confusing since transwomen in particular are trying to argue that lesbians should just accept their dicks, which is very scary and homophobic.
For more information on this revolting phenomena, look up the term "cotton ceiling" which was coined by transwomen to make themselves feel victimized by lesbians not wanting a hard dicking.



Oh look, they out and out admit that they're victimized specifically because you won't have sex with them.
Oppressed because women won't sleep with them, my god, why does that sound so familiar?


View attachment 1392890

History lesson over, so what do you do when faced with this?

Smart money says get new friends, yours are obviously insane but internet culture sometimes leaks into our real lives and can have real consequences if you're not prepared.
You tell them you don't find transpeople attractive then you're screeched at "that you can't even tell a transwoman from a cis woman" refusing to believe that just because there are exceptions to every rule, doesn't mean the rule is moot.

But I've finally found, and tested, an answer that seems to let us slide through these tricky minefields. See, they're playing a game you're not supposed to be able to win, since they have the trump card of just calling you a bigot and then twisting everything in retellings of the convo until it evolves into you literally stabbing them in the throat while misgendering everyone in the room.
The trick is to forget about all the concrete stuff that makes us attractive to one another, don't talk about looks or dicks or fat content or anything. You need to keep it nebulous. You need to talk about how you wouldn't date someone fat/homeless/trans/whatever you're not attracted to because they'd be incompatible with you lifestyle.

"I would never date a transperson because I just don't think I'm stable enough to give them the support and attention they deserve."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm afraid my own body dismorphia would be too constantly triggering for them and I'd make them miserable."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm constantly questioning my own gender but not ready to explore it and I'm afraid I'd become hateful towards how out and brave and beautiful they are."
"I would never date a trans person because my family is incredibly toxic and unaccepting and the idea of dragging someone I love into that situation would be too much for me to bear, but I could never ditch my fam because love them, as flawed as they are."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm not brave enough to face the world like they are, I'm not strong enough to survive in this transphobic world and they deserve someone who can stand strong by their side."

Imagine what a DICK someone would have to be to try and counter that shit? And if they do they'd have to pull out some wild hypothetical about you meeting the most stable, passing transperson in the entire world who lifts you above all else and is a paragon of love blah blah blah. Try to resit rolling your eyes and saying "well yeah and if I won the lotto I'd buy a fucking castle but let's talk odds here." and instead, again, massage that ego
"Oh I could never go out with someone that perfect, it'd be too intimidating. I'm pretty flawed and can really only be comfortable with compatibly flawed people."
Or some such shit.
And this works for all of Labelle's dumb shit "preferences are for bigots" crap.
Fat? "My place would be way too small for her to be comfortable in, it wouldn't be fair." or "I'd never want to restrict his lifestyle but having the kinds of foods he likes when we're together would just trigger my past eating disorder."
Wrong Genitals? Try to resist pointing out that no, those oozing, bleeding, malformed neo-vaginas and those permanently semi-erect horror hotdogs are not attractive to you, since that is also somehow transphobic (although somehow also stating you wouldn't date a cis-person with unnatural looking breasts due to enhancements isn't discrimination because fixing their body dismorphia was an "option" for them) and instead say that you need a fertile partner since having you and your partner share in creating a life is hella important to you and the adoption or fertility routes are just too expensive, long and painful for you to endure.
Or if you're gay, tell them that you've tried alternatives to your preferred for of pleasure (since they'll no doubt bring up sex toy alternatives) and you just don't get any pleasure from it, no matter how much you care about your partner, and that you're too selfish to live a life abstaining, even in the face of true love.

Trust me, when you make it personal and about "lifestyle" you'll quickly find your detractors giving you a pass, especially if you can work in something about money or mental health, since those aren't issues a good SJW will suggest you just "get over" to suck some lady cock.

Rate me autistic, I'm okay with that but if this helps even one cornered person out of a tumbler induced social panic or painfully uncomfortable forced/pressured sexual situation it will be worth it.
I think a simpler response is “I do not consent.” Once you frame it like that, anyone trying to get around it is openly exposed as a rapey dude.
 
I think a simpler response is “I do not consent.” Once you frame it like that, anyone trying to get around it is openly exposed as a rapey dude.
Problem is that they are comfortable being rapey as long as it's right kind of rapey. They just say you are tone policing and missunderstanding the argument.

Don't you know that trans don't want have sex with transphobes, they just want you look at you biases. Then you will find that they were formed by living in a horrible oppressive society and you actually do want sleep with trannies. You were just unconsciously in denial and it had nothing do with sexuality or them being inherently pretty unstable, unhealthy or anything like that. Also personal preferences are real and okey as long as they don't close anyone off. Like if you prefer blondes it doesn't mean you wouldn't date a red head so prefering a dick doesn't mean you don't date anyone with a vag. Not having sex or dating someone over these minor details is oppression witch extra super bad when it's towards transpeople who really need the support and validation.
 
Problem is that they are comfortable being rapey as long as it's right kind of rapey. They just say you are tone policing and missunderstanding the argument.

Don't you know that trans don't want have sex with transphobes, they just want you look at you biases. Then you will find that they were formed by living in a horrible oppressive society and you actually do want sleep with trannies. You were just unconsciously in denial and it had nothing do with sexuality or them being inherently pretty unstable, unhealthy or anything like that. Also personal preferences are real and okey as long as they don't close anyone off. Like if you prefer blondes it doesn't mean you wouldn't date a red head so prefering a dick doesn't mean you don't date anyone with a vag. Not having sex or dating someone over these minor details is oppression witch extra super bad when it's towards transpeople who really need the support and validation.
Ultimately it’s all theoretical. The scenarios Labelle imagines always involve someone who couldn’t even tell their partner was trans until they were told. That’s the troon fantasy, but in reality the hulking dude with scraggly hair is instantly identifiable (hi Sophie!).
 
I think a simpler response is “I do not consent.” Once you frame it like that, anyone trying to get around it is openly exposed as a rapey dude.

Haha very true! These are more arguments to avoid being "canceled" if you let it slip that you are uninterested in dating/sleeping with a trans person and know it will only damage your reputation/standing/career if you admit that most (not all) of them are just very unattractive and have deep seated mental issues that make their personalities and presence intolerable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treasure Champs
So I had a go. I would probably have to change the font, but I felt that it worked well.

03bd0560eb47adbfb541da7cf4fa07cb.png
>The UN
>Doing anything usefu (Years late but i am looking at edits in here)
What alternate universe is this?
Edit: I have to post it!
>Her
>She
 
Last edited:
  • Late
Reactions: WinchesterPremium
Haha very true! These are more arguments to avoid being "canceled" if you let it slip that you are uninterested in dating/sleeping with a trans person and know it will only damage your reputation/standing/career if you admit that most (not all) of them are just very unattractive and have deep seated mental issues that make their personalities and presence intolerable.
If for whatever reason you have to pander to people like this wouldn't it be better just to be vague about what your preferences are (Like 'Dunno, depends, etc') and just brush them off whatever excuse you can think of?

Preferably an excuse that is about you rather than them, which I guess would depend on how well you know them like saying you're not interested in looking for a partner right now, you've already got a partner or you see them more as a friend.

I mean I'm a guy so it might be different for women but if someone tells you they're interested in you and you turn them down it's awkward enough and they generally don't push it after you've made it clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sexy Senior Citizen
Back