Kelly Lenza / LividLipids / softbodytendermind / ass_child / photopotamus - "Radical body liberationist”, Intentionally Repulsive, Uber woke middle-aged SJW influencer wannabe, doxed her former therapist for getting WLS, ate her way to heart failure

Kelly's post made it onto r/fatlogic. Many commenters have no idea who this is (reddit policy requires deleting names and identifying avatars), but they figured Kelly out all the same:

1592782763418.png


1592782718605.png
 
Ma'am, I suggest you hire a lawyer and file a restraining order so she can no longer talk about you online.
what the fuck? That isn't how that works. Kelly can say whatever retarded shit she wants to about her therapist. She can go give her 1 star ratings on every website she wants to, and can kick up as much shit as she feels like about professional ethics. Its the same reason we are free to talk about her on kiwi farms. Everyone involved is american so the first amendment matters.

I'm seeing way too many people having a moral crisis about a therapist being named. Anyone can find the name if they want, so it isn't like you're protecting her from anything by not posting it. An interested party could figure it out on their own because kelly was dumb enough to give out the details. There is nothing wrong with posting dox. I'll do it just to get this bullshit out of the way.


Were it me, I would NOT post any of the therapists' info here ... she's not a cow, merely someone who had to deal with one at her job. But if I had her email address, I think I would send her a brief message and screenshot warning her that her former client Ms. Kelly Lenza is plotting some professional sabotage. As @Chamaelirium mentioned upthread, that is info she might genuinely need to have.
no one needs to insert themselves into this. If kelly makes a complaint it is going to be dismissed because it isn't serious. There are therapists that fuck their clients or defraud insurance companies, no one is going to care about a therapist getting WLS.
 
Agree that Kelly has every legal right to complain about her therapist, bitch about her therapist and leave one-star reviews for her therapist, and also agree that is not anything the therapist needs to care about. But if Kelly actually finds the motivation to file formal complaints with the licensing board and even have her fellow HAES cultists try filing suit, it wouldn't hurt for the therapist or other relevant parties to know what is going on.
 
I'm not going to argue constitutional law with an autist (anymore than this post) but the first amendment does NOT protect the right to incidentally discover a private citizen's medical history and publish it online.
We are publishing what kelly said about her therapist online. That isn't publishing a private citizen's medical history, it is what someone else claimed about her medical history.

Go to any family courthouse in the United States for a day and you will see a judge sign a dozen orders (that violate their first amendment by your assertion) mandating someone stop talking about an ex-husband/wife/boyfriend/girlfriend on social media or in front of the kids.
I am aware of such orders being typical in family court, and I know why. Those judgments are made on behalf of the children because of their legal right to have a relationship with both parents without interference. Shit talking the other parent where it is public is interference. Getting a restraining order against another adult isn't in family court. Some judges rubber stamp restraining orders, some require some proof of a threat of physical harm before granting it. Sometimes getting a restraining order makes the other person much crazier than if you just avoid each other.

I don't know where you got your JD in constitutional law, but you need a refund.
:story: if what you were saying was true, any cow could get a restraining order against null (or you, or me) and get their thread deleted. Its what you're arguing, even though there are years of efforts from cows to get their threads removed that have all failed. You're posting on the exact thing that proves that you are incorrect. I don't know how else to help you understand.
 
Moving away from the therapist thing real quick-

I wish Lipids or her kind ever read anything about these 'innocent' pee oh cees they cry about who are slain. Nevermind the fact they never bother to mention black people are more likely to be killed by another black person, let's forget about that for a second.

George Floyd was a scumbag. He didn't deserve to get choked out, but he was a dime a dozen criminal. He had a rap sheet a mile long with assault, robbery, and other petty crimes. It wasn't just one shitty check. On the long list of poor wittle black people that die at the hands of police, many of them were criminals just like George, stealing and sucker punching people as they pleased.

Tell me Kelly- would you have ever been friends with George? Assault someone and threaten to kill their kids like George did? Maybe even dabble in some narcotics, which George loved to do?

Hell no. Kelly locks her doors when she drives downtown. She tucks her purse into one of her folds when she's in a sketchy area. She doesn't peruse much downtown at all.

As someone who lived in a downtown area with the worst murder and robbery rates in the state: it ain't racist to want to be alive and have all your shit the next day.
 
Rayshard Brooks was convicted on child abuse charges. Yeah, he was a father. A lousy one. Not that he deserved to die, but it is irritating that people are acting like they were all saints. If he had passed out while driving instead of waiting in the drive thru at Wendy's, maybe somebody else would be spending Father's Day without their father.

And that Rest in Power stuff is cringe. Are they going to heaven and kicking some ass? I'd much rather think of the afterlife as peaceful. If you have power, that implies you can wield it over someone. That doesn't sound like equality.
 
She should try saying some interesting stuff. If people only want to see your naked body, maybe the problem is that you don't have anything else of value to offer them.


So, Karens can thank the Black Panthers for chardonnay and yoga?

I guess she does it because she thinks it's stunning and brave and making a statement. When really it evokes laughter, revulsion and maybe a little pity or secondhand embarrassment. If she's trying to gross people out on purpose to make some sort of point, I can't imagine what it might be. Most people grow out of doing stupid embarrassing shit for attention or just to prove they can by junior high.
 
Back