That is the conundrum, isn't it? On one hand you have them saying the accusations were credible, not true, but convincing enough to get him fired. Mika communicates Vic's behavior was unacceptable, but doesn't quite specify what that behavior is. It is only assumed... On the other hand the tweet about Vic was not meant to imply he was fired for sexual harrassment. If that is the case, what was Vic fired for then? Monica and Ron imply that is how Vic "hurt" others. But how were those people "hurt"? Was Vic fired because he hurt people physically or emotionally? Funi offers no proof to clarify this when it would be easy to do so.
If Vic was fired because of sexual harrassment and threatening behavior, it would be easy for Funi to say that their tweet was true and provide the results of their investigation to prove that. But they didn't choose that route and it is quite baffling. They say that he may have acted with sexual misconduct, but at the same time said he wasn't fired for that with their tweet when everyone knew the investigation was about sexual misconduct. Hurts my brain to think about it.