- Joined
- May 26, 2017
Promoted for what anyone else would be fired for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gesundheit.Expelliarmus!
Hypothetically speaking, I would go for a .300 Winchester Magnum with a 190 or 220gr vld bullet. But that's just me.Really? I think the .308 would be better suited thanks to the flatter trajectory.
Be careful what you wish for, you might get it.The weak shouldn’t be given more voice than the strong,
I would call any corporation that is more powerful then the US government, unconstitutional after all, the constitution is the law of the land, and is what gives the government its power, a corporation that has more power then a legimate government is a threat to that government and its citizens. Anti-trust should be about keeping companies in a state of competition as it is to preserve the power of government.big corporations have more power than governments
Hypothetically speaking, I would go for a .300 Winchester Magnum with a 190 or 220gr vld bullet. But that's just me.
BuT hAlLoW pOiNtS aRe BaNnEd By ThE gEnEvA CoNvEnTioN - Idoits who don't care if they kill innocent bystanders with over penetration in their anarchist state.The angle is just as important as caliber selection. We don't want to over penetrate and damage the sculptures, after all.
cambridge is a joke and i hope the joggers they support "peacefully protest" their racist heritage too. this after people saying that anything as mild as " i dont think racism exists, at least not systematically" should have their lives ruined. fuck this planet
I'd rather the government not have much power either. The correct state in the world is for the government, corporations, and church all be so busy fighting each other that they don't pay attention to the people and we can go about our lives. They've been fellow travelers for far too long.I would call any corporation that is more powerful then the US government, unconstitutional after all, the constitution is the law of the land, and is what gives the government its power, a corporation that has more power then a legimate government is a threat to that government and its citizens. Anti-trust should be about keeping companies in a state of competition as it is to preserve the power of government.
A company that is more power of the government is free to break laws as it pleases as the government is unable to act, it takes us back to the State of Nature and as we all see in CHAZ/CHOP and the like the state of nature is not one where people flourish, and the State of Nature is againts the very philsophies that influence the founding fathers to fight and die for freedom and create the Constitution (and before that the Articles of Confederation).
Good point!The angle is just as important as caliber selection. We don't want to over penetrate and damage the sculptures, after all.
Because redefining words is their whole schtick. These people are in a social bubble that does this all the time. They're always 'adding context' or qualifiers to make sense of the line in question, so when normal people hear somebody like this make really mean racist comments, the academia genuinely thinks its because they've not done enough exposing power structures or historic trauma or something.what is it with these fucking morons and having slogans and beliefs that clearly say one thing, then them getting their saris in a bunch when people call them out on it, and defend it with "BuT iT cLeArLy MeAnS sOmEtHiNg ElSe!!"
The left really are a bunh of gaslighting abusers.
any particular examples of the tweets? perhaps someone should plaster them up on nice laminate printed flyers around cambridge.
The united states is destined to become a fractured shitshow in which every race of people votes for a party in the name of one races general interests, all vying for a slice of their own pie. Whites need a support network with anonymous donations to harvest the untapped money from people George Lincoln Rockwell would have called cowards, the middle class white american who would rarely put his neck on the line in public to support anything but will agree with you in private and might do what they can if given the option to be completely unattached of consequence.This whole situation makes me think that we might be in one of the few situations where the constitution is outdated. Back when the founders wrote the 1st amendment there wasn’t a way to cancel someone’s entire life or make it impossible to have their views heard. With social media and technological tools, big corporations have more power than governments do to dictate the narrative that the public sees. Back in the 18th century, if someone slandered or humiliated you, then you could go to a new town, change your name, and start over.
Nowadays if you use gamer words or even just say something someone CONSIDERS offensive, mobs of people will follow you and ruin your life. This city councilman in Scottsdale said “I can’t breathe” because he was wearing a mask but the outrage mob of course couldn’t let that pass. Especially because he said it while leading a protest against these retarded masks. So sick of these people. I miss being able to have fun on the internet and in real life, wtf is wrong with society that we listen to miserable people who have no interest in happiness in their life. The weak shouldn’t be given more voice than the strong, it’s just silly where things are going.
I'd rather the government not have much power either. The correct state in the world is for the government, corporations, and church all be so busy fighting each other that they don't pay attention to the people and we can go about our lives. They've been fellow travelers for far too long.
Her Massive Forehead must be some kinda Orb of Confusion cause otherwise this makes no fucking sense.
this is the only one I had saved, unfortunately. probably a few others floating around in this thread's abyssany particular examples of the tweets? perhaps someone should plaster them up on nice laminate printed flyers around cambridge.
if I had the money I would pay for a billboard right near cambridge.
I am not calling for an all powerful government, but a Nation-State should be more powerful then companies, if companies are free to violate laws they are free to violate the rights of citizens with out ramification as the state could not enforce any judgements held againts the company either criminal or civil (i.e. Joe public sues mega corpration for knowing selling faulty products), they are free to raise private armies to harass their compitition and any one who speaks out against that company. The fact is right now most brands are owned by a few major international companies this makes a true free market of competition impossible instead it is more like an Oligopoly which leads to anti consumer behavior. A government should be large enough to enforce the laws across the land, but not worry its self with actions of private consenting adults (to a degree e.g. no one can "consent" to being murdered*)I'd rather the government not have much power either. The correct state in the world is for the government, corporations, and church all be so busy fighting each other that they don't pay attention to the people and we can go about our lives. They've been fellow travelers for far too long.
“Majoritarian”So our Professor gave out a word on the news, and god she is just as ugly in motion as she is in pictures
( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Sp2UCVqmWw)
Most have become far too obsessed with themselves to even acknowledge the need for a 'nation-state' without acknowledging said selfishness is one of the factors that created the society and problems we have now, where we have leftists screaming for collectivism.I am not calling for an all powerful government, but a Nation-State should be more powerful then companies, if companies are free to violate laws they are free to violate the rights of citizens with out ramification as the state could not enforce any judgements held againts the company either criminal or civil (i.e. Joe public sues mega corpration for knowing selling faulty products), they are free to raise private armies to harass their compitition and any one who speaks out against that company. The fact is right now most brands are owned by a few major international companies this makes a true free market of competition impossible instead it is more like an Oligopoly which leads to anti consumer behavior. A government should be large enough to enforce the laws across the land, but not worry its self with actions of private consenting adults (to a degree e.g. no one can "consent" to being murdered*)
*assisted suicide can be up for debate
And you just know that if the guy had pulled out a gun, they would have run like bitches.
I can agree, but Society and States requires some degrees of selfishness (e.g. "I want my goodies to stay my goodies") and collectivism (e.g. "I am willing to give up my rights to steal/murder/rape with impunity as it is in the State of Nature to be able to have laws that protect my goodies even if I have slightly less to help pay for people to protect them").Most have become far too obsessed with themselves to even acknowledge the need for a 'nation-state' without acknowledging said selfishness is one of the factors that created the society and problems we have now, where we have leftists screaming for collectivism.