Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
I watched parts of last night’s stream regarding the sur-reply to Jamie’s brief this morning, and in all fairness, it was mostly successful in hammering the argument that Jamie was defaming Vic and how she was constantly mischaracterizing and falsifying his evidence to make a case against him. The tone was also vicious to the point of brutal, which I found refreshing and probably helped strengthen this document. Thankfully, it seemed that Ty and his law firm revised the sur- reply in the last minute, added the word count, and then filed it right before midnight. That was a bone of contention for a lot of us and it’s good that they fixed it.

That being said, grammatically and in terms of formatting, this document was a fucking mess, easily the sloppiest of the four documents. The table of contents in particular was untidy and page numbers were missing. I know a lot of people on the Farms was reprehensive of this bad grammar and misspelling and honestly, I agree; they should have really done some word-proofing and spell checking ahead of time. Some of the sentences could also have been excluded. Writing a draft a month in advance, re-editing it a week beforehand, then completely finishing it a couple of days before its dateline would've been helpful. I’m also baffled as to why this was the longest of all the sur-replies when the other parties had done the most damage. To paraphrase Nick, this looked like it went through many hands.

So it wasn’t great and it should've been better. But it's not a disaster either. Just serviceable.
 
I watched parts of last night’s stream regarding the sur-reply to Jamie’s brief this morning, and in all fairness, it was mostly successful in hammering the argument that Jamie was defaming Vic and how she was constantly mischaracterizing and falsifying his evidence to make a case against him. The tone was also vicious to the point of brutal, which I found refreshing and probably helped strengthen this document. Thankfully, it seemed that Ty and his law firm revised the sur- reply in the last minute, added the word count, and then filed it right before midnight. That was a bone of contention for a lot of us and it’s good that they fixed it.

That being said, grammatically and in terms of formatting, this document was a fucking mess, easily the sloppiest of the four documents. The table of contents in particular was untidy and page numbers were missing. I know a lot of people on the Farms was reprehensive of this bad grammar and misspelling and honestly, I agree; they should have really done some word-proofing and spell checking ahead of time. Some of the sentences could also have been excluded. Writing a draft a month in advance, re-editing it a week beforehand, then completely finishing it a couple of days before its dateline would've been helpful. I’m also baffled as to why this was the longest of all the sur-replies when the other parties had done the most damage. To paraphrase Nick, this looked like it went through many hands.

So it wasn’t great and it should've been better. But it's not a disaster either. Just serviceable.

Actually was not surprised this was the longest, and most brutal one. Out of all of the parties involved, the case against Jamie is the weakest. But since they prob want her in there to make the conspiracy charges stick, they had to make sure to keep her in play. She prob
 
I've noted this before, but this is actually a very good counter to the nonsense about Vic trying to "silence" anyone. He had every opportunity to try to do so and did not do so.

1593146947668.png

1593146957537.png


I'm not sure if the decision at the outset not to seek injunctive relief was strategic or not, but it now provides a reasonable counter to one of the defendants' arguments.

Oh, here's my post that he just suddenly mentioned.
 
I've noted this before, but this is actually a very good counter to the nonsense about Vic trying to "silence" anyone. He had every opportunity to try to do so and did not do so.

I'm not sure if the decision at the outset not to seek injunctive relief was strategic or not, but it now provides a reasonable counter to one of the defendants' arguments.
On one hand, Ty is a wargaymer. On the other hand, Vic, impossibly kind soul that he is, thought they would calm down and talk like adults once the courts got involved.

On the third hand, Typo Beard the Tylophone Notary forgot to change his glasses batteries and never thought for an injunction.


@AnOminous Nick noticed you.

 
Last edited:
I didn't read the documents before these streams, but were you faggots hanging yourselves over everything loltwitter was saying again? I got the impression that everything in this was game ending but 99% of the issues I've seen have been typos.
 
I didn't read the documents before these streams, but were you faggots hanging yourselves over everything loltwitter was saying again? I got the impression that everything in this was game ending but 99% of the issues I've seen have been typos.
I mean, the vast majority of criticisms of Typo Beard was, well, typos. And grammar and formatting and stuff. I think everyone agreed that, past the misspellings, the actual substance was solid, if not necessarily groundbreaking.

I did like how through all the sur-replies Vic's team did some legal judo and used their own admitted evidence against the appellees.
 
Nick needs to put the kibosh on the "to-the-tune-of-in-so-and-so's-voice" bullshit. Nick is probably a better voice talent than Vic (especially when it comes to impersonations), but the joke is way past funny now.
I blame the super chatters beating the Lemoine jokes to death even harder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back