Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Thanks for the links, but somebody sounds mad.

When the next Republican wins the presidency, it will be orange man good like they have done with Bush and Romney.
Disagree, Trump is a very polarizing figure. The next Republican may not be able to fill in Trump's shoes. Remember even the GOP didn't like Trump.

Then again, the DNC didn't like Obama either so...
 
Thanks for the links, but somebody sounds mad.


Disagree, Trump is a very polarizing figure. The next Republican may not be able to fill in Trump's shoes. Remember even the GOP didn't like Trump.

Then again, the DNC didn't like Obama either so...
Obama had friendly charisma as well as the first black president thing going for him. And even current state demented Biden would have won that election that the GOP was guaranteed to lose. DNC also had the black vote to take into consideration and wouldn't dare fuck with Obama like they did with Sanders. And Obama was closer to a moderate Republican milquetoast of today than what he was post 2014. The full effects of the 2008 crash were not full felt yet.

By 2016, both parties's demographics wanted radical change which is why DNC successfully stopped Bernie but RNC couldn't stump the Trump.

It depends on the era as calmer eras lead to a milquetoast candidate winning whereas as a country in moral panic or economic crisis wants a populist candidate of change. Got to look at how the average plebian feels.

Maybe by 2024 shit is all good that a milquetoast from either side could win.
 
At least he didn't tell you to rape children, ahem.
Really bringing out the big guns there. lol. Everyone knows an endorsement from Anglin or those loonie fed types is intended to smear by association, it is not sincere. Soon they'll have David Duke go on CNN and endorse him. They are absolutely shaken and terrified of Tucker.

Televangelist Tucker is a slick, disingenuous agent whose role is to push Christard Civic Nationalism into the minds of the viewers
Civic nationalism is the only nationalist option for America. There is no choice there, ethnic nationalism is off the table as demographics make that impossible unless you go full Israel and ethnically cleanse people into the sea. We have to either learn to live with each other, or war with each other until everything is fucked. Tucker, rightly and wisely, sees that working at civic nationalism is the only way forward. Globalism is cancer, civnat is all we have.

It's funny how they try to hit Tucker from both angles: liberals/plebs get 'racist! white supremacist!', poltard-types get 'not racist! not white supremacist!' They do this with all of their enemies, using that same tired tactic. It doesn't work, shills, no one buys your crap.
 
We have to either learn to live with each other, or war with each other until everything is fucked.
We were doing just fine working toward that goal until a bunch of children decided that it wasn't good enough or fast enough. Yeah it wasn't perfect, but it was a continuation of decades of hard work to mend race relations and bring everyone together. The last decade and a half has really undermined a lot of good-faith work and set us back.
 
We were doing just fine working toward that goal until a bunch of children decided that it wasn't good enough or fast enough. Yeah it wasn't perfect, but it was a continuation of decades of hard work to mend race relations and bring everyone together. The last decade and a half has really undermined a lot of good-faith work and set us back.
If righteous and honorable people had control of the media we could get it back on track in a single generation. The obstacle, and villain, is the goddamn media!
 
If righteous and honorable people had control of the media we could get it back on track in a single generation. The obstacle, and villain, is the goddamn media!
It always has been. The Tulsa Riot was started because the papers printed a breathless article about how white militias were forming lynch mobs to murder the town's blacks, and distributed it for sale in the black part of town. There was a chance of defusing things there until they provoked an armed response, and now the event is used as a bludgeon by the media to beat whites with a hundred years later.
 
Disagree, Trump is a very polarizing figure. The next Republican may not be able to fill in Trump's shoes. Remember even the GOP didn't like Trump.

There's going to be a minor and at least partially behind the scenes civil war within the Republican party post Trump, and it really is going to wind up being Trump Republicans versus Establishment Republicans. The Establishment will want to go back to the old way of doing things, being Good Losers and working with the Democrats on everything, basically trying to keep the dynamic in stasis while gradually letting the Democrats be the ones to push ever increased government power while shrugging their shoulders and blandly declaring they couldn't do anything. Trump Republicans will be the ones who have decided they like winning and are interested in pushing actual conservative policy, and they'll probably form up around some of the more outspoken Republicans that have already followed Trump's lead in constantly calling out their opponents but being a little more dry and collected about it than Trump himself.

The thing is the Trump Republicans are the ones that are going to have the actual voter support... the Establishment Republicans are as out of touch and blind to actual public reaction as Democrats and seem to think the voters must actually despise Trump's behavior and want to go back to business as usual. It will make them much easier to primary... the biggest problem with this is that while it's all going on the Democrats are going to be trying to solidify their own base and collect together, having brought their own smaller base of malcontents to heel like AOC likely has been.
 
Trump Republicans will be the ones who have decided they like winning and are interested in pushing actual conservative policy, and they'll probably form up around some of the more outspoken Republicans that have already followed Trump's lead in constantly calling out their opponents but being a little more dry and collected about it than Trump himself.
Explain me the policies that Trump Republicans have versus Establishment Republicans have.

Are the Democrats NOW Establishment or Trump Democrats?
 
In a perfect world the anti-establishment Democrats and the anti-establishment Republicans would team up, foster a community based on compromise, and fuck up the establishment. Instead we have this world.
The problem with cooperating is that anti-establishment Dems seem to want to send every single conservative white person in the US to the gulag and start a Soviet-style dictatorship.
 
Explain me the policies that Trump Republicans have versus Establishment Republicans have.

Are the Democrats NOW Establishment or Trump Democrats?

Trying to divide Trump/Establishment Republicans by policy difference is sort of a red herring... not all political differences come down to stated platforms. The difference is in execution, with the issue being that in execution an Establishment Republican is very little different from a moderate Democrat. While their stated policies might be to protect individual rights and liberties as well as oppose overregulation, in practice it has been "allow those rights and liberties to be eroded very slightly more slowly" and absolutely nothing on the regulatory front. Establishment Republicans and Trump Republicans are divided not by stated policies, but by one side doing little if anything to actually advance those policies while instead working closely with the opposition who is entirely against those policies.

And there's nothing other than an Establishment Democrat. They haven't changed at all in the Trump era. The mask has slipped a little but they're all the same creatures. They've always been as petty, insulting, and crude as they liked and this was just accepted, it's only now that an opponent who came along that dared to do the same thing to them that they've decided to act like they've been forced to undergo some change to deal with him.
 
View attachment 1407376

Oh gosh, oh no, geeze that's awful who would do such a thing. I thought this was the game that you wanted to play?

Aside from the obvious pandora's box metaphor, I'm fine with Kimmel getting cancelled. Dude is no Conan.

I remember when the Guardians of the Galaxy dude got Cancelled there was a lot of screeching about how conservatives weren't allowed to use Cancel Culture. Like, just sheer, unapologetic "Only we are allowed to do this!"

I see that's recurring again. "They've weaponized our weapon!"

James Gunn kind of deserved it. He was aboard the "cancel and destroy Rosanne for her jokes on Twitter!" bandwagon, his "jokes" about diddling kids were too frequent to be a coincidence. While Rosanne accepted her fate and left, he had Bautista go on a tardrage to get his job back. Makes me wonder if any of the Rosanne cast said something she'd have gotten re-hired but it's too late now.

At the rate the blue buzzard app has completely gone mad with power over people's social fates, I really want to bet Twitter goes down before Trump does. But that sounds like a fool's bet.
 
I think it’ll be more fun post election. The reactions will be legendary.

Dixie Chicks anyone?

Sorry for this very late reply to this earlier post but the Dixie Chicks reached a new level of TDS and decided to change their name to be called only The Chicks.
https://variety.com/2020/music/news/dixie-chicks-change-name-1234689849/ ( http://archive.vn/ZkqqJ )

The Dixie Chicks have officially changed their name to “the Chicks,” after public discussions arose over the appropriateness of the Civil War-era “Dixie” as part of their moniker.
The group had long been unofficially referred to as simply the Chicks by many fans and most of their associates in the music industry, but losing the “Dixie” is still a surprise, albeit a pleasant one to some supporters who had been quietly uncomfortable with the name and its historic connotations.
“We want to meet this moment,” the country-pop trio said in a one-sentence statement on its website, alluding to the change.
In an additional statement provided by the group’s press representative, the Chicks added: “A sincere and heartfelt thank you goes out to ‘The Chicks’ of NZ for their gracious gesture in allowing us to share their name. We are honored to co-exist together in the world with these exceptionally talented sisters. Chicks Rock! — Emily, Natalie and Martie”

I guess that publicity stunt might have some unintended consequences like being associated with some memes like this one and Trump might have the last word.
iu
 
James Gunn kind of deserved it. He was aboard the "cancel and destroy Rosanne for her jokes on Twitter!" bandwagon, his "jokes" about diddling kids were too frequent to be a coincidence.
Yeah, they were pretty weird, honestly. Not enough for me to try and stir up an online mob to get him canceled but they were less 'lol catholic priests molest boys isn't that funny haha' and more 'lol wouldn't it be funny if I was a catholic priest and molested boys? Not that I would but just think wouldn't that be funny haha'.
 
Aside from the obvious pandora's box metaphor, I'm fine with Kimmel getting cancelled. Dude is no Conan.



James Gunn kind of deserved it. He was aboard the "cancel and destroy Rosanne for her jokes on Twitter!" bandwagon, his "jokes" about diddling kids were too frequent to be a coincidence. While Rosanne accepted her fate and left, he had Bautista go on a tardrage to get his job back. Makes me wonder if any of the Rosanne cast said something she'd have gotten re-hired but it's too late now.

At the rate the blue buzzard app has completely gone mad with power over people's social fates, I really want to bet Twitter goes down before Trump does. But that sounds like a fool's bet.
Thanks to the infiltration of soyboys and cat ladies into basically every marketing team and HR department, every institution is scared shitless of twitter morons who sexually identify as homosexual laundry detergent. There’s a completely separate government in the USA today and it’s the twitter mob. I doubt it’ll crash unless Trump makes good on revisiting 230 or Jack Dorsey gets caught balls deep in a five year old. The actual biggest losers on earth are running half the show because everyone with institutional power lets them.
 
Thanks to the infiltration of soyboys and cat ladies into basically every marketing team and HR department, every institution is scared shitless of twitter morons who sexually identify as homosexual laundry detergent. There’s a completely separate government in the USA today and it’s the twitter mob. I doubt it’ll crash unless Trump makes good on revisiting 230 or Jack Dorsey gets caught balls deep in a five year old. The actual biggest losers on earth are running half the show because everyone with institutional power lets them.
This is referred to as Anarcho-Tyranny.
 
Tucker wants the DOJ to arrest people as soon as they topple statues or set shit on fire. It takes time man. I'd rather get it right than just arrest the wrong guy and ruin his life.
Reminds me of the fun fact that for any federal agency to arrest people they need permission from a local sheriff's department. Normally this is granted without issue, but there's been a couple times where a sheriff's department denied the ATF for instance the ability to arrest people.

People forget just how much power their local officials really have in the end, and how their local politicians really have quite a bit of power when it comes to enforcing law and order.
 
Yeah, they were pretty weird, honestly. Not enough for me to try and stir up an online mob to get him canceled but they were less 'lol catholic priests molest boys isn't that funny haha' and more 'lol wouldn't it be funny if I was a catholic priest and molested boys? Not that I would but just think wouldn't that be funny haha'.
He's a jew in Hollywood, his chances of coming back were always going to be high. Especially as he was leading lucrative Marvel projects. Roseanne was just too white in every way. She was probably considered undesirable by most in the entertainment media even before then.
 
Back