- Joined
- May 8, 2020
There's no way in hell he isn't a pedophile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That doesn't do anything to help the current situtation, of course, but at least people will be able to make money off Steamboat Willy porn in the nearish future.
There's no way in hell he isn't a pedophile.
Same glasses, same MPB, same sloppy facial hair, same smug/indignant facial expressions, same wall-eyes.I don't really see that helping too many creators other than documentarians covering early Western animation, who can now use the actual Steamboat Willy without doing a fair use analysis.
I'm sure Disney will have a few test cases to see what the limit of it is, because unless you start with Steamboat Willy and completely forget every bit of subsequent mouse canon and don't use any of it, they can claim you're infringing the subsequent intellectual property that is still under copyright and that your claim of it being based solely on Steamboat Willy is bogus.
He sure looks like one.
And I mean that literally. He looks a lot like pedophile Peter Bright, a.k.a. DrPizza.
Of course all these soy golems look exactly the same, have the same robotic mannerisms, it's like they were made with a cookie cutter.
Is there actually some special glasses store where they sell only to pedophiles? Why do they all have the same glasses?
I've read a few samples of Chuck's writing and for the life of me, I can't understand what the appeal is.
His writing style of present-tense short sentences doesn't read fluent, it seems jerky, badly paced, pretentious and above all, his use and choice of words is boring and lame.
Or, to take a page from the Cuckmeister himself:
His writing. Present tense. All in present tense. It is not fluent or fun to read. Not at all. No. Way too jerky. Badly paced, too. Some call it pretentious with a sidedish of guacamole. Did I mention the bad choice of words? He is bad at choosing words. Words to express what he wants to say. What he wants you to read. Yeah, he is a writer like that. A writer that's bad at choosing words. Bad at getting to the point and moving on, too, at times. At times, he skips ahead too fast, but other times, not. Then he keeps reiterating things endlessly.
Sometimes.
But that was in the past, now Chuck is on Twitter. And we wait for the inevitable. That someone comes forward and spills the beans about Chuck being a sexpest. A sexpest that targets underage fans. Only a matter of time. Time.
February 21st, 1950
An abandoned auto court in the San Berdoo foothills; Buzz Meeks checked in with ninety-four thousand dollars, eighteen pounds of high-grade heroin, a 10-gauge pump, a .38 special, a .45 automatic and a switchblade he’d bought of a pachuco at the border – right before he spotted the car parked across the line: Mickey Cohen goons in an LAPD unmarked, Tijuana cops standing by to bootjack a piece of his goodies, dump his body in the San Ysidro River.
He’d been running a week; he’d spent fifty-six grand staying alive: cars, hideouts at four and five thousand a night – risk rates – the innkeepers knew Mickey C. was after him for heisting his dope summit and his woman, the L.A. Police wanted him for killing one of their own. The Cohen contract kiboshed an outright dope sale – nobody could move the shit for fear or reprisals; the best he could do was lay it off with Doc Englekling’s sons – Doc would freeze it, package it, sell it later and get him his percentage. Doc used to work with Mickey and had the smarts to be afraid of the prick; the brothers, charging fifteen grand, sent him to the El Serrano Motel and were setting up his escape. Tonight at dusk, two men – wetback runners – would drive him to a beanfield, shoot him to Guatemala City via white powder airlines. He’d have twenty-odd pounds of Big H working for him stateside – if he could trust Doc’s boys and they could trust the runners.
Meeks ditched his car in a pine grove, hauled his suitcase out, scoped the setup:
The motel was horseshoe-shaped, a dozen rooms, foot-hills against the back of them – no rear approach possible.
The courtyard was loose gravel covered with twigs, paper debris, empty wine bottles – footsteps would crunch, tires would crack wood and glass.
There was only one access – the road he drove in on – reconnoiterers would have to trek thick timber to take a potshot.
Or they could be waiting in one of the rooms.
Meeks grabbed the 10-gauge, started kicking in doors. One, two, three, four – cobwebs, rats, bathrooms with plugged-up toilets, rotted food, magazines in Spanish – the runners probably used the place to house their spics en route to the slave farms up in Kern County. Five, six, seven, bingo on that – Mex families huddled on mattresses, scared of a white man with a gun, ‘There, there’ to keep them pacified. The last string of rooms stood empty; Meeks got his satchel, plopped it down just inside unit 12: front/courtyard view, a mattress on box springs spilling kapok, not bad for a last American flop.
as John Aubrey (1626-1697) wrote about a similarly staccato Roman author: "Seneca writes as a boar doth pisse, by jirkes"Wendigprose is short. Very short. Lots of periods. You read it. Then your brain pauses. Constantly. Adjectives are at a minimum. Or they're stupid. Like herkily-jerkily. Who uses that? Wendig. Throw in a "yikes" for good measure. Also lesbians. Because you're woke. Woke wendigprose.
Who wants to bet that he read on Ernest Hemingway's Wikipedia page that short descriptive sentences are Literature while not understanding the difference between the tone that works for a Hemingway story and the tone that works for a Star Wars book.
Guess we'll finally find out why Mickey's whistling at the beginning.at least people will be able to make money off Steamboat Willy porn in the nearish future.
I'm glad I have no idea who any of these people are. Except for Harlan Ellison. Wendig is not fit to lick Ellison's typewriter ribbon.Chuck is apparently getting #MeToo'd now as well. These accusations read like they are straight out of somebody's Tumblr headcanon, but truth and falsity don't matter when you're dealing with Social Justice. Does Chuck #BelieveWomen, or doesn't he? To reiterate, I have absolutely no idea who this person is. But she is doubtless brave and powerful and totally badass. And female and therefore incapable of lying, right Chuck?
![]()
Jaym Gates
And on that note, because if I'm going to set fire to myself anyways, I might as well be thorough: Chuck Wendig demanded, repeatedly, that I be accountable for the behavior of a man I worked with...www.facebook.com
Honestly, I'm not even quite sure what he did, but whatever it was it sure made a wamen sad.
Chuck is apparently getting #MeToo'd now as well. These accusations read like they are straight out of somebody's Tumblr headcanon, but truth and falsity don't matter when you're dealing with Social Justice. Does Chuck #BelieveWomen, or doesn't he? To reiterate, I have absolutely no idea who this person is. But she is doubtless brave and powerful and totally badass. And female and therefore incapable of lying, right Chuck?
![]()
Jaym Gates
And on that note, because if I'm going to set fire to myself anyways, I might as well be thorough: Chuck Wendig demanded, repeatedly, that I be accountable for the behavior of a man I worked with...www.facebook.com
Honestly, I'm not even quite sure what he did, but whatever it was it sure made a wamen sad.
Earlier in this thread, I compared Soy Cowboy's "style" to Ellroy's -- very unfavorably. Like all genuine talents, Ellroy makes his terse, stream-of-consciousness style look easy. But it's damnably difficult to render effectively.He's trying to borrow the style from James Ellroy which is presented in that same machine gun type tense, rushing headlong into the next sentence, with phrasing that evokes raw imagery.
It's hard as HELL to do and very few writers can do it as good as Ellroy (LA Confidential) who mastered it to make you need a cigarette after reading a chapter.
Example:
When did the first movie come out? 2001, maybe, just maybe, that movie renewed interest in it. Maybe that's why. How much money was it making in 1998, or in the 80s?
In case you couldn't tell, this article was written when the movies were still some months from release. Also, Tolkien was worth nearly half a billion dollars in 1973 money (the RIP date in the article is in error), which, you may note, was almost 30 years before the movies came out, and 5 years before even the cartoon. Lord of the Rings was a license to print money pretty much from the moment the hippies discovered it in the 1960s. Even in the 1980s Tolkien ate up at least a full shelf in the fantasy section of most bookstores, and that's before you get to the calendars, video games, RPGs, posters, art books, and reams and reams of ancillary material.
If you don't know what a juggernaut Lord of the Rings was for decades before the movies came out, you're either very young, very ignorant, or both.
Good god almighty! You killed him! As god as my witness he is broken in half!
Half a billion pounds was worth a great deal more than half a billion dollars then.In case you couldn't tell, this article was written when the movies were still some months from release. Also, Tolkien was worth nearly half a billion dollars in 1973 money (the RIP date in the article is in error), which, you may note, was almost 30 years before the movies came out, and 5 years before even the cartoon. Lord of the Rings was a license to print money pretty much from the moment the hippies discovered it in the 1960s. Even in the 1980s Tolkien ate up at least a full shelf in the fantasy section of most bookstores, and that's before you get to the calendars, video games, RPGs, posters, art books, and reams and reams of ancillary material.
If you don't know what a juggernaut Lord of the Rings was for decades before the movies came out, you're either very young, very ignorant, or both.
Late and gay but fuck franchises. If the creator of the "franchise" can't convince the public to buy their recent installment instead of someone else's, they don't deserve it. Abolishing franchises means if the corporate owner fucks over the original human creator, the original creator can take his stuff and his audience to another corporation without having to file off serial numbers. it gives the humans behind multimedia works more creative power, not less.Literally any franchise worthy of the name.
I would love for The Shadow to be out of the copyright grasp of those mealy-mouthed simps at Conde Nast.Late and gay but fuck franchises. If the creator of the "franchise" can't convince the public to buy their recent installment instead of someone else's, they don't deserve it. Abolishing franchises means if the corporate owner fucks over the original human creator, the original creator can take his stuff and his audience to another corporation without having to file off serial numbers. it gives the humans behind multimedia works more creative power, not less.