Debate Webby's Boyfriend about the validity of him dating underage cartoon characters - Cartoons aren't real

@Webby's Boyfriend gets comfort from his mom, after a hard day online...
View attachment 1411426
"Disabled MILF dominates agoraphobic young vegan"

Sorry I'm late.

They're not adults either you sick fuck.
'Sup, glad you got here, this is exactly the situation that calls for your brand of shitposting, man.
This adoptive schnitzelnigger is possibly something special, I think.

@Webby's Boyfriend

Dearest Duckfucker, I realise that your mind-buggering-autism super-real cosmism might make this difficult to internalise and process but bear with me here...

"Cosmism" isn't a real word. No matter how much you flagellate your GermAzn micropeen, it won't make it a real thing. If you'd like to rebutt this, please feel free to provide an explanation of what "cosmism" actually means, the historical precedents and established etymology via any of the consensually recognised sources and I'll be happy to retract.

What do you think about Frank Agnones and Kate Micucci? Perhaps more pertinently, what do you think they would think of you and your particular fetish?

Let's move on to your most recent "special interest" (do you know the popular usage of that term, I wonder?), Deryn/Dylan.

Canonically, in the fantasy world created by Scott Westerfeld, Deryn is 15 years old, your assertion of her technically being 121 years old is not going to fly, given that you have no basis of interpolation for her age versus your age in the context of two entirely different eras. In the event that there is any weight at all to parallel universe theory, consider a contemporary analogy. When two completely different societies/tribes/*insert group here* are merged or intersect, there has to be capitulation or compromise on at least one side, yes? So, how is that going to work, exactly, could you explain with a minimum of macguffins/deus ex machina devices/outright whitewashing? I'd really like a solid, science based answer to this question. Provide me with one and I will cheerfully go to bat for you ITT.

Super quick bonus question: What is your opinion on Scott Westerfeld?
 
Really I'm still reeling from their belief that autism is a philosophical mindset rather than a mental disorder. Even stranger is the claim that Autism the Philosophy has an opposing force in the form of Cosmism, which judging from Duckfucker's interest in computer simulations I'm guessing has something to do with the beliefs of weirdo Aussie scientist Hugo de Garis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_de_Garis
Hugo De Garis believes that a major war before the end of the 21st century, resulting in billions of deaths, is almost inevitable.[2]:234 Intelligent machines (or "artilects", a shortened form of "artificial intellects") will be far more intelligent than humans and will threaten to attain world domination, resulting in a conflict between "Cosmists", who support the artilects, and "Terrans", who oppose them (both of these are terms of his invention). He describes this conflict as a "gigadeath" war, reinforcing the point that billions of people will be killed.[16][17] This scenario has been criticised by other AI researchers, including Chris Malcolm, who described it as "entertaining science fiction horror stories which happen to have caught the attention of the popular media".[18] Kevin Warwick called it a "hellish nightmare, as portrayed in films such as the Terminator".[2]:back cover
In 2005, de Garis published a book describing his views on this topic entitled The Artilect War: Cosmists vs. Terrans: A Bitter Controversy Concerning Whether Humanity Should Build Godlike Massively Intelligent Machines.[2]

Cosmism is a moral philosophy that favours building or growing strong artificial intelligence and ultimately leaving Earth to the Terrans, who oppose this path for humanity. The first half of the book describes technologies which he believes will make it possible for computers to be billions or trillions of times more intelligent than humans. He predicts that as artificial intelligence improves and becomes progressively more human-like, differing views will begin to emerge regarding how far such research should be allowed to proceed. Cosmists will foresee the massive, truly astronomical potential of substrate-independent cognition, and will therefore advocate unlimited growth in the designated fields, in the hopes that "super intelligent" machines might one day colonise the universe. It is this "cosmic" view of history, in which the fate of one single species, on one single planet, is seen as insignificant next to the fate of the known universe, that gives the Cosmists their name.
Hugo identifies with that group and noted that it "would be a cosmic tragedy if humanity freezes evolution at the puny human level".[19]

Terrans, on the other hand, will have a more "terrestrial" Earth-centred view, in which the fate of the Earth and its species (like humanity) are seen as being all-important. To Terrans, a future without humans is to be avoided at all costs, as it would represent the worst-case scenario. As such, Terrans will find themselves unable to ignore the possibility that super intelligent machines might one day cause the destruction of the human race—being very immensely intelligent and so cosmically inclined, these artilect machines may have no more moral or ethical difficulty in exterminating humanity than humans do in using medicines to cure diseases. So, Terrans will see themselves as living during the closing of a window of opportunity, to disable future artilects before they are built, after which humans will no longer have a say in the affairs of intelligent machines.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Uncanny Valley
@Webby's Boyfriend A lot of us warned you that this was creepy. I'm sorry, kid, you were always polite but arguing to lower the standard age of consent is always a red flag. No adult male should be interested in doing so or just in general concerned about when adolescents should have sex.

This degeneracy needs to be excised like a tumour.
 
Last edited:
@Webby's Boyfriend desperately tries to find a word to refute @Troon Draugur 's truth...
Dukkbook1.png
 
Age of consent already is 14 in Germany, though. (to be clear I'm not advocating fucking 14-year-olds)
Sure. I'm assuming @Webby's Boyfriend is an adult male and as @SIGSEGV said wouldn't be in 'contention' to be involved in that quandary. A teenage girl cannot genuinely consent to a relationship with an adult male. The fact it's a cartoon duck is just creepier.
 
Back