War Merkel: Europe Should Brace For a Reality in Which US No longer a World Power

Merkel: Europe Should Brace For a Reality in Which US No longer a World Power
Trump’s withdrawal of troops from Germany alarming European globalists

RT - June 27, 2020 109 Comments
Merkel: Europe Should Brace For a Reality in Which US No longer a World Power
Image Credits: MICHAEL KAPPELER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.









The US may voluntarily relinquish its status as a world power and Europeans must brace themselves for such a contingency, including by boosting their militaries, the German chancellor has warned.
European nations need “to carry more of the burden than during the cold war” in terms of defense spending, Merkel said, because they cannot assume that the US will be there to protect them.
“We grew up in the certain knowledge that the United States wanted to be a world power. Should the US now wish to withdraw from that role of its own free will, we would have to reflect on that very deeply,” she said, in an interview published in six European newspapers.

The German leader stopped short of advocating a joint EU military force, the idea favored by French President Emmanuel Macron. She said she saw the value of NATO capabilities, including the shared nuclear umbrella, in a world of the rising Asian powers China and India.
The French leader has a much more skeptical attitude towards the transatlantic defense bloc. Last year he said NATO was “brain dead.”
Merkel lamented the increasing selfishness of nations today, which, she said, contrasts with the unified multilateral response to the 2008 financial crisis. “These days, we have to do all we can to stop ourselves collapsing into protectionism,” she said.
“If Europe wants to be heard, then it needs to set a good example.”
Protectionist approaches are at the core of the Trump administration’s foreign policy. Under Trump, Washington pushed for the renegotiation of trade deals that the US president saw as unfavorable to his country. He also dialed up to 11 the criticism of European NATO members like Germany, which fail to meet their military spending obligations, calling them freeloaders. And his administration has made confrontation with China on all fronts a priority, ramping up the pressure on third nations to scare them away from cooperating with Beijing.
Speaking about China, Merkel said its rise “shows that even an undemocratic state can be economically successful, which is a major challenge for our liberal democracies.” This example and other post-cold war developments, from the emergence of the Islamist terrorist threat to the disappointing results of the Arab Spring, are a matter of grave concern for believers in liberal causes like herself.
“We have not yet been able to furnish absolute proof that the liberal system is about to win the day.”
But Merkel seems reluctant to join the US and go for a major confrontation with China, saying Beijing’s new-found power is a reality that other nations have to learn to live with.
“China has become a global player. That makes us partners in economic cooperation and combating climate change, but also competitors with very different political systems,” she said.
“Not to talk to each other would certainly be a bad idea.”
The same is true for Russia, the country that the US sees as its other strategic rival. Berlin needs to remain engaged with Moscow despite all issues in their bilateral relations.
“In countries like Syria and Libya, countries in Europe’s immediate neighbourhood, Russia’s strategic influence is great,” Merkel explained.
“I will therefore continue to strive for cooperation.”


Alex Jones breaks down the authoritarian globalists touting fake numbers and projections of deaths wrongly associated with covid-19 as a reason to call for mandatory vaccines.

 
This is funny to me, because the world power status isnt obtained via a popularity contest. It is a matter of strength, and as far as I know the United States leads the world in military, money, and hospitable land.

They are so far ahead of China, Russia, and even other European powers in terms of military that it would take the course of decade to construct nearly as many aircraft carriers, never mind the aircraft and support vessels itself.

Places like china and Russia like to talk a big game, to keep the US on their toes with occasional trips into foreign airspace. Because if something really is going down, you know how long you have til you are intercepted, and there is a good chance your enemy will default into thinking this is yet another false alarm.

Money wise, the American dollar is the standard. It is accepted anywhere, and in many cases it is preferred over domestic currency. I don't see this changing any time soon, especially given the great "Euro" experiment failed so badly.

Last but not least the United States has a resource more valuable than gold, and that is land. You can make more weapon, can print more money, but at the end of the day land is a limited commodity that will only become more important as the population multiplies.

That is not to say China, Russia, and India do not have land. In China's case a lot of this land is undeveloped, with a majority of their citizens crammed into cities.

I can see making an arguement that they are exploiting the rest of the world infinitely better than everyone else, as they have become the manufacturers of the world, along with their pseudo colonization in Africa, mining the resources. A lot of the projects they have been contracted to complete in these developing nations must be paid within the next few years. If they do not pay, then all the land and infrastructure defaults into China's hands. Seeing as they just crippled the first world economy and set up a massive food shortage for impoverished nations, I think this plays into their hands.

I can see China wanting to be a world leader, and doing it in a manner which forces the rest of the world to have to appoint them into this position, rather than reach and take it in a direct fashion. They sure were quick to offer aid after sucking the world's supply of medical equipment as the age of the Kung Flumania began.

In Russia's case everything west of the Urals is fine land, but the vast majority of the country is not west of the Urals. Once you go past the mountains, you are in Siberia. Beautiful and unique as the landscape may be, it is impossible to farm such land, as the soil underneath has itself been frozen. Even the places where the snow does melt, you almost have to live like you're in the mid 1900s.

Russia is hurting since they depend on oil, not just for their own use (like the US), but they need to be able to lean their economy on selling it. They do not have the swathes of fertile farm land with developed rural areas, and miles upon miles of power, water, and a sturdy political infrastructure where the rule of law is enforced.

In some of these crazy remote places in Siberia, there are villages that do not answer the the Kremlin. Hell, you can see it in a place somewhat developed, Chechnya, who really don't like the Russian government. Ramzan (the guy in charge of Chechnya) is a fucking king who does what he pleases, including indulging in an obsession with pro fighting. To which he keeps the minimum age very low. Go ahead and look for the videos of 14 year olds in a Vegas style fight, being watched by enormous crowds.

Russia wants to be seen on equal footing as the most powerful in the world, for sure. This is hard to argue. But I think Putin's current government is sly, and if they are planning for a power grab, I do not think they are yet at this stage.

Right now Russia is consolidating the land they lost from the dissolution of the USSR. This land is fertile and developed in many cases, with strategic access points, such as ports and cities. Ukraine was for gaining a port. Chechnya was for geographical location. Georgia as well. Last on their list, if even possible, are Lithuania, Latvia, Finland (less likely), and Estonia. But they want to consolidate as much land as they can, in careful enough intervals that they can play a game of "What are you gonna do about it?" to the rest of the world.

And as they want to speed up, they distract their enemies from within, with internal chaos and instability. Russia has some sweet weapons, but right now they do not wish to engage in full blown war. They instead wish to train their men, with these petty battles over former Soviet territory, and do what they are the best at - counterintelligence.

India is the weird one here, because while they might have the highest potential out of any of the countries (resources, ports, highly wealthy entrepreneurs, population size), the country still seems like it is going through adolescence.

Many people living there are in some of the worst conditions in the world. But then you have this untapped potential of using this massive population and turning them into workers like china. Plus the history and story of the land itself is filled with a lot of questions, many of which may be answered within our lifetimes. I can see kids growing up with the idea that it is this mythical sort of place, sort of like the Egypt hype in the early 20th century.

But I also wantto point one interesting difference.

Seems like they are also the only country on my list that is riding the liberal mania train. At least on a federal and foreign policy level. Getting real cozy with Europe, which is an interesting dynamic considering their shared history. Makes you think about the current situation in the US.
 
What? Have you even seen the training budget for the US military? We spend more money on ammo in a month for training our Nasty Girls than most nations spend in a year on their entire defense force.
more low IQ people means more basic training.

Yes, the upper brass and flag ranks turn into politically back stabbing retards to further their careers but a huge focus in the military is making leaders, not brain dead followers.
Leaders who sit at home and fuck journalists instead of fighting against politicians to better the rules of engagement for his soldiers in the field...


No, that's bullshit. The US Army is better, and more expensively trained than most Euro armies
thats why they perform so poorly all of the time? they cant even occupy Afghanistan right-

also has a lot more experience of fighting wars than any Euro army - only the Brits come close.
losing wars against goatfuckers and gooks is nothing you should be proud about.

"Fixating on materiel" isn't a US or Russian thing, it's literally what you need to win wars. Running at the bad guys with nothing but your dick in your hand tends to be a suboptimal tactic.
You run out of Material if you fight the whole world.
Having endless streams of Material only works if you fight a war on a different continent or are willing to sacrifice a a bunch of men for every dead enemy soldier.
 
That said unless Trump fails to secure his next term they are and I. and clearly the EU leadership, see no reason to make enemies of the PRC until it's established if the current American stance can be ascribed to being a temporary blip or a long term change.

They are already the enemies of the entire Western world. They hate our freedom and seek to undermine it at every possible turn. Their spies infiltrate our institutions, attempt to brainwash our youth, corrupt our politics and bribe our businesses. They. Are. Our. Enemies. Already.
 
@Stoneheart you need to go look into WW2 and what US CAS and artillery did to German offensives. When the US started using VT fuses in artillery for the first time in the Ardennes your superbly trained infantry defied direct orders to assault our positions due to how scared shitless they were of ending up as hamburger. Radar aside, being able to fire 5 shells for every 2 the enemy can is a ridiculous force multiplier, especially when you're the US and have been focusing on arty over infantry since before it was truly a proper nation.

As to size... with the "amphibious assault ships" it has, the US Marine Corps is the world's second largest carrier navy, only losing to the US Navy proper, which is itself the world's second largest air force. Anyone who wants to talk about us not being a world leader should start thinking about what to do if the fricking Marines decide they want to go to war with your entire country just because they're bored and feel like a brawl.
 
losing wars against goatfuckers and gooks is nothing you should be proud about.

The US Army hasn't lost a battle since Rommel got the upper hand in Tunisia in 1943. The US troops in that fight were still very green, up against veteran Krauts. We both know who went on to win that war though, amirite?

Occupying foreign shithole countries for long periods isn't something any army is particularly good at, you either have to behave like monsters (as the Nazis did in Eastern Europe) - which just encourages the population to resist. Or you go softly softly like the US does - which just encourages the population to resist.

It's almost as if the army is very good at killing people and breaking shit, not so good at being cops.

You run out of Material if you fight the whole world.
Having endless streams of Material only works if you fight a war on a different continent or are willing to sacrifice a a bunch of men for every dead enemy soldier.

Is that why the Germans only have a couple dozen military aircraft working at any given time? If you guys got into a fight with a kebab shop, you'd probably surrender before their superior firepower (knives)
 
They are already the enemies of the entire Western world. They hate our freedom and seek to undermine it at every possible turn. Their spies infiltrate our institutions, attempt to brainwash our youth, corrupt our politics and bribe our businesses. They. Are. Our. Enemies. Already.

You say the western world.

About twenty years ago I would have conceded that America and Europe shared a common outlook that could be defined as western.

Today? America has very little in common with what I would consider the "western" world (Canada, Australia, Japan, Europe etc). America is a rotting relic being demolished from within by a mixture of foreign influences and leftist thought.

China is far from a reliable ally. They are a threat, and yet despite that they're still more palletable than modern America.

Europe has long to our own degradation looked to the US as a source of leadership and culture. It now fails to provide both in any satisfying quantity.
 
Europe has long to our own degradation looked to the US as a source of leadership and culture. It now fails to provide both in any satisfying quantity.
Good. The US was better off when we were selling Missiles for the rest of world to throw at each other and only getting into shit when some body started shit with us.
 
Its hard to justify 2% of GDP if you dont have enemies around.
The much bigger problem is also the leftest ideology that gets the best to leave the troop.




Thats not true, they were not allowed to get the machine guns from Storage. MG3s are not missing, they are just in giant vaults and not with the soldiers. same goes for every other small arm. the MG3 is the worst. they use alot of very old ones while they have thousands of brand new ones in storage, some of those storages have brand new 50 year old guns in them...

Are the APC's also locked in the vaults? Because in addition to thhe broomsticks they showed up in minivans with "tank" painted on the side. At the same time it came out that they only had a single fixed wing aircraft in service capable of both leaving the ground and equiping and delivering weapons. But dont worry they still had helicopters... only they didn't. St the same time Germany had to beg off several humanitarian missions because they had fewer than a dozen working helicopters. If you looked at the SJW lesbian Gender Studies Professor Minister of Defense Germany had at the time it quickly became obvious why things had deteriorated to the extent they had.
 
The US will not last forever, and I will freely admit that. Nobody in the 1700s thought that the mighty British empire would end up a sad cucked rock or that the roman empire would collapse. History turns slowly.

But it wont be in Merkel's lifetime, or anyone elses here for that matter. The US is supremely powerful in military power, cultural influence, resource availability, and monetary wealth. America is the defender of international shipping lanes. American dollars are the standard currency. Empires like this take literal centuries to decompose, and in the case of Britain never truly die completely, but become shells of their former selves.

Merkel is absolutely right when she says the US influence in Europe is waning, but it isnt because America is weakening. It's because Europe is. Asia is the up and coming conglomerate in politics. The Chinese and their subterfuge hold immense power, India is growing stronger by the day, and countries like Vietnam are absorbing fleeing industries and gaining wealth at an incredible pace. They are the important political economic sphere.

What does Europe offer? The same leftist BS? Companies that are increasingly selling out to the Chinese? Cultural rot as millions of migrants are pumped into their cities and their politicians turn a blind eye as child rape rings and human slavery go untouched? The same whinging about how mean the ol' US is while the US is the only thing that stopped them from becoming USSR satellite states? European states slobbering at the opportunity to become Chinese vassal states?

European influence has been dwindling for decades, and now they've realized their welfare states and culture of national infighting is going to
 
If she met her NATO GPD spending requirements she wouldn’t be worrying about not having a functioning military.
Now she’s stuck with single digit readiness rates and all those Africans she imported.
You should see their own military and how they train 1st hand. They cannot afford to train with real guns so they use sticks for "rifles." Their vehicles don't even run and if they did; they couldn't afford the gas to drive them. They're too scared to build their military because of past "injustices," so their current one is a laughing stock. I'm sure their elite tier gets all the funding, but once you get to the German grunts, we're talking barbaric training.

If any nation picked a war with Germany right now and gained air supremacy; they could not defend themselves. They would be completely reliant on others. Just look how weak their "strongest" armed forces is compared to the US:

Germany Air Farce:
+27K personnel
+400 aircraft

US Air Force:
+321K active duty personnel
+141K civilian personnel
+69K reserve personnel
+105K air national guard personnel
+5K aircraft
+400 ICBMs

Then add on, the US has been at war for 19 years. Our "war" knife is the sharpest of all the countries. The only thing knocking the US from a super power is a nuclear holocaust--and nobody is going to "win" if that action is took.
 
maybe one day, Hans will finally be able to hold a real life rifle when doing military excercises. I wonder if the rinos and cucks are freaking out. No one is more susceptible to reverse psychology like the gope.
 
Back