Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Checks and balances doesn't work.
Legislative branch must be abolished.
President must be able to override SCOTUS.

Think of the US Govt like a corporation:
President = CEO
Cabinet = C-Suite (Press Secretary = Chief Marketing Officer)
SCOTUS = Customer Support
Alphabet Agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ, DOD, etc. = Divisions.

The entire goal of congress is to cockblock the president and this is so bad that they've had to go around the US Cons, by giving the president executive orders, basically the ability to legislate laws. In practice all congress does is in fight and block reform. This is EXACTLY what occurred in the Roman Republic too. They generate 0 value and instead cause gridlock and division. They must be abolished.

SCOTUS should be customer service. They interpret the rules and enact them. But because of the "separate of powers" BS our SCOTUS passes laws. They take the responsibility to pass controversial laws because the legislative branch doesn't want to take heat during re-elections. Since SCOTUS can block the president, we have Kritarchy. Imagine if Apple or Google or Microsoft customer support could override the CEO. Insane.

I know the founding father's vision was to prevent tyranny but in practice they created a system that guarantees incompetence -> low trust in the system -> people wanting to overthrow the system, This is why many other nation that tries to implement our system eventually reject it and go back to a dictatorship because at least that system works, able to pass laws. This is not the best form of govt, it's the absolute worst.
Why do you want to fuck a Ducktales character?
 
1 month
no thumb
no bitchute
no coherency
no understanding of any new argument terms he was unaware of (strawman, etc)
no progress towards anything he wants to do, just endless cycling through the same nonsense and gettin' mad at stickers
It's like he's an incompetent retard or something... Weird.

Why do you want to fuck a Ducktales character?
Be honest, at this point, would anyone be surprised if he said he did, though?
 
If he was as competent as he is persistent, he might actually achieve something in life.
I believe I said something of the same nature, waaaaay back in the thread when we weren't sure if it would even hit 50 pages before he got the message.

You've got to admire his persistence, though; he hasn't let things (total failure to persuade, being roundly mocked or his username becoming a byword for utter autistic faggotry on the site) stop his quest to become the leading voice for wignat spastics everywhere. I mean, he's more chance of extinguishing the sun by spitting on it repeatedly but then, he's both dumb and persistent enough to give even that a try, I deem.
 
I believe I said something of the same nature, waaaaay back in the thread when we weren't sure if it would even hit 50 pages before he got the message.

You've got to admire his persistence, though; he hasn't let things (total failure to persuade, being roundly mocked or his username becoming a byword for utter autistic faggotry on the site) stop his quest to become the leading voice for wignat spastics everywhere. I mean, he's more chance of extinguishing the sun by spitting on it repeatedly but then, he's both dumb and persistent enough to give even that a try, I deem.
@BoxerShorts47 would try to debate the sun about interplanetary politics or some shit.
 
If you get rid of checks and balances and allow the President [Congress & SCOTUS] to act unilaterally, what incentive would they have to serve the interests of the people? The various dictators [CEOs, Corporations and Lobbyists] across the Arab [Fortune 500 & Wall Street] world definitely don't care about the people they're subjugating, they just care about enriching themselves and living comfortably in their gold palaces. How would you prevent that from happening?

I must say, considering how closely Donald Trump's taste in interior decorating matches that of an Arab dictator, I certainly can't say I'd trust him to behave much better than one if he were granted absolute power.

Fixed. You're implying that our current system of "checks and balances" prevents tyranny and our government represents the Internets of the people. It does not. To answer your question.
YOU CANNOT BUILD A SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT WITHOUT TRUST!!!
If your government officials betray you than you're screwed. That simple.
Most people agree that USA today is already a tyranny, call it anarcho-tyranny.
Govt. will not protect even your most basic rights like freedom to protest, they'll allow ANTIFA to beat you up and if you defend yourself, you'll be put in jail. (Cville 2017).
Everyone saw the exact same treatment with the BLM riots 2020. Mayors telling the police to stand-down, allowing stores to be rioted and burned down and targeting people that were protecting themselves like the Ken & Karen Couple https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/0...or-intimidation-of-peaceful-protesters-941393

Or look at Prop 197 or Prop 8. CA voted to not allow the state to become an anchor magnet and the law was struck down in the courts. Prop 8. CA voted to not allow gay marriage (gay marriage is not marriage, it's cultural appropriation). SCOTUS overruled them. Irony here is that "unconstitutional" is used to NOT serve the interests of the people. Systems of checks and balances is being used to prevent the general public from having representation.
 
Fixed. You're implying that our current system of "checks and balances" prevents tyranny and our government represents the Internets of the people. It does not. To answer your question.
YOU CANNOT BUILD A SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT WITHOUT TRUST!!!
If your government officials betray you than you're screwed. That simple.
Most people agree that USA today is already a tyranny, call it anarcho-tyranny.
Govt. will not protect even your most basic rights like freedom to protest, they'll allow ANTIFA to beat you up and if you defend yourself, you'll be put in jail. (Cville 2017).
Everyone saw the exact same treatment with the BLM riots 2020. Mayors telling the police to stand-down, allowing stores to be rioted and burned down and targeting people that were protecting themselves like the Ken & Karen Couple https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/0...or-intimidation-of-peaceful-protesters-941393

Or look at Prop 197 or Prop 8. CA voted to not allow the state to become an anchor magnet and the law was struck down in the courts. Prop 8. CA voted to not allow gay marriage (gay marriage is not marriage, it's cultural appropriation). SCOTUS overruled them. Irony here is that "unconstitutional" is used to NOT serve the interests of the people. Systems of checks and balances is being used to prevent the general public from having representation.
Yes, corruption can seep into any system, but all it takes for a dictatorship to become horifically corrupt is literally one bad apple in the right position. Do you want cities razed because voices in the dictator's head told them to do so?
 
Yes, corruption can seep into any system, but all it takes for a dictatorship to become horifically corrupt is literally one bad apple in the right position. Do you want cities razed because voices in the dictator's head told them to do so?
Are you fucking retarded? USA govt allows ANTIFA and BLM to attack and kill us and will charge us for protecting ourselves. They are even attacking the police officers now, trying to put them in jail for defending themselves against street nigger. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/17/for...er-in-death-of-rayshard-brooks-at-wendys.html
If you don't support the USA's agenda of replacing white people with non-whites and allowing blacks to kill with impunity then you'll be punished.
America is just as bad as most dictatorships at this point. Only difference is we have a better economy so we get bread and circus while we're oppressed.
 
Fixed. You're implying that our current system of "STRAWMEN and BAD FAITH" prevents opposition and my wignat view represents the Internets of the people. It does not. To answer your question.
I LITERALLY CAN'T STOP GARGLING CUM. I FUCKING LOVE IT, GUYS!!!
If your Twitter betrays you, than you're a faggot. That simple.
Most people agree that @BoxerShorts47 today is already an autist, call it turbo-autism.
Govt. will not protect even your most basic rights like freedom to chase minors, they'll allow NORMAL PEOPLE to beat you up and if you defend yourself, you'll be put in jail.
Everyone saw the exact same treatment with the "Debate Boxershorts" thread 2020. Posters telling the Flip to stand-down, allowing views to be mocked and torn apart and targeting people that were protecting themselves like the titular faggot. This is my jam, guys

** I couldn't be fucked altering any more, I'll be honest, lads. TD **
Fixed your fixings, homeslice.

Ayyyy, he's back and apparently, the dosage is about right... Note the bold/italic sections.
 
Are you fucking retarded? USA govt allows ANTIFA and BLM to attack and kill us and will charge us for protecting ourselves. They are even attacking the police officers now, trying to put them in jail for defending themselves against street nigger. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/17/for...er-in-death-of-rayshard-brooks-at-wendys.html
If you don't support the USA's agenda of replacing white people with non-whites and allowing blacks to kill with impunity then you'll be punished.
America is just as bad as most dictatorships at this point. Only difference is we have a better economy so we get bread and circus while we're oppressed.
Thanks for further proving horseshoe theory.
 
Fixed. You're implying that our current system of "checks and balances" prevents tyranny and our government represents the Internets of the people. It does not. To answer your question.
YOU CANNOT BUILD A SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT WITHOUT TRUST!!!
If your government officials betray you than you're screwed. That simple.
Most people agree that USA today is already a tyranny, call it anarcho-tyranny.
Govt. will not protect even your most basic rights like freedom to protest, they'll allow ANTIFA to beat you up and if you defend yourself, you'll be put in jail. (Cville 2017).
Everyone saw the exact same treatment with the BLM riots 2020. Mayors telling the police to stand-down, allowing stores to be rioted and burned down and targeting people that were protecting themselves like the Ken & Karen Couple https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/0...or-intimidation-of-peaceful-protesters-941393

Or look at Prop 197 or Prop 8. CA voted to not allow the state to become an anchor magnet and the law was struck down in the courts. Prop 8. CA voted to not allow gay marriage (gay marriage is not marriage, it's cultural appropriation). SCOTUS overruled them. Irony here is that "unconstitutional" is used to NOT serve the interests of the people. Systems of checks and balances is being used to prevent the general public from having representation.
Lol calm down.
 
Are you fucking retarded? USA govt allows ANTIFA and BLM to attack and kill us and will charge us for protecting ourselves. They are even attacking the police officers now, trying to put them in jail for defending themselves against street nigger. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/17/for...er-in-death-of-rayshard-brooks-at-wendys.html
If you don't support the USA's agenda of replacing white people with non-whites and allowing blacks to kill with impunity then you'll be punished.
America is just as bad as most dictatorships at this point. Only difference is we have a better economy so we get bread and circus while we're oppressed.
Dude, you sound exactly like a foreigner who gets all of his knowledge of America exclusively from the most hyperbolic alt-right voices.

You always have sounded that way, but that post, man, you couldn't make it more obvious that you've never set foot once in the USA.
 
Back