Trainwreck Onision / James Gregory Jackson / Gregory James Daniel/Jackson/Avaroe - Edgy king of the tweens, Vegan with deformed dick, Pedo, Destroying the Environment. Serial Domestic Abuser, Served the wrong Chris Hansen.

1593749686985.png

Deorio now thinks that going on the onision subreddit can help him convince people that Chris Hansen lied
 
Greg is 34 years old and still tries to be a weeb
View attachment 1424353
View attachment 1424358
you still look like shit
View attachment 1424361
you look sad
View attachment 1424363
the edge is very dull
View attachment 1424364
enough with the ass shots please
View attachment 1424366
once again, iron the fucking suit
View attachment 1424367
not porn
View attachment 1424368
stop squeezing the dick
View attachment 1424371
nice rusty sword
View attachment 1424373
you are fat
View attachment 1424422
horrifying
View attachment 1424424
cringe
View attachment 1424426
covering the tiny dick again eh?
View attachment 1424427
no, this is fucking bad
View attachment 1424428
stop covering the dick
View attachment 1424431
disgusting
View attachment 1424435
no, i don't like this
View attachment 1424436
yikes
View attachment 1424437
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
there's a video of him rubbing his fucking balls, but I'm too fucking tired to include that

However I bring you audio clips tonight, enjoy.

Every one of these audio clips sound like they've been extracted from some badly dubbed hentai. Also, what is he trying to cosplay as? L? Cloud? His husbando Light-sama? His cosplay just comes off as some edgy Kingdom Heart self-insert OC from the early deviantart days.
 
Oh boy, i just caught up with the last 300+ pages and now my eyes hurt. Really cannot believe that grug sold his own body out for so little money in return. (also i need to stop clicking on spoilers) His most recent pictures are lazy and half of them arent even pornographic, they're just pics of him staring off into the middle distance thinking he looks sexy. You're not sexy Greg, you never will be.
 
I get that camwhores use apps and photoshop and whatever, but damn Greg is lazy. Whatever app he’s using for his body shots is working overtime and giving up halfway through in despair. Those serratus anterior muscles lookin’ suspicious as hell.
CEFB7DE1-D517-4F17-89BF-B921B242FE0E.jpeg9F32D15A-90DD-4BD2-B214-96BED177CF43.jpeg
 
Last edited:
These fucking social media investigative journalists are so draining to witness.

They all seem to have a need to sour public opinion on Hansen, don't they? I try to understand why it is they all seem so personally invested in this "cause" to such a degree they are willing to try and vindicate fucking GREG if it means discrediting Hansen. In my humble opinion it all comes down to jealousy, bruised egos, feeling threatened, and entitlement.

Hansen was able to use his position as a cultural icon to gain quick success on YouTube at the time he began focusing on Greg. I think this bothered many of these low/mid-level commentary channels because Hansen is an "old-media" figure. A lot of creators on all corners of YouTube have expressed negative feelings towards traditional celebrities and media personalities being on the platform. So I think it's reasonable to apply that sentiment to at least some of the commentary channels doing constant negative Hansen content.

Hansen also has decades of experience in investigative journalism. He is a very skilled interviewer. I've seen interviews done by several of these same mid/low-level commentary channels and while they range in skill, one factor I've noticed with nearly all of them is that in their interviews, they have way too much interest in conveying their own thoughts and opinions when they should really be listening to who it is their interviewing. If the interview shifts towards being more conversational, the interviewee may clam up as some individuals are naturally submissive/passive/unsure in conversations. That's why GOOD interviews are structured in a way that gives the interviewee direct questions to respond to, resulting in the quality of information being much better. Let's say that Lainey has finally left Greg and was interested in telling her story. Who would you rather conduct the interview, Hansen or Repzion? Creepshow or Hansen? Edwin or Hansen? John Swan or Hansen?

Some of these creators who have been vocal about their disdain for Hansen seem to have expected he act in a way that expresses his position as being lower on the totem pole. Like he should be subservient to them because they perceive themselves as being the fucking arbiters of commentary or something? Creepshow made a comment about how Hansen, a complete stranger, should have used his personal free-time to make a public statement acknowledging "Edwin's" criticism of him because "Edwin" is his superior and outranks him on the platform. Of course, by "Edwin" she means herself, allowing her to make her (idiotic) point without showing her true narcassism.

And the fact that Hansen is now apparently in talks with ID Discovery regarding their interest in his coverage of Onision really chapped their asses. Repzion said something about how Hansen used HIS information which is categorically incorrect. It was Hansen who interviewed the victims. It was Hansen who interviewed Detective Ed Troyer, resulting in confirmation of an existing criminal investigation. It was Hansen's name that brought MSM interest. So whatever there is going on with Hansen and ID Discovery has to do with his name recognition and the way he specifically presented his Onision content. How delusional is Repzion to believe it had anything to do with him. Not only that, but Repzion openly expressed that he feels he is entitled to the Onision story because he'd been covering it so long or something? I'm sorry, what? IIRC Stevie had been doing content on Greg before Repzion. Not only that, but he did actual research and brought new information to his videos in a time WAY before Onision critical content was profitable. I'm legit baffled that this scumbag Repzion SERIOUSLY feels entitled to a whole-ass other person's life? Beyond that, I can't think of a single instance where Repzion has provided new information in all the years he's covered Greg. It was so obvious he got all of his content from the farms and Twitter and did little to no additional research into the information he found. A huge example of this was when he did a video about the wetlands saga and got wrong the absolute most basic, most relevant piece to that story. He referred to the fucking wetlands as Greg's property, not just in name for simplicity's sake, but totally did not know that the destruction Greg did was on government owned and protected property. That's like the core fucking issue! He put together this whole fucking video without doing even the most basic research because had he even begun to look into it that would have been immediately clear. Repzion could not have made himself look like more of a spiteful, immature, unprofessional, irrational weakling.

EDIT: I really didn't intend to write a novel here or present myself as some Hansen warrior cause I'm not. It's just that to me, the behavior of these commentary channels is so much worse. They're acting on emotion, whether it be their feelings of inadequacy/entitlement/jealousy, yet they try to present their stance as having come from a place of logic and facts. That's what bothers me.
 
Last edited:
They all seem to have a need to sour public opinion on Hansen, don't they? I try to understand why it is they all seem so personally invested in this "cause" to such a degree they are willing to try and vindicate fucking GREG if it means discrediting Hansen. In my humble opinion it all comes down to jealousy, bruised egos, feeling threatened, and entitlement.

Hansen was able to use his position as a cultural icon to gain quick success on YouTube at the time he began focusing on Greg. I think this bothered many of these low/mid-level commentary channels because Hansen is an "old-media" figure. A lot of creators on all corners of YouTube have expressed negative feelings towards traditional celebrities and media personalities being on the platform. So I think it's reasonable to apply that sentiment to at least some of the commentary channels doing constant negative Hansen content.

Hansen also has decades of experience in investigative journalism. He is a very skilled interviewer. I've seen interviews done by several of these same mid/low-level commentary channels and while they range in skill, one factor I've noticed with nearly all of them is that in their interviews, they have way too much interest in conveying their own thoughts and opinions when they should really be listening to who it is their interviewing. If the interview shifts towards being more conversational, the interviewee may clam up as some individuals are naturally submissive/passive/unsure in conversations. That's why GOOD interviews are structured in a way that gives the interviewee direct questions to respond to, resulting in the quality of information being much better. Let's say that Lainey has finally left Greg and was interested in telling her story. Who would you rather conduct the interview, Hansen or Repzion? Creepshow or Hansen? Edwin or Hansen? John Swan or Hansen?

Some of these creators who have been vocal about their disdain for Hansen seem to have expected he act in a way that expresses his position as being lower on the totem pole. Like he should be subservient to them because they perceive themselves as being the fucking arbiters of commentary or something? Creepshow made a comment about how Hansen, a complete stranger, should have used his personal free-time to make a public statement acknowledging "Edwin's" criticism of him because "Edwin" is his superior and outranks him on the platform. Of course, by "Edwin" she means herself, allowing her to make her (idiotic) point without showing her true narcassism.

And the fact that Hansen is now apparently in talks with ID Discovery regarding their interest in his coverage of Onision really chapped their asses. Repzion said something about how Hansen used HIS information which is categorically incorrect. It was Hansen who interviewed the victims. It was Hansen who interviewed Detective Ed Troyer, resulting in confirmation of an existing criminal investigation. It was Hansen's name that brought MSM interest. So whatever there is going on with Hansen and ID Discovery has to do with his name recognition and the way he specifically presented his Onision content. How delusional is Repzion to believe it had anything to do with him. Not only that, but Repzion openly expressed that he feels he is entitled to the Onision story because he'd been covering it so long or something? I'm sorry, what? IIRC Stevie had been doing content on Greg before Repzion. Not only that, but he did actual research and brought new information to his videos in a time WAY before Onision critical content was profitable. I'm legit baffled that this scumbag Repzion SERIOUSLY feels entitled to a whole-ass other person's life? Beyond that, I can't think of a single instance where Repzion has provided new information in all the years he's covered Greg. It was so obvious he got all of his content from the farms and Twitter and did little to no additional research into the information he found. A huge example of this was when he did a video about the wetlands saga and got wrong the absolute most basic, most relevant piece to that story. He referred to the fucking wetlands as Greg's property, not just in name for simplicity's sake, but totally did not know that the destruction Greg did was on government owned and protected property. That's like the core fucking issue! He put together this whole fucking video without doing even the most basic research because had he even begun to look into it that would have been immediately clear. Repzion could not have made himself look like more of a spiteful, immature, unprofessional, irrational weakling.

EDIT: I really didn't intend to write a novel here or present myself as some Hansen warrior cause I'm not. It's just that to me, the behavior of these commentary channels is so much worse. They're acting on emotion, whether it be their feelings of inadequacy/entitlement/jealousy, yet they try to present their stance as having come from a place of logic and facts. That's what bothers me.
You've summed up everything perfectly, bravo.

These drama channels are money hungry and hansen doing this deal with discovery really shows how quickly dramatubers will manipulate the viewers opinion for a quick buck and click, no matter what the consequences are.

Washington state is two party consent for recording calls, and I wouldn't be shocked if swan faces some legal heat for recording that clerk without permission.
 
I've never been a fan of Repzion but after he backtracked over contacting Lainey's parents I realised he was never anything more than an opportunistic fool.

These commentators have a real fucking issue with flipping their opinions and beliefs based on their audience yet have the nerve to snack of Hansen's remains after the attention he brought to this.

You can't be taken seriously if you're a flake, which all of these people are. I agree, I think a lot of it is jealousy. That's why they often bring up the fact he's ''washed up'' and a ''failed journalist'' despite that not really being true.
 
My problem with Hansen is that he has no fucking idea what he's doing, what's going on and why that's a problem... But he would never admit that or ask for help.

After he lost all of his credability in media cicrcles for various reasons, including his fraud charges, he was set to make himself a YouTuber and leeched on the platform for dear life... My first encounter of Chris Hansen on YouTube was not the Onision case.


MistaGG sharing news to his fans before interview

There is a YouTuber - MistaGG, who at the begining of his career made commentary videos on the Hansen vs. Predetor series. A lot of people liked his style and humor on the subject so these series became really popular.
When Chris Hansen made his YouTube account and saw all of this, he reached to MistaGG and asked him how he did it, how did he make this old-ass show so popular again.

The attention he brought to the series and his viewers' interest in the show was one of the reasons Chris wanted to continue the series on YouTube. There are many claims the fundraising for this project was a scam and in the end Chris was unable to do shit without the team he once had behind him.

So, while interviewing MistaGG he was so smug and very condescending to him (I think he said something among the lines that he's basically MistaGG's boss), while at the same time asking him for guidance and of course, saying he doesn't understand why he is so succesful.

Aftermath:





(Btw I totally forgot they (Chris and Vincent) wanted to stage an online feud/fight between Chris and MistaGG lmao)

After he couldn't latch on to this guy's success he covered whatever he thought would get him views on his channel, including dumb drama, trying to find something or someone he could, basically get clout from.

The horryfying part is exactly that people trust him based on his past career and because he's smart & experienced enough to hide his 'tism.... Truth is he's an oppurtunist just like the rest of the commentary community.
The type of guy that takes sponsorships from a company that claims their magic whatever-the-fuck will cure AIDS and the Rona...

Debunk for that if you're interested:



Do you even realise how dumb and gullible people are? They think that this random guy, Chris Hansen, works with the FBI, has knowledge about everything & connections everywhere... And believe me, he isn't in a hurry to dispel any of these beliefs.

And yes, in the end this guy came and took credit for years of hard work from various people.... Exactly what I was saying above that he was looking to do.

And I know I'm going to get in even more shit because of this but I don't get how so many of you are "fans" of CreepshowArt when a lot of the things she does are borderline lolcow behaviour. (So I added some links for all my other points so it isn't just "hate" but for this you should honestly just look into her earlier videos and the stories/claims in them to fully grasp what I mean.)

Just seeing the type of people that like her speaks enough about her and her content to me...

Screenshot_20200703_223930.jpg
Screenshot_20200703_224013.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224032.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224117.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224154.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224223.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224338.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224502.jpgScreenshot_20200703_224558.jpg

Same goes for Edwin as well... He's a big lolcow. His own mail order beard, I mean, girlfriend was in a poly relationship with Onision's BFF (Cyr) and some other BPD cow... There was a lot of fighting and lolcow drama involved with that. They have a DDLG relationship and everything as well.


Link to DDLG video
 
Last edited:
Greg reuploaded his UhOhBro mocking video on his Sicesca account . The video is very old and was uploaded around the time when YouTube decided to nuke his channel before bringing it back for no damn reason.

5316EC61-0E76-40E2-B885-465064E5E55D.jpeg
















5051EDFF-371D-4958-A419-EFF787AE344B.jpeg

He also uploaded some questionable content three months ago that makes me wonder about his mental state. He also tried to make Someguy look like a bad guy by reuploading the same video Repzion tried to clout himself with back in the days.

Watch your headphones and keep your volume very LOW, guys.
















How delusional is Repzion to believe it had anything to do with him. Not only that, but Repzion openly expressed that he feels he is entitled to the Onision story because he'd been covering it so long or something? I'm sorry, what? IIRC Stevie had been doing content on Greg before Repzion. Not only that, but he did actual research and brought new information to his videos in a time WAY before Onision critical content was profitable.

Yeah, Repzion did some slimy shit to @Someguy827 in the past too. It’s funny how Repzion would try to shoot down someone who was the first to call out and make public about Craig’s behavior then take Steve's own hard research as if he did all the work himself. Unlike Onion, Stevie took actual responsibility for his own actions and changed into a better person than he was before. Some of what Stevie says here still stays true about Repzion being a wagon hopper and clout chaser.


Edit: Mobile formatting fucked my post.
 
Last edited:
He’s such a fuck.
No. Your sexuality is not fluid. You fuck your husband in her pussy and you watch loli hentai rape porn. Also saying that male celebrities are handsome doesn’t make your sexuality fluid.

He can’t even look at a dildo without getting uncomfortable. He’s probably upset because his dick is smaller then most of them anyway.
 

Attachments

  • BDE81B87-B198-4F25-9B24-851999DBEAE3.jpeg
    BDE81B87-B198-4F25-9B24-851999DBEAE3.jpeg
    155.2 KB · Views: 130
He’s such a fuck.
No. Your sexuality is not fluid. You fuck your husband in her pussy and you watch loli hentai rape porn. Also saying that male celebrities are handsome doesn’t make your sexuality fluid.

He can’t even look at a dildo without getting uncomfortable. He’s probably upset because his dick is smaller then most of them anyway.
bUt hE kIssEd ShAne
 
Back