U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
The fact that we were supposed to be so for free expression that you could burn a flag was monumental. You know the leftists will publically skin you for burning the flag of their envisioned utopia if they got their way, and all protesting would be met with executions and the execution of your family, because if you have any complaints it is only admitting that you are evil.
Look no further than CHAZ which kicked the shit out of some random guy for 'disrespecting George Floyd' around the same time their 'security forces' were lighting up two unarmed black teenagers.
 
alot of the ones ive seen, the more "hardcore ones" acknowledge itll be harder work and less prosperous at first (they dont realize how long or how hard itll actually be of course) and alot of those types are intent on having a vanguard party in power, its what they cite to me as the main check against abuses of power, having a leadership overseeing everything. im probably conflating different commie groups though apologies
I'd believe them if:
- Any of these people actually worked the kind of strenous labor required to make commie countries run. In my experience, the more hardcore the Commie, the more of a lazy dropout/unemployed crustpunk they are. I can't see these people working for any cause outside of going down the street for more weed.

- Their Vanguard party wasn't so similar to what we already have. They want to tear the whole system down just to half-assedly replicate it.

- They won't lift a finger to stop being burdens but will sacrifice their bodies and their lives for a movement that won't even benefit them or their offspring until several generations in? Yeah, right.

These people also assume every racial demographic in America is on board with their revolution. Which they are not. Purely anecdotal, but a black woman who is my coworker commented how she has put out her American flags for the 4th of July. Its truly sad that the state of our discourse is I have to point out the race of an American who wants to celebrate the birth of America.

And that my friends is the insidious poison these fools are trying to inject into our society. Racial division.

And it must be pointed out the people who are doing this are WHITE. White people, hilariously claiming to be anti racist, stoking racial division.

Indeed. A lot of illegal immigrants came to find stability and a chance to prosper/send money to their families. They are not going to be onboard fucking it all up,
Imagine a majority of Cubans in Miami touting for Communism.
You will get your ass kicked by Cuban refugees for cheering pinko ideals in their neighborhoods, but they expect the same Cubans to raise the flag of an ideology that killed many of their siblings? Lol good luck with that.
 
Last edited:
Wait... What? Lol, why? Wasn't this just some random house with some white chubby people who pulled guns and said "Please don't protest in my yard."

Like, why do they give a shit about this one couple? I thought BLM was about anti-cop brutality, not anti-chubby dudes not on the force who didn't do anything.
Because they initially resisted. They symbolise what will happen if they go into the suburbs, which is that homeowners of every race will be armed and willing to defend their property and family.
It is VERY important for them to make an example of this couple so that anyone else who thinks they have guns and will be able to resist knows that to do so will result in the loss of jobs and possible charges.
It’s the equivalent of a battered wife snapping back a bit one day and being beaten into the floor with a threat that the kids will be next. ‘never do that again, or next time....’

These protesters use the same, horrible tactics that any abusive piece of shit does. They make people afraid of consequences for standing up for themselves. Allowing the McKloskeys to ‘win’ would have emboldened the opposition and encouraged others to stand their ground as well, and so they will be targeted by protestors u TIL they have fully capitalised and grovelled.
 
Here’s my predictions:
  • Many of the founding fathers were slave owners, so looking up to them means you support slavery (at least by insane social justice logic)
  • They’ll nitpick things he said, such as quotes, and try and “own” him by showing the real quote (thus creating a self-own if one of the quotes gets people to like Trump more)
  • They’ll try and discredit the people he mentioned by bringing up all their problematic history (such as racism and sexism, but only for the white people that were mentioned)
  • They’ll say that he was encouraging Judeo-Christian supremacy by saying “we only bow to God”
  • They’ll say that the place Trump wants to build the new memorial with his EO is on sacred land (so it can’t be used, and to do so is disrespectful)
Overall, I think they might go for the white supremacist angle that’s really popular, but with a dash of euphoric atheism (for all his references to God).
"HE BARELY MENTIONED THE PANDEMIC!" is apparently the winner for the NYT. I'll link the story and archive it but I aint fucking reading it.
dark divisive speech.jpg



EDIT; Couldnt help myself. Started ready and wanted to kill myself. Two choice excerpts

"Mr. Trump barely mentioned the frightening resurgence of the pandemic, even as the country surpassed 53,000 new cases and health officials across the nation urged Americans to scale back their Fourth of July plans. " (A pandemic caused by their pet negros chimping out, chimp outs that YOU helped encourage. Rules for thee but not for me I suppose)

"The scene at Mount Rushmore was the latest sign of how Mr. Trump appears, by design or default, increasingly disconnected from the intense concern among Americans about the health crisis gripping the country. More than just a partisan rally, it underscored the extent to which Mr. Trump is appealing to a subset of Americans to carry him to a second term by changing the subject and appealing to fear and division." (Because you fucks havent been appealing to fear and division for the past month? Also lol at the idea of The NYT calling anyone disconnected)

TL;DR It's your usual media hackjob bullshit that omits context to make the facts fit their narrative.
 
Last edited:
Because they initially resisted. They symbolise what will happen if they go into the suburbs, which is that homeowners of every race will be armed and willing to defend their property and family.
It is VERY important for them to make an example of this couple so that anyone else who thinks they have guns and will be able to resist knows that to do so will result in the loss of jobs and possible charges.
It’s the equivalent of a battered wife snapping back a bit one day and being beaten into the floor with a threat that the kids will be next. ‘never do that again, or next time....’

These protesters use the same, horrible tactics that any abusive piece of shit does. They make people afraid of consequences for standing up for themselves. Allowing the McKloskeys to ‘win’ would have emboldened the opposition and encouraged others to stand their ground as well, and so they will be targeted by protestors u TIL they have fully capitalised and grovelled.

Isn't it sad that this is what journalism has become?

Shouldn't it be, I don't know, report the facts and let us make up our minds? Why does it have to be a game of "MY SIDE HAS TO WIN DAMNIT!!!"
 
Because they initially resisted. They symbolise what will happen if they go into the suburbs, which is that homeowners of every race will be armed and willing to defend their property and family.
It is VERY important for them to make an example of this couple so that anyone else who thinks they have guns and will be able to resist knows that to do so will result in the loss of jobs and possible charges.
It’s the equivalent of a battered wife snapping back a bit one day and being beaten into the floor with a threat that the kids will be next. ‘never do that again, or next time....’

These protesters use the same, horrible tactics that any abusive piece of shit does. They make people afraid of consequences for standing up for themselves. Allowing the McKloskeys to ‘win’ would have emboldened the opposition and encouraged others to stand their ground as well, and so they will be targeted by protestors u TIL they have fully capitalised and grovelled.
Protesters and the government. If it was just protesters it'd be only a minor problem. But going against BLM is more or less the same as going against the government.
 
looking at the search results for st louis couple on twitter is heartening, scrolled to a couple of highly liked tweets at the top, one with 44k likes, i might have been too focused on lefty twitter but it seems like even on their home base theyre losing a bit of ground online. not really too important but they already lost swathes of youtube and facebook and having the one platform they tried hardest to hold onto swarmed amuses me, no safe space for leftists or anti white bigots online

Because they went into the suburbs. White liberals saw the protests leave downtown and trespass on clearly marked private property, the kind of private gated community they all prefer to live in, even if their houses aren't as palatial. They can't ignore the "liberals get the bullet too" slogans forever.

Suddenly, the image of armed resistance wasn't bearded boogaloo bros with tac vests and meme patches. It was two barefoot senior citizens in business casual on their own front lawn. That's relatable to the people who drive home and park in their own "safe neighborhood" driveways.

I've said multiple times that the protesters are contained because they aren't going into the suburbs. Over the last week, the protesters seemed to have noticed it too, and they started edging into the suburbs, threatening more. They had an "eat the rich" march in Los Angeles, and Portland had one march originate in the suburb a few days ago.

Current theory: the BLM organizers know they've lost the edge, and don't want their energy to metastasize into background noise. So they're feeling out how an expansion would go. They want to gain ground somewhere, and the suburbs are the next bit of territory. They've also started more highway blocking, which is sure to get a reaction eventually.​
Blackpill theory: They had counted on getting some Charlottesville-style martyrs by now, but instead they caused David Dorn. The two tactics above might be an attempt to force the issue.​
Edit: making the point--Seattle is now marching through a residential area (not quite a suburb), chanting "out of your homes, into the streets!" Which should sound familiar to anyone from an authoritarian regime, circa 80 years ago.

1593844182804.png
 
Last edited:
I cannot wait until these people get the power vacuum they are so desperately trying to create.... If I go down, I promise I'll have a positive KDR... but most these useless fucks won't realize what they've done until they are lined up against the wall or asked to dig a ditch in the middle of a field.
If CHAZ got a Soundcloud rapper, I can't wait to see what kinds of warlords police-free cities will get.
 
So they going to ignore the full speech lol. And this is on the heels of calling for the destruction of George Washington and Mount Rushmore.

Fuck the elite of New York seriously.
 
JW and Mormons are in the same heretical boat and are easily destroyed because of it. Both insist all other sects have been apostate since the first century, yet they follow the book as compiled and codified by an apostate church in the fourth century. Cannot have it both ways.
That said, they are sadly the only Christian religious sects that can't be subverted by weirdos, I'll give them that. Also even if their takes on the Bible are inaccurate, the few people who actually practice those beliefs do so due to their more rigid rules and being more effective at avoiding drama.
 
So they going to ignore the full speech lol. And this is on the heels of calling for the destruction of George Washington and Mount Rushmore.

Fuck the elite of New York seriously.
They’re trying to memory hole the leftists that have called for the destruction of Mt. Rushmore. With the President now talking about it, they need to save face.
 
Remember Moldylocks? She and her boyfriend did a live AMA on Pornhub, and /pol/ found out while it was happening. They almost made her cry on stream.
SHit. Just found out AMA means "ask me anything". I got a bit excited when I thought it meant "ass to mouth to ass"
 
I'd believe them if:
- Any of these people actually worked the kind of strenous labor required to make commie countries run. In my experience, the more hardcore the Commie, the more of a lazy dropout/unemployed crustpunk they are. I can't see these people working for any cause outside of going down the street for more weed.

- Their Vanguard party wasn't so similar to what we already have. They want to tear the whole system down just to half-assedly replicate it.

- They won't lift a finger to stop being burdens but will sacrifice their bodies and their lives for a movement that won't even benefit them or their offspring until several generations in? Yeah, right.
preaching to the choir on that one, i meant hardcore relatively. their garden in chaz was less built to support people than the one i work on even after someone threw out some of our crop from indifference to the final product.

Because they went into the suburbs. White liberals saw the protests leave downtown and trespass on clearly marked private property, they kind of private gated community they all prefer to live in, even if their houses aren't as palatial. They can't ignore the "liberals get the bullet too" slogans forever.

Suddenly, the image of armed resistance wasn't bearded boogaloo bros with tac vests and meme patches. It was two barefoot senior citizens in business casual on their own front lawn. That's relatable to the people who drive home and park in their own "safe neighborhood" driveways.

I've said multiple times that the protesters are contained because they aren't going into the suburbs. Over the last week, the protesters seemed to have noticed it too, and they started edging into the suburbs, threatening more. They had an "eat the rich" march in Los Angeles, and Portland had one march originate in the suburb a few days ago.

Current theory: the BLM organizers know they've lost the edge, and don't want their energy to metastasize into background noise. So they're feeling out how an expansion would go. They want to gain ground somewhere, and the suburbs are the next bit of territory. They've also started more highway blocking, which is sure to get a reaction eventually.​
Blackpill theory: They had counted on getting some Charlottesville-style martyrs by now, but instead they caused David Dorn. The two tactics above might be an attempt to force the issue.​
Edit: making the point--Seattle is now marching through a residential area (not quite a suburb), chanting "out of your homes, into the streets!" Which should sound familiar to anyone from an authoritarian regime, circa 80 years ago.

View attachment 1426686
oh yeah, i hadnt considered that since i wouldnt stir up shit like this if i knew it was basically built to backfire on my virtue signalling ass but that makes a lot of sense, antics like this and their cowardice makes me more optimistic that 8 years is more likely
 
Because they initially resisted. They symbolise what will happen if they go into the suburbs, which is that homeowners of every race will be armed and willing to defend their property and family.
It is VERY important for them to make an example of this couple so that anyone else who thinks they have guns and will be able to resist knows that to do so will result in the loss of jobs and possible charges.
It’s the equivalent of a battered wife snapping back a bit one day and being beaten into the floor with a threat that the kids will be next. ‘never do that again, or next time....’

These protesters use the same, horrible tactics that any abusive piece of shit does. They make people afraid of consequences for standing up for themselves. Allowing the McKloskeys to ‘win’ would have emboldened the opposition and encouraged others to stand their ground as well, and so they will be targeted by protestors u TIL they have fully capitalised and grovelled.
What we really need is strength in numbers. Beanie boy keeps talking about how right now it's easier to arrest the couple than quell the mob. If a town banded together, like that one where the sheriff said he would deputize people, then it might be enough opposition to stop them. That's too many forth degree assaults to bother with, so that would be everyone's freebie.

It wouldn't even necessarily come to anything more than that. I don't think a lot of these people are ready to face true mortal danger, they tantrum so much over tear gas and pepper spray. Sure some unfortunates lost eyes to rubber bullets, but out of their whole group, very few.
 
Because they initially resisted. They symbolise what will happen if they go into the suburbs, which is that homeowners of every race will be armed and willing to defend their property and family.
It is VERY important for them to make an example of this couple so that anyone else who thinks they have guns and will be able to resist knows that to do so will result in the loss of jobs and possible charges.
It’s the equivalent of a battered wife snapping back a bit one day and being beaten into the floor with a threat that the kids will be next. ‘never do that again, or next time....’

These protesters use the same, horrible tactics that any abusive piece of shit does. They make people afraid of consequences for standing up for themselves. Allowing the McKloskeys to ‘win’ would have emboldened the opposition and encouraged others to stand their ground as well, and so they will be targeted by protestors u TIL they have fully capitalised and grovelled.

They wont get the capitulation they want. People know the score now, and the inner city governments run by the Democrats are viewed as hostile entities. I live in a Virginia suburb and the local sheriffs department views the nearby city as a potential invader. They are on high alert. Every road leading out of the city is monitored.

Last weekend I went out to the eastern shore to escape it all. Northampton county on the Peninsula was, to put mildly, a beacon of harmony. No high speed internet. Cell phone towers were even hit and miss. At the local country store on US 13, the cops on patrol would happily go in, grab some lunch, talk to people and head back out.

Back out to the barricade on the North Side of the Bay Bridge tunnel facing the Newport News metropolitan area. The place where the "Statutory Murder" incident happened in Portsmouth. There was literally no chance at all of the nonense crossing that bridge, but it was almost like Northampton County wanted to make a very deliberate point about how shenanigans would not be tolerated on their side by having a massive police presence at the border.

They may think they can demoralize the suburbs and rural areas into accepting their fucked revolution, but people already know the score. Even in states that are for now controlled by enablers of these riots.
 
So they going to ignore the full speech lol. And this is on the heels of calling for the destruction of George Washington and Mount Rushmore.

Fuck the elite of New York seriously.

Funny thing about New York and the New York Times, the state was named after the Duke of York James Stuart, who history knows as King of England James II. Before James II was king he was in charge of the Royal African Company, the RAC shipped more enslaved men, women, and children to the Americas than any other single institution during the entire history of the transatlantic slave trade. So if you want to play the SJW's little game of shaming people from history then the New York Times and state of New York and NYC need to be renamed because the states history is muddied by the history of James II and the RAC.

Washington owned slaves but he was also a man that recognized slavery wasn't inherently right or just in the newly born United States of America so upon the death of himself and his wife Martha he had all his slaves freed according to his will. It was also noted that Washington was never cruel to his slaves and actually treated them fairly well for the time, keeping them housed and fed and clothed.
 
Isn't it sad that this is what journalism has become?

Shouldn't it be, I don't know, report the facts and let us make up our minds? Why does it have to be a game of "MY SIDE HAS TO WIN DAMNIT!!!"

Real journalism still exists. It's just often buried and too "boring" for normies to bother reading.

Edit:


Calling to tear down Mt Rushmore...
Literally localized entirely within this video.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back