reddit General

Guys. Actual question.

Is reddit gonna die?

I mean, I really want it to. Enough is enough.

Zuck is just riding the wave. Either way, that android is going to win.
I don't see Reddit dying as a business. If you ever looked at the front page, you'll see tons of redditors buying Reddit's virtual coins to promote posts. Reddit is basically getting free money from doing nothing.
 
I don't see Reddit dying as a business. If you ever looked at the front page, you'll see tons of redditors buying Reddit's virtual coins to promote posts. Reddit is basically getting free money from doing nothing.
Some of that is astroturfed to "prime the pump" for more people to fork over money. But yeah enough people still buy gold that it's insanely more profitable than ads.
 
I'm gonna be :optimistic: as ever and hope and pray that all of these companies face antitrust lawsuits in the near future - Visa, Mastercard, Disney, Comcast, Verizon - all of them should have been broken up yesterday.
In regards to Visa and Mastercard, this is why I've started to really like crytocoins. No list saying "ban this person", no political bullshit, no payment pulling, etc. Yes, the volatility is obviously an issue, along with the dozens and dozens of coins now available, but freedom has never felt so good.
 
Just a few months ago, I saw somebody comment “If Reddit was reality, the US would be going into our second term of Bernie Sanders after eight years of Ron Paul.”
tfw no qt meme paul president
MGTOW is very self contained, it’s actually part of their ‘philosophy’. But the MRAs are all generally disliked by Reddit, and I’m really just surprised that other more innocuous subs got the Old Yeller treatment instead of them.
Unless there is a second banwave, which I think is possible in the time leading up to November, MGTOW being allowed to stay is weird given how Reddit banned so much else.
There's a certain subset of feminists that doesn't mind MGTOW dudes for exactly this reason. I know a radfem who thinks MGTOW is a perfectly fine movement because it's misogynists going out of their way to leave women alone. It works for everyone, lol.
 
Speaking about SJWs, you need tools with language and the interpretation of language in order to fight against them: their main weapon is language, hence straw and ad homiem fallacies and placing pathos into logos. They know how to tug on emotions and heartstrings, and that's where you need to play the game.

And my argumentation fell flat because I sounded like a SJW instead of just saying "hey, this is what a SJW sounds like and here's the counterargument" :story:

Eh, i'll do better next time.
Liberals / SJWs use ethic. It's impossible to defeat ethic with logic, i.e. ideology, because they are mutually exclusive. Many libertarians will attack you for "being emotional" when you start to make ethical arguments or say your policies are against the US constitution.

I work at one of these tech companies. Mark Cuban has been coordinating with our leadership as well at other tech companies to help deplatform conservative speech online under the guise of it being hateful. Cuban actually gave an online townhall talk to all the employees here talking about how important it is to remove hate online and to use our abilities to facilitate it.

If you don't think it's coordinated at this point, I don't know what to say. These people need to be purged from society.

I'm sick of "hate speech." People hate because reason. These hateful people are upset. Hate speech is a spin to marginalize people that are upset and have legit grievances.
 
Liberals / SJWs use ethic. It's impossible to defeat ethic with logic, i.e. ideology, because they are mutually exclusive. Many libertarians will attack you for "being emotional" when you start to make ethical arguments or say your policies are against the US constitution.



I'm sick of "hate speech." People hate because reason. These hateful people are upset. Hate speech is a spin to marginalize people that are upset and have legit grievances.
Yeah, I've dealt with more than my fair share of those logic-ethic flipping retards, though I know it as flipping between logos and pathos to prove their point at any cost.
Even when they end up obviously contradicting themselves, they retort with either "you're stupid" or "you're taking me out of context". I usually run into these assholes in larger subreddits (including a few that haven't been touched by Reddit's supposed "moral crusade" cause they're attacking "the enemy") and on Twitter.

Of course, I fully understand the need to voice your own opinion. And blocking people from speaking "hatred" is very much so bad news. I mean, fuck, if you can make hatred illegal, whats to stop anyone from making discontent illegal?
 
Yeah, I've dealt with more than my fair share of those logic-ethic flipping retards, though I know it as flipping between logos and pathos to prove their point at any cost.
Even when they end up obviously contradicting themselves, they retort with either "you're stupid" or "you're taking me out of context". I usually run into these assholes in larger subreddits (including a few that haven't been touched by Reddit's supposed "moral crusade" cause they're attacking "the enemy") and on Twitter.

Of course, I fully understand the need to voice your own opinion. And blocking people from speaking "hatred" is very much so bad news. I mean, fuck, if you can make hatred illegal, whats to stop anyone from making discontent illegal?
That's the liberal's goal. "if you don't have anything nice to say than don't say it at all" Oversocialization. They want to create a fake society of yesman; no criticism or accountability because that hurts the feelings of other people and/or they're low self-esteem so that hurts their feelings. Look at that war against accountability where liberals rebrand keeping other people accountable as harassment or bullying. Everything we see today was already the liberal culture in the 90s or 00s and they're just making it the mainstream culture today through their "community guidelines" and "hate speech" policies.
 
doomers are very amusing at least "x has happened! collapse of society is imminent!!"
if you poke them they'll fly off the handle with their END IS NEAR mindset and work themselves into complete hysteria

Tim Pool wants to know your location.

reddit admins are allergic to any kind of transparency or consistency. if they outright said "the rules are this, don't do x and you won't get banned" it'd be at least more moral and consistent than this waffling about, and promoting the site as "bastion of free speech" when they never gave any thought to what free speech is. they only do something about a sub once there's media attention and bad press, and they always do some pussy half-way measure because they're limpdick faggots who would never make any definite statements.

confusing rules and lack of support for sub jannies is by design
I have become more convinced over time that internet "free speech" actually refers to the ability to post and host porn. That's one topic that le Skeptics will defend, regardless if they are "Left" or "Right."

These sites know which side their bread is buttered on. Reddit only bans porn subreddits when the feel outside pressure, and even then rape porn and other hideous genres are still there. Same with Twitch. Tumblr had to be practically forced to cleanse the site of porn blogs. They know that's what brings in the majority of their traffic, so they just wink at it. If Reddit jannies were transparent, then we would know that subreddits only get banned for wrong think or corporate pressure, and never according to any level of decency.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Elim Garak
Guys. Actual question.

Is reddit gonna die?

I mean, I really want it to. Enough is enough.
Lmao most of the users on Reddit probably barely noticed that anything happened. It seems like a big deal to us faggots, but most people on that site don't give a shit about terfs or doomers or edgy niche memes. Reddit's just instagram for people who think they're too cool for instagram but are also too scared to go on a forum incase they get called a nigger or doxed. People post pictured of their dogs, their ugly kids, their gamer tags, their craft project or their dying gran, everyone claps and gives them useless stickers, rinse and repeat. Occasionally some unpopular opinion might crawl to the surface, but the front page is like 70% bragging and/or self promotion, 20% thinly veiled porn, 10% recycled memes and askreddit threads. r/PCM gets there sometimes, but that's not what the bulk of users come to see.

I mean, could you imagine posting a photo of yourself, in your own home, with your children/pets/easily identifiable belongings visible in the background on this forum, or even on something like r/drama? Fuck no, you'd have to be completely retarded to let people see your actual face. Same on reddit - people who posted on the edgier subs that got banned had to be super careful with their privacy or they'd be doxed (or worse, if the cp stuff apparently posted in brigades attracted the feds), while on the same site in a different sub some white chick from New Jersey posts a photo of herself and literally asks for people to troll her.
The community was completely schizophrenic, divided between privacy-conscious edgybois who were too pussy for /pol/ and people who were quite willing to give up all anonymity for some attention. This latter group were the ones making all the money for the site. Reddit doesn't want anons, it wants people with wallets and hobbies and collections who'll buy stuff and post it online for validation. The subs that got banned - a lot of them were the kind of place which openly mocked the idea of awards and rarely participated in it, and if they did they rarely bought the big bux stickers. They weren't fostering a profitable environment, so they had to go.

TL;DR most Reddit users are r/pics normies, and don't give a shit about the bans.
 
Guys. Actual question.

Is reddit gonna die?

I mean, I really want it to. Enough is enough.
I think it won't just from this. In a lot of the smaller hobby or game subs there's barely been any mention of the large announcement because it doesn't really matter to the communities that frequent those kinds of subs. It's pretty much business as usual for those kinds of subs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
TL;DR most Reddit users are r/pics normies, and don't give a shit about the bans.
Or worse, in my opinion, are happy about it. They see themselves as fighting the good fight, and combatting the plague of wrongthink spreading across the internet, but what happens when they come for the subs they enjoy. Well, these subs supported Trump, so it's okay to ban them, right? What about when they start banning people whom you share your opinions with? Look at how salty Chapo Trap House users got when their sub got the axe. It's all fun and games when the people they don't like get kicked off, but when it's them? Well, now that's just too far
 
Or worse, in my opinion, are happy about it. They see themselves as fighting the good fight, and combatting the plague of wrongthink spreading across the internet, but what happens when they come for the subs they enjoy. Well, these subs supported Trump, so it's okay to ban them, right? What about when they start banning people whom you share your opinions with? Look at how salty Chapo Trap House users got when their sub got the axe. It's all fun and games when the people they don't like get kicked off, but when it's them? Well, now that's just too far
The thing about the chapocels is that they won't leave. They'll just take it up the ass from big corpo and eventually they'll go back to defending it. Right wingers left over time. They won't play the game anymore. The more convinced ones left first but now even the KiA and T_D boomers are leaving.
 
Lmao most of the users on Reddit probably barely noticed that anything happened. It seems like a big deal to us faggots, but most people on that site don't give a shit about terfs or doomers or edgy niche memes. Reddit's just instagram for people who think they're too cool for instagram but are also too scared to go on a forum incase they get called a nigger or doxed. People post pictured of their dogs, their ugly kids, their gamer tags, their craft project or their dying gran, everyone claps and gives them useless stickers, rinse and repeat. Occasionally some unpopular opinion might crawl to the surface, but the front page is like 70% bragging and/or self promotion, 20% thinly veiled porn, 10% recycled memes and askreddit threads. r/PCM gets there sometimes, but that's not what the bulk of users come to see.

I mean, could you imagine posting a photo of yourself, in your own home, with your children/pets/easily identifiable belongings visible in the background on this forum, or even on something like r/drama? Fuck no, you'd have to be completely retarded to let people see your actual face. Same on reddit - people who posted on the edgier subs that got banned had to be super careful with their privacy or they'd be doxed (or worse, if the cp stuff apparently posted in brigades attracted the feds), while on the same site in a different sub some white chick from New Jersey posts a photo of herself and literally asks for people to troll her.
The community was completely schizophrenic, divided between privacy-conscious edgybois who were too pussy for /pol/ and people who were quite willing to give up all anonymity for some attention. This latter group were the ones making all the money for the site. Reddit doesn't want anons, it wants people with wallets and hobbies and collections who'll buy stuff and post it online for validation. The subs that got banned - a lot of them were the kind of place which openly mocked the idea of awards and rarely participated in it, and if they did they rarely bought the big bux stickers. They weren't fostering a profitable environment, so they had to go.

TL;DR most Reddit users are r/pics normies, and don't give a shit about the bans.
If most of reddit are just r/pics normies, they wouldn't have tended to venture far out from the mainstream subs anyway, so they'd never run into the edgier ones. Edgi bois tended to stick to their home subs, anyway, since they'd just get downvoted to oblivion for daring to speak up, or shadowbanned if they had ever, even once, posted in a sub deemed too edgy by the powermods.

Now with most dissenting subs gone, power users will probably feel more empowered to post pushy politicized bullshit, which will drive off the moderates. All they need is somewhere else to go for their cat pictures and work-friendly memes, and Reddit will just become another dying echochamber like Fark. Never actually dead and closed, but a total shell of itself and a punchline for anyone old enough to remember internet culture of the 2010s.
 
If most of reddit are just r/pics normies, they wouldn't have tended to venture far out from the mainstream subs anyway, so they'd never run into the edgier ones. Edgi bois tended to stick to their home subs, anyway, since they'd just get downvoted to oblivion for daring to speak up, or shadowbanned if they had ever, even once, posted in a sub deemed too edgy by the powermods.

Now with most dissenting subs gone, power users will probably feel more empowered to post pushy politicized bullshit, which will drive off the moderates. All they need is somewhere else to go for their cat pictures and work-friendly memes, and Reddit will just become another dying echochamber like Fark. Never actually dead and closed, but a total shell of itself and a punchline for anyone old enough to remember internet culture of the 2010s.
As long as leddit doesn't force everyone to use the new UI (like Digg did) it won't have such a big decline.
 
In case you were wondering, Reddit's new ADL approved rules SPECIFICALLY ALLOW RACISM against White people, Sexism against Men, Bigotry against Heterosexuals, Harassment of "cis" (normal) people by Troons, et cetera.

View attachment 1416090

Reminder:

View attachment 1416094

No matter what they tell you: It's not Racism. It's pattern recognition and self defense.


I’m making my way through this thread now so rate me late if necessary but women are 51% of the world population, right? The highlighted part excludes “people in the majority.” Is this wording by design or??
 
I’m making my way through this thread now so rate me late if necessary but women are 51% of the world population, right? The highlighted part excludes “people in the majority.” Is this wording by design or??
Yes, but we all know that de facto it just means "icky evil people we disagree with can be criticized", so if you're a woman you're fine unless you're one of them evil TERFs.
 
Back