🐱 Pedophiles rebranding themselves as 'Minor-Attracted Persons’, seek same protection as LGBT community

CatParty


An investigation for The Mail on Sunday has found that several notorious child-sex offenders of Britain are using online platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter to rebrand themselves as ‘Minor-Attracted Persons’. Through these social media sites, they are also trying to re-categorize pedophilia as a harmless sexual preference.

As per the findings of the investigation, every day hundreds of social accounts are being set referring to both potential and prolific abusers as “MAPs” - Minor-Attracted Persons. The rebranding is reportedly an attempt by them to detach themselves from the “stigma” attached to the word pedophile. The report has claimed that anonymous users have also come up with their own rainbow “MAP Pride” flag, with some even arguing that they should be celebrated as a niche group alongside the LGBT community.

Not just that, the anonymous users have also created their slogan just like the LGBT community. Some of those slogans are, “#MAPPride” and “#Mappositivity”, reportedly seen as an aim to present pedophilia as part of society’s wider move towards sexual freedom. The unidentified users have posted memes online proclaiming “Gay MAPs are amazing” and cartoon characters saying, “Repost if you think maps should be able to date minors.” One such account was @SandMapMinorva, which has now been suspended. The message posted on that account read: “Minor-attraction is natural.”

Besides, the investigation by The Mail on Sunday has discovered that for the profile image of these anonymous accounts, the users are using cartoon avatars rather than photographs. Most of them have mentioned the ages of children they are attracted to and it goes to as low as “two to seven”. “They are a fiendish group of sub-humans and they will find no haven in the LGBTQ community. We utterly rebuke their delusional and evil claims,” Otep Shamaya, a gay rights campaigner, said.

However, this is not the first time such type of campaign has started online. According to reports, in the 1970s and 80s, the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) campaign was there that took advantage of the gay liberation movement at the time to push for pro-child abuse policies, such as lowering the age of consent to just four. It has also been said that the current propaganda has chilling echoes of the PIE that happened decades ago.






Though the PIE campaign was dissolved in 1984, the investigation by the newspaper has found out that its former chairman, Tom O’Carroll, is still active and is using social sites to argue for the legalization of pedophilia. In one “interview”, which is still on YouTube, Britain’s most notorious pedophile campaigner - O’Carroll - has claimed that a sexual relationship between an adult and a child is similar to a relationship between a child and the mother. Along with YouTube, O’Carroll also uses his Wordpress blog to work towards the legalization of sex with children. However, the report said that Wordpress had suspended his blogs.

The report stated that some academics are also supporting these kinds of campaigns as they believe pedophiles’ voices should be heard. One such academic is Dr Craig Harper, senior lecturer in psychology at Nottingham Trent University, who signed a 2018 letter written to Twitter demanding retrieval of pedophile accounts that were taken down. Harper stated that “pedophilia and child abuse are not the same things” and “pedophilia is a sexual attraction pattern that shares common features with other sexual orientations”.

Meanwhile, child sex abuse survivor Jacqui Dillon, who runs the Beck Road Alliance online support network, said: “This is absurd and dangerous. Twitter and other corporations are now providing pedophiles with access to children online.”






While Twitter responded that it had “zero tolerance for any material that features or promotes child sexual exploitation”.
 
For the same reason 14 year old males should not be allowed to date older men but LGBTQWERTY will eventually take care of that.
well thats different.yes its pretty much equal to a normal heterosexual relationship, but the minor is the weaker part and we have to protect minors.

A 14 year old and a woman are equals, there is no weaker part.
 
dwarf is the right term anyway...


Why should 14 year old males not be allowed to date older woman?

I’ll hAve you know I’m offended. My dwarven beard is very feminine and I declare you beardphobic. Possibly dwarf phobic too.

Because the age of consent is 16 where I am. Most countries have Romeo and Juliet style laws either codified or in application - it would be very rare to see a relationship of a 16/17 yo prosecuted. An older woman preying on a 14 yo boy is as bad as older men going for 14yo girls. Although the courts seem to let the women off far more..
 
before somebody starts crying,to make something clear: im a misogynist, not a pedo apologist...
This makes me smile, because an avowed and amusing shitposter with a heart of granite is keen to distance themselves from the paedos. There are some lines it feels grubby to cross even in jest, right?
Show me on the doll where the headmistress touched you.
 
Show me on the doll where the headmistress touched you.
Its no milo situation. i think woman shouldnt be allowed to vote, do jury duty, have a couple of important positions, etc.
when they are on the same level as youth, why shouldnt we allow youth to have relationships with them?
the only argument against it would be that we dont want relationships without reason and accountability, but that would mean outlawing lesbian relationships too.
 
I think it's important to realize that the slippery slope is not a fallacy, at the very least from a purely strategic viewpoint. People have largely ceded ground when it came to LGBT shit being shoved down everyones throat by corporations, predatory drag queen storytime, trans/drag children and so on. Children have been heavily confronted with abnormal sexuality and this is why it came to this. Pedophilia is now the final battleground, and the people who should be holding the line have the worst track record imaginable after being pushed to this point largely without noteworthy resistance.
 
The lgb community has always been a hive of foul and vile degeneracy that loved their pedo comrades.
Trannies are just the first step. This is what the rainbow flag is for, and all who support that flag support child molesters.
 
Last edited:
Its no milo situation. i think woman shouldnt be allowed to vote, do jury duty, have a couple of important positions, etc.
when they are on the same level as youth, why shouldnt we allow youth to have relationships with them?
the only argument against it would be that we dont want relationships without reason and accountability, but that would mean outlawing lesbian relationships too.
my GF believes this too, from a fundie perspective. Bless you both.
 
"Distance" all you want, unless you come out and SAY "No, we don't support pedophilia, not even the tiniest bit" it's not distanced far enough.

They won't because they're making the same mistake they made with the "T", they think they can coddle just enough so that the "T" and "P" back the "LGB" part, and they get a little boost in votes and support under the false notion that they can just sweep these "P" people aside if they ever get "too uppity"

However, as the total explosion of the "T" in the last 5 years proves, ANY foothold at all is too much for you to sweep them out, they are determined, militant and cancerous, they LIVE for glomming on to and subverting the movement to benefit them, like Hillary in 16', the "T" and "P" now think it's "Their Turn" to be normalized. And they will NOT take "no" for an answer in the Great Culture War (tm)

You brought them on in an enemy-of-my-enemy way, but, you were foolish to do it, as these folks have wanted a bully pulpit for so long, they'll use every dirty trick in the book up to KEEP and expand any power you give them, even if it was only behind the scenes and temporary. They'll smear you online, they'll dox you as bigots, they'll pull the worst of the worst mean girl shit that you've seen this side of a High School election, they'll get you blacklisted, they'll cancel you, they'll turn everyone against you and you'll be powerless to stop it because you legitimized cancel culture and the purity of progthought arrogantly thinking it wouldn't come for you, that it COULDN'T, you were "on the right side" and all that...

And that's exactly what is happening. The "T" already took 60% of your movement, the "P" is angling to take the other 40%.

The "sexual alphabet" movement was a mistake.
Eventually we’re gonna have to build walls around New York and California, and tell the Left that it’s there’s now, do whatever you want.

ten years later we go in and clean up the corpses and rebuild.

I’m not joking, that’s what I’m really afraid we’ll have to do.
 
Because the age of consent is 16 where I am. Most countries have Romeo and Juliet style laws either codified or in application - it would be very rare to see a relationship of a 16/17 yo prosecuted. An older woman preying on a 14 yo boy is as bad as older men going for 14yo girls. Although the courts seem to let the women off far more..
It should be noted that Romeo and Juliet laws are not always consistently upheld and I vaguely remember one case where they theoretically should have applied but they went after the senior boy anyway. I'm struggling to remember where it happened, I want to say maybe Florida?
 
How long have we been talking about this? How did some "journalist" JUST find out about peds trying to move the goal posts so their behavior is acceptable?
 
FFS, you can think a kid is cute, even beautiful (how often do you hear parents describe their kids as such?), without wanting to fuck them.

Nothing good has come of the sexual revolution. What you want to have sex with becoming integral to your identity is narcissistic madness.
it used to be about equality now it's devolved into madness. I don't care if 2 consenting adults want to engage in degenerate behavior with each other. that stops at kids. All pedos deserve to be shot.
 
>implying they were ever wrong

Fundamental Christians were always right in the first place but the autistic fedora tippers somehow managed to convince people that JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MORALS BAD.

So which denomination do you think will openly pat chomos on the head first and say "There, there."? My money is on the Methodists.
 
Back